World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Environmental Sciences
Australia
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
91
Citations
39272
World Ranking
552
National Ranking
24

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
91
Citations
39466
World Ranking
2283
National Ranking
52

Ying-Ping Wang publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ying-Ping Wang sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 323 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Ying-Ping Wang D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ying-Ping Wang sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in Australia Leader Award

Overview

Ying-Ping Wang is affiliated with the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation in Australia. Their research spans significant topics within environmental science, particularly focusing on soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics, plant water relations and carbon dynamics, and climate variability and models.

Their recent publications include the following papers:

  • Microbial carbon use efficiency promotes global soil carbon storage (2023, Nature)
  • The Australian Earth System Model: ACCESS-ESM1.5 (2020, Journal of Southern Hemisphere Earth System Science)
  • Disentangling the effects of vapor pressure deficit on northern terrestrial vegetation productivity (2023, Science Advances)
  • Tradeoff of CO2 and CH4 emissions from global peatlands under water-table drawdown (2021, Nature Climate Change)
  • Global patterns and drivers of soil total phosphorus concentration (2021, Earth system science data)

Ying-Ping Wang frequently collaborates with other researchers in their field. Notable co-authors include:

  • Philippe Ciais
  • Yuanyuan Huang
  • Junhua Yan
  • Daniel S. Goll
  • Yiqi Luo

The scientist publishes regularly in several academic venues, with a concentration of works appearing in:

  • Faculty Opinions - Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Global Change Biology
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Environmental Research Letters

Their research covers subfields that include global and planetary change, molecular biology, plant science, soil science, and ecology. Specific topics addressed across their publications are:

  • Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Ginseng Biological Effects and Applications
  • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Climate variability and models
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
  • Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics

Best Publications

  • Global carbon budget 2014

    C. Le Quéré;R. Moriarty;R. M. Andrew;G. P. Peters

  • Greening of the Earth and its drivers

    Zaichun Zhu;Zaichun Zhu;Shilong Piao;Shilong Piao;Ranga B. Myneni;Mengtian Huang

  • Increased atmospheric vapor pressure deficit reduces global vegetation growth

    Wenping Yuan;Yi Zheng;Shilong Piao;Philippe Ciais

  • The dominant role of semi-arid ecosystems in the trend and variability of the land CO2 sink

    Anders Ahlström;Anders Ahlström;Michael R. Raupach;Guy Schurgers;Benjamin Smith

  • Harmonization of land-use scenarios for the period 1500–2100: 600 years of global gridded annual land-use transitions, wood harvest, and resulting secondary lands

    G. C. Hurtt;G. C. Hurtt;L. P. Chini;S. Frolking;R. A. Betts

  • A unifying framework for dinitrogen fixation in the terrestrial biosphere

    Benjamin Z. Houlton;Benjamin Z. Houlton;Benjamin Z. Houlton;Ying-Ping Wang;Peter M. Vitousek;Christopher B. Field

  • Detection and Attribution of Vegetation Greening Trend in China over the Last 30 Years

    Shilong Piao;Shilong Piao;Guodong Yin;Jianguang Tan;Lei Cheng

  • Multi-decadal trends in global terrestrial evapotranspiration and its components

    Yongqiang Zhang;Jorge L. Peña-Arancibia;Tim R. McVicar;Tim R. McVicar;Francis H. S. Chiew

  • A two-leaf model for canopy conductance, photosynthesis and partitioning of available energy I:: Model description and comparison with a multi-layered model

    Y.-P. Wang;R. Leuning

  • Microbial carbon use efficiency promotes global soil carbon storage

    Unknown

  • A global model of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus cycles for the terrestrial biosphere

    Y. P. Wang;R. M. Law;B. Pak

  • Compensatory water effects link yearly global land CO2 sink changes to temperature

    Martin Jung;Markus Reichstein;Christopher R. Schwalm;Christopher Huntingford

  • Description and validation of an array model - MAESTRO.

    Y.P. Wang;P.G. Jarvis

  • A Two-Big-Leaf Model for Canopy Temperature, Photosynthesis, and Stomatal Conductance

    Yongjiu Dai;Robert E. Dickinson;Ying Ping Wang

  • The Australian Earth System Model: ACCESS-ESM1.5

    Tilo Ziehn;Matthew A. Chamberlain;Rachel M. Law;Andrew Lenton

  • A meta-analysis of 1,119 manipulative experiments on terrestrial carbon-cycling responses to global change

    Jian Song;Jian Song;Shiqiang Wan;Shiqiang Wan;Shilong Piao;Shilong Piao;Alan K. Knapp

  • Toward more realistic projections of soil carbon dynamics by Earth system models

    Yiqi Luo;Yiqi Luo;Anders Ahlström;Anders Ahlström;Steven D. Allison;Niels H. Batjes

  • Climate mitigation from vegetation biophysical feedbacks during the past three decades

    Zhenzhong Zeng;Shilong Piao;Laurent Z. X. Li;Liming Zhou

  • Evaluation of 11 terrestrial carbon–nitrogen cycle models against observations from two temperate Free‐Air CO2 Enrichment studies

    Soenke Zaehle;Belinda E. Medlyn;Martin G. De Kauwe;Anthony P. Walker

  • Forest water use and water use efficiency at elevated CO2: a model‐data intercomparison at two contrasting temperate forest FACE sites

    Martin G. De Kauwe;Belinda E. Medlyn;Soenke Zaehle;Anthony P. Walker

  • Improving land surface models with FLUXNET data

    Mathew Williams;Andrew D. Richardson;M. Reichstein;Paul C. Stoy

Frequent Co-Authors

Yiqi Luo
Yiqi Luo Cornell University
Shilong Piao
Shilong Piao Peking University
Belinda E. Medlyn
Belinda E. Medlyn Western Sydney University
Jianyang Xia
Jianyang Xia East China Normal University
Sönke Zaehle
Sönke Zaehle Max Planck Society
Andrew J. Pitman
Andrew J. Pitman University of New South Wales
Richard J. Norby
Richard J. Norby University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Anthony P. Walker
Anthony P. Walker Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Martin G. De Kauwe
Martin G. De Kauwe University of Bristol
Lei Cheng
Lei Cheng Wuhan University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to diverse career pathways, many of which can be enhanced through advanced online degrees. For educators seeking to deepen their expertise without the extensive commitment of a traditional dissertation, programs like those found in edd no dissertation are ideal. These flexible options allow professionals to balance work and study effectively.

For those looking to advance within educational leadership, exploring the best eds to edd programs can provide a streamlined pathway, ensuring alignment between educational theory and practice. Such degrees often translate well into policy-making or administrative roles in environmental organizations.

Social work in environmental contexts is another critical area. Programs like the fully funded dsw programs offer financially accessible options for professionals aiming to merge social impact with environmental advocacy.

Finally, a broader academic foundation can be established through the best affordable online general studies degree programs. These programs provide flexibility and multidisciplinary approaches, which are valuable in tackling complex environmental challenges.

Best Scientists Citing Ying-Ping Wang

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles