World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
52
Citations
23339
World Ranking
933
National Ranking
16

Anthony C. Davison publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony C. Davison sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 208 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Anthony C. Davison D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony C. Davison sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2002 - Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA)

Overview

Anthony C. Davison is affiliated with the École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne in Switzerland. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with significant contributions across several subfields including global and planetary change, statistics and probability, finance, atmospheric science, and artificial intelligence.

The scientist's main areas of study encompass financial risk and volatility modeling, climate variability and models, hydrology and drought analysis, meteorological phenomena and simulations, statistical methods and Bayesian inference, plant water relations and carbon dynamics, and market dynamics and volatility.

Their recent publications demonstrate a range of topics and methodologies. Some notable papers include:

  • "Modelling Time Series Extremes" (2022), published in DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)
  • "The challenges of impact evaluation: Attempting to measure the effectiveness of community-based disaster risk management" (2020), published in International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
  • "Functional Peaks-Over-Threshold Analysis" (2022), published in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology)
  • "A fully joint Bayesian quantitative trait locus mapping of human protein abundance in plasma" (2020), published in PLoS Computational Biology
  • "Downscaling of Historical Wind Fields over Switzerland Using Generative Adversarial Networks" (2022), published in Artificial Intelligence for the Earth Systems

Frequent collaborators include Valérie Chavez-Demoulin, Ophélia Miralles, Soumaya Elkantassi, Léo R. Belzile, and Raphaël de Fondeville. The scientist has published extensively in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), Stat, The Annals of Applied Statistics, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology), and Journal of the American Statistical Association.

Over their career, they have contributed a significant body of work in environmental science as demonstrated by 25 publications in that field, with deeper engagement in statistics and financial modeling through 15 and 14 publications respectively. Their interdisciplinary approach integrates environmental change, statistical methodology, and contemporary artificial intelligence techniques.

Anthony C. Davison was named a Fellow of the American Statistical Association in 2002, reflecting recognition from the statistical community.

Best Publications

  • Bootstrap Methods and Their Application

    A. C. Davison;D. V. Hinkley

  • Models for exceedances over high thresholds

    A. C. Davison;R. L. Smith

  • The Oxford Dictionary of Statistical Terms

    D. R. Cox;D. Commenges;A. C. Davison;P. J. Solomon

  • Statistical Modeling of Spatial Extremes

    Anthony Davison;Simone Padoan;Mathieu Ribatet

  • Generalized additive modelling of sample extremes

    V. Chavez-Demoulin;A. C. Davison

  • Bootstrap Methods and Their Application

    S. T. Buckland;A. C. Davison;D. V. Hinkley

  • Modelling Excesses over High Thresholds, with an Application

    Anthony C. Davison

  • Recent Developments in Bootstrap Methodology

    A. C. Davison;D. V. Hinkley;G. A. Young

  • Geostatistics of Extremes

    Anthony C. Davison;Mehdi Mohammad Gholamrezaee

  • Statistics of Extremes

    A. C. Davison;R. Huser

  • Space–time modelling of extreme events

    R. Huser;Anthony C. Davison

  • Local likelihood smoothing of sample extremes

    A. C. Davison;N. I. Ramesh

  • Bayesian inference from composite likelihoods, with an application to spatial extremes

    Mathieu Ribatet;D. Cooley;Anthony C. Davison

  • Spatial modeling of extreme snow depth

    Juliette Blanchet;Anthony C. Davison

  • Saddlepoint approximations in resampling methods

    Anthony C. Davison;David V. Hinkley

  • Applied Asymptotics: Case Studies in Small-Sample Statistics

    Alessandra Rosalba Brazzale;A. C. Davison;N. Reid

  • Estimating value-at-risk: a point process approach

    V. Chavez-Demoulin;A. C. Davison;A. J. McNeil

  • Measuring the relative effect of factors affecting species distribution model predictions

    Emeric Thibaud;Blaise Petitpierre;Olivier Broennimann;Anthony C. Davison

  • Composite likelihood estimation for the Brown–Resnick process

    Raphaël Huser;Anthony C. Davison

  • Approximate predictive likelihood

    A. C. Davison

  • 11. Exploring the Limits of Bootstrap

    A. C. Davison

  • Statistics of extremes

    M. Lovric;A. C. Davison

Frequent Co-Authors

Nancy Reid
Nancy Reid University of Toronto
Thomas Peter
Thomas Peter ETH Zurich
Jonathan A. Tawn
Jonathan A. Tawn Lancaster University
René Stübi
René Stübi Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology
David R. Cox
David R. Cox University of Oxford
Arne Astrup
Arne Astrup Novo Nordisk Foundation
Wim H. M. Saris
Wim H. M. Saris Maastricht University
Mary-Ellen Harper
Mary-Ellen Harper University of Ottawa
Ted C. J. Turlings
Ted C. J. Turlings University of Neuchâtel

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Mathematics in the USA opens doors to various related online degrees that can enhance career prospects. Students interested in merging quantitative skills with business acumen often consider pursuing an MBA. Many programs offer options for mba transfer credits, making it easier to expedite the degree by recognizing prior coursework.

For those focused on data-driven decision-making, a data analytics master's degree is a strong complement to a mathematics background. This specialization prepares graduates for high-demand roles in technology, finance, and healthcare sectors.

Online MBA options vary widely in terms of competitiveness and duration. Students seeking flexible routes might explore the easiest mba specialization, which focuses on accessible programs with balanced rigor. Additionally, the easiest and fastest online mba programs can be an attractive option for professionals looking to upgrade their credentials quickly while continuing to work.

Choosing the right pathway depends on career goals and lifestyle needs, but these related degrees provide valuable options for math graduates aiming to diversify their skill sets and advance professionally.

Best Scientists Citing Anthony C. Davison

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles