World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Stanley Wasserman

Stanley Wasserman

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
50
Citations
78927
World Ranking
2645
National Ranking
1281

Stanley Wasserman publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stanley Wasserman sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 136 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Stanley Wasserman D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stanley Wasserman sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stanley Wasserman is affiliated with Indiana University in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on fields including Physics and Astronomy as well as Computer Science. Within these domains, Wasserman's work covers several specialized subfields such as Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Artificial Intelligence, and Computer Networks and Communications.

The scientist has contributed to topics including Complex Network Analysis Techniques, Mental Health Research Topics, Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Advanced Graph Neural Networks, and Network Security and Intrusion Detection. These topics reflect a multidisciplinary approach involving both theoretical and applied aspects of network science and related fields.

Wasserman's publication record includes recent papers such as:

  • Critiques of network analysis of multivariate data in psychological science (2022) published in Nature Reviews Methods Primers
  • Editors' Note (2022) published in Network Science
  • Introduction to the special issue on COMPLEX NETWORKS 2018 (2020) published in Network Science

The primary venues for Wasserman's research publications are Network Science and Nature Reviews Methods Primers. Network Science accounts for multiple publications by Wasserman, indicating a consistent contribution to this journal in particular.

Frequent collaborators in their research include Zachary P. Neal, Miriam K. Forbes, Jennifer Watling Neal, Michael J. Brusco, and Robert F. Krueger. These coauthors represent a range of interdisciplinary partnerships across social science and computational domains.

Best Publications

  • Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications

    Stanley Wasserman;Katherine Faust

  • Social Network Analysis: List of Tables

    Stanley Wasserman;Katherine Faust

  • Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis

    Peter J. Carrington;John Scott;Stanley Wasserman

  • LOGIT MODELS AND LOGISTIC REGRESSIONS FOR SOCIAL NETWORKS: I. AN INTRODUCTION TO MARKOV GRAPHS AND p*

    Stanley Wasserman;Philippa Pattison

  • Object permanence in five-month-old infants

    Renée Baillargeon;Elizabeth S. Spelke;Stanley Wasserman

  • Mimetic Processes within an Interorganizational Field: An Empirical Test

    Joseph Galaskiewicz;Stanley Wasserman

  • Advances in Social Network Analysis: Research in the Social and Behavioral Sciences

    Stanley Wasserman;Joseph Galaskiewicz

  • Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications.

    David Knoke;Stanley Wasserman;Katherine Faust

  • Testing Multitheoretical, Multilevel Hypotheses About Organizational Networks: An Analytic Framework and Empirical Example

    Noshir S. Contractor;Stanley Wasserman;Katherine Faust

  • New Frontiers in Network Theory Development

    Arvind Parkhe;Stanley Wasserman;David A. Ralston

  • Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks: II. Multivariate relations.

    Philippa Pattison;Stanley Wasserman

  • A p* primer: logit models for social networks

    Carolyn J Anderson;Stanley Wasserman;Bradley Crouch

  • Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis: Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences

    Peter J. Carrington;John Scott;Stanley Wasserman

  • Statistical Analysis of Multiple Sociometric Relations.

    Stephen E. Fienberg;Michael M. Meyer;Stanley S. Wasserman

  • Statistical Models for Social Support Networks

    Michael E. Walker;Stanley Wasserman;Barry Wellman

  • Categorical Data Analysis of Single Sociometric Relations

    Stephen E. Fienberg;Stanley S. Wasserman

  • Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks: III. Valued relations

    Garry Robins;Philippa Pattison;Stanley Wasserman

  • Social Network Analysis: Concepts, Methodology, and Directions for the 1990s

    Joseph Galaskiewicz;Stanley Wasserman

  • Analyzing Social Networks as Stochastic Processes

    Stanley Wasserman

  • Sociological Methodology, 1987

    Clifford Clogg;Stanley Wasserman

  • An Exponential Family of Probability Distributions for Directed Graphs: Comment

    Stephen E. Fienberg;Stanley Wasserman

  • Social Network Analysis: Statistical Dyadic Interaction Models

    Stanley Wasserman;Katherine Faust

  • Social Network Analysis: List of Illustrations

    Stanley Wasserman;Katherine Faust

Frequent Co-Authors

Dawn Iacobucci
Dawn Iacobucci Vanderbilt University
Joseph Galaskiewicz
Joseph Galaskiewicz University of Arizona
Garry Robins
Garry Robins University of Melbourne
Philippa Pattison
Philippa Pattison University of Sydney
Stephen E. Fienberg
Stephen E. Fienberg Carnegie Mellon University
Carolyn J. Anderson
Carolyn J. Anderson University of Pittsburgh
Noshir Contractor
Noshir Contractor Northwestern University
John Scott
John Scott Queensland University of Technology
David Knoke
David Knoke University of Minnesota
Dorothy L. Espelage
Dorothy L. Espelage University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens up a wide range of career opportunities and further study options. Students have more flexible paths than ever thanks to online programs tailored to various needs and schedules.

For those seeking to enhance their qualifications quickly, online master programs offer accelerated routes to advanced degrees in fields like psychology, sociology, and education. If you’re starting your academic journey, consider online bachelor degree programs—these provide the convenience of remote study without compromising on academic quality.

Many students are also drawn to specialized, affordable career pathways. For example, if you are interested in social work, the cheapest online msw programs make it possible to gain vital credentials while managing tuition costs. Similarly, those passionate about behavioral sciences may want to explore the bcba degree, an important credential for careers in applied behavior analysis.

These online degrees not only open doors to meaningful careers, but also enable lifelong learning in a flexible format tailored to your ambitions.

Best Scientists Citing Stanley Wasserman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles