World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Environmental Sciences
Australia
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
90
Citations
36690
World Ranking
582
National Ranking
25

Andrew J. Pitman publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew J. Pitman sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 340 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Andrew J. Pitman D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew J. Pitman sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 90 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in Australia Leader Award

Overview

Andrew J. Pitman is affiliated with the University of New South Wales in Australia. Their research primarily centers on environmental science, with a particular focus on global and planetary change.

The main fields of study for this scientist include:

  • Environmental Science

The subfields of study they engage with are:

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Environmental Engineering

Central topics in their research cover:

  • Climate variability and models
  • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Hydrology and Drought Analysis
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Fire effects on ecosystems

Andrew J. Pitman has published multiple papers in frequently appearing venues such as:

  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Weather and Climate Extremes
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Nature Climate Change
  • Biogeosciences

Some recent publications include:

  • "Connections of climate change and variability to large and extreme forest fires in southeast Australia," 2021, Communications Earth & Environment
  • "Robust Future Changes in Meteorological Drought in CMIP6 Projections Despite Uncertainty in Precipitation," 2020, Geophysical Research Letters
  • "Global hotspots for the occurrence of compound events," 2020, Nature Communications
  • "Widespread shift from ecosystem energy to water limitation with climate change," 2022, Nature Climate Change
  • "Increased occurrence of high impact compound events under climate change," 2022, npj Climate and Atmospheric Science

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Martin G. De Kauwe
  • Anna Ukkola
  • Gab Abramowitz
  • Sanaa Hobeichi
  • Jason P. Evans

Best Publications

  • Regions of Strong Coupling Between Soil Moisture and Precipitation

    Randal D. Koster;Paul A. Dirmeyer;Zhichang Guo;Gordon Bonan

  • Future climate risk from compound events

    Jakob Zscheischler;Seth Westra;Bart J. J. M. van den Hurk;Bart J. J. M. van den Hurk;Sonia I. Seneviratne

  • The evolution of, and revolution in, land surface schemes designed for climate models

    A. J. Pitman

  • Global patterns in plant height

    Angela T. Moles;David I. Warton;Laura Warman;Nathan G. Swenson

  • Land use/land cover changes and climate: modeling analysis and observational evidence

    Roger A. Pielke Sr.;Andy Pitman;Dev Niyogi;Rezaul Mahmood

  • Evaluation of the AR4 Climate Models’ Simulated Daily Maximum Temperature, Minimum Temperature, and Precipitation over Australia Using Probability Density Functions

    SE Perkins;AJ Pitman;NJ Holbrook;J McAneney

  • GLACE: The Global Land-Atmosphere Coupling Experiment. Part I: Overview

    Randal D. Koster;Zhichang Guo;Paul A. Dirmeyer;Gordon Bonan

  • Allowable CO2 emissions based on regional and impact-related climate targets

    Sonia I. Seneviratne;Markus G. Donat;Andy J. Pitman;Reto Knutti

  • Connections of climate change and variability to large and extreme forest fires in southeast Australia

    Nerilie J. Abram;Benjamin J. Henley;Benjamin J. Henley;Alex Sen Gupta;Tanya J. R. Lippmann

  • Uncertainties in climate responses to past land cover change: First results from the LUCID intercomparison study

    A. J. Pitman;N. de Noblet-Ducoudré;F. T. Cruz;E. L. Davin;E. L. Davin

  • The Copenhagen Diagnosis: Updating the World on the Latest Climate Science

    I. Allison;N. L. Bindoff;R. A. Bindschadler;P. M. Cox

  • Tropical deforestation: Modeling local- to regional-scale climate change

    A. Henderson-Sellers;Robert Earl Dickinson;T. B. Durbidge;P. J. Kennedy

  • Global patterns in seed size

    Angela T Moles;Angela T Moles;David D Ackerly;John C Tweddle;John C Tweddle;John B Dickie

  • Modeling Root Water Uptake in Hydrological and Climate Models

    R.A. Feddes;H. Hoff;M. Bruen;T.E. Dawson

  • Which is a better predictor of plant traits: temperature or precipitation?

    Angela T. Moles;Sarah E. Perkins;Shawn W. Laffan;Habacuc Flores-Moreno

  • Robust Future Changes in Meteorological Drought in CMIP6 Projections Despite Uncertainty in Precipitation

    Anna M. Ukkola;Martin G. De Kauwe;Michael L. Roderick;Gab Abramowitz

  • Land–atmosphere feedbacks amplify aridity increase over land under global warming

    Alexis Berg;Kirsten Findell;Benjamin Lintner;Alessandra Giannini

  • Cabauw Experimental Results from the Project for Intercomparison of Land-Surface Parameterization Schemes

    T.H. Chen;A. Henderson-Sellers;P.C.D. Milly;A.J. Pitman

  • The Project for Intercomparison of Land Surface Parameterization Schemes (PILPS): Phases 2 and 3

    A. Henderson-Sellers;A. J. Pitman;P. K. Love;P. Irannejad

  • Why is the choice of future climate scenarios for species distribution modelling important

    Linda J. Beaumont;Lesley Hughes;A. J. Pitman

  • Impacts of climate change on the world's most exceptional ecoregions

    Linda J. Beaumont;Andrew Pitman;Sarah Perkins;Niklaus E. Zimmermann

  • Determining Robust Impacts of Land-Use-Induced Land Cover Changes on Surface Climate over North America and Eurasia: Results from the First Set of LUCID Experiments

    N de Noblet-Ducoudre;J.P. Boisier;A. Pitman;G.B. Bonan

Frequent Co-Authors

Jason P. Evans
Jason P. Evans University of New South Wales
Ann Henderson-Sellers
Ann Henderson-Sellers Macquarie University
Ying-Ping Wang
Ying-Ping Wang Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Martin G. De Kauwe
Martin G. De Kauwe University of Bristol
Markus G. Donat
Markus G. Donat Barcelona Supercomputing Center
Belinda E. Medlyn
Belinda E. Medlyn Western Sydney University
Paul A. Dirmeyer
Paul A. Dirmeyer George Mason University
Zong-Liang Yang
Zong-Liang Yang The University of Texas at Austin
Sarah E. Perkins-Kirkpatrick
Sarah E. Perkins-Kirkpatrick University of New South Wales

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond Environmental Sciences, numerous online degree options offer flexible pathways. Educators and professionals can explore an online eds to edd bridge program to advance their qualifications, combining environmental knowledge with leadership in educational settings.

Social work professionals aiming to address environmental justice issues may find pursuing the cheapest dsw program useful, which balances affordability with rigorous study in social work leadership.

For students seeking a broader foundation, affordable options like the cheap online general studies degree provide flexibility to tailor coursework around environmental topics and interdisciplinary learning.

Additionally, some learners prefer programs that are less intensive or have more accessible entry points; exploring the easy bachelor's degree pathway can offer a pragmatic solution without compromising educational value.

Choosing the right program depends on individual goals, balancing degree rigor with accessibility, and aligning studies with career aspirations in environmental sciences and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew J. Pitman

Trending Scientists