World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Business and Management
USA
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 88 97 90 46 43 207 65242

Jan-Benedict E. M. Steenkamp publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jan-Benedict E. M. Steenkamp between 1985 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jan-Benedict E. M. Steenkamp published across 41 years, from 1985 to 2025, averaging 5.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2013. 5 of the 236 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2013. 1985: 2 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 6 publications 1989: 7 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 10 publications 1997: 12 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 10 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 4 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 13 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 3 publications 2025: 2 publications
1985 2025

236 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jan-Benedict E. M. Steenkamp: publications per year, 1985 to 2025
Year Publications
1985 2
1986 3
1987 3
1988 6
1989 7
1990 3
1991 5
1992 3
1993 2
1994 5
1995 4
1996 10
1997 12
1998 7
1999 10
2000 5
2001 7
2002 7
2003 7
2004 2
2005 11
2006 9
2007 13
2008 8
2009 8
2010 5
2011 1
2012 4
2013 14
2014 2
2015 5
2016 1
2017 13
2018 6
2019 8
2020 3
2021 6
2022 3
2023 1
2024 3
2025 2
Total 236
Download as CSV

Jan-Benedict E. M. Steenkamp publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan-Benedict E. M. Steenkamp sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 205–209 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 207 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48 207
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Jan-Benedict E. M. Steenkamp D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan-Benedict E. M. Steenkamp sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 88 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6 88
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Business and Management in United States Leader Award
  • 2024 - Research.com Business and Management in United States Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Business and Management in United States Leader Award
  • 2021 - AMA-Irwin-McGraw-Hill Distinguished Marketing Educator Award, American Marketing Association
  • 2021 - Fellow of the American Marketing Association
  • 2005 - Dr Hendrik Muller Prize, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • Fellow of the European Marketing Academy (EMAC)
  • Fellow of the European Marketing Academy (EMAC)
  • Fellow of the European Marketing Academy (EMAC)
  • Fellow of the European Marketing Academy (EMAC)
  • Fellow of the European Marketing Academy (EMAC)

Overview

Jan-Benedict E. M. Steenkamp is affiliated with the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on fields related to Business, Management, and Accounting, with a substantial concentration on Marketing.

The scientist's work spans multiple subfields, including Marketing, Sociology and Political Science, Management Science and Operations Research, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, and Food Science.

The main topics covered in their publications include:

  • Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
  • Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
  • Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
  • Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
  • Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
  • Technology Adoption and User Behaviour

Recent papers authored by Jan-Benedict E. M. Steenkamp are:

  • Branding in a Hyperconnected World: Refocusing Theories and Rethinking Boundaries, 2020, Journal of Marketing
  • Global Brand Building and Management in the Digital Age, 2020, Journal of International Marketing
  • An updated paradigm for evaluating measurement invariance incorporating common method variance and its assessment, 2020, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
  • Unrestricted factor analysis: A powerful alternative to confirmatory factor analysis, 2022, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
  • Cross-National Differences in Market Response: Line-Length, Price, and Distribution Elasticities in 14 Indo-Pacific Rim Economies, 2021, Journal of Marketing Research

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Steenkamp include:

  • Bernadette J. van Ewijk
  • Els Gijsbrechts
  • Rajeev Batra
  • Alberto Maydeu-Olivares
  • Dana L. Alden

The scientist has published in several key marketing and management journals, with recurrent appearances in:

  • Journal of Marketing
  • Journal of International Marketing
  • Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
  • International Journal of Research in Marketing
  • Journal of Marketing Research

Jan-Benedict E. M. Steenkamp has received multiple awards, including the AMA-Irwin-McGraw-Hill Distinguished Marketing Educator Award from the American Marketing Association in 2021 and was named a Fellow of the American Marketing Association in the same year. Earlier distinctions include the Dr Hendrik Muller Prize from the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences in 2005 and Fellowship in the European Marketing Academy (EMAC).

Best Publications

  • Assessing Measurement Invariance in Cross-National Consumer Research

    Jan Benedict E.M. Steenkamp;Hans Baumgartner

  • The use of LISREL in validating marketing constructs.

    Jan-Benedict E.M. Steenkamp;Hans C.M. van Trijp

  • The Effects of Perceived Interdependence on Dealer Attitudes

    Nirmalya Kumar;Lisa K. Scheer;Jan-Benedict E. M. Steenkamp

  • A review and meta-analysis of country-of-origin research

    Peeter W.J. Verlegh;Jan-Benedict E.M. Steenkamp;Jan-Benedict E.M. Steenkamp

  • The Effects of Supplier Fairness On Vulnerable Resellers

    Nirmalya Kumar;Lisa K. Scheer;Jan-Benedict E.M. Steenkamp

  • The effects of trust and interdependence on relationship commitment: A trans-Atlantic study

    Inge Geyskens;Jan-Benedict E.M. Steenkamp;Jan-Benedict E.M. Steenkamp;Lisa K. Scheer;Nirmalya Kumar

  • A meta-analysis of satisfaction in marketing channel relationships

    Inge Geyskens;Jan-Benedict E.M. Steenkamp;Nirmalya Kumar

  • Effects of Brand Local and Nonlocal Origin on Consumer Attitudes in Developing Countries

    Rajeev Batra;Venkatram Ramaswamy;Dana L. Alden;Jan-Benedict E.M. Steenkamp

  • A CROSS -NATIONAL INVESTIGATION INTO THE INDIVIDUAL AND NATIONAL CULTURAL ANTECEDENTS OF CONSUMER INNOVATIVENESS

    J.E.B.M. Steenkamp;J.E.B.M. Steenkamp;F. ter Hofstede;M. Wedel

  • How perceived brand globalness creates brand value

    Jan-Benedict E M Steenkamp;Rajeev Batra;Dana L Alden

  • Brand Positioning Through Advertising in Asia, North America, and Europe : The Role of Global Consumer Culture

    Dana L. Alden;Jan-Benedict E.M. Steenkamp;Rajeev Batra

  • Response Styles in Marketing Research: A Cross-National Investigation

    Hans Baumgartner;Jan Benedict E.M. Steenkamp

  • Generalizations about trust in marketing channel relationships using meta-analysis

    Inge Geyskens;Jan-Benedict E.M Steenkamp;Jan-Benedict E.M Steenkamp;Nirmalya Kumar

  • A Meta-Analysis of Satisfaction in Marketing Channel Relationships

    Unknown

  • Emotions in consumer behavior: A hierarchical approach

    Fleur J.M. Laros;Jan-Benedict E.M. Steenkamp

  • Make, Buy, or Ally: A Transaction Cost Theory Meta-Analysis

    Inge Geyskens;Jan-Benedict E. M. Steenkamp;Nirmalya Kumar

  • The role of national culture in international marketing research

    Jan‐Benedict E. M. Steenkamp

  • Marketing renaissance: How research in emerging markets advances marketing science and practice

    Steven Michael Burgess;Jan-Benedict E.M. Steenkamp

  • The Role of Optimum Stimulation Level in Exploratory Consumer Behavior

    Jan-Benedict E. M. Steenkamp;Hans Baumgartner

  • Conceptual model of the quality perception process

    Jan-Benedict E.M. Steenkamp

  • Exploratory consumer buying behavior: conceptualization and measurement.

    Hans Baumgartner;Jan Benedict E.M. Steenkamp;Jan Benedict E.M. Steenkamp

Frequent Co-Authors

Marnik G. Dekimpe
Marnik G. Dekimpe Tilburg University
Inge Geyskens
Inge Geyskens Tilburg University
Hans Baumgartner
Hans Baumgartner Pennsylvania State University
Nirmalya Kumar
Nirmalya Kumar London Business School
Dominique M. Hanssens
Dominique M. Hanssens University of California, Los Angeles
Michel Wedel
Michel Wedel University of Maryland, College Park
Rajeev Batra
Rajeev Batra University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Dana L. Alden
Dana L. Alden University of Hawaii at Manoa
Harald J. van Heerde
Harald J. van Heerde University of New South Wales
Hans C.M. van Trijp
Hans C.M. van Trijp Wageningen University & Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing to study Business and Management in the USA opens up a variety of online learning options and career paths. Many students are now looking for the fastest bachelor degree programs, which can save both time and money while accelerating entry into the workforce.

It’s crucial to select an accredited online business degree to ensure your qualifications are recognized by employers. Accreditation not only impacts education quality, but also affects financial aid eligibility and future educational opportunities.

For those interested in the growing healthcare sector, a health administration degree can pave the way for rewarding leadership roles in hospitals, clinics, or public health agencies. If you’re seeking an advanced credential, there are options for the cheapest online mha programs that combine affordability with career advancement.

Whether your goal is to complete your degree quickly, minimize costs, or pursue specialized tracks, exploring these online pathways can lead to flexible and lucrative business careers.

Best Scientists Citing Jan-Benedict E. M. Steenkamp

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles