World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
112
Citations
55505
World Ranking
5091
National Ranking
140

John Lynch publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Lynch sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 461 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

John Lynch D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Lynch sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 112 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

John Lynch is affiliated with the University of Adelaide in Australia. Their research spans primarily across the fields of Social Sciences and Medicine, with a focus on specific subfields such as General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Health, Education, and Sociology and Political Science.

The topics frequently addressed in their work include Child Abuse and Trauma, Homelessness and Social Issues, Health Disparities and Outcomes, Early Childhood Education and Development, Smoking Behavior and Cessation, Child Welfare and Adoption, and Language Development and Disorders.

John Lynch has contributed to multiple journals and publication venues, notably:

  • International Journal of Epidemiology
  • International Journal for Population Data Science
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health
  • Research Square (Research Square)

Some of their recent papers include:

  • Causal inference and effect estimation using observational data (2022), Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health
  • Comparison of the Tree-Based Machine Learning Algorithms to Cox Regression in Predicting the Survival of Oral and Pharyngeal Cancers: Analyses Based on SEER Database (2020), Cancers
  • Examining Bias and Reporting in Oral Health Prediction Modeling Studies (2020), Journal of Dental Research
  • The impact of women's empowerment on their children's early development in 26 African countries (2020), Journal of Global Health
  • Maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index and risk of preterm birth: a collaboration using large routine health datasets (2024), BMC Medicine

Frequent collaborators include Rhiannon Pilkington, Murthy Mittinty, Alicia Montgomerie, Lisa G. Smithers, and Catherine Chittleborough.

John Lynch has also contributed to book publications with University of Hawaii Press and University of Ljubljana Press. Notable titles include Pacific Languages (2020) and Meritokracija: zgodba o regulativni ideji našega časa (2023).

Best Publications

  • Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 1)

    Bruna Galobardes;Mary Shaw;Debbie A Lawlor;John W Lynch

  • Life course epidemiology

    D Kuh;Y Ben-Shlomo;J Lynch;Johan Hallqvist

  • Income inequality and mortality: importance to health of individual income, psychosocial environment, or material conditions

    John W Lynch;George Davey Smith;George A Kaplan;James S House

  • Inequality in income and mortality in the United States: analysis of mortality and potential pathways.

    George A Kaplan;Elsie R Pamuk;John W Lynch;Richard D Cohen

  • Why do poor people behave poorly? Variation in adult health behaviours and psychosocial characteristics by stages of the socioeconomic lifecourse.

    J.W. Lynch;G.A. Kaplan;J.T. Salonen

  • Is Income Inequality a Determinant of Population Health? Part 1. A Systematic Review

    John Lynch;George Davey Smith;Sam Harper;Marianne Hillemeier

  • Cumulative impact of sustained economic hardship on physical, cognitive, psychological, and social functioning

    John W. Lynch;George A. Kaplan;Sarah J. Shema

  • Bullying and symptoms among school-aged children: international comparative cross sectional study in 28 countries

    Pernille Due;Bjørn E. Holstein;John Lynch;Finn Diderichsen

  • A LIFE COURSE APPROACH TO CHRONIC DISEASE EPIDEMIOLOGY

    John Lynch;George Davey Smith

  • Epidemiologic evidence for the relation between socioeconomic status and depression, obesity, and diabetes.

    Susan A Everson;Siobhan C Maty;John W Lynch;George A Kaplan

  • Childhood Socioeconomic Circumstances and Cause-specific Mortality in Adulthood: Systematic Review and Interpretation

    Bruna Galobardes;John W. Lynch;George Davey Smith

  • Measuring socioeconomic position in health research

    Bruna Galobardes;John Lynch;George Davey Smith

  • Inequalities in non-communicable diseases and effective responses

    Mariachiara Di Cesare;Young Ho Khang;Perviz Asaria;Tony Blakely

  • Income inequality and mortality in metropolitan areas of the United States.

    J. W. Lynch;G. A. Kaplan;E. R. Pamuk;Richard. D. Cohen

  • Global Variability in Fruit and Vegetable Consumption

    Justin N. Hall;Spencer Moore;Spencer Moore;Sam B. Harper;John W. Lynch;John W. Lynch;John W. Lynch

  • A brief conceptual tutorial of multilevel analysis in social epidemiology: linking the statistical concept of clustering to the idea of contextual phenomenon

    Juan Merlo;Basile Chaix;Min Yang;John Lynch

  • Systematic Review of the Influence of Childhood Socioeconomic Circumstances on Risk for Cardiovascular Disease in Adulthood

    Bruna Galobardes;George Davey Smith;John W. Lynch

  • Do Cardiovascular Risk Factors Explain the Relation between Socioeconomic Status, Risk of All-Cause Mortality, Cardiovascular Mortality, and Acute Myocardial Infarction?

    John W. Lynch;George A. Kaplan;Richard D. Cohen;Jaakko Tuomilehto

  • Income inequality, the psychosocial environment, and health: comparisons of wealthy nations

    John W. Lynch;George Davey Smith;M. M. Hillemeier;Mary Shaw

  • Socioeconomic disparities in health change in a longitudinal study of US adults: the role of health-risk behaviors.

    Paula M Lantz;John W Lynch;James S House;James M Lepkowski

Frequent Co-Authors

George A. Kaplan
George A. Kaplan University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Sam Harper
Sam Harper McGill University
George Davey Smith
George Davey Smith University of Bristol
Michael G. Sawyer
Michael G. Sawyer University of Adelaide
Jukka T. Salonen
Jukka T. Salonen University of Helsinki
Philip L. Ritter
Philip L. Ritter Stanford University
Kate Lorig
Kate Lorig Stanford University
Sally Brinkman
Sally Brinkman University of Adelaide
Young-Ho Khang
Young-Ho Khang Seoul National University
Juan Merlo
Juan Merlo Lund University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in alternative or supplementary paths to studying Medicine in the USA, online healthcare degrees have become increasingly popular. Many accredited programs now provide flexible options to advance your career while balancing personal commitments.

Among advanced degrees, online mha programs cahme accredited are highly regarded for leadership roles in healthcare administration. These programs offer rigorous curricula aligned with best practices and industry standards.

Nurses can now find rn to bsn online programs without clinicals, ideal for working professionals looking to advance without the need for on-site clinical requirements.

For those interested in the highest level of nursing practice, exploring the shortest dnp programs online can fast-track your journey. If balancing convenience and academic rigor is essential, some resources recommend the dnp programs that may offer a more manageable course load.

Each of these pathways opens new doors in healthcare leadership, advanced nursing practice, or administration—all conveniently accessible through online study.

Best Scientists Citing John Lynch

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles