World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michal Abrahamowicz

Michal Abrahamowicz

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
103
Citations
37876
World Ranking
7385
National Ranking
283

Michal Abrahamowicz publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michal Abrahamowicz sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 480 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Michal Abrahamowicz D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michal Abrahamowicz sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 103 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michal Abrahamowicz is affiliated with McGill University in Canada and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a focus on statistical methods, epidemiology, and clinical research. Their work spans a variety of topics including statistical methods and inference, health systems, economic evaluations, and quality of life.

Their recent scholarly output includes papers published in prominent venues such as:

  • "State of the art in selection of variables and functional forms in multivariable analysis-outstanding issues," 2020, Diagnostic and Prognostic Research
  • "Assessing Performance and Clinical Usefulness in Prediction Models With Survival Outcomes: Practical Guidance for Cox Proportional Hazards Models," 2022, Annals of Internal Medicine
  • "Group-Based vs Individual Pelvic Floor Muscle Training to Treat Urinary Incontinence in Older Women," 2020, JAMA Internal Medicine
  • "Long-term exposure to wildfires and cancer incidence in Canada: a population-based observational cohort study," 2022, The Lancet Planetary Health
  • "Flares after hydroxychloroquine reduction or discontinuation: results from the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) inception cohort," 2021, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

Their frequent collaborators include:

  • Louise Pilote
  • Sasha Bernatsky
  • Marie-Eve Beauchamp
  • Cristiano Soares de Moura
  • Coraline Danieli

Michal Abrahamowicz regularly publishes in several scientific journals, with multiple contributions to:

  • Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
  • American Journal of Epidemiology
  • Biometrical Journal
  • International Journal of Cardiology
  • Circulation

Their main fields of study are centered on medicine, supported by significant work in specialized areas such as:

  • Statistics and Probability
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Rheumatology
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Epidemiology

Key research topics covered in their work include:

  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Statistical Methods and Inference
  • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies

Best Publications

  • A New and Improved Population-Based Canadian Reference for Birth Weight for Gestational Age

    Michael S. Kramer;Robert W. Platt;Shi Wu Wen;K.S. Joseph

  • Traditional Framingham risk factors fail to fully account for accelerated atherosclerosis in systemic lupus erythematosus.

    John M. Esdaile;Michal Abrahamowicz;Tamara Grodzicky;Yin Li

  • Changing mortality in congenital heart disease.

    Paul Khairy;Raluca Ionescu-Ittu;Andrew S. Mackie;Michal Abrahamowicz

  • Development of a Model for Training and Evaluation of Laparoscopic Skills

    Anna M Derossis;Gerald M Fried;Michal Abrahamowicz;Harvey H Sigman

  • Delirium predicts 12-month mortality.

    Jane McCusker;Martin Cole;Michal Abrahamowicz;Francois Primeau

  • The Quebec back pain disability scale : measurement properties

    Jacek Kopec;John Esdaile;Michal Abrahamowicz;Lucien Abenhaim

  • Autoantibodies and microvascular damage are independent predictive factors for the progression of Raynaud's phenomenon to systemic sclerosis: A twenty‐year prospective study of 586 patients, with validation of proposed criteria for early systemic sclerosis

    Martial Koenig;Marvin J. Fritzler;André Roussin

  • The Natural History of Type-specific Human Papillomavirus Infections in Female University Students

    Harriet Richardson;Gail Kelsall;Pierre Tellier;Hélène Voyer

  • Physician scores on a national clinical skills examination as predictors of complaints to medical regulatory authorities.

    Robyn Tamblyn;Michal Abrahamowicz;Dale Dauphinee;Elizabeth Wenghofer

  • Use of medications with anticholinergic effect predicts clinical severity of delirium symptoms in older medical inpatients.

    Ling Han;Jane McCusker;Martin Cole;Michal Abrahamowicz

  • Rejoinder: Reanalysis of the Harvard Six Cities Study and American Cancer Society Study of Particulate Air Pollution and Mortality

    Daniel Krewski;Richard T. Burnett;Mark S. Goldberg;Michal Abrahamowicz

  • Survival Bias Associated with Time-to-Treatment Initiation in Drug Effectiveness Evaluation: A Comparison of Methods

    Zheng Zhou;Elham Rahme;Michal Abrahamowicz;Louise Pilote

  • A review of spline function procedures in R.

    Aris Perperoglou;Willi Sauerbrei;Michal Abrahamowicz;Matthias Schmid

  • Patient nonadherence to medication in inflammatory bowel disease.

    Maida J Sewitch;Michal Abrahamowicz;Michal Abrahamowicz;Alan Barkun;Alain Bitton

  • Myoblast transfer in duchenne muscular dystrophy

    George Karpati;Djordje Ajdukovic;Douglas Arnold;Robert B. Gledhill

  • Modeling Smoking History: A Comparison of Different Approaches

    Karen Leffondré;Michal Abrahamowicz;Jack Siemiatycki;Bernard Rachet

  • Immediate and delayed impact of oral glucocorticoid therapy on risk of serious infection in older patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a nested case–control analysis

    William G. Dixon;Michal Abrahamowicz;Marie Eve Beauchamp;David W. Ray

  • Predictors of Functional Decline in Hospitalized Elderly Patients A Systematic Review

    Jane McCusker;Ritsuko Kakuma;Michal Abrahamowicz

  • Association Between Licensure Examination Scores and Practice in Primary Care

    Robyn Tamblyn;Michal Abrahamowicz;W. Dale Dauphinee;James A. Hanley

  • The Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale: conceptualization and development.

    J A Kopec;J M Esdaile;M Abrahamowicz;L Abenhaim

Frequent Co-Authors

Louise Pilote
Louise Pilote McGill University
Tomáš Paus
Tomáš Paus University of Toronto
Daniel Gaudet
Daniel Gaudet University of Montreal
Gabriel Leonard
Gabriel Leonard Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Jack Siemiatycki
Jack Siemiatycki University of Montreal
Patricia L. Dobkin
Patricia L. Dobkin McGill University
John Lynch
John Lynch University of Adelaide
Robert W. Platt
Robert W. Platt McGill University
Daniel Krewski
Daniel Krewski University of Ottawa
Paul R. Fortin
Paul R. Fortin Université Laval

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in careers related to Medicine or healthcare but prefer flexible learning options, there are several quality online degrees that can open up rewarding career pathways. For registered nurses, the option to transition from ASN to NP is a popular route, allowing working nurses to advance their clinical expertise and scope of practice through accelerated bridge programs.

Nutrition is another growing field in health science. Students can explore online nutrition degrees to pursue roles in dietetics, wellness coaching, or community health. These programs offer vital foundational knowledge in a format suited to busy schedules.

For those aiming to move into healthcare leadership, pursuing a Master of Health Administration from top cahme accredited mha programs is an excellent option. Accreditation ensures high educational standards and can improve job prospects in hospital administration or policy roles.

Lastly, registered nurses seeking advancement can consider rn to bsn online no clinicals accredited programs, which streamline the educational journey and often waive clinical hour requirements for experienced professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Michal Abrahamowicz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles