World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
48
Citations
13172
World Ranking
6059
National Ranking
2732

Carter T. Butts publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carter T. Butts sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 193 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Carter T. Butts D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carter T. Butts sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Carter T. Butts is affiliated with the University of California, Irvine in the United States. Their research spans a range of interdisciplinary fields focused primarily within the social sciences. The main field of study for Butts centers on Social Sciences, with subfields including Molecular Biology, Sociology and Political Science, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Communication, and Artificial Intelligence.

Butts's scholarly output demonstrates a strong emphasis on topics such as Complex Network Analysis Techniques, Protein Structure and Dynamics, Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence, Enzyme Structure and Function, Public Relations and Crisis Communication, Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies, as well as Computational Drug Discovery Methods.

Frequent publication venues for Butts include:

  • Biophysical Journal
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Social Networks
  • Journal of Mathematical Sociology
  • Harvard Dataverse

Among recent notable papers authored or co-authored by Butts are:

  • Spatial heterogeneity can lead to substantial local variations in COVID-19 timing and severity, 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • COVID-19: Retransmission of official communications in an emerging pandemic, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • Sequence Characterization and Molecular Modeling of Clinically Relevant Variants of the SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease, 2020, Biochemistry
  • A cyclic peptide inhibitor of the SARS-CoV-2 main protease, 2021, European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
  • The First 60 Days: American Public Health Agencies' Social Media Strategies in the Emerging COVID-19 Pandemic, 2020, Health Security

Frequent collaborators of Butts include Rachel W. Martin, Elizabeth M. Diessner, John R. Hipp, Gemma R. Takahashi, and Peng Huang. Their repeated partnerships reflect ongoing research activities in their shared areas of interest.

Butts has been recognized as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) since 2018.

Best Publications

  • ergm: A Package to Fit, Simulate and Diagnose Exponential-Family Models for Networks.

    David R. Hunter;Mark S. Handcock;Carter T. Butts;Steven M. Goodreau

  • Walking in Facebook: A Case Study of Unbiased Sampling of OSNs

    Minas Gjoka;Maciej Kurant;Carter T. Butts;Athina Markopoulou

  • statnet: Software Tools for the Representation, Visualization, Analysis and Simulation of Network Data.

    Mark S. Handcock;David R. Hunter;Carter T. Butts;Steven M. Goodreau

  • Social network analysis: A methodological introduction

    Carter T. Butts

  • Social Network Analysis with sna

    Carter T. Butts

  • Revisiting the Foundations of Network Analysis

    Carter T. Butts

  • 4. A Relational Event Framework for Social Action

    Carter T. Butts

  • A statnet Tutorial

    Steven M. Goodreau;Mark S. Handcock;David R. Hunter;Carter T. Butts

  • network: A Package for Managing Relational Data in R

    Carter T. Butts

  • Tools for Social Network Analysis

    Carter T. Butts

  • Practical Recommendations on Crawling Online Social Networks

    M. Gjoka;M. Kurant;C. T. Butts;A. Markopoulou

  • Network inference, error, and informant (in)accuracy: a Bayesian approach

    Carter T. Butts

  • Warning tweets: serial transmission of messages during the warning phase of a disaster event

    Jeannette Sutton;Emma S. Spiro;Britta Johnson;Sean Fitzhugh

  • The interaction of size and density with graph-level indices

    Brigham S. Anderson;Carter T. Butts;Kathleen M. Carley

  • Extended structures of mediation: Re-examining brokerage in dynamic networks

    Emma S. Spiro;Ryan M. Acton;Carter T. Butts

  • Walking on a graph with a magnifying glass: stratified sampling via weighted random walks

    Maciej Kurant;Minas Gjoka;Carter T. Butts;Athina Markopoulou

  • Multigraph Sampling of Online Social Networks

    M. Gjoka;C. T. Butts;M. Kurant;A. Markopoulou

  • Exponential-Family Models of Random Graphs: Inference in Finite, Super and Infinite Population Scenarios

    Michael Schweinberger;Pavel N. Krivitsky;Carter T. Butts;Jonathan R. Stewart

  • A Walk in Facebook: Uniform Sampling of Users in Online Social Networks

    Minas Gjoka;Maciej Kurant;Carter T. Butts;Athina Markopoulou

  • Project Rescue: Challenges in Responding to the Unexpected

    Sharad Mehrotra;C. T. Butts;D. Kalashnikov;Nalini Venkatasubramanian

  • Communication and cooperation

    John H. Miller;Carter T. Butts;David Rode

Frequent Co-Authors

Athina Markopoulou
Athina Markopoulou University of California, Irvine
John R. Hipp
John R. Hipp University of California, Irvine
Jeannette Sutton
Jeannette Sutton University at Albany, State University of New York
Martina Morris
Martina Morris University of Washington
Mark S. Handcock
Mark S. Handcock University of California, Los Angeles
Padhraic Smyth
Padhraic Smyth University of California, Irvine
Kathleen M. Carley
Kathleen M. Carley Carnegie Mellon University
Sharad Mehrotra
Sharad Mehrotra University of California, Irvine
Nalini Venkatasubramanian
Nalini Venkatasubramanian University of California, Irvine
David Krackhardt
David Krackhardt Carnegie Mellon University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The world of computer science offers many flexible pathways for learners at every stage of their careers. For those seeking a rapid entry into the tech workforce, pursuing an associate degree in 6 months online is an efficient choice. These programs are designed to deliver foundational skills—and many are fully accredited.

If you are considering advanced study, there are numerous opportunities to continue your education online at a lower cost. Many institutions offer cheap phd programs online, allowing you to conduct research and earn a doctorate without breaking the bank. Similarly, aspiring education professionals can take advantage of cheapest edd programs online that offer shorter timelines and affordable tuition.

Computer science professionals often branch out into business or management roles. If you’re interested in broadening your expertise, an online business degree cost can be surprisingly affordable, and many reputable colleges offer flexible options tailored for working adults.

Best Scientists Citing Carter T. Butts

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles