World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
40
Citations
15279
World Ranking
477
National Ranking
264

Keith Krehbiel publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keith Krehbiel sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 79 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Keith Krehbiel D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keith Krehbiel sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1994 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences

Overview

Keith Krehbiel is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the social sciences, with a particular focus on political science and international relations, as well as strategy and management.

Their work addresses key topics including:

  • Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
  • Social Policy and Reform Studies

Krehbiel has authored several papers, with recent publications including:

  • The Manchin Paradox, 2022, SSRN Electronic Journal
  • The Manchin Paradox, 2023, Quarterly Journal of Political Science

These publications explore aspects of political behavior and legislative dynamics.

The frequent venues of publication for Krehbiel are:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Quarterly Journal of Political Science

Krehbiel has collaborated with coauthors, notably including Sara Krehbiel.

Recognition of their contributions includes being named a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 1994.

Best Publications

  • Information and legislative organization

    Keith Krehbiel

  • Collective Decision-Making and Standing Committees: An Informational Rational for Restrictive Amendment Procedures

    Thomas W. Gilligan;Keith. Krehbiel

  • Where's the Party?

    Keith Krehbiel

  • Collective Decisionmaking and Standing Committees: An Informational Rationale for Restrictive Amendment Procedures

    Thomas W. Gilligan;Keith Krehbiel

  • Asymmetric Information and Legislative Rules with a Heterogeneous Committee

    Thomas W. Gilligan;Keith Krehbiel

  • Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking

    Keith Krehbiel

  • Organization of Informative Committees by a Rational Legislature

    Thomas W. Gilligan;Keith Krehbiel

  • Asymmetric Information and Legislative Rules with a Heterogeneous

    Thomas W. Gilligan;Keith Krehbiel

  • Dynamics of Cosponsorship

    Daniel Kessler;Keith Krehbiel

  • Institutionalism as a Methodology

    Daniel Diermeier;Keith Krehbiel

  • Are Congressional Committees Composed of Preference Outliers

    Keith Krehbiel

  • Party Discipline and Measures of Partisanship

    Keith Krehbiel

  • Institutional and Partisan Sources of Gridlock: A Theory of Divided and Unified Government

    Keith Krehbiel

  • Golden Parachutes, Rubber Checks, and Strategic Retirements from the 102d House

    Timothy Groseclose;Keith Krehbiel

  • Spatial Models of Legislative Choice

    Keith Krehbiel

  • The budget process and the size of the budget

    John A. Ferejohn;Keith Krehbiel

  • Cosponsors and Wafflers from A to Z

    Keith Krehbiel

  • Why are Congressional Committees Powerful

    Keith Krehbiel;Kenneth A. Shepsle;Barry R. Weingast

  • Gatekeeping

    Unknown

  • Supreme Court Appointments as a Move‐the‐Median Game

    Keith Krehbiel

  • Paradoxes of Parties in Congress

    Keith Krehbiel

  • The analysis of committee power: An application to senate voting on the minimum wage

    Keith Krehbiel;Douglas Rivers

Frequent Co-Authors

John Ferejohn
John Ferejohn New York University
Daniel Diermeier
Daniel Diermeier Vanderbilt University
Nolan McCarty
Nolan McCarty Princeton University
D. Roderick Kiewiet
D. Roderick Kiewiet California Institute of Technology
Daniel P. Kessler
Daniel P. Kessler Stanford University
Barry R. Weingast
Barry R. Weingast Stanford University
Kenneth A. Shepsle
Kenneth A. Shepsle Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online learning has opened new doors for students interested in Political Science and related fields. Many students begin their search for flexible options by exploring affordable colleges online to find quality education that fits their budget. These schools provide a range of programs designed for distance learners.

Political Science builds strong analytical and research skills useful in diverse careers. Those curious about unique pathways might ask: what can you do with an environmental science degree? This expands career possibilities into public policy, advocacy, and compliance roles.

Interdisciplinary studies are also possible. Combining Political Science with subjects like mathematics creates new opportunities—explore your options through a math degree online to boost your quantitative analysis edge.

For those interested in research, data, and organizing information, pursuing a degree through one of the best online library science programs is also an excellent complement to Political Science, adding valuable information management skills to your academic profile.

Best Scientists Citing Keith Krehbiel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles