World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 33 9551 9143 7 7 110 4548

Anneli Poska publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Anneli Poska between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Anneli Poska published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 4.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2014. 11 of the 134 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2014. 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 3 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 1 publication 2008: 4 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 5 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 5 publications
1996 2025

134 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Anneli Poska: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 1
1997 1
1998 2
1999 2
2000 0
2001 1
2002 3
2003 0
2004 3
2005 3
2006 1
2007 1
2008 4
2009 1
2010 5
2011 4
2012 4
2013 8
2014 15
2015 6
2016 3
2017 4
2018 11
2019 5
2020 4
2021 9
2022 8
2023 14
2024 6
2025 5
Total 134
Download as CSV

Anneli Poska publications per year - data summary

  • Anneli Poska, a Environmental Sciences scholar from Tallinn University of Technology, has 134 publications recorded across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1996 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2014, with 15 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1996, 1997, 2001, 2006 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 2 of the 30 years in the span carry no publications at all (2000 and 2003).
  • The rate of publication averages 4.5 papers per year over the whole span, or 4.8 per year counting only the 28 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 42 publications, 31% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1996-2005: 16 publications (1.6 per year); 2006-2015: 49 publications (4.9 per year); 2016-2025: 69 publications (6.9 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Anneli Poska publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anneli Poska sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 110 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492 110
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Anneli Poska publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 9,676 Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 66 ranges running from 41–50 to 690+ publications.
  • Anneli Poska, a Environmental Sciences scholar from Tallinn University of Technology, records 110 publications - the 18th percentile of the discipline.
  • 18% of ranked Environmental Sciences scientists score the same or lower than Anneli Poska, and about 82% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 161–170 publications range, and Anneli Poska ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 121–130 publications, holding 617 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 67% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 690 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Anneli Poska D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anneli Poska sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88 33
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Anneli Poska D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 9,676 Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 97 ranges running from 30 to 126+ D-Index.
  • Anneli Poska, a Environmental Sciences scholar from Tallinn University of Technology, records 33 D-Index - the 2nd percentile of the discipline.
  • 2% of ranked Environmental Sciences scientists score the same or lower than Anneli Poska, and about 98% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 51 D-Index range, and Anneli Poska ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 45 D-Index, holding 348 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 54 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more, 92 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Anneli Poska is affiliated with Tallinn University of Technology in Estonia and specializes in Earth and Planetary Sciences as well as Environmental Science. Their work spans multiple subfields including Atmospheric Science, Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Paleontology, and Anthropology.

They have contributed extensively to research topics such as:

  • Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Tree-ring climate responses
  • Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
  • Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Isotope Analysis in Ecology
  • Fire effects on ecosystems

Throughout their career, Anneli Poska has published in various scientific venues, frequently appearing in:

  • Quaternary Science Reviews
  • Earth system science data
  • Land
  • Climate of the past
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Recent publications include:

  • "Fire hazard modulation by long-term dynamics in land cover and dominant forest type in eastern and central Europe," 2020, Biogeosciences
  • "Human impacts and their interactions in the Baltic Sea region," 2022, Earth System Dynamics
  • "European pollen-based REVEALS land-cover reconstructions for the Holocene: methodology, mapping and potentials," 2022, Earth system science data
  • "Palaeoecological data indicates land-use changes across Europe linked to spatial heterogeneity in mortality during the Black Death pandemic," 2022, Nature Ecology & Evolution
  • "Mid-Holocene European climate revisited: New high-resolution regional climate model simulations using pollen-based land-cover," 2022, Quaternary Science Reviews

They have collaborated frequently with several co-authors including Siim Veski, Jüri Vassiljev, Ralph Fyfe, Marie-José Gaillard, and Angelica Feurdean.

Best Publications

  • Pollen productivity estimates of key European plant taxa for quantitative reconstruction of past vegetation: a review

    Anna Broström;Anne Birgitte Nielsen;Marie-José Gaillard;Kari Hjelle

  • Holocene land-cover reconstructions for studies on land cover-climate feedbacks

    M. J Gaillard;S. Sugita;F. Mazier;F. Mazier;A. K Trondman

  • A modern pollen–climate calibration set from northern Europe: developing and testing a tool for palaeoclimatological reconstructions

    Heikki Seppä;H. J. B. Birks;Arvid Odland;Anneli Poska

  • Pollen-based quantitative reconstructions of Holocene regional vegetation cover (plant-functional types and land-cover types) in Europe suitable for climate modelling.

    Anna-Kari Trondman;M.J. Gaillard;Florence Mazier;S. Sugita

  • The use of modelling and simulation approach in reconstructing past landscapes from fossil pollen data: a review and results from the POLLANDCAL network.

    Marie-José Gaillard;Shinya Sugita;M. Jane Bunting;Richard Middleton

  • Reflections of pre- and early-agrarian human impact in the pollen diagrams of Estonia

    A Poska;L Saarse;S Veski

  • Holocene annual mean temperature changes in Estonia and their relationship to solar insolation and atmospheric circulation patterns

    Heiikki Seppä;Anneli Poska

  • Holocene changes in vegetation composition in northern Europe: why quantitative pollen-based vegetation reconstructions matter

    Laurent Marquer;Laurent Marquer;Marie José Gaillard;Shinya Sugita;Anna Kari Trondman

  • Quantifying the effects of land use and climate on Holocene vegetation in Europe

    Laurent Marquer;Laurent Marquer;Marie-Jose Gaillard;Shinya Sugita;Anneli Poska

  • Plant macrofossil evidence for an early onset of the Holocene summer thermal maximum in northernmost Europe

    M. Valiranta;J. S. Salonen;M. Heikkila;L. Amon

  • Holocene fire activity during low-natural flammability periods reveals scale-dependent cultural human-fire relationships in Europe

    Elisabeth Dietze;Martin Theuerkauf;Karolina Bloom;Achim Brauer

  • Regional climate model simulations for Europe at 6 and 0.2 k BP: sensitivity to changes in anthropogenic deforestation

    G. Strandberg;E. Kjellstrom;Anneli Poska;S. Wagner

  • Integrated palaeoecological and historical data in the service of fine-resolution land use and ecological change assessment during the last 1000 years in Rõuge, southern Estonia

    Siim Veski;Kalev Koppel;Anneli Poska

  • Palaeoecological data indicates land-use changes across Europe linked to spatial heterogeneity in mortality during the Black Death pandemic

    Unknown

  • Early Holocene coastal settlements and palaeoenvironment on the shore of the Baltic Sea at Párnu, southwestern Estonia

    Siim Veski;Atko Heinsalu;Veiko Klassen;Aivar Kriiska

  • Pollen dispersal and deposition characteristics of Abies alba , Fagus sylvatica and Pinus sylvestris , Roztocze region (SE Poland)

    Anneli Poska;Anneli Poska;Irena Agnieszka Pidek

  • Fire hazard modulation by long-term dynamics in land cover and dominant forest type in eastern and central Europe

    Angelica Feurdean;Angelica Feurdean;Boris Vannière;Walter Finsinger;Dan Warren

  • Palynological richness and pollen sample evenness in relation to local floristic diversity in southern Estonia

    Vivika Meltsov;Anneli Poska;Bent Vad Odgaard;Marek Sammul

  • Relative pollen productivity estimates of major anemophilous taxa and relevant source area of pollen in a cultural landscape of the hemi-boreal forest zone (Estonia)

    Anneli Poska;Anneli Poska;Vivika Meltsov;Shinya Sugita;Jueri Vassiljev

  • Mid-Holocene European climate revisited: New high-resolution regional climate model simulations using pollen-based land-cover

    Unknown

  • Long-term drivers of forest composition in a boreonemoral region: the relative importance of climate and human impact.

    Triin Reitalu;Heikki Seppa;Shinya Sugita;Mihkel Kangur

  • Using quantitative pollen-based land-cover estimations and a spatial CA_Markov model to reconstruct the development of cultural landscape at Rouge, South Estonia

    Anneli Poska;Anneli Poska;Edgar Sepp;Siim Veski;Kalev Koppel

Frequent Co-Authors

Marie-José Gaillard
Marie-José Gaillard Linnaeus University
Florence Mazier
Florence Mazier Federal University of Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées
Ralph Fyfe
Ralph Fyfe Plymouth University
Shinya Sugita
Shinya Sugita Tallinn University
Heikki Seppä
Heikki Seppä University of Helsinki
Jed O. Kaplan
Jed O. Kaplan University of Calgary
Anne E. Bjune
Anne E. Bjune Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research
Erik Kjellström
Erik Kjellström Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute
Bent Vad Odgaard
Bent Vad Odgaard Aarhus University
John Dodson
John Dodson Chinese Academy of Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens up diverse academic and career opportunities, often intersecting with social sciences and education fields. For those interested in understanding societal impacts on the environment, exploring the best online bachelors in sociology programs can provide valuable insights into human behavior and community dynamics.

Educators aiming to enhance their expertise might consider advanced degrees such as an EdD. Some programs offer a streamlined path with an online edd no dissertation requirement, allowing professionals to focus on practical leadership skills. Additionally, bridge programs offer flexibility for teachers to advance from an eds to edd bridge programs online without interrupting their careers.

For those passionate about community well-being and environmental justice, social work is a complementary field. Exploring affordable advanced degrees such as online dsw programs in social work can prepare graduates to advocate for sustainable, equitable policies in diverse communities.

These related online degrees offer flexible options to build interdisciplinary skills and expand career pathways aligned with environmental science priorities.

Best Scientists Citing Anneli Poska

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles