World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
40
Citations
8002
World Ranking
9196
National Ranking
566

Gabriela Ochoa publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gabriela Ochoa sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 202 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Gabriela Ochoa D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gabriela Ochoa sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gabriela Ochoa is affiliated with the University of Stirling in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on areas within computer science, particularly in the domains of artificial intelligence and computational theory and mathematics.

The main fields of study for Gabriela Ochoa include:

  • Computer Science

Within this broad field, their work spans several subfields such as:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Genetics
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
  • Molecular Biology

The scientist's main research topics include:

  • Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
  • Evolutionary Algorithms and Applications
  • Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
  • Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Data Visualization and Analytics
  • Machine Learning and Data Classification

Gabriela Ochoa's publication record includes contributions to journals and conferences focused on evolutionary computation and optimization. Some of the recent papers authored or coauthored by them are:

  • Search trajectory networks: A tool for analysing and visualising the behaviour of metaheuristics, 2021, Applied Soft Computing
  • Fitness landscape analysis of convolutional neural network architectures for image classification, 2022, Information Sciences
  • A comparative analysis of two matheuristics by means of merged local optima networks, 2020, European Journal of Operational Research
  • Management responses in Belize and Honduras, as stony coral tissue loss disease expands its prevalence in the Mesoamerican reef, 2022, Frontiers in Marine Science
  • Understanding parameter spaces using local optima networks, 2021, Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion

The frequent coauthors collaborating with Gabriela Ochoa include:

  • Yuri Lavinas
  • Francisco Chicano
  • Christian Blum
  • Claus Aranha
  • Sebástien Vérel

Gabriela Ochoa has published extensively in venues such as:

  • Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion
  • ACM SIGEVOlution
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

The scientist's book publications include contributions to volumes published by Springer Science+Business Media, specifically:

  • Parallel Problem Solving from Nature - PPSN XVII (2022)
  • Parallel Problem Solving from Nature - PPSN XVII (2022)

Best Publications

  • Hyper-heuristics: a survey of the state of the art

    Edmund K. Burke;Michel Gendreau;Matthew R. Hyde;Graham Kendall

  • A Classification of Hyper-heuristic Approaches

    Edmund K. Burke;Matthew Hyde;Graham Kendall;Gabriela Ochoa

  • Google Trends in Infodemiology and Infoveillance: Methodology Framework.

    Amaryllis Mavragani;Gabriela Ochoa

  • Assessing the Methods, Tools, and Statistical Approaches in Google Trends Research: Systematic Review

    Amaryllis Mavragani;Gabriela Ochoa;Konstantinos P Tsagarakis

  • Exploring Hyper-heuristic Methodologies with Genetic Programming

    Edmund K. Burke;Mathew R. Hyde;Graham Kendall;Gabriela Ochoa

  • HyFlex: a benchmark framework for cross-domain heuristic search

    Gabriela Ochoa;Matthew Hyde;Tim Curtois;Jose A. Vazquez-Rodriguez

  • A study of NK landscapes' basins and local optima networks

    Gabriela Ochoa;Marco Tomassini;Sebástien Vérel;Christian Darabos

  • A Classification of Hyper-Heuristic Approaches: Revisited

    Edmund K. Burke;Matthew R. Hyde;Graham Kendall;Gabriela Ochoa

  • A Reinforcement Learning-Great-Deluge Hyper-Heuristic for Examination Timetabling

    Ender Özcan;Mustafa Misir;Gabriela Ochoa;Edmund K. Burke

  • Contrasting meta-learning and hyper-heuristic research: the role of evolutionary algorithms

    Gisele L. Pappa;Gabriela Ochoa;Matthew R. Hyde;Alex A. Freitas

  • Effective learning hyper-heuristics for the course timetabling problem

    Jorge A. Soria-Alcaraz;Gabriela Ochoa;Jerry Swan;Martin Carpio

  • Local Optima Networks of NK Landscapes With Neutrality

    S. Verel;G. Ochoa;M. Tomassini

  • On Genetic Algorithms and Lindenmayer Systems

    Gabriela Ochoa

  • Local Optima Networks: A New Model of Combinatorial Fitness Landscapes

    Gabriela Ochoa;Sébastien Verel;Fabio Daolio;Marco Tomassini

  • Iterated local search vs. hyper-heuristics: Towards general-purpose search algorithms

    Edmund Burke;Tim Curtois;Matthew Hyde;Graham Kendall

  • A unified hyper-heuristic framework for solving bin packing problems

    Eunice López-Camacho;Hugo Terashima-Marin;Peter Ross;Gabriela Ochoa

  • An Integer Linear Programming approach to the single and bi-objective Next Release Problem

    Nadarajen Veerapen;Gabriela Ochoa;Mark Harman;Edmund K. Burke

  • Search trajectory networks: A tool for analysing and visualising the behaviour of metaheuristics

    Gabriela Ochoa;Katherine M Malan;Christian Blum

  • Analyzing the landscape of a graph based hyper-heuristic for timetabling problems

    Gabriela Ochoa;Rong Qu;Edmund K. Burke

  • Error thresholds in genetic algorithms

    Gabriela Ochoa

  • The Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference

    Gabriela Ochoa;Edmund Burke

  • HyFlex: A Benchmark Framework for Cross-domain Heuristic Search

    Edmund Burke;Tim Curtois;Matthew Hyde;Gabriela Ochoa

Frequent Co-Authors

Marco Tomassini
Marco Tomassini University of Lausanne
Edmund K. Burke
Edmund K. Burke Bangor University
Graham Kendall
Graham Kendall MILA University
Natalio Krasnogor
Natalio Krasnogor Newcastle University
Ender Özcan
Ender Özcan University of Nottingham
Christian Blum
Christian Blum Spanish National Research Council
Michel Gendreau
Michel Gendreau Polytechnique Montréal
L. Darrell Whitley
L. Darrell Whitley Colorado State University
Marc Schoenauer
Marc Schoenauer French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Inman Harvey
Inman Harvey University of Sussex

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degree options can offer flexibility and affordability, especially for those interested in advancing their careers in computer science and related fields. For those aiming for the highest academic credentials, most affordable online doctoral programs allow students to earn advanced degrees with less financial burden, opening doors to leadership and academic positions.

If you're seeking a quicker path to educational advancement, options like 1 year edd programs online offer an accelerated way to earn an education doctorate. This is ideal for professionals looking to move into executive roles in education or training within tech industries.

Starting your higher education journey? Earning an online associates degree is a fast, accessible stepping stone to a bachelor’s or entry-level tech job.

Career pathways in computer science often intersect with business. The best online business management degree programs can equip you with essential leadership and managerial skills that complement technical knowledge.

Best Scientists Citing Gabriela Ochoa

Trending Scientists