World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
35
Citations
7373
World Ranking
9124
National Ranking
3845

Paul D. Cheney publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul D. Cheney sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 106 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Paul D. Cheney D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul D. Cheney sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul D. Cheney is affiliated with the University of Kansas in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, including Neuroscience, Engineering, and Medicine. Within these broader areas, their work touches on several subfields such as Neurology, Biomedical Engineering, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Political Science and International Relations, and History.

The scientist's research topics cover a wide range of interests. These include Vestibular and auditory disorders, Muscle activation and electromyography studies, Spinal Cord Injury Research, Political Theory and Influence, and European Political History Analysis.

Paul D. Cheney has contributed to academic literature with publications in venues including Neuroscience Letters. One recent paper published in 2021 is titled "Monkey flexor and abductor pollicis brevis motoneuron pools: Proximal dendritic trees and small motoneurons," featured in Neuroscience Letters.

  • Monkey flexor and abductor pollicis brevis motoneuron pools: Proximal dendritic trees and small motoneurons (2021, Neuroscience Letters)

Their frequent co-author is Arthur B. Jenny, with whom they have collaborated at least once.

Best Publications

  • Postspike facilitation of forelimb muscle activity by primate corticomotoneuronal cells.

    E. E. Fetz;P. D. Cheney

  • Functional classes of primate corticomotoneuronal cells and their relation to active force

    P. D. Cheney;E. E. Fetz

  • Corticomotoneuronal Postspike Effects in Shoulder, Elbow, Wrist, Digit, and Intrinsic Hand Muscles During a Reach and Prehension Task

    Brian J. McKiernan;Joanne K. Marcario;Jennifer Hill Karrer;Paul D. Cheney

  • Comparable patterns of muscle facilitation evoked by individual corticomotoneuronal (CM) cells and by single intracortical microstimuli in primates: evidence for functional groups of CM cells

    P. D. Cheney;E. E. Fetz

  • Corticomotoneuronal cells contribute to long‐latency stretch reflexes in the rhesus monkey.

    P D Cheney;E E Fetz

  • Patterns of facilitation and suppression of antagonist forelimb muscles from motor cortex sites in the awake monkey.

    P. D. Cheney;E. E. Fetz;S. S. Palmer

  • Consistent Features in the Forelimb Representation of Primary Motor Cortex in Rhesus Macaques

    Michael C. Park;Abderraouf Belhaj-Saı̈f;Michael Gordon;Paul D. Cheney

  • Neural mechanisms underlying corticospinal and rubrospinal control of limb movements.

    Paul D. Cheney;Eberhard E. Fetz;Klaus Mewes

  • Control of forelimb muscle activity by populations of corticomotoneuronal and rubromotoneuronal cells.

    E E Fetz;P D Cheney;K Mewes;S Palmer

  • Exosome-mediated shuttling of microRNA-29 regulates HIV Tat and morphine-mediated Neuronal dysfunction

    G Hu;H Yao;A D Chaudhuri;M Duan

  • Responses of cortical neurons (areas 3a and 4) to ramp stretch of hindlimb muscles in the baboon.

    Unknown

  • Characteristics of corticomotoneuronal postspike facilitation and reciprocal suppression of EMG activity in the monkey.

    Richard Kasser;P. D. Cheney

  • Plasticity in the distribution of the red nucleus output to forearm muscles after unilateral lesions of the pyramidal tract.

    Abderraouf Belhaj-Saïf;Paul D. Cheney

  • Corticomotoneuronal connections of precentral cells detected by post-spike averages of EMG activity in behaving monkeys

    E. E. Fetz;P. D. Cheney;D. C. German

  • Properties of primary motor cortex output to forelimb muscles in rhesus macaques

    Michael C. Park;Abderraouf Belhaj-Saïf;Paul D. Cheney

  • Encoding of motor parameters by corticomotoneuronal (CM) and rubromotoneuronal (RM) cells producing postspike facilitation of forelimb muscles in the behaving monkey

    Paul D. Cheney;Klaus Mewes;Eberhard E. Fetz

  • Perspectives on classical controversies about the motor cortex.

    Mohsen Omrani;Matthew T. Kaufman;Nicholas G. Hatsopoulos;Paul D. Cheney

  • Distribution and Characteristics of Poststimulus Effects in Proximal and Distal Forelimb Muscles From Red Nucleus in the Monkey

    Abderraouf Belhaj-Saïf;Jennifer Hill Karrer;Paul D. Cheney

  • Effects on muscle activity from microstimuli applied to somatosensory and motor cortex during voluntary movement in the monkey.

    Gail L. Widener;Paul D. Cheney

  • Functional relations between primate motor cortex cells and muscles: fixed and flexible.

    Fetz Ee;Cheney Pd

  • Output Properties and Organization of the Forelimb Representation of Motor Areas on the Lateral Aspect of the Hemisphere in Rhesus Macaques

    Marie-Hélène Boudrias;Rebecca L. McPherson;Shawn B. Frost;Paul D. Cheney

Frequent Co-Authors

Opendra Narayan
Opendra Narayan University of Kansas
Eberhard E. Fetz
Eberhard E. Fetz University of Washington
Nancy E.J. Berman
Nancy E.J. Berman University of Kansas
Shilpa Buch
Shilpa Buch University of Nebraska Medical Center
Janet Marquis
Janet Marquis University of Kansas
Francois Villinger
Francois Villinger University of Louisiana at Lafayette
Miguel A. L. Nicolelis
Miguel A. L. Nicolelis Duke University
Mikhail A. Lebedev
Mikhail A. Lebedev Moscow State University
Sabita Roy
Sabita Roy University of Miami
Katrin Amunts
Katrin Amunts Forschungszentrum Jülich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in neuroscience often overlaps with several related fields, such as social work, psychology, and behavior analysis. For those seeking flexibility, pursuing msw programs online can be a practical choice, especially for learners interested in applying neuroscience within social work and community settings.

If your interests align with behavioral science, consider enrolling in bcba accredited programs online. These programs offer training in the principles of behavior analysis, which is closely connected to neuroscience research on learning and behavior modification.

Students who want to fast-track their careers may benefit from 1 year msw programs online or an accelerated online bachelor’s degree in psychology. These programs can help you build a foundation in neural sciences, mental health, and therapeutic practices in less time.

With a range of affordable and accelerated online options, choosing the right pathway will depend on your ultimate career goals—whether in clinical practice, research, or education.

Best Scientists Citing Paul D. Cheney

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles