World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 50 2665 2436 1292 1167 96 25871

Philip L. Ritter publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Philip L. Ritter between 1980 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Philip L. Ritter published across 45 years, from 1980 to 2024, averaging 2.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 1996. 1 of the 99 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 1996. 1980: 2 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 2 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 20 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 1 publication 2012: 0 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 3 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication
1980 2024

99 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Philip L. Ritter: publications per year, 1980 to 2024
Year Publications
1980 2
1981 1
1982 0
1983 0
1984 3
1985 3
1986 1
1987 2
1988 0
1989 0
1990 2
1991 4
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 2
1996 20
1997 3
1998 0
1999 4
2000 0
2001 5
2002 1
2003 1
2004 2
2005 4
2006 2
2007 0
2008 3
2009 3
2010 1
2011 1
2012 0
2013 6
2014 4
2015 3
2016 3
2017 1
2018 3
2019 2
2020 2
2021 3
2022 1
2023 0
2024 1
Total 99
Download as CSV

Philip L. Ritter publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip L. Ritter sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 94–103 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 96 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390 96
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Philip L. Ritter D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip L. Ritter sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187 50
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Philip L. Ritter is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Their research is primarily situated within the field of Health Professions, with publications also covering subfields such as General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology, and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism.

The scientist's work frequently addresses topics including Family Support in Illness, Family and Disability Support Research, Health and Wellbeing Research, Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving, Health, Psychology, and Well-being, Health Policy Implementation Science, and Digital Mental Health Interventions.

Philip L. Ritter has contributed to several papers, with notable publications including:

  • "Development and Evaluation of the Eight-Item Caregiver Self-Efficacy Scale (CSES-8)," 2020, published in The Gerontologist
  • "Effects of COVID-19 on Informal Caregivers and the Development and Validation of a Scale in English and Spanish to Measure the Impact of COVID-19 on Caregivers," 2020, published in Journal of Applied Gerontology
  • "Remote Delivery of the Chronic Pain Self-management Program Using Self-directed Materials and Small-group Telephone Support: A Pilot Study," 2021, published in Journal of Applied Gerontology
  • "AB1195 CO-RELATION BETWEEN SELF EFFICACY, DEPRESSION AND PAIN AMONG CAREGIVERS WITH AND WITHOUT ARTHRITIS," 2020, published in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
  • "Caregiver COVID-19 Limitations Scale," 2021, published in PsycTESTS Dataset

The primary publication venues for their work include:

  • Journal of Applied Gerontology
  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • The Gerontologist
  • Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

Frequent collaborators in Philip L. Ritter's research include Khushboo Sheth, Kate Lorig, Anita L. Stewart, José F. Parodi, and Dolores Gallagher-Thompson.

Best Publications

  • Evidence suggesting that a chronic disease self-management program can improve health status while reducing hospitalization: a randomized trial.

    Kate R. Lorig;David S. Sobel;Anita L. Stewart;Byron William Brown Jr.

  • THE RELATION OF PARENTING STYLE TO ADOLESCENT SCHOOL PERFORMANCE

    Sanford M. Dornbusch;Philip L. Ritter;P. Herbert Leiderman;Donald F. Roberts

  • Chronic disease self-management program: 2-year health status and health care utilization outcomes.

    Kate R. Lorig;Philip Ritter;Anita L. Stewart;David S. Sobel

  • Effect of a Self- Management Program on Patients with Chronic Disease

    K R Lorig;D S Sobel;P L Ritter;D Laurent

  • CHAMPS physical activity questionnaire for older adults: outcomes for interventions.

    Anita L. Stewart;Kristin M. Mills;Abby C. King;William L. Haskell

  • Outcome Measures for Health Education and Other Health Care Interventions

    Kate Lorig;Anita Stewart;Philip Ritter;Virginia González

  • Single parents, extended households, and the control of adolescents.

    S M Dornbusch;J M Carlsmith;S J Bushwall;P L Ritter

  • Standardized percentile curves of body-mass index for children and adolescents.

    Lawrence D. Hammer;Helena C. Kraemer;Darrell M. Wilson;Philip L. Ritter

  • Family Influences on Dropout Behavior in One California High School.

    Russell W. Rumberger;Rita Ghatak;Gary Poulos;Philip L. Ritter

  • Internet-based chronic disease self-management: a randomized trial.

    Kate R Lorig;Philip L Ritter;Diana D Laurent;Kathryn Plant

  • Community-based peer-led diabetes self-management: a randomized trial.

    Kate Lorig;Philip L. Ritter;Frank J. Villa;Jean Armas

  • Internet Versus Mailed Questionnaires: A Randomized Comparison

    Philip Ritter;Kate Lorig;Diana Laurent;Katy Matthews

  • The internet-based arthritis self-management program: a one-year randomized trial for patients with arthritis or fibromyalgia.

    Kate R. Lorig;Philip L. Ritter;Diana D. Laurent;Kathryn Plant

  • Self-reports of health care utilization compared to provider records

    Philip L Ritter;Anita L Stewart;Hulya Kaymaz;David S Sobel

  • Parenting Styles, Adolescents' Attributions, and Educational Outcomes in Nine Heterogeneous High Schools

    Kristan L. Glasgow;Sanford M. Dornbusch;Lisa Troyer;Laurence Steinberg

  • Online diabetes self-management program: a randomized study.

    Kate Lorig;Philip L. Ritter;Diana D. Laurent;Kathryn Plant

  • Hispanic chronic disease self-management: a randomized community-based outcome trial.

    Kate R. Lorig;Philip L. Ritter;Virginia M. Gonzalez

  • Physical Activity Outcomes of CHAMPS II A Physical Activity Promotion Program for Older Adults

    Anita L. Stewart;Carol J. Verboncoeur;Barbara Y. McLellan;Dawn E. Gillis

  • A disease-specific self-help program compared with a generalized chronic disease self-help program for arthritis patients

    Kate Lorig;Philip L. Ritter;Kathryn Plant

  • Evaluation of champs, a physical activity promotion program for older adults

    Anita L. Stewart;Kris M. Mills;Peter G. Sepsis;Abby C. King

Frequent Co-Authors

Kate Lorig
Kate Lorig Stanford University
Sanford M. Dornbusch
Sanford M. Dornbusch Stanford University
Anita L. Stewart
Anita L. Stewart University of California, San Francisco
Abby C. King
Abby C. King Stanford University
Darrell M. Wilson
Darrell M. Wilson Stanford University
Marcia G. Ory
Marcia G. Ory Texas A&M University
Laurence Steinberg
Laurence Steinberg Temple University
Helena C. Kraemer
Helena C. Kraemer Stanford University
William L. Haskell
William L. Haskell Stanford University
Albert Bandura
Albert Bandura Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in the Social Sciences and Humanities often starts with choosing the right degree. There are several accredited psyd programs online, which prepare students for advanced clinical roles in psychology and mental health services.

For those interested in family and marriage counseling, the best online mft programs offer flexible options to earn a degree while balancing work and personal life. These programs equip students for licensure and hands-on client work.

Affordability is often a key concern. Many students choose a master in psychology online to gain specialized knowledge without the high cost of traditional on-campus programs. These degrees can open doors to careers in education, counseling, research, and business.

For educational leaders or those aiming for top administrative roles, edd degrees can be pursued through accelerated online tracks. These fast-track options are ideal for professionals eager to advance without interrupting their careers.

Best Scientists Citing Philip L. Ritter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles