World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
106
Citations
197395
World Ranking
32
National Ranking
1

David R. Cox publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David R. Cox sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 82 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 492 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

David R. Cox D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David R. Cox sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 137 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 106 D-Index — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2017 - International Prize in Statistics For Survival Analysis Model Applied in Medicine, Science and Engineering
  • 1989 - Member of Academia Europaea
  • 1974 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 1973 - Fellow of the Royal Society, United Kingdom
  • 1962 - Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA)

Overview

David R. Cox was affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Their main field of study was Mathematics, with specialization in Statistics and Probability as well as General Agricultural and Biological Sciences.

Their research focused on areas including Advanced Statistical Methods and Models, Agricultural Economics and Practices, and Statistics Education and Methodologies.

Throughout their career, they published articles in the following venues:

  • Significance
  • UNC Libraries

Notable recent papers included:

  • "C. R. Rao's Century," published in 2020 in Significance
  • "Loss-of-function mutations in SLC30A8 protect against type 2 diabetes," published in 2020 by UNC Libraries

Frequent co-authors of David R. Cox were:

  • Jaakko Tuomilehto
  • Bradley Efron
  • Шун-ичи Амари
  • Donald B. Rubin
  • Arni S. R. Srinivasa Rao

They were recognized with several awards, including:

  • International Prize in Statistics (2017) for Survival Analysis Model Applied in Medicine, Science and Engineering
  • Member of Academia Europaea (1989)
  • Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences (1974)
  • Fellow of the Royal Society, United Kingdom (1973)
  • Fellow of the American Statistical Association (1962)

Best Publications

  • Regression Models and Life-Tables

    David R. Cox

  • Regression models and life tables (with discussion

    David R. Cox

  • An Analysis of Transformations

    G. E. P. Box;D. R. Cox

  • Analysis of Survival Data

    D.R. Cox;D. Oakes

  • analysis of binary data

    D. R. Cox;E. J. Snell

  • Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II. analysis and examples.

    R Peto;M C Pike;P Armitage;N E Breslow

  • The theory of stochastic processes

    David R. Cox;Hilton D. Miller

  • The Analysis of Binary Data

    D. R. Cox

  • The statistical analysis of series of events

    David Roxbee Cox;Peter A W Lewis

  • Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. I. Introduction and design.

    R. Peto;M. C. Pike;P. Armitage;N. E. Breslow

  • The Regression Analysis of Binary Sequences

    D. R. Cox

  • Planning of Experiments

    David Cox

  • Parameter Orthogonality and Approximate Conditional Inference

    D. R. Cox;N. Reid

  • A General Definition of Residuals

    D. R. Cox;E. J. Snell

  • Tests of Separate Families of Hypotheses

    D. R. Cox

  • Further Results on Tests of Separate Families of Hypotheses

    D. R. Cox

  • The estimation of animal abundance

    D. R. Cox;G. A. F. Seber

  • Multivariate Dependencies: Models, Analysis and Interpretation

    D.R. Cox;Nanny Wermuth

  • Linear Amplification with Nonlinear Components

    D. Cox

  • On Bayesian analysis of mixtures with an unknown number of components. Discussion. Author's reply

    S. Richardson;P. J. Green;C. P. Robert;M. Aitkin

  • Analysis of Survival Data.

    N. Breslow;D. R. Cox;D. Oakes

Frequent Co-Authors

Nanny Wermuth
Nanny Wermuth Chalmers University of Technology
Gregg W. Stone
Gregg W. Stone Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Christl A. Donnelly
Christl A. Donnelly University of Oxford
Kelly A. Frazer
Kelly A. Frazer University of California, San Diego
Bruce R. Brodie
Bruce R. Brodie Moses H Cone Memorial Hospital
David A. Hinds
David A. Hinds 23andMe (United States)
George Gettinby
George Gettinby University of Strathclyde
Nancy Reid
Nancy Reid University of Toronto
Roxana Mehran
Roxana Mehran Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Timothy D. Henry
Timothy D. Henry Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students exploring Mathematics in the USA, branching into related fields through online degrees can broaden career opportunities. Many find that pursuing advanced education, such as an MBA, complements math skills with essential business acumen. The easiest mba program to get into offers a flexible option for those seeking quick admission and a manageable curriculum.

If speed and convenience are priorities, looking into easiest and fastest online mba programs provides a pathway to gain leadership credentials without pausing your career. These programs emphasize practical skill development alongside analytical thinking.

For individuals aiming at executive-level roles, the best 1 year dba program online can accelerate advancement by blending research, strategy, and business leadership within a short timeframe.

Additionally, complementing a mathematics background with financial expertise can open doors in banking, investment, and corporate sectors. The online masters in finance offers an affordable way to gain specialized knowledge tailored for these industries.

Best Scientists Citing David R. Cox

Recently Published Articles