World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Environmental Sciences
Australia
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 91 555 522 24 24 323 39272
Biology and Biochemistry 91 2282 2079 52 51 323 39466

Ying-Ping Wang publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ying-Ping Wang between 1988 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ying-Ping Wang published across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025, averaging 16.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 89 publications in 2025. 151 of the 612 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 89. Peak 89 publications in 2025. 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 3 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 2 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 4 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 28 publications 2016: 36 publications 2017: 21 publications 2018: 20 publications 2019: 33 publications 2020: 22 publications 2021: 53 publications 2022: 60 publications 2023: 68 publications 2024: 62 publications 2025: 89 publications
1988 2025

612 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ying-Ping Wang: publications per year, 1988 to 2025
Year Publications
1988 1
1989 1
1990 3
1991 2
1992 2
1993 3
1994 2
1995 2
1996 1
1997 2
1998 4
1999 2
2000 4
2001 1
2002 1
2003 4
2004 2
2005 0
2006 8
2007 5
2008 4
2009 5
2010 10
2011 14
2012 12
2013 14
2014 11
2015 28
2016 36
2017 21
2018 20
2019 33
2020 22
2021 53
2022 60
2023 68
2024 62
2025 89
Total 612
Download as CSV

Ying-Ping Wang publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ying-Ping Wang sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 321–330 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 323 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106 323
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Ying-Ping Wang D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ying-Ping Wang sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 91 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20 91
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in Australia Leader Award

Overview

Ying-Ping Wang is affiliated with the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation in Australia. Their research spans significant topics within environmental science, particularly focusing on soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics, plant water relations and carbon dynamics, and climate variability and models.

Their recent publications include the following papers:

  • Microbial carbon use efficiency promotes global soil carbon storage (2023, Nature)
  • The Australian Earth System Model: ACCESS-ESM1.5 (2020, Journal of Southern Hemisphere Earth System Science)
  • Disentangling the effects of vapor pressure deficit on northern terrestrial vegetation productivity (2023, Science Advances)
  • Tradeoff of CO2 and CH4 emissions from global peatlands under water-table drawdown (2021, Nature Climate Change)
  • Global patterns and drivers of soil total phosphorus concentration (2021, Earth system science data)

Ying-Ping Wang frequently collaborates with other researchers in their field. Notable co-authors include:

  • Philippe Ciais
  • Yuanyuan Huang
  • Junhua Yan
  • Daniel S. Goll
  • Yiqi Luo

The scientist publishes regularly in several academic venues, with a concentration of works appearing in:

  • Faculty Opinions - Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Global Change Biology
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Environmental Research Letters

Their research covers subfields that include global and planetary change, molecular biology, plant science, soil science, and ecology. Specific topics addressed across their publications are:

  • Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Ginseng Biological Effects and Applications
  • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Climate variability and models
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
  • Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics

Best Publications

  • Global carbon budget 2014

    C. Le Quéré;R. Moriarty;R. M. Andrew;G. P. Peters

  • Greening of the Earth and its drivers

    Zaichun Zhu;Zaichun Zhu;Shilong Piao;Shilong Piao;Ranga B. Myneni;Mengtian Huang

  • Increased atmospheric vapor pressure deficit reduces global vegetation growth

    Wenping Yuan;Yi Zheng;Shilong Piao;Philippe Ciais

  • The dominant role of semi-arid ecosystems in the trend and variability of the land CO2 sink

    Anders Ahlström;Anders Ahlström;Michael R. Raupach;Guy Schurgers;Benjamin Smith

  • Harmonization of land-use scenarios for the period 1500–2100: 600 years of global gridded annual land-use transitions, wood harvest, and resulting secondary lands

    G. C. Hurtt;G. C. Hurtt;L. P. Chini;S. Frolking;R. A. Betts

  • A unifying framework for dinitrogen fixation in the terrestrial biosphere

    Benjamin Z. Houlton;Benjamin Z. Houlton;Benjamin Z. Houlton;Ying-Ping Wang;Peter M. Vitousek;Christopher B. Field

  • Detection and Attribution of Vegetation Greening Trend in China over the Last 30 Years

    Shilong Piao;Shilong Piao;Guodong Yin;Jianguang Tan;Lei Cheng

  • Multi-decadal trends in global terrestrial evapotranspiration and its components

    Yongqiang Zhang;Jorge L. Peña-Arancibia;Tim R. McVicar;Tim R. McVicar;Francis H. S. Chiew

  • A two-leaf model for canopy conductance, photosynthesis and partitioning of available energy I:: Model description and comparison with a multi-layered model

    Y.-P. Wang;R. Leuning

  • Microbial carbon use efficiency promotes global soil carbon storage

    Unknown

  • A global model of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus cycles for the terrestrial biosphere

    Y. P. Wang;R. M. Law;B. Pak

  • Compensatory water effects link yearly global land CO2 sink changes to temperature

    Martin Jung;Markus Reichstein;Christopher R. Schwalm;Christopher Huntingford

  • Description and validation of an array model - MAESTRO.

    Y.P. Wang;P.G. Jarvis

  • A Two-Big-Leaf Model for Canopy Temperature, Photosynthesis, and Stomatal Conductance

    Yongjiu Dai;Robert E. Dickinson;Ying Ping Wang

  • The Australian Earth System Model: ACCESS-ESM1.5

    Tilo Ziehn;Matthew A. Chamberlain;Rachel M. Law;Andrew Lenton

  • A meta-analysis of 1,119 manipulative experiments on terrestrial carbon-cycling responses to global change

    Jian Song;Jian Song;Shiqiang Wan;Shiqiang Wan;Shilong Piao;Shilong Piao;Alan K. Knapp

  • Toward more realistic projections of soil carbon dynamics by Earth system models

    Yiqi Luo;Yiqi Luo;Anders Ahlström;Anders Ahlström;Steven D. Allison;Niels H. Batjes

  • Climate mitigation from vegetation biophysical feedbacks during the past three decades

    Zhenzhong Zeng;Shilong Piao;Laurent Z. X. Li;Liming Zhou

  • Evaluation of 11 terrestrial carbon–nitrogen cycle models against observations from two temperate Free‐Air CO2 Enrichment studies

    Soenke Zaehle;Belinda E. Medlyn;Martin G. De Kauwe;Anthony P. Walker

  • Forest water use and water use efficiency at elevated CO2: a model‐data intercomparison at two contrasting temperate forest FACE sites

    Martin G. De Kauwe;Belinda E. Medlyn;Soenke Zaehle;Anthony P. Walker

  • Improving land surface models with FLUXNET data

    Mathew Williams;Andrew D. Richardson;M. Reichstein;Paul C. Stoy

Frequent Co-Authors

Yiqi Luo
Yiqi Luo Cornell University
Shilong Piao
Shilong Piao Peking University
Belinda E. Medlyn
Belinda E. Medlyn Western Sydney University
Jianyang Xia
Jianyang Xia East China Normal University
Sönke Zaehle
Sönke Zaehle Max Planck Society
Andrew J. Pitman
Andrew J. Pitman University of New South Wales
Richard J. Norby
Richard J. Norby University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Anthony P. Walker
Anthony P. Walker Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Martin G. De Kauwe
Martin G. De Kauwe University of Bristol
Lei Cheng
Lei Cheng Wuhan University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to diverse career pathways, many of which can be enhanced through advanced online degrees. For educators seeking to deepen their expertise without the extensive commitment of a traditional dissertation, programs like those found in edd no dissertation are ideal. These flexible options allow professionals to balance work and study effectively.

For those looking to advance within educational leadership, exploring the best eds to edd programs can provide a streamlined pathway, ensuring alignment between educational theory and practice. Such degrees often translate well into policy-making or administrative roles in environmental organizations.

Social work in environmental contexts is another critical area. Programs like the fully funded dsw programs offer financially accessible options for professionals aiming to merge social impact with environmental advocacy.

Finally, a broader academic foundation can be established through the best affordable online general studies degree programs. These programs provide flexibility and multidisciplinary approaches, which are valuable in tackling complex environmental challenges.

Best Scientists Citing Ying-Ping Wang

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles