World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
31
Citations
6052
World Ranking
13428
National Ranking
400

Scott A. Sisson publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott A. Sisson sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 141 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Scott A. Sisson D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott A. Sisson sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Scott A. Sisson is affiliated with the University of New South Wales in Australia. Their research primarily focuses on the field of computer science, with a significant emphasis on artificial intelligence and statistics.

The main fields of study for Scott A. Sisson include:

  • Computer Science

Within these fields, the subfields covered are:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Statistics and Probability
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Their research topics have involved the following areas:

  • Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models
  • Statistical Methods and Inference
  • Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods
  • Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
  • Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling
  • Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference

Their recent papers cover a variety of applied topics and were published in notable venues. These include:

  • "Ensemble of ARIMA: combining parametric and bootstrapping technique for traffic flow prediction," 2020, Transportmetrica A Transport Science
  • "Tools for enhancing the application of self-organizing maps in water resources research and engineering," 2020, Advances in Water Resources
  • "Machine Learning in Polymer Research," 2025, Advanced Materials
  • "Informing management decisions for ecological networks, using dynamic models calibrated to noisy time-series data," 2020, Ecology Letters
  • "Predicting seagrass decline due to cumulative stressors," 2020, Environmental Modelling & Software

Scott A. Sisson frequently collaborates with other researchers. Their most frequent co-authors include:

  • Boris Béranger
  • Xuhui Fan
  • David J. Nott
  • Kerrie Mengersen
  • Christopher Drovandi

They have published extensively across several venues, with multiple publications in:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Statistics and Computing
  • Drug and Alcohol Review
  • Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics
  • Extremes

Best Publications

  • Sequential Monte Carlo without likelihoods

    S. A. Sisson;Y. Fan;Mark M. Tanaka

  • Likelihood-Based Inference for Max-Stable Processes

    Simone Padoan;Mathieu Ribatet;Scott Sisson

  • A comparative review of dimension reduction methods in approximate Bayesian computation

    Michael Gb Blum;Matthew A. Nunes;Dennis Prangle;Scott A. Sisson

  • Handbook of Approximate Bayesian Computation

    Scott A. Sisson;Yanan Fan;Mark Beaumont

  • A fully probabilistic approach to extreme rainfall modeling

    Stuart Coles;Luis Raúl Pericchi;Scott Sisson

  • In defence of model-based inference in phylogeography.

    Mark A. Beaumont;Rasmus Nielsen;Christian Robert;Jody Hey

  • Modeling dependence between extreme rainfall and storm surge to estimate coastal flooding risk

    Feifei Zheng;Seth Westra;Michael Leonard;Scott A. Sisson

  • Transdimensional markov chains : A decade of progress and future perspectives

    Scott A Sisson

  • Detection of non-stationarity in precipitation extremes using a max-stable process model

    Seth Westra;Scott A. Sisson

  • Using Approximate Bayesian Computation to Estimate Tuberculosis Transmission Parameters From Genotype Data

    Mark M Tanaka;Andrew R Francis;Fabio Luciani;Scott Sisson

  • Inference for stereological extremes

    P Bortot;S. G Coles;S. A Sisson

  • Bayesian Inference, Monte Carlo Sampling and Operational Risk

    G. W. Peters;S. A. Sisson

  • Likelihood-free Markov chain Monte Carlo

    S A Sisson;Y Fan

  • Ensemble of ARIMA: combining parametric and bootstrapping technique for traffic flow prediction

    Siroos Shahriari;Milad Ghasri;S. A. Sisson;Taha Rashidi

  • Development of a formal likelihood function for improved Bayesian inference of ephemeral catchments

    Tyler Smith;Tyler Smith;Ashish Sharma;Lucy Marshall;Raj Mehrotra

  • Likelihood-Free MCMC

    Scott A Sisson;Yanan Fan

  • Likelihood-free Bayesian inference for α-stable models

    G. W. Peters;S. A. Sisson;Y. Fan

  • On sequential Monte Carlo, partial rejection control and approximate Bayesian computation

    Gareth W. Peters;Gareth W. Peters;Yanan Fan;Scott A. Sisson

  • Adaptive optimal scaling of Metropolis–Hastings algorithms using the Robbins–Monro process

    P. H. Garthwaite;Y. Fan;S. A. Sisson

  • Bayesian calibration and uncertainty analysis of hydrological models: A comparison of adaptive Metropolis and sequential Monte Carlo samplers

    Erwin Jeremiah;Scott Sisson;Lucy Marshall;Rajeshwar Mehrotra

  • Diagnostic tools for approximate Bayesian computation using the coverage property

    Dennis Prangle;Michael Gb Blum;G. Popovic;Scott Sisson

  • Approximate Bayesian computation via regression density estimation

    Yanan Fan;David J. Nott;Scott A. Sisson

  • Approximate Bayesian Computation and Bayes’ Linear Analysis: Toward High-Dimensional ABC

    D. J. Nott;Y. Fan;L. Marshall;S. A. Sisson

  • Statistical Inference and Simulation for Spatial Point Processes

    Scott A. Sisson

Frequent Co-Authors

David J. Nott
David J. Nott National University of Singapore
Ashish Sharma
Ashish Sharma University of New South Wales
Mark A. Beaumont
Mark A. Beaumont University of Bristol
Seth Westra
Seth Westra University of Adelaide
Laurent Excoffier
Laurent Excoffier University of Bern
Andrew J. Pitman
Andrew J. Pitman University of New South Wales
Stuart J. Khan
Stuart J. Khan University of Sydney
Rasmus Nielsen
Rasmus Nielsen University of California, Berkeley
David J. Balding
David J. Balding University of Melbourne
Paul H. Garthwaite
Paul H. Garthwaite The Open University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Computer Science but looking for flexible learning options, exploring an online associate degree can be an excellent start. These programs allow you to build foundational knowledge without committing to a four-year program and are suitable for career changers or those balancing work and study.

If affordability is a primary concern, consider applying to cheap online colleges. These institutions offer recognized programs at reduced tuition rates while still providing quality education.

Admission can be another hurdle for some learners. Fortunately, there are online schools that accept low gpa. These schools give more students a second chance to pursue a technology degree and launch a lucrative career.

Beyond computer science, other in-demand fields like environmental science also offer lucrative job prospects. You can learn more about high-paying jobs with environmental science degree programs, which can also be earned online.

Best Scientists Citing Scott A. Sisson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles