World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
39
Citations
9963
World Ranking
8223
National Ranking
3526

Theoden I. Netoff publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Theoden I. Netoff sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 148 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Theoden I. Netoff D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Theoden I. Netoff sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Theoden I. Netoff is affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Neuroscience and Medicine, with a significant focus on various subfields including Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, and Surgery.

Their work addresses several main topics, such as Neuroscience and Neural Engineering, Neurological disorders and treatments, EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces, Neural dynamics and brain function, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies, Spinal Cord Injury Research, and Pain Management and Treatment.

Theoden I. Netoff has contributed to multiple publication venues, frequently publishing in:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Neural Engineering
  • Brain Stimulation
  • Journal of Neurophysiology
  • Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Among their recent papers are:

  • Long-Term Spinal Cord Stimulation After Chronic Complete Spinal Cord Injury Enables Volitional Movement in the Absence of Stimulation, 2020, Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
  • Optimization of closed-loop electrical stimulation enables robust cerebellar-directed seizure control, 2022, Brain
  • Effect of epidural spinal cord stimulation after chronic spinal cord injury on volitional movement and cardiovascular function: study protocol for the phase II open label controlled E-STAND trial, 2022, BMJ Open
  • Evaluation of functional MRI-based human brain parcellation: a review, 2022, Journal of Neurophysiology
  • Optimization of Spinal Cord Stimulation Using Bayesian Preference Learning and Its Validation, 2021, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering

Theoden I. Netoff frequently collaborates with several researchers, including:

  • David Darrow
  • Renata Saha
  • Walter C. Low
  • Jian-Ping Wang
  • Ann M. Parr

Best Publications

  • Seizure prediction with spectral power of EEG using cost-sensitive support vector machines

    Yun Park;Lan Luo;Keshab K. Parhi;Theoden Netoff

  • Stochastic Resonance in a Neuronal Network from Mammalian Brain

    Bruce J. Gluckman;Theoden I. Netoff;Emily J. Neel;William L. Ditto

  • Sniffing controls an adaptive filter of sensory input to the olfactory bulb

    Justus V Verhagen;Daniel W Wesson;Theoden I Netoff;John A White

  • Decreased neuronal synchronization during experimental seizures.

    Theoden I. Netoff;Theoden I. Netoff;Steven J. Schiff;Steven J. Schiff

  • Epilepsy in small-world networks.

    Theoden I. Netoff;Robert Clewley;Scott Arno;Tara Keck

  • Neuromodulation for Brain Disorders: Challenges and Opportunities

    M. D. Johnson;H. H. Lim;T. I. Netoff;A. T. Connolly

  • Epidural Spinal Cord Stimulation Facilitates Immediate Restoration of Dormant Motor and Autonomic Supraspinal Pathways after Chronic Neurologically Complete Spinal Cord Injury

    David Darrow;David Balser;Theoden I. Netoff;Andrei Krassioukov

  • Electric field suppression of epileptiform activity in hippocampal slices

    Bruce J. Gluckman;Emily J. Neel;Theoden I. Netoff;William L. Ditto

  • Synchronization in hybrid neuronal networks of the hippocampal formation.

    Theoden I. Netoff;Matthew I. Banks;Alan D. Dorval;Corey D. Acker

  • Early seizure detection.

    Kristin K. Jerger;Theoden I. Netoff;Theoden I. Netoff;Joseph T. Francis;Joseph T. Francis;Timothy Sauer

  • Identification of the Hippocampal Input to Medial Prefrontal Cortex In Vitro

    Marc A. Parent;Lang Wang;Jianjun Su;Theoden Netoff

  • Periodic orbits: a new language for neuronal dynamics.

    Paul So;Joseph T. Francis;Theoden I. Netoff;Bruce J. Gluckman

  • Chaotic Desynchronization as the Therapeutic Mechanism of Deep Brain Stimulation

    Charles J Wilson;Bryce Beverlin;Theoden I Netoff

  • Synchronization from second order network connectivity statistics

    Liqiong Zhao;Bryce Beverlin;Theoden I. Netoff;Duane Q. Nykamp

  • Reconstructing micrometer-scale fiber pathways in the brain: multi-contrast optical coherence tomography based tractography.

    Hui Wang;Adam J. Black;Junfeng Zhu;Tyler W. Stigen

  • Reversible neuroinhibition by focused ultrasound is mediated by a thermal mechanism.

    David P. Darrow;Parker O'Brien;Thomas J. Richner;Theoden I. Netoff

  • Phasic Burst Stimulation: A Closed-Loop Approach to Tuning Deep Brain Stimulation Parameters for Parkinson's Disease.

    Abbey B. Holt;Dan Wilson;Max Shinn;Jeff Moehlis

  • Long-Term Spinal Cord Stimulation After Chronic Complete Spinal Cord Injury Enables Volitional Movement in the Absence of Stimulation

    Isabela Peña Pino;Caleb Hoover;Shivani Venkatesh;Aliya Ahmadi

  • Beyond two-cell networks: experimental measurement of neuronal responses to multiple synaptic inputs.

    Theoden I. Netoff;Corey D. Acker;Jonathan C. Bettencourt;John A. White

  • Modulations in Oscillatory Frequency and Coupling in Globus Pallidus with Increasing Parkinsonian Severity

    Allison T. Connolly;Alicia L. Jensen;Edward M. Bello;Theoden I. Netoff

  • Origins and suppression of oscillations in a computational model of Parkinson's disease

    Abbey B. Holt;Theoden I. Netoff

  • Seizure prediction using cost-sensitive support vector machine

    Theoden Netoff;Yun Park;Keshab Parhi

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven J. Schiff
Steven J. Schiff Yale University
John A. White
John A. White Boston University
Jeff Moehlis
Jeff Moehlis University of California, Santa Barbara
Keshab K. Parhi
Keshab K. Parhi University of Minnesota
Nancy Kopell
Nancy Kopell Boston University
Andrei V. Krassioukov
Andrei V. Krassioukov University of British Columbia
Kelvin O. Lim
Kelvin O. Lim University of Minnesota
Michel J. A. M. van Putten
Michel J. A. M. van Putten University of Twente
Florian Mormann
Florian Mormann University of Bonn
Emad S. Ebbini
Emad S. Ebbini University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in studying neuroscience in the USA, exploring related online degrees can open new doors. Many students now choose accelerated degree programs online to finish their studies faster and start their careers sooner. These flexible formats are ideal for learners balancing work, family, or other commitments.

Neuroscience shares core concepts with some of the highest paid degrees in the country. Majors with strong scientific and technical skills, like biomedical engineering and computer science, often lead to lucrative roles. Thinking about both passion and earning potential is key when choosing your path.

Beyond neuroscience, students may also want to explore the highest paid college majors, many of which integrate biology, technology, and healthcare. These fields offer rewarding career opportunities in research, medicine, and industry.

Affordability is another important factor. There are many options for finding an online school that accepts fafsa, allowing more students access to financial aid and flexible learning. This makes pursuing a neuroscience degree or related pathway more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Theoden I. Netoff

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles