World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
96
Citations
33602
World Ranking
9673
National Ranking
941

Anne Rogers publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anne Rogers sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 441 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Anne Rogers D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anne Rogers sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 96 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Anne Rogers is affiliated with the University of Southampton in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Health Professions and Medicine, with notable contributions to General Health Professions, Health, Clinical Psychology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

Their work covers a range of topics including Mental Health and Patient Involvement, Community Health and Development, Health disparities and outcomes, Health Policy Implementation Science, Diabetes Management and Education, Family Caregiving in Mental Illness, and Chronic Disease Management Strategies.

Anne Rogers has published in multiple academic venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Health Expectations
  • BMC Psychiatry
  • Social Science & Medicine
  • BMC Health Services Research
  • JMIR Formative Research

Their recent papers illustrate a focus on social network interventions and mental health management, including these works:

  • "Optimising and profiling pre-implementation contexts to create and implement a public health network intervention for tackling loneliness," 2020, Implementation Science
  • "Negotiating support from relationships and resources: a longitudinal study examining the role of personal support networks in the management of severe and enduring mental health problems," 2020, BMC Psychiatry
  • "Assessing the effectiveness of social network interventions for adults with a diagnosis of mental health problems: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of impact," 2022, Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
  • "Mediating engagement in a social network intervention for people living with a long-term condition: A qualitative study of the role of facilitation," 2020, Health Expectations
  • "Findings from a pilot randomised trial of a social network self-management intervention in COPD," 2020, BMC Pulmonary Medicine

Anne Rogers regularly collaborates with several frequent co-authors, including:

  • Ivaylo Vassilev
  • Jaimie Ellis
  • Elizabeth James
  • Helen Brooks
  • Rebecca Band

Best Publications

  • Normalisation process theory: A framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions

    Elizabeth Murray;Shaun Treweek;Catherine Pope;Anne MacFarlane

  • Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory

    Carl R May;Frances Mair;Tracy Finch;Anne E. MacFarlane

  • Rationale and Standards for the Systematic Review of Qualitative Literature in Health Services Research

    Jennie Popay;Anne Rogers;Gareth Williams

  • A Sociology of Mental Health and Illness

    Anne Rogers;David Pilgrim

  • Understanding the implementation of complex interventions in health care: the normalization process model.

    Carl James May;Tracy Finch;Frances S. Mair;Luciana Ballini

  • 'I wouldn't want it on my CV or their records': medical students' experiences of help-seeking for mental health problems.

    Carolyn A Chew-Graham;Anne Rogers;Nuha Yassin

  • Rethinking the patient: using Burden of Treatment Theory to understand the changing dynamics of illness.

    Carl R. May;David T. Eton;Kasey Boehmer;Katie Gallacher

  • Effect of telehealth on use of secondary care and mortality: findings from the Whole System Demonstrator cluster randomised trial

    Adam Steventon;Martin Bardsley;John Billings;Jennifer Dixon

  • Achieving change in primary care—causes of the evidence to practice gap: systematic reviews of reviews

    Rosa Lau;Fiona Stevenson;Bie Nio Ong;Krysia Dziedzic

  • Exploring barriers to participation and adoption of telehealth and telecare within the Whole System Demonstrator trial: A qualitative study

    Caroline Sanders;Anne Rogers;Robert Bowen;Peter Bower

  • Attitudes toward antipsychotic medication: The impact of clinical variables and relationships with health professionals

    Jennifer C. Day;Richard P. Bentall;Chris Roberts;Fiona Randall

  • The effectiveness and cost effectiveness of a national lay-led self care support programme for patients with long-term conditions: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial

    Anne Kennedy;David Reeves;Peter Bower;Victoria Lee

  • Experiencing Psychiatry: Users’ Views of Services

    Anne Rogers;Ron Lacey;David Pilgrim

  • Cost effectiveness of telehealth for patients with long term conditions (Whole Systems Demonstrator telehealth questionnaire study): nested economic evaluation in a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial

    Catherine Henderson;Martin Knapp;Martin Knapp;José Luis Fernández;Jennifer Beecham

  • Support for self care for patients with chronic disease

    Anne Kennedy;Anne Rogers;Peter Bower

  • Mental Health Policy in Britain

    Anne Rogers;David Pilgrim

  • Self-management support interventions to reduce health care utilisation without compromising outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Maria Panagioti;Gerry Richardson;Nicola Small;Elizabeth Murray

  • The power of support from companion animals for people living with mental health problems: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of the evidence

    Helen Louise Brooks;Kelly Rushton;Karina Lovell;Penny Bee

  • Mental Health and Inequality

    Anne Rogers;PilgrimD Rogers Ae

  • The Impact of Clinical Variables and Relationships With Health Professionals

    Jennifer C. Day;Richard P. Bentall;Chris Roberts;Fiona Randall

Frequent Co-Authors

Anne Kennedy
Anne Kennedy University of Southampton
Peter Bower
Peter Bower University of Manchester
Catherine Pope
Catherine Pope University of Oxford
Caroline Sanders
Caroline Sanders University of Manchester
Lucy Yardley
Lucy Yardley University of Bristol
Tom Fahey
Tom Fahey Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
Glyn Lewis
Glyn Lewis University College London
Jon Nicholl
Jon Nicholl University of Sheffield
Linda Gask
Linda Gask University of Manchester
Martin Knapp
Martin Knapp London School of Economics and Political Science

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in healthcare but may not be ready for the full commitment of a traditional medical degree, there are several alternative pathways to consider. Many students choose to start with nursing or allied health degrees as a stepping stone into the medical field.

For those already working as registered nurses, there are affordable rn to bsn programs available online, which can help you advance your career with minimal disruption to your current job or lifestyle. If you want to reach the highest level in nursing, pursuing online phd programs nursing may open doors to leadership or academic roles.

If you hold a bachelor’s degree in a different field but want to enter advanced nursing directly, direct msn programs online can help you pivot into nursing faster. Some people also search for easy nursing programs to get into to begin their journey as quickly as possible.

Exploring these options can provide greater flexibility and a range of rewarding healthcare careers beyond the traditional path to becoming a physician.

Best Scientists Citing Anne Rogers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles