World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Annmarie MacNamara

Annmarie MacNamara

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 33 10457 9787 5494 5016 83 5510

Annmarie MacNamara publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Annmarie MacNamara between 2009 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Annmarie MacNamara published across 17 years, from 2009 to 2025, averaging 5.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2022. 13 of the 91 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2009 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2022. 2009: 2 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 8 publications
2009 2025

91 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Annmarie MacNamara: publications per year, 2009 to 2025
Year Publications
2009 2
2010 2
2011 4
2012 4
2013 3
2014 3
2015 3
2016 9
2017 9
2018 7
2019 4
2020 5
2021 8
2022 10
2023 5
2024 5
2025 8
Total 91
Download as CSV

Annmarie MacNamara publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Annmarie MacNamara sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 83 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605 83
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Annmarie MacNamara D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Annmarie MacNamara sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 33
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Annmarie MacNamara is affiliated with Texas A&M University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology and neuroscience, with notable contributions in cognitive neuroscience and experimental and cognitive psychology. They have also engaged with areas such as clinical psychology, social psychology, and applied psychology.

Their work focuses on a range of topics including neural and behavioral psychology studies, anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, cognitive processes, mental health research, functional brain connectivity, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, neural dynamics and brain function, and memory and neural mechanisms.

Annmarie MacNamara has published multiple papers in various scientific journals. Some of their recent publications include:

  • #EEGManyLabs: Investigating the replicability of influential EEG experiments, 2021, Cortex
  • Event-related potential studies of emotion regulation: A review of recent progress and future directions, 2022, International Journal of Psychophysiology
  • Intolerance of uncertainty and threat generalization: A replication and extension, 2020, Psychophysiology
  • Establishing norms for error-related brain activity during the arrow Flanker task among young adults, 2020, NeuroImage
  • One hundred years of EEG for brain and behaviour research, 2024, Nature Human Behaviour

Frequent co-authors collaborating with MacNamara include:

  • Elizabeth Bauer
  • Kayla A. Wilson
  • Yuhan Cheng
  • Anna Weinberg
  • Brandon K. Watanabe

Their research results appear regularly in the following publication venues:

  • Psychophysiology
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • International Journal of Psychophysiology
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy
  • NeuroImage

Best Publications

  • Event-Related Potentials, Emotion, and Emotion Regulation: An Integrative Review

    Greg Hajcak;Annmarie MacNamara;Doreen M Olvet

  • ERPs and the Study of Emotion

    Greg Hajcak;Anna Weinberg;Annmarie MacNamara;Dan Foti

  • Tell me about it: Neural activity elicited by emotional pictures and preceding descriptions.

    Annmarie MacNamara;Dan Foti;Greg Hajcak

  • Electrocortical evidence for rapid allocation of attention to threat in the dot-probe task

    Emily S. Kappenman;Annmarie MacNamara;Greg Hajcak Proudfit

  • Working memory load reduces the late positive potential and this effect is attenuated with increasing anxiety

    Annmarie MacNamara;Jamie Ferri;Greg Hajcak

  • The dynamic allocation of attention to emotion: Simultaneous and independent evidence from the late positive potential and steady state visual evoked potentials

    Greg Hajcak;Annmarie MacNamara;Dan Foti;Jamie Ferri

  • Distinct electrocortical and behavioral evidence for increased attention to threat in generalized anxiety disorder

    Annmarie MacNamara;Greg Hajcak

  • Previously reappraised: the lasting effect of description type on picture-elicited electrocortical activity

    Annmarie MacNamara;Kevin N. Ochsner;Greg Hajcak

  • Anxiety and spatial attention moderate the electrocortical response to aversive pictures

    Annmarie MacNamara;Greg Hajcak

  • Diagnostic and Symptom-Based Predictors of Emotional Processing in Generalized Anxiety Disorder and Major Depressive Disorder: An Event-Related Potential Study

    Annmarie MacNamara;Roman Kotov;Greg Hajcak

  • Event-related induced frontal alpha as a marker of lateral prefrontal cortex activation during cognitive reappraisal

    Muhammad A. Parvaz;Annmarie MacNamara;Rita Z. Goldstein;Greg Hajcak

  • Enhanced Neural Reactivity to Threatening Faces in Anxious Youth: Evidence from Event-Related Potentials.

    Autumn Kujawa;Autumn Kujawa;Annmarie MacNamara;Kate D. Fitzgerald;Christopher S. Monk

  • #EEGManyLabs : investigating the replicability of influential EEG experiments

    Yuri G. Pavlov;Nika Adamian;Stefan Appelhoff;Mahnaz Arvaneh

  • Resting-state theta band connectivity and graph analysis in generalized social anxiety disorder

    Mengqi Xing;Reza Tadayonnejad;Annmarie MacNamara;Olusola Ajilore

  • FOCAL AND ABERRANT PREFRONTAL ENGAGEMENT DURING EMOTION REGULATION IN VETERANS WITH POSTTRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER

    Christine A. Rabinak;Annmarie MacNamara;Amy E. Kennedy;Mike Angstadt

  • Emotion Regulatory Brain Function and SSRI Treatment in PTSD: Neural Correlates and Predictors of Change

    Annmarie MacNamara;Christine A. Rabinak;Amy E. Kennedy;Amy E. Kennedy;Daniel A. Fitzgerald;Daniel A. Fitzgerald

  • What do clinicians treat: Diagnoses or symptoms? The incremental validity of a symptom-based, dimensional characterization of emotional disorders in predicting medication prescription patterns

    Monika A. Waszczuk;Mark Zimmerman;Mark Zimmerman;Camilo Ruggero;Kaiqiao Li

  • Event-related potential studies of emotion regulation: A review of recent progress and future directions

    Unknown

  • Cognitive load and emotional processing in generalized anxiety disorder: electrocortical evidence for increased distractibility.

    Annmarie MacNamara;Greg Hajcak Proudfit

  • Electrocortical processing of social signals of threat in combat-related post-traumatic stress disorder.

    Annmarie MacNamara;David Post;Amy E. Kennedy;Amy E. Kennedy;Christine A. Rabinak

  • Intolerance of uncertainty and threat generalization: A replication and extension.

    Elizabeth A Bauer;Annmarie MacNamara;Aislinn Sandre;Tina B Lonsdorf

Frequent Co-Authors

K. Luan Phan
K. Luan Phan The Ohio State University
Greg Hajcak
Greg Hajcak Santa Clara University
Anna Weinberg
Anna Weinberg McGill University
Dan Foti
Dan Foti Purdue University West Lafayette
Gregory J. Zelinsky
Gregory J. Zelinsky Stony Brook University
Israel Liberzon
Israel Liberzon Texas A&M University
Daniel A. Fitzgerald
Daniel A. Fitzgerald University of Illinois at Chicago
Autumn Kujawa
Autumn Kujawa Vanderbilt University
Roman Kotov
Roman Kotov Stony Brook University
Stewart A. Shankman
Stewart A. Shankman Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

A degree in Psychology opens up diverse career possibilities beyond traditional counseling roles. One fast-growing area is Speech-Language Pathology, which combines psychological principles with communication science to support individuals with speech, language, and swallowing disorders.

Many states have distinct requirements for this rewarding career. For example, students interested in becoming a speech therapist in Pennsylvania must complete a master’s program, supervised clinical hours, and pass state and national exams. Those considering becoming a speech therapist in Rhode Island will encounter similar educational and licensure requirements.

If you’re interested in SLP requirements in other states, it’s important to review regional guidelines, such as the slp requirements in South Carolina or learn how to become a speech language pathologist in South Dakota. Pursuing online psychology or communication sciences degrees can help you build a flexible and impactful career supporting communication health across all ages.

Best Scientists Citing Annmarie MacNamara

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles