World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
30
Citations
5221
World Ranking
1157
National Ranking
587

Steven S. Smith publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven S. Smith sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 137 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Steven S. Smith D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven S. Smith sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Overview

Steven S. Smith is affiliated with Washington University in St. Louis in the United States. Their academic work primarily focuses on social sciences, with a concentration in political science and international relations.

Their recent publications include the following papers:

  • "Senate Republican Radicalism and the Need for Filibuster Reform," 2021, published in The Forum
  • "Changes in Candidate Evaluations over the Campaign Season: A Comparison of House, Senate, and Presidential Races," 2020, published in Political Behavior
  • "Just One of Those Things: Parties and Exclusive Committees in the U.S. House," 2025, published in Studies in American Political Development
  • "The Changing Nature of Congressional Party Support in a Hyper-Partisan Era," 2025, published in Political Research Quarterly

These papers cover topics related to electoral systems, political participation, and party dynamics within the United States.

Frequent co-authors in their research include:

  • Gerald Gamm
  • Patrick Tucker
  • Patrick Rickert
  • Ryan J. Vander Wielen

Their publications frequently appear in:

  • The Forum
  • Political Behavior
  • Studies in American Political Development
  • Political Research Quarterly

Steven S. Smith's research spans several key subfields, including political science and international relations, gender studies, sociology and political science, and strategy and management. Their work addresses main topics such as electoral systems and political participation, populism and right-wing movements, political and economic history of the UK and US, gender politics and representation, media influence and politics, political influence and corporate strategies, as well as policy transfer and learning.

Their research contributes to ongoing discussions around electoral dynamics, party politics, and the evolving nature of congressional support in contexts characterized by political polarization.

Best Publications

  • Committees in Congress

    Christopher J. Deering;Steven S. Smith

  • Politics or Principle?: Filibustering in the United States Senate

    Sarah A. Binder;Steven S. Smith

  • Party Influence in Congress

    Steven S. Smith

  • The American Congress

    Steven S. Smith;Jason M. Roberts;Ryan J. Vander Wielen

  • Call to Order: Floor Politics in the House and Senate

    Steven S. Smith

  • Procedural Contexts, Party Strategy, and Conditional Party Voting in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1971-2000

    Jason M. Roberts;Steven S. Smith

  • The Politics of Institutional Choice: The Formation of the Russian State Duma

    Steven S. Smith;Thomas F. Remington

  • Judicial Review, the Congressional Process, and the Federalism Cases: An Interdisciplinary Critique

    Philip P. Frickey;Steven S. Smith

  • Electoral Institutions and Party Cohesion in the Russian Duma

    Moshe Haspel;Thomas F. Remington;Steven S. Smith

  • Political Goals, Institutional Context, and the Choice of an Electoral System: The Russian Parliamentary Election Law

    Thomas F. Remington;Steven S. Smith

  • Who Wins? Party Effects in Legislative Voting

    Eric D. Lawrence;Forrest Maltzman;Steven S. Smith

  • News Media, Candidates and Issues, and Public Opinion in the 1996 Presidential Campaign.

    David Domke;David P. Fan;Michael Fibison;Dhavan V. Shah

  • Managing Uncertainty in the House of Representatives: Adaptation and Innovation in Special Rules

    Stanley Bach;Steven S. Smith

  • The Senate Syndrome: The Evolution of Procedural Warfare in the Modern U.S. Senate

    Steven S. Smith

  • Decrees, Laws, and Inter-Branch Relations in the Russian Federation

    Thomas F. Remington;Steven S. Smith;Moshe Haspel

  • The Development of Parliamentary Parties in Russia

    Thomas F. Remington;Steven S. Smith

  • Managing the Senate Floor: Complex Unanimous Consent Agreements since the 1950s

    Steven S. Smith;Marcus Flathman

  • Positive Theories of Congressional Parties

    Steven S. Smith

  • Congressional leadership of public opinion

    Lawrence R. Jacobs;Eric D. Lawrence;Robert Y. Shapiro;Steven S. Smith

  • Ideological Labels in America

    Christopher Claassen;Patrick Tucker;Steven S. Smith

  • Going Nuclear, Senate Style

    Sarah A. Binder;Anthony J. Madonna;Steven S. Smith

  • Tracking the Filibuster, 1917 to 1996:

    Sarah A. Binder;Eric D. Lawrence;Steven S. Smith

  • The Impact of Congressional Reform: House Democratic Committee Assignments

    Steven S. Smith;Bruce A. Ray

  • “It’s Largely a Rigged System”: Voter Confidence and the Winner Effect in 2016:

    Betsy Sinclair;Steven S. Smith;Patrick D. Tucker

  • Party Influence in Congress: Recent Theories of Party Influence: Cartel and Conditional Party Government Theory

    Steven S. Smith

Frequent Co-Authors

Jason M. Roberts
Jason M. Roberts University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Thomas F. Remington
Thomas F. Remington Emory University
Sarah A. Binder
Sarah A. Binder George Washington University
Forrest Maltzman
Forrest Maltzman George Washington University
Lee Epstein
Lee Epstein Washington University in St. Louis
Jane E. Salmon
Jane E. Salmon Hospital for Special Surgery
Dhavan V. Shah
Dhavan V. Shah University of Wisconsin–Madison
Gary King
Gary King Harvard University
David R. Nelson
David R. Nelson University of Tennessee Health Science Center
Yoel Sadovsky
Yoel Sadovsky University of Pittsburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Political Science in the USA opens many professional doors, especially in an online learning environment. For those looking to quickly advance their qualifications, consider the quickest masters degree online options, which allow students to earn advanced credentials in less time and often with greater flexibility.

If you are interested in gaining practical skills alongside your Political Science studies, there are also easy certifications to get online that pay well. These certifications can quickly boost your resume and increase your employment opportunities in fields such as public administration, analysis, and communication.

Affordability is a key consideration for many students. Choosing the cheapest online school can help you minimize student debt while still earning a reputable degree.

Additionally, students considering interdisciplinary careers may explore how Political Science pairs well with other high-demand fields. For example, those interested in policy and the environment can look into top paying jobs for environmental science majors, which often intersect with government and advocacy work.

Best Scientists Citing Steven S. Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles