World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
121
Citations
51356
World Ranking
250
National Ranking
158

Medicine

D-Index
126
Citations
53882
World Ranking
2980
National Ranking
1649

C. Barr Taylor publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where C. Barr Taylor sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 429 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

C. Barr Taylor D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where C. Barr Taylor sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 121 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

C. Barr Taylor was affiliated with Stanford University in the United States and contributed extensively to the field of Psychology, particularly within Clinical Psychology. Their research spanned various subfields including Sociology and Political Science, Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

The main topics covered in their work included:

  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health

Their published papers appeared frequently in several academic venues, with a notable presence in:

  • International Journal of Eating Disorders
  • Eating Behaviors
  • UNC Libraries
  • BMC Psychiatry
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research

Among the most cited papers authored by C. Barr Taylor were:

  • "Digital technology can revolutionize mental health services delivery: The COVID-19 crisis as a catalyst for change" (2020), published in International Journal of Eating Disorders
  • "Current state of scientific evidence on Internet-based interventions for the treatment of depression, anxiety, eating disorders and substance abuse: an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses" (2020), published in European Journal of Public Health

Their frequent co-authors included:

  • Ellen E. Fitzsimmons-Craft
  • Denise E. Wilfley
  • Marie-Laure Firebaugh
  • Michelle G. Newman
  • Katherine N. Balantekin

C. Barr Taylor's body of work focused heavily on digital and behavioral interventions related to mental health and eating disorders, exploring the intersection of technology and psychological treatment. Their research network and publication record reflect collaborations with other notable figures in the domain of clinical and applied psychology, particularly those involved in digital cognitive behavior therapy and prevention of eating disorders.

Best Publications

  • Depression and Coronary Heart Disease Recommendations for Screening, Referral, and Treatment: A Science Advisory From the American Heart Association Prevention Committee of the Council on Cardiovascular Nursing, Council on Clinical Cardiology, Council on Epidemiology and Prevention, and Interdisciplinary Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research: Endorsed by the American Psychiatric Association

    Judith H. Lichtman;J. Thomas Bigger;James A. Blumenthal;Nancy Frasure-Smith

  • Effects of communitywide education on cardiovascular disease risk factors. The Stanford Five-City Project.

    JW Farquhar;Stephen P. Fortmann;JA Flora;CB Taylor

  • A Case-Management System for Coronary Risk Factor Modification after Acute Myocardial Infarction

    R F DeBusk;N H Miller;H R Superko;C A Dennis

  • Body-image and eating disturbances predict onset of depression among female adolescents: a longitudinal study

    Eric Stice;Chris Hayward;Rebecca P. Cameron;Joel D. Killen

  • Peer, parent, and media influences on the development of weight concerns and frequent dieting among preadolescent and adolescent girls and boys.

    Alison E. Field;Carlos A. Camargo;Carlos A. Camargo;C. Barr Taylor;Catherine S. Berkey;Catherine S. Berkey

  • Pursuit of thinness and onset of eating disorder symptoms in a community sample of adolescent girls: A three‐year prospective analysis

    Joel D. Killen;C. Barr Taylor;Chris Hayward;Darrell M. Wilson

  • Relation between dieting and weight change among preadolescents and adolescents.

    Alison E. Field;S. B. Austin;C. B. Taylor;Susan Malspeis

  • Weight concerns influence the development of eating disorders: A 4-year prospective study.

    J D Killen;C B Taylor;C Hayward;K F Haydel

  • Group- vs home-based exercise training in healthy older men and women. A community-based clinical trial.

    A C King;W L Haskell;C B Taylor;H C Kraemer

  • Predictors of adoption and maintenance of physical activity in a community sample

    James F. Sallis;William L. Haskell;Stephen P. Fortmann;Karen M. Vranizan

  • Naturalistic weight-reduction efforts prospectively predict growth in relative weight and onset of obesity among female adolescents.

    E Stice;R P Cameron;J D Killen;C Hayward

  • Effects of Antidepressant Medication on Morbidity and Mortality in Depressed Patients After Myocardial Infarction

    C. Barr Taylor;Marston E. Youngblood;Diane Catellier;Richard C. Veith

  • Evaluation of an internet support group for women with primary breast cancer.

    Andrew J. Winzelberg;Catherine Classen;Georg W. Alpers;Heidi Roberts

  • Perceived self-efficacy and pain control: opioid and nonopioid mechanisms.

    Albert Bandura;Ann O'Leary;C. Barr Taylor;Janel Gauthier

  • Perceived self-efficacy in coping with cognitive stressors and opioid activation.

    Albert Bandura;Delia Cioffi;C. Barr Taylor;Mary E. Brouillard

  • Catecholamine secretion as a function of perceived coping self-efficacy.

    A Bandura;C B Taylor;S L Williams;I N Mefford

  • Effects of early postmyocardial infarction exercise testing on self-perception and subsequent physical activity

    Craig K. Ewart;C.Barr Taylor;Linda B. Reese;Robert F. DeBusk

  • Does Television Viewing Increase Obesity and Reduce Physical Activity? Cross-sectional and Longitudinal Analyses Among Adolescent Girls

    Thomas N. Robinson;LD Hammer;JD Killen;HC Kraemer

  • Smoking cessation after acute myocardial infarction: effects of a nurse-managed intervention.

    C. Barr Taylor;Nancy Houston-Miller;Joel D. Killen;Robert F. DeBusk

  • Effects of antidepressant medication on morbidity and mortality in depressed patients after myocardial infarction.

    Unknown

  • Depression and Coronary Heart Disease: Recommendations for Screening, Referral, and Treatment

    Judith H. Lichtman;J. Thomas Bigger;James A. Blumenthal;Nancy Frasure-Smith

  • A Case-Management System for Coronary Risk Factor Modification After Acute Myocardial Infarction

    R F DeBusk;N H Miller;R Superko;C. A Dennis

Frequent Co-Authors

Denise E. Wilfley
Denise E. Wilfley Washington University in St. Louis
Mickey Trockel
Mickey Trockel Stanford University
Michelle G. Newman
Michelle G. Newman Pennsylvania State University
Ellen E. Fitzsimmons-Craft
Ellen E. Fitzsimmons-Craft Washington University in St. Louis
Joel D. Killen
Joel D. Killen Stanford University
Helena C. Kraemer
Helena C. Kraemer Stanford University
Walton T. Roth
Walton T. Roth Stanford University
Brian Oldenburg
Brian Oldenburg University of Melbourne
W. Stewart Agras
W. Stewart Agras Stanford University
Chris Hayward
Chris Hayward Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to various rewarding career pathways, especially in the field of mental health counseling. With the rise of flexible online degree programs, students can now study from anywhere and prepare for state-specific counselor requirements.

If your goal is to practice in California, you'll need to meet the Bakersfield mental health counselor certification requirements. Alternatively, those interested in the East Coast should learn about how to become a mental health counselor in Baltimore. Each state—and often each city—can have unique licensure steps, including supervised clinical hours and education credits.

For aspiring counselors in Idaho, understanding the Boise mental health counselor certification requirements is essential. Likewise, Boston offers its own guidelines, so be sure to read about mental health counselor requirements in Boston. Research your target location’s requirements before enrolling in any online psychology program, ensuring your chosen pathway aligns with your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing C. Barr Taylor

Recently Published Articles