World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
47
Citations
8924
World Ranking
6490
National Ranking
389

Sanja Petrovic publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sanja Petrovic sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 135 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Sanja Petrovic D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sanja Petrovic sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sanja Petrovic is affiliated with the University of Nottingham in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Engineering and Business, Management, and Accounting, with a focus on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Emergency Medical Services, Sociology and Political Science, and Control and Systems Engineering as subfields.

The main topics covered in their research include Facility Location and Emergency Management, Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization, Disaster Response and Management, Disaster Management and Resilience, Optimization and Mathematical Programming, Vehicle Routing Optimization Methods, and Transportation and Mobility Innovations.

Sanja Petrovic has contributed to academic literature through various recent papers, including:

  • "Operational Research: methods and applications," 2023, Journal of the Operational Research Society
  • "A review of applications of operational research in healthcare coordination in disaster management," 2021, European Journal of Operational Research
  • "Operational Research: Methods and Applications," 2023, ePrints Soton (University of Southampton)
  • "Data-Driven Prioritization of Activities in Preventive Maintenance Planning," 2023, SSRN Electronic Journal
  • "Uso de mineração de dados para priorização no planejamento de manutenção preventiva," 2025, Proceeding Series of the Brazilian Society of Computational and Applied Mathematics

The venues where Sanja Petrovic frequently publishes include:

  • Journal of the Operational Research Society
  • European Journal of Operational Research
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Proceeding Series of the Brazilian Society of Computational and Applied Mathematics

Sanja Petrovic has collaborated frequently with a group of co-authors, including:

  • Fotios Petropoulos
  • Gilbert Laporte
  • Emel Aktaş
  • Sibel A. Alumur
  • Claudia Archetti

Best Publications

  • A survey of dynamic scheduling in manufacturing systems

    Djamila Ouelhadj;Sanja Petrovic

  • A Graph-Based Hyper-Heuristic for Educational Timetabling Problems

    Edmund K. Burke;Barry McCollum;Amnon Meisels;Sanja Petrovic

  • Recent research directions in automated timetabling

    Edmund Kieran Burke;Sanja Petrovic

  • An investigation into minimising total energy consumption and total weighted tardiness in job shops

    Ying Liu;Haibo Dong;Niels Lohse;Sanja Petrovic

  • Case-based heuristic selection for timetabling problems

    Edmund K. Burke;Sanja Petrovic;Rong Qu

  • A time-predefined local search approach to exam timetabling problems

    Edmund Burke;Yuri Bykov;James Newall;Sanja Petrovic

  • Hybrid variable neighbourhood approaches to university exam timetabling

    Edmund Burke;Adam J Eckersley;Barry McCollum;Sanja Petrovic

  • HyFlex: a benchmark framework for cross-domain heuristic search

    Gabriela Ochoa;Matthew Hyde;Tim Curtois;Jose A. Vazquez-Rodriguez

  • A multicriteria approach to examination timetabling

    Edmund Burke;Yuri Bykov;Sanja Petrovic

  • Selecting and weighting features using a genetic algorithm in a case-based reasoning approach to personnel rostering

    Gareth R. Beddoe;Sanja Petrovic

  • Variable neighborhood search for nurse rostering problems

    Edmund Burke;Patrick De Causmaecker;Sanja Petrovic;Greet Vanden Berghe

  • A multi-agent architecture for dynamic scheduling of steel hot rolling

    Peter I. Cowling;Djamila Ouelhadj;Sanja Petrovic

  • A multi-objective genetic algorithm for optimisation of energy consumption and shop floor production performance

    Ying Liu;Haibo Dong;Niels Lohse;Sanja Petrovic

  • An Introduction to Multiobjective Metaheuristics for Scheduling and Timetabling

    J. Dario Landa Silva;Edmund K. Burke;Sanja Petrovic

  • METAHEURISTICS FOR HANDLING TIME INTERVAL COVERAGE CONSTRAINTS IN NURSE SCHEDULING

    Edmund K. Burke;Patrick De Causmaecker;Sanja Petrovic;Greet Vanden Berghe

  • Dynamic scheduling of steel casting and milling using multi-agents

    Peter I. Cowling;D. Ouelhadj;S. Petrovic

  • Structured cases in case-based reasoning—re-using and adapting cases for time-tabling problems

    E. K. Burke;B. MacCarthy;S. Petrovic;R. Qu

  • A time-predefined approach to course timetabling

    Edmund Burke;Yuri Bykov;James Newall;Sanja Petrovic

  • A hybrid metaheuristic case-based reasoning system for nurse rostering

    Gareth Beddoe;Sanja Petrovic;Jingpeng Li

  • A novel similarity measure for heuristic selection in examination timetabling

    Yong Yang;Sanja Petrovic

  • Discrete Optimization A graph-based hyper-heuristic for educational timetabling problems

    Edmund K. Burke;Barry McCollum;Amnon Meisels;Sanja Petrovic

Frequent Co-Authors

Edmund K. Burke
Edmund K. Burke Bangor University
Rong Qu
Rong Qu University of Nottingham
Bart L. MacCarthy
Bart L. MacCarthy University of Nottingham
Graham Kendall
Graham Kendall MILA University
Peter I. Cowling
Peter I. Cowling Queen Mary University of London
Michel Gendreau
Michel Gendreau Polytechnique Montréal
Gabriela Ochoa
Gabriela Ochoa University of Stirling
Nishikant Mishra
Nishikant Mishra University of Hull
Moshe Dror
Moshe Dror University of Arizona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Computer Science starts with choosing the best educational path to meet your goals, timeline, and budget. Many students consider flexible options like online associates, which offer a fast entry to the workforce or a foundation for further study. These programs are ideal if you want a cost-effective start in technology.

For those seeking advanced qualifications, the quickest cheapest masters degree options provide a chance to boost your expertise without long-term commitments or significant expenses.

Choosing from the most valuable masters degrees will enhance your job prospects in an ever-evolving tech job market. Selecting in-demand programs ensures your skills remain competitive and sought-after by top employers.

Tuition costs can add up, so it’s important to research affordable online degree programs that offer recognized credentials without breaking the bank. This makes a quality education accessible, no matter your circumstances.

Best Scientists Citing Sanja Petrovic

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles