World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Neuroscience
New Zealand
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
63
Citations
15437
World Ranking
3379
National Ranking
11

Cathy M. Stinear publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cathy M. Stinear sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 204 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Cathy M. Stinear D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cathy M. Stinear sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Neuroscience in New Zealand Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Neuroscience in New Zealand Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Neuroscience in New Zealand Leader Award

Overview

Cathy M. Stinear is affiliated with the University of Auckland in New Zealand. Their research primarily focuses on the intersection of medicine and neuroscience, particularly within the subfields of rehabilitation, neurology, epidemiology, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, and cognitive neuroscience.

The scientist's work emphasizes several main topics, including stroke rehabilitation and recovery, transcranial magnetic stimulation studies, acute ischemic stroke management, cerebral palsy and movement disorders, advanced neuroimaging techniques and applications, muscle activation and electromyography studies, and botulinum toxin and related neurological disorders.

Recent scholarly contributions include publications such as:

  • Advances and challenges in stroke rehabilitation, 2020, The Lancet Neurology
  • Clinical diagnostic utility of transcranial magnetic stimulation in neurological disorders. Updated report of an IFCN committee, 2023, Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Motor rehabilitation after stroke: European Stroke Organisation (ESO) consensus-based definition and guiding framework, 2023, European Stroke Journal
  • The ENIGMA Stroke Recovery Working Group: Big data neuroimaging to study brain-behavior relationships after stroke, 2020, Human Brain Mapping
  • Association of Brain Age, Lesion Volume, and Functional Outcome in Patients With Stroke, 2023, Neurology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Cathy M. Stinear include:

  • Winston D. Byblow
  • Marie-Claire Smith
  • Michael R. Borich
  • Lara A. Boyd
  • Amy Brodtmann

The scientist regularly publishes in journals and venues such as:

  • Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
  • Clinical Neurophysiology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • European Stroke Journal
  • Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging

The research portfolio of Cathy M. Stinear comprises a significant output in medicine, with 95 publications, complemented by 33 publications in neuroscience. Their contributions extend to a variety of rehabilitation and neurological studies informed by clinical and imaging data, addressing complex issues in brain injury and recovery.

Best Publications

  • Functional potential in chronic stroke patients depends on corticospinal tract integrity

    Cathy M. Stinear;P. Alan Barber;Peter R. Smale;James P. Coxon

  • Converging evidence for a fronto-basal-ganglia network for inhibitory control of action and cognition.

    Adam R. Aron;Sarah Durston;Dawn M. Eagle;Gordon D. Logan

  • Advances and challenges in stroke rehabilitation.

    Cathy M Stinear;Catherine E Lang;Steven Zeiler;Winston D Byblow

  • Biomarkers of Stroke Recovery: Consensus-Based Core Recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable.

    Lara A Boyd;Kathryn S Hayward;Nick S Ward;Cathy M Stinear

  • The PREP algorithm predicts potential for upper limb recovery after stroke.

    Cathy M. Stinear;P. Alan Barber;P. Alan Barber;Matthew Petoe;Samir Anwar

  • Kinesthetic, but not visual, motor imagery modulates corticomotor excitability

    Cathy M. Stinear;Winston D. Byblow;Maarten Steyvers;Oron Levin

  • Prediction of recovery of motor function after stroke

    Cathy Stinear

  • Proportional recovery after stroke depends on corticomotor integrity

    Winston D. Byblow;Cathy M. Stinear;P. Alan Barber;Matthew A. Petoe;Matthew A. Petoe

  • Intracortical inhibition during volitional inhibition of prepared action

    James Peter Coxon;Cathy M Stinear;Winston D Byblow

  • PREP2: A biomarker-based algorithm for predicting upper limb function after stroke

    Cathy M. Stinear;Winston D. Byblow;Suzanne J. Ackerley;Marie-Claire Smith

  • Prediction of motor recovery after stroke: advances in biomarkers

    Cathy M Stinear

  • Priming the motor system enhances the effects of upper limb therapy in chronic stroke

    Cathy M. Stinear;P. Alan Barber;James P. Coxon;Melanie K. Fleming

  • Contralesional Hemisphere Control of the Proximal Paretic Upper Limb following Stroke

    Lynley Bradnam;Cathy Stinear;Peter Barber;Winston Byblow

  • Responding with restraint: What are the neurocognitive mechanisms?

    Sara Jahfari;Cathy M. Stinear;Mike Claffey;Frederick Verbruggen

  • TMS measures of motor cortex function after stroke: A meta-analysis

    Michelle N. McDonnell;Cathy M. Stinear

  • Role of intracortical inhibition in selective hand muscle activation.

    Cathy M. Stinear;Winston D. Byblow

  • Combining Theta Burst Stimulation With Training After Subcortical Stroke

    Suzanne J. Ackerley;Cathy M. Stinear;P. Alan Barber;Winston D. Byblow

  • Clinical diagnostic utility of transcranial magnetic stimulation in neurological disorders. Updated report of an IFCN committee

    Unknown

  • Primary motor cortex and movement prevention: Where Stop meets Go

    Cathy M Stinear;James Peter Coxon;Winston D Byblow

  • Selective inhibition of movement

    James Peter Coxon;Cathy M Stinear;Winston D Byblow

  • Carbohydrate in the mouth immediately facilitates motor output

    Nicholas Gant;Cathy M. Stinear;Winston D. Byblow

  • Prediction Tools for Stroke Rehabilitation

    Cathy M. Stinear;Marie-Claire Smith;Winston D. Byblow

Frequent Co-Authors

Winston D. Byblow
Winston D. Byblow University of Auckland
Steven C. Cramer
Steven C. Cramer University of California, Los Angeles
Nick S. Ward
Nick S. Ward University College London
Lars T. Westlye
Lars T. Westlye University of Oslo
George F. Wittenberg
George F. Wittenberg University of Pittsburgh
Bradley J. MacIntosh
Bradley J. MacIntosh Sunnybrook Health Science Centre
Steven A. Kautz
Steven A. Kautz Medical University of South Carolina
Lara A. Boyd
Lara A. Boyd University of British Columbia
Surjo R. Soekadar
Surjo R. Soekadar Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Benjamin Thompson
Benjamin Thompson University of Waterloo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in neuroscience opens doors to diverse fields, especially where brain science meets mental health and social work. While neuroscience degrees are highly specialized, students often explore related areas of study or alternative pathways that build on foundational psychology and counseling skills.

For those interested in therapy, mft programs offer training focused on marriage and family counseling, intertwining understanding of brain and behavior. Additionally, pursuing an affordable online masters in clinical psychology can provide deeper insights into mental processes and patient care.

Students seeking a cost-effective entry into these fields may consider the cheapest online psychology degree options. These programs lay the groundwork for future graduate study or direct entry-level work in behavioral science. Meanwhile, those passionate about social work can look into the easiest msw online program pathways, which cover intervention strategies and mental health advocacy.

Exploring these related programs can help aspiring neuroscience professionals discover interdisciplinary skills and alternative career routes while keeping education accessible and affordable.

Best Scientists Citing Cathy M. Stinear

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles