World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
36
Citations
4148
World Ranking
9077
National Ranking
3826

Carmen C. Canavier publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carmen C. Canavier sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 123 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Carmen C. Canavier D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carmen C. Canavier sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Carmen C. Canavier is affiliated with the Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on neuroscience, with significant contributions spanning cellular and molecular neuroscience, cognitive neuroscience, and molecular biology. Other areas of study include computer networks and communications as well as statistical and nonlinear physics.

The scientist's work centers around several topics, notably neural dynamics and brain function, neuroscience and neuropharmacology research, and photoreceptor and optogenetics research. Additional identified research areas include nonlinear dynamics and pattern formation, stochastic dynamics and bifurcation, memory and neural mechanisms, and neuroscience and neural engineering.

Among the recent publications by Carmen C. Canavier are the following:

  • Kinetics and Connectivity Properties of Parvalbumin- and Somatostatin-Positive Inhibition in Layer 2/3 Medial Entorhinal Cortex, 2022, eNeuro
  • Ca v 1.3 calcium channels are full-range linear amplifiers of firing frequencies in lateral DA SN neurons, 2022, Science Advances
  • Inactivation mode of sodium channels defines the different maximal firing rates of conventional versus atypical midbrain dopamine neurons, 2021, PLoS Computational Biology
  • Cholinergic modulation shifts the response of CA1 pyramidal cells to depolarizing ramps via TRPM4 channels with potential implications for place field firing, 2023, eLife
  • Interneuronal network model of theta-nested fast oscillations predicts differential effects of heterogeneity, gap junctions and short term depression for hyperpolarizing versus shunting inhibition, 2022, PLoS Computational Biology

Carmen C. Canavier has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Christopher J. Knowlton
  • Fernando R. Fernandez
  • John A. White
  • Román Baravalle
  • A. Srinivas

The scientist's work is regularly published in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), eNeuro, PLoS Computational Biology, Science Advances, and eLife.

Best Publications

  • The energy cost of action potential propagation in dopamine neurons: clues to susceptibility in Parkinson's disease

    Eleftheria Kyriaki Pissadaki;J. Paul Bolam

  • Phase-Resetting Curves Determine Synchronization, Phase Locking, and Clustering in Networks of Neural Oscillators

    Srisairam Achuthan;Carmen C. Canavier

  • Phase resetting and phase locking in hybrid circuits of one model and one biological neuron.

    S. A. Oprisan;A. A. Prinz;C. C. Canavier

  • Phase-resetting as a tool of information transmission.

    Carmen C Canavier

  • Nonlinear dynamics in a model neuron provide a novel mechanism for transient synaptic inputs to produce long-term alterations of postsynaptic activity.

    C. C. Canavier;D. A. Baxter;J. W. Clark;J. H. Byrne

  • Simulation of the bursting activity of neuron R15 in Aplysia: role of ionic currents, calcium balance, and modulatory transmitters.

    C. C. Canavier;J. W. Clark;John H Byrne

  • Calcium dynamics underlying pacemaker-like and burst firing oscillations in midbrain dopaminergic neurons: a computational study.

    B. Amini;J. W. Clark;C. C. Canavier

  • Pulse coupled oscillators and the phase resetting curve

    Carmen C. Canavier;Srisairam Achuthan

  • A modeling study suggests complementary roles for GABAA and NMDA receptors and the SK channel in regulating the firing pattern in midbrain dopamine neurons.

    Alexander O. Komendantov;Olena G. Komendantova;Steven W. Johnson;Carmen C. Canavier

  • Phase response characteristics of model neurons determine which patterns are expressed in a ring circuit model of gait generation

    Carmen C. Canavier;Robert J. Butera;R. O. Dror;Douglas A. Baxter

  • Routes to chaos in a model of a bursting neuron.

    C.C. Canavier;J.W. Clark;J.H. Byrne

  • Resonant Interneurons Can Increase Robustness of Gamma Oscillations.

    Ruben A. Tikidji-Hamburyan;Joan José Martínez;John A. White;Carmen C. Canavier

  • Control of multistability in ring circuits of oscillators.

    Carmen C. Canavier;Douglas A. Baxter;John W. Clark;John H. Byrne

  • A mathematical criterion based on phase response curves for stability in a ring of coupled oscillators

    R. O. Dror;Carmen C. Canavier;Robert J. Butera;John W. Clark

  • Multiple modes of activity in a model neuron suggest a novel mechanism for the effects of neuromodulators

    C. C. Canavier;Douglas Baxter;J. W. Clark;John H Byrne

  • Sodium dynamics underlying burst firing and putative mechanisms for the regulation of the firing pattern in midbrain dopamine neurons: a computational approach.

    Carmen C. Canavier

  • Analysis of the effects of modulatory agents on a modeled bursting neuron: Dynamic interactions between voltage and calcium dependent systems

    Robert J. Butera;John W. Clark;Carmen C. Canavier;Douglas A. Baxter

  • Regulation of Firing Frequency in a Computational Model of a Midbrain Dopaminergic Neuron

    Anna Y. Kuznetsova;Marco A. Huertas;Alexey S. Kuznetsov;Carlos A. Paladini

  • Phase Response Curve

    Carmen C. Canavier

  • An Increase in AMPA and a Decrease in SK Conductance Increase Burst Firing by Different Mechanisms in a Model of a Dopamine Neuron In Vivo

    C. C. Canavier;R. S. Landry

  • Functional phase response curves: a method for understanding synchronization of adapting neurons.

    Jianxia Cui;Carmen C. Canavier;Robert J. Butera

  • Computational model of the serotonergic modulation of sensory neurons in Aplysia.

    Douglas A. Baxter;Carmen C. Canavier;John W. Clark;John H. Byrne

Frequent Co-Authors

John H. Byrne
John H. Byrne The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Douglas A. Baxter
Douglas A. Baxter The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Edwin S. Levitan
Edwin S. Levitan University of Pittsburgh
John A. White
John A. White Boston University
Jochen Roeper
Jochen Roeper Goethe University Frankfurt
Michael C. Andresen
Michael C. Andresen Oregon Health & Science University
Boris Gutkin
Boris Gutkin École Normale Supérieure
Nancy Kopell
Nancy Kopell Boston University
Theoden I. Netoff
Theoden I. Netoff University of Minnesota
Diana L. Kunze
Diana L. Kunze Case Western Reserve University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Neuroscience students often explore related disciplines to expand their career options. Many pursue psychology or social work degrees given the overlapping topics and skill sets. For those interested in mental health counseling, accredited marriage and family therapy online programs accredited offer flexible routes to licensure and careers supporting families and couples.

Psychology remains a popular path to complement neuroscience, especially via an online masters in psychology, which deepens expertise in behavioral health and opens doors to research, counseling, or clinical roles. Cost-conscious students should compare psychology degree cost to find programs that fit their budget without sacrificing quality or accreditation.

Social work is another promising avenue. For those without a bachelor’s in social work, 1 year msw programs online no bsw allow for quick entry into clinical or organizational settings. Each pathway offers unique advantages and can complement a neuroscience background, supporting diverse healthcare and research careers.

Best Scientists Citing Carmen C. Canavier

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles