World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Neuroscience
New Zealand
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 63 3379 3091 11 9 204 15437

Cathy M. Stinear publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Cathy M. Stinear between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Cathy M. Stinear published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 8.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2017. 17 of the 217 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2017. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 26 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 9 publications
2001 2025

217 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Cathy M. Stinear: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 0
2003 2
2004 6
2005 2
2006 7
2007 7
2008 5
2009 10
2010 12
2011 8
2012 9
2013 13
2014 16
2015 10
2016 14
2017 26
2018 6
2019 10
2020 9
2021 11
2022 5
2023 11
2024 8
2025 9
Total 217
Download as CSV

Cathy M. Stinear publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cathy M. Stinear sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 198–207 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 204 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306 204
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Cathy M. Stinear D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cathy M. Stinear sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 62–63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260 63
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Neuroscience in New Zealand Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Neuroscience in New Zealand Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Neuroscience in New Zealand Leader Award

Overview

Cathy M. Stinear is affiliated with the University of Auckland in New Zealand. Their research primarily focuses on the intersection of medicine and neuroscience, particularly within the subfields of rehabilitation, neurology, epidemiology, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, and cognitive neuroscience.

The scientist's work emphasizes several main topics, including stroke rehabilitation and recovery, transcranial magnetic stimulation studies, acute ischemic stroke management, cerebral palsy and movement disorders, advanced neuroimaging techniques and applications, muscle activation and electromyography studies, and botulinum toxin and related neurological disorders.

Recent scholarly contributions include publications such as:

  • Advances and challenges in stroke rehabilitation, 2020, The Lancet Neurology
  • Clinical diagnostic utility of transcranial magnetic stimulation in neurological disorders. Updated report of an IFCN committee, 2023, Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Motor rehabilitation after stroke: European Stroke Organisation (ESO) consensus-based definition and guiding framework, 2023, European Stroke Journal
  • The ENIGMA Stroke Recovery Working Group: Big data neuroimaging to study brain-behavior relationships after stroke, 2020, Human Brain Mapping
  • Association of Brain Age, Lesion Volume, and Functional Outcome in Patients With Stroke, 2023, Neurology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Cathy M. Stinear include:

  • Winston D. Byblow
  • Marie-Claire Smith
  • Michael R. Borich
  • Lara A. Boyd
  • Amy Brodtmann

The scientist regularly publishes in journals and venues such as:

  • Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
  • Clinical Neurophysiology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • European Stroke Journal
  • Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging

The research portfolio of Cathy M. Stinear comprises a significant output in medicine, with 95 publications, complemented by 33 publications in neuroscience. Their contributions extend to a variety of rehabilitation and neurological studies informed by clinical and imaging data, addressing complex issues in brain injury and recovery.

Best Publications

  • Functional potential in chronic stroke patients depends on corticospinal tract integrity

    Cathy M. Stinear;P. Alan Barber;Peter R. Smale;James P. Coxon

  • Converging evidence for a fronto-basal-ganglia network for inhibitory control of action and cognition.

    Adam R. Aron;Sarah Durston;Dawn M. Eagle;Gordon D. Logan

  • Advances and challenges in stroke rehabilitation.

    Cathy M Stinear;Catherine E Lang;Steven Zeiler;Winston D Byblow

  • Biomarkers of Stroke Recovery: Consensus-Based Core Recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable.

    Lara A Boyd;Kathryn S Hayward;Nick S Ward;Cathy M Stinear

  • The PREP algorithm predicts potential for upper limb recovery after stroke.

    Cathy M. Stinear;P. Alan Barber;P. Alan Barber;Matthew Petoe;Samir Anwar

  • Kinesthetic, but not visual, motor imagery modulates corticomotor excitability

    Cathy M. Stinear;Winston D. Byblow;Maarten Steyvers;Oron Levin

  • Prediction of recovery of motor function after stroke

    Cathy Stinear

  • Proportional recovery after stroke depends on corticomotor integrity

    Winston D. Byblow;Cathy M. Stinear;P. Alan Barber;Matthew A. Petoe;Matthew A. Petoe

  • Intracortical inhibition during volitional inhibition of prepared action

    James Peter Coxon;Cathy M Stinear;Winston D Byblow

  • PREP2: A biomarker-based algorithm for predicting upper limb function after stroke

    Cathy M. Stinear;Winston D. Byblow;Suzanne J. Ackerley;Marie-Claire Smith

  • Prediction of motor recovery after stroke: advances in biomarkers

    Cathy M Stinear

  • Priming the motor system enhances the effects of upper limb therapy in chronic stroke

    Cathy M. Stinear;P. Alan Barber;James P. Coxon;Melanie K. Fleming

  • Contralesional Hemisphere Control of the Proximal Paretic Upper Limb following Stroke

    Lynley Bradnam;Cathy Stinear;Peter Barber;Winston Byblow

  • Responding with restraint: What are the neurocognitive mechanisms?

    Sara Jahfari;Cathy M. Stinear;Mike Claffey;Frederick Verbruggen

  • TMS measures of motor cortex function after stroke: A meta-analysis

    Michelle N. McDonnell;Cathy M. Stinear

  • Role of intracortical inhibition in selective hand muscle activation.

    Cathy M. Stinear;Winston D. Byblow

  • Combining Theta Burst Stimulation With Training After Subcortical Stroke

    Suzanne J. Ackerley;Cathy M. Stinear;P. Alan Barber;Winston D. Byblow

  • Clinical diagnostic utility of transcranial magnetic stimulation in neurological disorders. Updated report of an IFCN committee

    Unknown

  • Primary motor cortex and movement prevention: Where Stop meets Go

    Cathy M Stinear;James Peter Coxon;Winston D Byblow

  • Selective inhibition of movement

    James Peter Coxon;Cathy M Stinear;Winston D Byblow

  • Carbohydrate in the mouth immediately facilitates motor output

    Nicholas Gant;Cathy M. Stinear;Winston D. Byblow

  • Prediction Tools for Stroke Rehabilitation

    Cathy M. Stinear;Marie-Claire Smith;Winston D. Byblow

Frequent Co-Authors

Winston D. Byblow
Winston D. Byblow University of Auckland
Steven C. Cramer
Steven C. Cramer University of California, Los Angeles
Nick S. Ward
Nick S. Ward University College London
Lars T. Westlye
Lars T. Westlye University of Oslo
George F. Wittenberg
George F. Wittenberg University of Pittsburgh
Bradley J. MacIntosh
Bradley J. MacIntosh Sunnybrook Health Science Centre
Steven A. Kautz
Steven A. Kautz Medical University of South Carolina
Lara A. Boyd
Lara A. Boyd University of British Columbia
Surjo R. Soekadar
Surjo R. Soekadar Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Benjamin Thompson
Benjamin Thompson University of Waterloo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in neuroscience opens doors to diverse fields, especially where brain science meets mental health and social work. While neuroscience degrees are highly specialized, students often explore related areas of study or alternative pathways that build on foundational psychology and counseling skills.

For those interested in therapy, mft programs offer training focused on marriage and family counseling, intertwining understanding of brain and behavior. Additionally, pursuing an affordable online masters in clinical psychology can provide deeper insights into mental processes and patient care.

Students seeking a cost-effective entry into these fields may consider the cheapest online psychology degree options. These programs lay the groundwork for future graduate study or direct entry-level work in behavioral science. Meanwhile, those passionate about social work can look into the easiest msw online program pathways, which cover intervention strategies and mental health advocacy.

Exploring these related programs can help aspiring neuroscience professionals discover interdisciplinary skills and alternative career routes while keeping education accessible and affordable.

Best Scientists Citing Cathy M. Stinear

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles