World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 96 9672 9078 938 894 441 33602

Anne Rogers publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Anne Rogers between 1976 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Anne Rogers published across 50 years, from 1976 to 2025, averaging 9.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 47 publications in 2017. 7 of the 496 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1976 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 47. Peak 47 publications in 2017. 1976: 1 publication 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 12 publications 1997: 12 publications 1998: 11 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 13 publications 2004: 15 publications 2005: 15 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 16 publications 2008: 18 publications 2009: 18 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 22 publications 2012: 19 publications 2013: 30 publications 2014: 42 publications 2015: 26 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 47 publications 2018: 19 publications 2019: 27 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 1 publication
1976 2025

496 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Anne Rogers: publications per year, 1976 to 2025
Year Publications
1976 1
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 4
1990 1
1991 1
1992 0
1993 7
1994 2
1995 0
1996 12
1997 12
1998 11
1999 7
2000 4
2001 10
2002 11
2003 13
2004 15
2005 15
2006 11
2007 16
2008 18
2009 18
2010 7
2011 22
2012 19
2013 30
2014 42
2015 26
2016 17
2017 47
2018 19
2019 27
2020 18
2021 9
2022 5
2023 12
2024 6
2025 1
Total 496
Download as CSV

Anne Rogers publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anne Rogers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 441–460 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 441 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771 441
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Anne Rogers D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anne Rogers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 96–97 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 96 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779 96
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Anne Rogers is affiliated with the University of Southampton in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Health Professions and Medicine, with notable contributions to General Health Professions, Health, Clinical Psychology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

Their work covers a range of topics including Mental Health and Patient Involvement, Community Health and Development, Health disparities and outcomes, Health Policy Implementation Science, Diabetes Management and Education, Family Caregiving in Mental Illness, and Chronic Disease Management Strategies.

Anne Rogers has published in multiple academic venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Health Expectations
  • BMC Psychiatry
  • Social Science & Medicine
  • BMC Health Services Research
  • JMIR Formative Research

Their recent papers illustrate a focus on social network interventions and mental health management, including these works:

  • "Optimising and profiling pre-implementation contexts to create and implement a public health network intervention for tackling loneliness," 2020, Implementation Science
  • "Negotiating support from relationships and resources: a longitudinal study examining the role of personal support networks in the management of severe and enduring mental health problems," 2020, BMC Psychiatry
  • "Assessing the effectiveness of social network interventions for adults with a diagnosis of mental health problems: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of impact," 2022, Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
  • "Mediating engagement in a social network intervention for people living with a long-term condition: A qualitative study of the role of facilitation," 2020, Health Expectations
  • "Findings from a pilot randomised trial of a social network self-management intervention in COPD," 2020, BMC Pulmonary Medicine

Anne Rogers regularly collaborates with several frequent co-authors, including:

  • Ivaylo Vassilev
  • Jaimie Ellis
  • Elizabeth James
  • Helen Brooks
  • Rebecca Band

Best Publications

  • Normalisation process theory: A framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions

    Elizabeth Murray;Shaun Treweek;Catherine Pope;Anne MacFarlane

  • Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory

    Carl R May;Frances Mair;Tracy Finch;Anne E. MacFarlane

  • Rationale and Standards for the Systematic Review of Qualitative Literature in Health Services Research

    Jennie Popay;Anne Rogers;Gareth Williams

  • A Sociology of Mental Health and Illness

    Anne Rogers;David Pilgrim

  • Understanding the implementation of complex interventions in health care: the normalization process model.

    Carl James May;Tracy Finch;Frances S. Mair;Luciana Ballini

  • 'I wouldn't want it on my CV or their records': medical students' experiences of help-seeking for mental health problems.

    Carolyn A Chew-Graham;Anne Rogers;Nuha Yassin

  • Rethinking the patient: using Burden of Treatment Theory to understand the changing dynamics of illness.

    Carl R. May;David T. Eton;Kasey Boehmer;Katie Gallacher

  • Effect of telehealth on use of secondary care and mortality: findings from the Whole System Demonstrator cluster randomised trial

    Adam Steventon;Martin Bardsley;John Billings;Jennifer Dixon

  • Achieving change in primary care—causes of the evidence to practice gap: systematic reviews of reviews

    Rosa Lau;Fiona Stevenson;Bie Nio Ong;Krysia Dziedzic

  • Exploring barriers to participation and adoption of telehealth and telecare within the Whole System Demonstrator trial: A qualitative study

    Caroline Sanders;Anne Rogers;Robert Bowen;Peter Bower

  • Attitudes toward antipsychotic medication: The impact of clinical variables and relationships with health professionals

    Jennifer C. Day;Richard P. Bentall;Chris Roberts;Fiona Randall

  • The effectiveness and cost effectiveness of a national lay-led self care support programme for patients with long-term conditions: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial

    Anne Kennedy;David Reeves;Peter Bower;Victoria Lee

  • Experiencing Psychiatry: Users’ Views of Services

    Anne Rogers;Ron Lacey;David Pilgrim

  • Cost effectiveness of telehealth for patients with long term conditions (Whole Systems Demonstrator telehealth questionnaire study): nested economic evaluation in a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial

    Catherine Henderson;Martin Knapp;Martin Knapp;José Luis Fernández;Jennifer Beecham

  • Support for self care for patients with chronic disease

    Anne Kennedy;Anne Rogers;Peter Bower

  • Mental Health Policy in Britain

    Anne Rogers;David Pilgrim

  • Self-management support interventions to reduce health care utilisation without compromising outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Maria Panagioti;Gerry Richardson;Nicola Small;Elizabeth Murray

  • The power of support from companion animals for people living with mental health problems: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of the evidence

    Helen Louise Brooks;Kelly Rushton;Karina Lovell;Penny Bee

  • Mental Health and Inequality

    Anne Rogers;PilgrimD Rogers Ae

  • The Impact of Clinical Variables and Relationships With Health Professionals

    Jennifer C. Day;Richard P. Bentall;Chris Roberts;Fiona Randall

Frequent Co-Authors

Anne Kennedy
Anne Kennedy University of Southampton
Peter Bower
Peter Bower University of Manchester
Catherine Pope
Catherine Pope University of Oxford
Caroline Sanders
Caroline Sanders University of Manchester
Lucy Yardley
Lucy Yardley University of Bristol
Tom Fahey
Tom Fahey Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
Glyn Lewis
Glyn Lewis University College London
Jon Nicholl
Jon Nicholl University of Sheffield
Linda Gask
Linda Gask University of Manchester
Martin Knapp
Martin Knapp London School of Economics and Political Science

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in healthcare but may not be ready for the full commitment of a traditional medical degree, there are several alternative pathways to consider. Many students choose to start with nursing or allied health degrees as a stepping stone into the medical field.

For those already working as registered nurses, there are affordable rn to bsn programs available online, which can help you advance your career with minimal disruption to your current job or lifestyle. If you want to reach the highest level in nursing, pursuing online phd programs nursing may open doors to leadership or academic roles.

If you hold a bachelor’s degree in a different field but want to enter advanced nursing directly, direct msn programs online can help you pivot into nursing faster. Some people also search for easy nursing programs to get into to begin their journey as quickly as possible.

Exploring these options can provide greater flexibility and a range of rewarding healthcare careers beyond the traditional path to becoming a physician.

Best Scientists Citing Anne Rogers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles