What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Statistics
- World War II
- Politics
His primary areas of study are Voting, Political economy, Politics, NOMINATE and Democracy.
Much of his study explores Voting relationship to Econometrics.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Public administration, Polarization, Economic inequality and Politics of the United States in addition to Political economy.
His research integrates issues of Legislature, Development economics, Public relations and Power in his study of Politics.
His study in NOMINATE is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Probabilistic logic, Logistic regression, Roll call and Spatial reference system.
His Group voting ticket research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Economic history and Voting behavior.
His most cited work include:
- Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting (2096 citations)
- Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches (1330 citations)
- A Spatial Model for Legislative Roll Call Analysis (656 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Voting, Politics, Political economy, Ideology and Polarization are his primary areas of study.
His Voting research incorporates themes from Econometrics, NOMINATE, Legislator and Law and economics.
The concepts of his Politics study are interwoven with issues in Power, Legislature, Dimension and Public administration.
His Political economy study deals with Democracy intersecting with Elite.
His Ideology research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Social psychology, Perception and Voting behavior.
His Polarization research includes elements of Development economics and Politics of the United States.
He most often published in these fields:
- Voting (35.97%)
- Politics (24.46%)
- Political economy (23.02%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2011-2020)?
- Political economy (23.02%)
- Politics (24.46%)
- Ideology (19.42%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Keith T. Poole mainly focuses on Political economy, Politics, Ideology, Polarization and Bayesian probability.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Macroeconomics, Economy, Tea party, Economic inequality and Democracy.
His studies in Politics integrate themes in fields like Scale and Dimension.
His Systematic ideology study in the realm of Ideology connects with subjects such as Environmental ethics.
The Markov chain Monte Carlo research Keith T. Poole does as part of his general Bayesian probability study is frequently linked to other disciplines of science, such as Angle of rotation, therefore creating a link between diverse domains of science.
His NOMINATE study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Converse and Voting.
Between 2011 and 2020, his most popular works were:
- Why Hasn't Democracy Slowed Rising Inequality? (193 citations)
- Using Bayesian Aldrich-McKelvey Scaling to Study Citizens' Ideological Preferences and Perceptions (82 citations)
- The Polarization of Contemporary American Politics (62 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Statistics
- World War II
- Politics
His scientific interests lie mostly in Politics, Democracy, Ideology, Legislature and Public administration.
His biological study focuses on Polarization.
His research on Democracy often connects related topics like Political economy.
Keith T. Poole integrates Political economy and Population in his studies.
In his research on the topic of Ideology, Bayesian probability and Scaling is strongly related with Perception.
Keith T. Poole works mostly in the field of Legislature, limiting it down to topics relating to Economic model and, in certain cases, Roll call.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
