World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 121 250 158 429 51356
Medicine 126 2980 1649 450 53882

C. Barr Taylor publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by C. Barr Taylor between 1975 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. C. Barr Taylor published across 51 years, from 1975 to 2025, averaging 10.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2024. 28 of the 515 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1975 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2024. 1975: 1 publication 1976: 0 publications 1977: 3 publications 1978: 2 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 9 publications 1981: 4 publications 1982: 4 publications 1983: 11 publications 1984: 6 publications 1985: 15 publications 1986: 13 publications 1987: 14 publications 1988: 12 publications 1989: 8 publications 1990: 18 publications 1991: 10 publications 1992: 9 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 9 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 12 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 12 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 17 publications 2024: 20 publications 2025: 8 publications
1975 2025

515 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
C. Barr Taylor: publications per year, 1975 to 2025
Year Publications
1975 1
1976 0
1977 3
1978 2
1979 2
1980 9
1981 4
1982 4
1983 11
1984 6
1985 15
1986 13
1987 14
1988 12
1989 8
1990 18
1991 10
1992 9
1993 7
1994 9
1995 6
1996 9
1997 9
1998 7
1999 12
2000 9
2001 7
2002 11
2003 12
2004 9
2005 11
2006 10
2007 11
2008 13
2009 8
2010 5
2011 6
2012 13
2013 16
2014 16
2015 19
2016 14
2017 10
2018 9
2019 14
2020 14
2021 18
2022 15
2023 17
2024 20
2025 8
Total 515
Download as CSV

C. Barr Taylor publications per year - data summary

  • C. Barr Taylor, a Psychology scholar from Stanford University, has 515 publications recorded across 51 years, from 1975 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1975 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2024, with 20 publications.
  • The least productive year with any output is 1975, with 1 publication.
  • 1 of the 51 years in the span carries no publications at all (1976).
  • The rate of publication averages 10.1 papers per year over the whole span, or 10.3 per year counting only the 50 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 78 publications, 15% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1975-1991: 132 publications (7.8 per year); 1992-2008: 161 publications (9.5 per year); 2009-2025: 222 publications (13.1 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

C. Barr Taylor publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where C. Barr Taylor sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 421–430 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 429 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50 429
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

C. Barr Taylor publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • C. Barr Taylor, a Psychology scholar from Stanford University, records 429 publications - the 95th percentile of the discipline.
  • 95% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than C. Barr Taylor, and about 5% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and C. Barr Taylor ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

C. Barr Taylor D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where C. Barr Taylor sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 120–121 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 121 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16 121
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

C. Barr Taylor D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • C. Barr Taylor, a Psychology scholar from Stanford University, records 121 D-Index - the 98th percentile of the discipline.
  • 98% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than C. Barr Taylor, and about 2% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and C. Barr Taylor ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

C. Barr Taylor was affiliated with Stanford University in the United States and contributed extensively to the field of Psychology, particularly within Clinical Psychology. Their research spanned various subfields including Sociology and Political Science, Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

The main topics covered in their work included:

  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health

Their published papers appeared frequently in several academic venues, with a notable presence in:

  • International Journal of Eating Disorders
  • Eating Behaviors
  • UNC Libraries
  • BMC Psychiatry
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research

Among the most cited papers authored by C. Barr Taylor were:

  • "Digital technology can revolutionize mental health services delivery: The COVID-19 crisis as a catalyst for change" (2020), published in International Journal of Eating Disorders
  • "Current state of scientific evidence on Internet-based interventions for the treatment of depression, anxiety, eating disorders and substance abuse: an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses" (2020), published in European Journal of Public Health

Their frequent co-authors included:

  • Ellen E. Fitzsimmons-Craft
  • Denise E. Wilfley
  • Marie-Laure Firebaugh
  • Michelle G. Newman
  • Katherine N. Balantekin

C. Barr Taylor's body of work focused heavily on digital and behavioral interventions related to mental health and eating disorders, exploring the intersection of technology and psychological treatment. Their research network and publication record reflect collaborations with other notable figures in the domain of clinical and applied psychology, particularly those involved in digital cognitive behavior therapy and prevention of eating disorders.

Best Publications

  • Depression and Coronary Heart Disease Recommendations for Screening, Referral, and Treatment: A Science Advisory From the American Heart Association Prevention Committee of the Council on Cardiovascular Nursing, Council on Clinical Cardiology, Council on Epidemiology and Prevention, and Interdisciplinary Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research: Endorsed by the American Psychiatric Association

    Judith H. Lichtman;J. Thomas Bigger;James A. Blumenthal;Nancy Frasure-Smith

  • Effects of communitywide education on cardiovascular disease risk factors. The Stanford Five-City Project.

    JW Farquhar;Stephen P. Fortmann;JA Flora;CB Taylor

  • A Case-Management System for Coronary Risk Factor Modification after Acute Myocardial Infarction

    R F DeBusk;N H Miller;H R Superko;C A Dennis

  • Body-image and eating disturbances predict onset of depression among female adolescents: a longitudinal study

    Eric Stice;Chris Hayward;Rebecca P. Cameron;Joel D. Killen

  • Peer, parent, and media influences on the development of weight concerns and frequent dieting among preadolescent and adolescent girls and boys.

    Alison E. Field;Carlos A. Camargo;Carlos A. Camargo;C. Barr Taylor;Catherine S. Berkey;Catherine S. Berkey

  • Pursuit of thinness and onset of eating disorder symptoms in a community sample of adolescent girls: A three‐year prospective analysis

    Joel D. Killen;C. Barr Taylor;Chris Hayward;Darrell M. Wilson

  • Relation between dieting and weight change among preadolescents and adolescents.

    Alison E. Field;S. B. Austin;C. B. Taylor;Susan Malspeis

  • Weight concerns influence the development of eating disorders: A 4-year prospective study.

    J D Killen;C B Taylor;C Hayward;K F Haydel

  • Group- vs home-based exercise training in healthy older men and women. A community-based clinical trial.

    A C King;W L Haskell;C B Taylor;H C Kraemer

  • Predictors of adoption and maintenance of physical activity in a community sample

    James F. Sallis;William L. Haskell;Stephen P. Fortmann;Karen M. Vranizan

  • Naturalistic weight-reduction efforts prospectively predict growth in relative weight and onset of obesity among female adolescents.

    E Stice;R P Cameron;J D Killen;C Hayward

  • Effects of Antidepressant Medication on Morbidity and Mortality in Depressed Patients After Myocardial Infarction

    C. Barr Taylor;Marston E. Youngblood;Diane Catellier;Richard C. Veith

  • Evaluation of an internet support group for women with primary breast cancer.

    Andrew J. Winzelberg;Catherine Classen;Georg W. Alpers;Heidi Roberts

  • Perceived self-efficacy and pain control: opioid and nonopioid mechanisms.

    Albert Bandura;Ann O'Leary;C. Barr Taylor;Janel Gauthier

  • Perceived self-efficacy in coping with cognitive stressors and opioid activation.

    Albert Bandura;Delia Cioffi;C. Barr Taylor;Mary E. Brouillard

  • Catecholamine secretion as a function of perceived coping self-efficacy.

    A Bandura;C B Taylor;S L Williams;I N Mefford

  • Effects of early postmyocardial infarction exercise testing on self-perception and subsequent physical activity

    Craig K. Ewart;C.Barr Taylor;Linda B. Reese;Robert F. DeBusk

  • Does Television Viewing Increase Obesity and Reduce Physical Activity? Cross-sectional and Longitudinal Analyses Among Adolescent Girls

    Thomas N. Robinson;LD Hammer;JD Killen;HC Kraemer

  • Smoking cessation after acute myocardial infarction: effects of a nurse-managed intervention.

    C. Barr Taylor;Nancy Houston-Miller;Joel D. Killen;Robert F. DeBusk

  • Effects of antidepressant medication on morbidity and mortality in depressed patients after myocardial infarction.

    Unknown

  • Depression and Coronary Heart Disease: Recommendations for Screening, Referral, and Treatment

    Judith H. Lichtman;J. Thomas Bigger;James A. Blumenthal;Nancy Frasure-Smith

  • A Case-Management System for Coronary Risk Factor Modification After Acute Myocardial Infarction

    R F DeBusk;N H Miller;R Superko;C. A Dennis

Frequent Co-Authors

Denise E. Wilfley
Denise E. Wilfley Washington University in St. Louis
Mickey Trockel
Mickey Trockel Stanford University
Michelle G. Newman
Michelle G. Newman Pennsylvania State University
Ellen E. Fitzsimmons-Craft
Ellen E. Fitzsimmons-Craft Washington University in St. Louis
Joel D. Killen
Joel D. Killen Stanford University
Helena C. Kraemer
Helena C. Kraemer Stanford University
Walton T. Roth
Walton T. Roth Stanford University
Brian Oldenburg
Brian Oldenburg University of Melbourne
W. Stewart Agras
W. Stewart Agras Stanford University
Chris Hayward
Chris Hayward Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to various rewarding career pathways, especially in the field of mental health counseling. With the rise of flexible online degree programs, students can now study from anywhere and prepare for state-specific counselor requirements.

If your goal is to practice in California, you'll need to meet the Bakersfield mental health counselor certification requirements. Alternatively, those interested in the East Coast should learn about how to become a mental health counselor in Baltimore. Each state—and often each city—can have unique licensure steps, including supervised clinical hours and education credits.

For aspiring counselors in Idaho, understanding the Boise mental health counselor certification requirements is essential. Likewise, Boston offers its own guidelines, so be sure to read about mental health counselor requirements in Boston. Research your target location’s requirements before enrolling in any online psychology program, ensuring your chosen pathway aligns with your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing C. Barr Taylor

Recently Published Articles