World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
60
Citations
14681
World Ranking
2897
National Ranking
52

Erik Kjellström publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Erik Kjellström sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 224 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Erik Kjellström D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Erik Kjellström sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Erik Kjellström is affiliated with the Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute in Sweden. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science and earth and planetary sciences, with significant contributions in atmospheric science and global and planetary change. Their work intersects with civil and structural engineering, oceanography, and water science and technology, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach to environmental studies.

The researcher's main topics of study include climate variability and models, meteorological phenomena and simulations, cryospheric studies and observations, atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, geology and paleoclimatology research, climate change and permafrost, and hydrology and watershed management studies.

Erik Kjellström's scholarly output includes numerous papers published in well-regarded venues. Notable recent publications include:

  • "Regional climate downscaling over Europe: perspectives from the EURO-CORDEX community," 2020, Regional Environmental Change
  • "Evaluation of the Large EURO-CORDEX Regional Climate Model Ensemble," 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • "Assessment of the European Climate Projections as Simulated by the Large EURO-CORDEX Regional and Global Climate Model Ensemble," 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • "Climate change in the Baltic Sea region: a summary," 2022, Earth System Dynamics
  • "Warmer climate projections in EC-Earth3-Veg: the role of changes in the greenhouse gas concentrations from CMIP5 to CMIP6," 2020, Environmental Research Letters

Frequent publication venues for Kjellström include:

  • Earth System Dynamics
  • Climate Dynamics
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Helda (University of Helsinki)
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres

The scientist has collaborated extensively with a group of coauthors in their field. Frequent collaborators include Ole B. Christensen, Danijel Belušić, Petter Lind, Grigory Nikulin, and David Lindstedt.

Best Publications

  • An intercomparison of regional climate simulations for Europe: assessing uncertainties in model projections

    M. Déqué;D. P. Rowell;D. Lüthi;F. Giorgi

  • The Rossby Centre Regional Climate model RCA3: model description and performance

    Patrick Samuelsson;Colin G. Jones;Ulrika Willén;Anders Ullerstig

  • An inter-comparison of regional climate models for Europe: model performance in present-day climate

    Daniela Jacob;Lars Bärring;Ole Bøssing Christensen;Jens Hesselbjerg Christensen

  • 21st century changes in the European climate: uncertainties derived from an ensemble of regional climate model simulations

    Erik Kjellström;Grigory Nikulin;Ulf Hansson;Gustav Strandberg

  • Simulation of the tropospheric sulfur cycle in a global climate model

    Johann Feichter;Erik Kjellström;Henning Rodhe;Frank Dentener

  • Evaluation and future projections of temperature, precipitation and wind extremes over Europe in an ensemble of regional climate simulations

    Grigory Nikulin;Erik Kjellström;Ulf Hansson;Gustav Strandberg

  • Potential applications of subseasonal-to-seasonal (S2S) predictions

    Christopher J. White;Christopher J. White;Henrik Carlsen;Andrew W. Robertson;Richard J.T. Klein

  • The European climate under a 2 C global warming

    Robert Vautard;Andreas Gobiet;Stefan Sobolowski;Erik Kjellström

  • Regional climate downscaling over Europe: perspectives from the EURO-CORDEX community

    Daniela Jacob;Claas Teichmann;Stefan Sobolowski;Eleni Katragkou

  • Weight assignment in regional climate models

    Jens Hesselbjerg Christensen;Erik Kjellström;Filippo Giorgi;Geert Lenderink

  • Holocene land-cover reconstructions for studies on land cover-climate feedbacks

    M. J Gaillard;S. Sugita;F. Mazier;F. Mazier;A. K Trondman

  • Precipitation in the EURO-CORDEX 0.11° and 0.44° simulations: high resolution, high benefits?

    A.F. Prein;A. Gobiet;H. Truhetz;K. Keuler

  • A 140-year simulation of European climate with the new version of the Rossby Centre regional atmospheric climate model (RCA3)

    Erik Kjellström;Lars Bärring;Stefan Gollvik;Ulf Hansson

  • Evaluation of the Large EURO-CORDEX Regional Climate Model Ensemble

    Robert Vautard;Nikolay Kadygrov;Carley Iles;Fredrik Boberg

  • Potential climate change impact on wind energy resources in northern Europe: analyses using a regional climate model

    S C Pryor;R J Barthelmie;Erik Kjellström

  • Assessment of the European Climate Projections as Simulated by the Large EURO-CORDEX Regional and Global Climate Model Ensemble

    Erika Coppola;Rita Nogherotto;James M. Ciarlo;Filippo Giorgi

  • Global high resolution versus Limited Area Model climate change projections over Europe: quantifying confidence level from PRUDENCE results

    M Deque;R G Jones;M Wild;F Giorgi

  • A comparison of scavenging and deposition processes in global models: results from the WCRP Cambridge Workshop of 1995

    P. J. Rasch;J. Feichter;K. Law;N. Mahowald

  • Modelling daily temperature extremes: recent climate and future changes over Europe

    Erik Kjellström;Lars Bärring;Daniela Jacob;Richard Jones

  • The effects of 1.5 and 2 degrees of global warming on Africa in the CORDEX ensemble

    Grigory Nikulin;Christopher Lennard;Alessandro Dosio;Erik Kjellström

  • Daily and monthly temperature and precipitation statistics as performance indicators for regional climate models.

    Erik Kjellström;Fredrik Boberg;Manuel Castro;Jens Hesselbjerg Christensen

Frequent Co-Authors

Grigory Nikulin
Grigory Nikulin Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute
Ole Bøssing Christensen
Ole Bøssing Christensen Danish Meteorological Institute
Colin Jones
Colin Jones University of Leeds
Jens Hesselbjerg Christensen
Jens Hesselbjerg Christensen University of Copenhagen
Johann Feichter
Johann Feichter Max Planck Society
Geert Lenderink
Geert Lenderink Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute
Patrick Samuelsson
Patrick Samuelsson Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute
Daniela Jacob
Daniela Jacob Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht Centre for Materials and Coastal Research
Marie-José Gaillard
Marie-José Gaillard Linnaeus University
Samuel Somot
Samuel Somot Federal University of Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. Programs such as the cheapest dsw program offer specialized knowledge in social work, which often intersects with environmental policy and community health initiatives. This can be a valuable route for those aiming to impact environmental justice.

If you are looking for broader educational options, the cheapest online general studies degree programs provide flexible curricula that can be tailored to include environmental studies alongside other disciplines.

For those curious about ease and accessibility in earning a degree, exploring the what's the easiest bachelor's degree to get can help guide decisions based on workload and adaptability, especially for working students balancing various commitments.

Lastly, specialized STEM online programs like the geology online degree are excellent for students seeking technical skills related to earth sciences, which complement core environmental studies and enhance career opportunities in research, conservation, and resource management.

Best Scientists Citing Erik Kjellström

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles