World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Law

D-Index
33
Citations
9303
World Ranking
192
National Ranking
145

Political Science

D-Index
34
Citations
9649
World Ranking
805
National Ranking
429

Overview

Andrew D. Martin is affiliated with Washington University in St. Louis in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines within the social sciences with a focus on law, artificial intelligence, economics, and political science. The scientist's work integrates methodologies from Bayesian modeling and causal inference with applied topics in judicial and constitutional studies.

The main fields of study for Andrew D. Martin include:

  • Social Sciences

Subfields of particular interest are:

  • Law
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Aerospace Engineering

Their primary research topics reflect a blend of methodological and applied areas:

  • Judicial and Constitutional Studies
  • Legal and Constitutional Studies
  • Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
  • Target Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
  • Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
  • Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
  • Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units

Andrew D. Martin has contributed to multiple academic venues. The frequent publication venues include:

  • Sensors
  • British Journal of Anaesthesia
  • BMC Medical Research Methodology
  • Journal of Law and Courts
  • Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Andrew D. Martin cover diverse areas from medical research to sensor networks and law:

  • Recovery after critical illness in COVID-19 ICU survivors, 2021, British Journal of Anaesthesia
  • Comparison of Enhanced Noise Model Performance Based on Analysis of Civilian GPS Data, 2020, Sensors
  • Modeling COVID-19 disease processes by remote elicitation of causal Bayesian networks from medical experts, 2023, BMC Medical Research Methodology
  • Improving Real-Time Position Estimation Using Correlated Noise Models, 2020, Sensors
  • CompLaw: A Coding Protocol and Database for the Comparative Study of Judicial Review, 2024, Journal of Law and Courts

Collaboration is a notable aspect of their work. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Lee Epstein
  • Andy W. R. Soundy
  • Bradley J. Panckhurst
  • Phillip Brown
  • T. C. A. Molteno

Best Publications

  • Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953-1999

    Andrew D. Martin;Kevin M. Quinn

  • MCMCpack: Markov chain Monte Carlo in R

    Andrew D. Martin;Kevin M. Quinn;Jong Hee Park

  • Untangling the Causal Effects of Sex on Judging

    Christina L. Boyd;Lee Epstein;Andrew D. Martin

  • The Judicial Common Space

    Lee Epstein;Andrew D. Martin;Andrew D. Martin;Jeffrey A. Segal;Chad Westerland

  • The Supreme Court Forecasting Project: Legal and Political Science Approaches to Predicting Supreme Court Decisionmaking

    Theodore W. Ruger;Pauline T. Kim;Andrew D. Martin;Kevin M. Quinn

  • Ideological Drift Among Supreme Court Justices: Who, When, and How Important?

    Lee Epstein;Andrew D. Martin;Kevin M. Quinn;Jeffrey A. Segal

  • The Supreme Court as A Strategic National Policymaker

    Lee Epstein;Jack Knight;Andrew D. Martin

  • Socioeconomic status and health: Do gradients differ within childhood and adolescence?

    Edith Chen;Andrew D. Martin;Karen A. Matthews

  • The Median Justice on the United States Supreme Court

    Andrew D. Martin;Kevin M. Quinn;Lee Epstein

  • Understanding health disparities: The role of race and socioeconomic status in children's health

    Edith Chen;Andrew D. Martin;Karen A. Matthews

  • Ideological Divergence and Public Support for the Supreme Court

    Robert H. Durr;Andrew D. Martin;Christina Wolbrecht

  • Voter Choice in Multi-Party Democracies: A Test of Competing Theories and Models

    Kevin M. Quinn;Andrew D. Martin;Andrew B. Whitford

  • Does Public Opinion Influence the Supreme Court?: Probably Yes (But We’re Not Sure Why)

    Lee Epstein;Andrew D. Martin

  • Multiparty electoral competition in the Netherlands and Germany: A model based on multinomial probit

    Norman J. Schofield;Andrew D. Martin;Kevin M. Quinn;Andrew B. Whitford

  • The Public’s Conditional Response to Supreme Court Decisions

    Timothy R. Johnson;Andrew D. Martin

  • Trajectories of socioeconomic status across children's lifetime predict health

    Edith Chen;Andrew D. Martin;Karen A. Matthews

  • Competing Approaches to Predicting Supreme Court Decision Making

    Andrew D. Martin;Kevin M. Quinn;Theodore W. Ruger;Pauline T. Kim

  • An Introduction to Empirical Legal Research

    Lee Epstein;Andrew D. Martin

  • Congressional Decision Making and the Separation of Powers

    Andrew D. Martin

  • Automating tactile graphics translation

    Richard E. Ladner;Melody Y. Ivory;Rajesh Rao;Sheryl Burgstahler

  • Critical Elections and Political Realignments in the USA: 1860–2000:

    Norman Schofield;Gary Miller;Andrew Martin

  • Who Controls the Content of Supreme Court Opinions

    Clifford J. Carrubba;Barry Friedman;Andrew D. Martin;Georg Vanberg

  • Assessing Preference Change on the US Supreme Court

    Andrew D. Martin;Kevin M. Quinn

Frequent Co-Authors

Lee Epstein
Lee Epstein Washington University in St. Louis
Jeffrey A. Segal
Jeffrey A. Segal Stony Brook University
Edith Chen
Edith Chen Northwestern University
Karen A. Matthews
Karen A. Matthews University of Pittsburgh
Claire E. Wainwright
Claire E. Wainwright University of Queensland
Peter Richmond
Peter Richmond University of Western Australia
Norman Schofield
Norman Schofield Washington University in St. Louis
Andrew B. Whitford
Andrew B. Whitford University of Georgia
Keith Grimwood
Keith Grimwood Griffith University
Georg Vanberg
Georg Vanberg Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Law in the USA opens up diverse career opportunities, and many students consider advancing their expertise and skills through additional online degrees. For those eyeing entrepreneurial or business law, earning a best online mba in entrepreneurship can provide valuable knowledge in starting and managing businesses, which is particularly useful if you plan to work with startups or as a business consultant.

Some law graduates want to move quickly into management roles. Choosing online mba programs no gmat low-cost can be an affordable and flexible way to gain advanced business credentials without standardized testing hurdles.

Another growing field is project management, where understanding legal and regulatory frameworks is a plus. Completing a project management degree online accredited can help future legal professionals lead complex projects or oversee compliance within organizations.

Those interested in property law or real estate transactions might consider a real estate degree. This specialization can enhance your marketability in law firms or real estate companies. Online degree options make it easier for law students and professionals to balance work, study, and career advancement.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew D. Martin

Trending Scientists