World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
59
Citations
16510
World Ranking
3044
National Ranking
54

Grigory Nikulin publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Grigory Nikulin sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 150 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Grigory Nikulin D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Grigory Nikulin sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Grigory Nikulin is affiliated with the Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute in Sweden. Their research primarily addresses environmental and earth sciences, with significant contributions to the study of climate variability, meteorological phenomena, and global and planetary change.

The main fields of study for Nikulin include Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a focused engagement in subfields such as Global and Planetary Change and Atmospheric Science. Several other research areas related to their work include Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, and Oceanography.

Their research topics cover a broad range of climate and atmospheric science themes. These include:

  • Climate variability and models
  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Hydrology and Drought Analysis
  • Climate change impacts on agriculture
  • Climate change and permafrost

Nikulin has published in several prominent venues, with recurring contributions in:

  • Climate Dynamics
  • Geoscientific Model Development
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Recent notable papers include:

  • Regional climate downscaling over Europe: perspectives from the EURO-CORDEX community (2020), published in Regional Environmental Change
  • Evaluation of the Large EURO-CORDEX Regional Climate Model Ensemble (2020), published in Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Assessment of the European Climate Projections as Simulated by the Large EURO-CORDEX Regional and Global Climate Model Ensemble (2020), published in Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Projected future changes in rainfall in Southeast Asia based on CORDEX-SEA multi-model simulations (2020), published in Climate Dynamics
  • Business-as-usual will lead to super and ultra-extreme heatwaves in the Middle East and North Africa (2021), published in npj Climate and Atmospheric Science

Nikulin frequently collaborates with a group of researchers, including Erika Coppola, Claas Teichmann, Erik Kjellström, Robert Vautard, and Minchao Wu. These collaborations indicate a sustained engagement with teams focused on climate modeling and atmospheric science.

Best Publications

  • EURO-CORDEX : new high-resolution climate change projections for European impact research

    Daniela Jacob;Juliane Petersen;Bastian Eggert;Antoinette Alias

  • Regional climate modeling on European scales: a joint standard evaluation of the EURO-CORDEX RCM ensemble

    S. Kotlarski;K. Keuler;O. B. Christensen;A. Colette

  • The Rossby Centre Regional Climate model RCA3: model description and performance

    Patrick Samuelsson;Colin G. Jones;Ulrika Willén;Anders Ullerstig

  • Precipitation Climatology in an Ensemble of CORDEX-Africa Regional Climate Simulations

    Grigory Nikulin;Colin Jones;Filippo Giorgi;Ghassem Asrar

  • 21st century changes in the European climate: uncertainties derived from an ensemble of regional climate model simulations

    Erik Kjellström;Grigory Nikulin;Ulf Hansson;Gustav Strandberg

  • Evaluation and future projections of temperature, precipitation and wind extremes over Europe in an ensemble of regional climate simulations

    Grigory Nikulin;Erik Kjellström;Ulf Hansson;Gustav Strandberg

  • Future global meteorological drought hot spots: A study based on CORDEX data

    Jonathan Spinoni;Paulo Barbosa;Edoardo Bucchignani;John Cassano

  • The simulation of European heat waves from an ensemble of regional climate models within the EURO-CORDEX project

    Robert Vautard;Andreas Gobiet;Daniela Jacob;Michal Belda

  • The European climate under a 2 C global warming

    Robert Vautard;Andreas Gobiet;Stefan Sobolowski;Erik Kjellström

  • Regional climate downscaling over Europe: perspectives from the EURO-CORDEX community

    Daniela Jacob;Claas Teichmann;Stefan Sobolowski;Eleni Katragkou

  • WCRP COordinated Regional Downscaling EXperiment (CORDEX): A diagnostic MIP for CMIP6

    William J. Gutowski;Filippo Giorgi;Bertrand Timbal;Anne Frigon

  • Precipitation in the EURO-CORDEX 0.11° and 0.44° simulations: high resolution, high benefits?

    A.F. Prein;A. Gobiet;H. Truhetz;K. Keuler

  • Assessment of the performance of CORDEX Regional Climate Models in Simulating East African Rainfall

    Hussen Seid Endris;Philip Omondi;Suman Jain;Christopher Lennard

  • Evaluation of the Large EURO-CORDEX Regional Climate Model Ensemble

    Robert Vautard;Nikolay Kadygrov;Carley Iles;Fredrik Boberg

  • Evaluation of the CORDEX-Africa multi-RCM hindcast: systematic model errors

    J. Kim;Duane E. Waliser;Duane E. Waliser;Chris A. Mattmann;Chris A. Mattmann;Cameron E. Goodale

  • Assessment of the European Climate Projections as Simulated by the Large EURO-CORDEX Regional and Global Climate Model Ensemble

    Erika Coppola;Rita Nogherotto;James M. Ciarlo;Filippo Giorgi

  • Managing the effects of multiple stressors on aquatic ecosystems under water scarcity. The GLOBAQUA project

    Alícia Navarro-Ortega;Vicenç Acuña;Alberto Bellin;Peter Burek

  • Climatology, annual cycle and interannual variability of precipitation and temperature in CORDEX simulations over West Africa

    Emiola Gbobaniyi;Emiola Gbobaniyi;Abdoulaye Sarr;Mouhamadou Bamba Sylla;Ismaila Diallo

  • The effects of 1.5 and 2 degrees of global warming on Africa in the CORDEX ensemble

    Grigory Nikulin;Christopher Lennard;Alessandro Dosio;Erik Kjellström

  • Daily and monthly temperature and precipitation statistics as performance indicators for regional climate models.

    Erik Kjellström;Fredrik Boberg;Manuel Castro;Jens Hesselbjerg Christensen

  • What can we know about future precipitation in Africa? Robustness, significance and added value of projections from a large ensemble of regional climate models

    Alessandro Dosio;Richard G. Jones;Richard G. Jones;Christopher Jack;Christopher Lennard

Frequent Co-Authors

Erik Kjellström
Erik Kjellström Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute
Claas Teichmann
Claas Teichmann Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht Centre for Materials and Coastal Research
Colin Jones
Colin Jones University of Leeds
Ole Bøssing Christensen
Ole Bøssing Christensen Danish Meteorological Institute
Alessandro Dosio
Alessandro Dosio Joint Research Centre
Robert Vautard
Robert Vautard École Normale Supérieure Paris-Saclay
Daniela Jacob
Daniela Jacob Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht Centre for Materials and Coastal Research
Augustin Colette
Augustin Colette Stanford University
Sven Kotlarski
Sven Kotlarski Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology
Bruce Hewitson
Bruce Hewitson University of Cape Town

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens doors to a variety of related fields that enhance skills and career prospects. For those interested in spatial analysis and mapping, exploring the best gis graduate programs can provide advanced training in Geographic Information Systems, vital for environmental planning and resource management.

For professionals aiming to influence public policy and manage environmental projects effectively, enrolling in one of the best online mpa programs offers valuable leadership and administrative skills within a one-year timeframe, perfect for those seeking career advancement without career interruption.

Understanding societal impacts and human behavior is crucial in tackling environmental challenges. Accredited online sociology programs are a great complement, with options such as accredited online bachelors in sociology providing foundational knowledge to better assess human-environment interactions.

For educators and professionals focused on environmental education or policy implementation, pursuing an advanced education degree can be beneficial. Some candidates might prefer streamlined doctoral paths that remove the traditional dissertation, making programs like those featured in edd no dissertation attractive for balancing academic goals with practical career needs.

Best Scientists Citing Grigory Nikulin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles