World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Best Female Scientists
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Best Female Scientists

D-Index
160
Citations
103369
World Ranking
100
National Ranking
58

Medicine

D-Index
160
Citations
104016
World Ranking
782
National Ranking
441

Helena C. Kraemer publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Helena C. Kraemer sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 570 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Helena C. Kraemer D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Helena C. Kraemer sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 160 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Best Female Scientists Award
  • 2003 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)
  • 1987 - Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA)

Overview

Helena C. Kraemer is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Their research work spans several fields, including statistics, probability and uncertainty, economics and econometrics, psychiatry and mental health, cellular and molecular neuroscience, and cognitive neuroscience. The primary topics covered in their publications include meta-analysis and systematic reviews, health systems, economic evaluations, quality of life, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, treatment of major depression, genetic neurodegenerative diseases, neurotransmitter receptor influence on behavior, and statistical methods in clinical trials.

Among recent papers authored or coauthored by Helena C. Kraemer are:

  • "Envisioning an improved research strategy for detecting moderators/mediators in intervention studies: A commentary on McClure et al." (2024), International Journal of Eating Disorders
  • "The future of psychopharmacology: a critical appraisal of ongoing phase 2/3 trials, and of some current trends aiming to de-risk trial programmes of novel agents" (2023), World Psychiatry
  • "Cognitive markers for efficacy of neurofeedback for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder - personalized medicine using computational psychiatry in a randomized clinical trial" (2023), Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
  • "Wrangling with p-values versus effect sizes to improve medical decision-making: A tutorial" (2020), International Journal of Eating Disorders

Frequent collaborative partners include Daniel S. Pine, Eric Neri, Nadja R. Ging-Jehli, Michelle E. Roley-Roberts, and Roger deBeus. The venues where Helena C. Kraemer publishes often include the International Journal of Eating Disorders, the Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, the International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, World Psychiatry, and the Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology.

Helena C. Kraemer has been recognized with awards such as membership in the National Academy of Medicine since 2003 and fellowship in the American Statistical Association since 1987.

Best Publications

  • EFFECT OF PSYCHOSOCIAL TREATMENT ON SURVIVAL OF PATIENTS WITH METASTATIC BREAST CANCER

    David Spiegel;David Spiegel;HelenaC. Kraemer;HelenaC. Kraemer;JoanR. Bloom;JoanR. Bloom;Ellen Gottheil;Ellen Gottheil

  • Mediators and Moderators of Treatment Effects in Randomized Clinical Trials

    Helena Chmura Kraemer;G. Terence Wilson;Christopher G. Fairburn;W. Stewart Agras

  • The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery, Part 1: Test Selection, Reliability, and Validity

    Keith H. Nuechterlein;Michael F. Green;Robert S. Kern;Lyle E. Baade

  • How Do Risk Factors Work Together? Mediators, Moderators, and Independent, Overlapping, and Proxy Risk Factors

    Helena Chmura Kraemer;Eric Stice;Alan Kazdin;David Offord

  • Coming to Terms With the Terms of Risk

    Helena Chmura Kraemer;Alan E. Kazdin;David R. Offord;Ronald C. Kessler

  • The role and interpretation of pilot studies in clinical research

    Andrew C. Leon;Lori L. Davis;Lori L. Davis;Helena C. Kraemer

  • Coming to Terms With Risk Factors for Eating Disorders: Application of Risk Terminology and Suggestions for a General Taxonomy

    Corinna Jacobi;Chris Hayward;Martina de Zwaan;Helena C. Kraemer

  • Untreated depression and hippocampal volume loss.

    Yvette I. Sheline;Mokhtar H. Gado;Helena C. Kraemer

  • ADHD Comorbidity Findings From the MTA Study: Comparing Comorbid Subgroups

    Peter S. Jensen;Stephen P. Hinshaw;Helena C. Kraemer;Nilantha Lenora

  • Clinical relevance of the primary findings of the MTA: success rates based on severity of ADHD and ODD symptoms at the end of treatment.

    James M. Swanson;Helena C. Kraemer;Stephen P. Hinshaw;L. Eugene Arnold

  • Diurnal Cortisol Rhythm as a Predictor of Breast Cancer Survival

    Sandra E. Sephton;Robert M. Sapolsky;Helena C. Kraemer;David Spiegel

  • DSM-5 Field Trials in the United States and Canada, Part II: Test-Retest Reliability of Selected Categorical Diagnoses

    Darrel A. Regier;William E. Narrow;Diana E. Clarke;Helena C. Kraemer

  • Comparison of the Atkins, Zone, Ornish, and LEARN Diets for Change in Weight and Related Risk Factors Among Overweight Premenopausal Women: The A TO Z Weight Loss Study: A Randomized Trial

    Christopher D. Gardner;Alexandre Kiazand;Sofiya Alhassan;Soowon Kim

  • Approaching a consensus cognitive battery for clinical trials in schizophrenia: The NIMH-MATRICS conference to select cognitive domains and test criteria

    Michael F. Green;Keith H. Nuechterlein;James M. Gold;M Deanna

  • A Multicenter Comparison of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy and Interpersonal Psychotherapy for Bulimia Nervosa

    W. Stewart Agras;B. Timothy Walsh;Christopher G. Fairburn;G. Terence Wilson

  • Size of treatment effects and their importance to clinical research and practice.

    Helena Chmura Kraemer;David J. Kupfer

  • Some conceptual and statistical issues in analysis of longitudinal psychiatric data. Application to the NIMH treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program dataset.

    Robert D. Gibbons;Donald R. Hedeker;Irene Elkin;Christine Waternaux

  • A Case-Management System for Coronary Risk Factor Modification after Acute Myocardial Infarction

    R F DeBusk;N H Miller;H R Superko;C A Dennis

  • A new approach to integrating data from multiple informants in psychiatric assessment and research: mixing and matching contexts and perspectives.

    Helena C. Kraemer;Jeffrey R. Measelle;Jennifer C. Ablow;Marilyn J. Essex

  • Pursuit of thinness and onset of eating disorder symptoms in a community sample of adolescent girls: A three‐year prospective analysis

    Joel D. Killen;C. Barr Taylor;Chris Hayward;Darrell M. Wilson

Frequent Co-Authors

Jerome A. Yesavage
Jerome A. Yesavage Stanford University
David Spiegel
David Spiegel Stanford University
W. Stewart Agras
W. Stewart Agras Stanford University
David J. Kupfer
David J. Kupfer University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
Stephen P. Hinshaw
Stephen P. Hinshaw University of California, Berkeley
Karen C. Wells
Karen C. Wells Duke University
C. Barr Taylor
C. Barr Taylor Stanford University
Jeffrey H. Newcorn
Jeffrey H. Newcorn Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Glen R. Elliott
Glen R. Elliott Children's Health Council
James M. Swanson
James M. Swanson University of California, Irvine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine goes beyond the traditional MD path. Today, many students are choosing online degree options to fast-track their entry into rewarding healthcare careers. Online DNP programs are a popular choice for nurses looking to earn the highest clinical nursing degree with flexibility and convenience.

For those aiming to enter the workforce quickly, a fast LPN program can be an excellent starting point. These programs are tailored for rapid training and licensure as a Licensed Practical Nurse, opening doors to hands-on patient care roles.

If you are interested in mental health, consider pursuing accelerated MSN psychiatric NP programs. These specialized degrees prepare graduates for advanced practice as psychiatric mental health nurse practitioners much faster than traditional in-person routes.

Those drawn to the administrative and management side of healthcare should look into an online master of health administration. These programs equip future leaders with essential skills for overseeing hospitals, clinics, and healthcare systems efficiently.

Best Scientists Citing Helena C. Kraemer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles