World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 105 6802 6396 654 624 630 38498

Helen J. Lachmann publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Helen J. Lachmann between 1998 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Helen J. Lachmann published across 29 years, from 1998 to 2026, averaging 24.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 59 publications in 2013. 21 of the 701 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 59. Peak 59 publications in 2013. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 4 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 15 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 16 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 21 publications 2007: 20 publications 2008: 18 publications 2009: 23 publications 2010: 40 publications 2011: 35 publications 2012: 21 publications 2013: 59 publications 2014: 38 publications 2015: 59 publications 2016: 29 publications 2017: 34 publications 2018: 29 publications 2019: 37 publications 2020: 34 publications 2021: 28 publications 2022: 30 publications 2023: 23 publications 2024: 36 publications 2025: 20 publications 2026: 1 publication
1998 2026

701 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Helen J. Lachmann: publications per year, 1998 to 2026
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 1
2000 4
2001 9
2002 15
2003 9
2004 16
2005 11
2006 21
2007 20
2008 18
2009 23
2010 40
2011 35
2012 21
2013 59
2014 38
2015 59
2016 29
2017 34
2018 29
2019 37
2020 34
2021 28
2022 30
2023 23
2024 36
2025 20
2026 1
Total 701
Download as CSV

Helen J. Lachmann publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Helen J. Lachmann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 621–640 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 630 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386 630
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Helen J. Lachmann D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Helen J. Lachmann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 104–105 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 105 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513 105
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Helen J. Lachmann is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a significant focus on areas such as Molecular Biology, Nephrology, Immunology, Rheumatology, and Genetics.

Their work addresses multiple topics, including:

  • Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
  • Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments
  • Inflammasome and immune disorders
  • Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
  • Medical Imaging and Pathology Studies
  • Autoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders Research
  • Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis

Helen J. Lachmann has contributed to recent publications in high-impact journals. Notable papers include:

  • "Somatic Mutations in UBA1 and Severe Adult-Onset Autoinflammatory Disease," 2020, New England Journal of Medicine
  • "Familial Mediterranean fever, from pathogenesis to treatment: a contemporary review," 2020, TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES
  • "Impact of Earlier Diagnosis in Cardiac ATTR Amyloidosis Over the Course of 20 Years," 2022, Circulation
  • "Effect of Canakinumab vs Placebo on Survival Without Invasive Mechanical Ventilation in Patients Hospitalized With Severe COVID-19," 2021, JAMA
  • "Epidemiologic and Survival Trends in Amyloidosis, 1987-2019," 2020, New England Journal of Medicine

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Lachmann feature:

  • Philip N. Hawkins
  • Julian D. Gillmore
  • Ashutosh Wechalekar
  • Carol Whelan
  • Ana Martinez-Naharro

Their research outputs are often published in venues such as:

  • European Heart Journal
  • Circulation
  • European Journal of Heart Failure
  • British Journal of Haematology
  • Blood

Best Publications

  • Nonbiopsy Diagnosis of Cardiac Transthyretin Amyloidosis.

    Julian D. Gillmore;Mathew S. Maurer;Rodney H. Falk;Giampaolo Merlini

  • Somatic Mutations in UBA1 and Severe Adult-Onset Autoinflammatory Disease.

    David B. Beck;Marcela A. Ferrada;Keith A. Sikora;Amanda K. Ombrello

  • Natural history and outcome in systemic AA amyloidosis.

    Helen J Lachmann;Hugh J B Goodman;Janet A Gilbertson;J Ruth Gallimore

  • Use of canakinumab in the cryopyrin-associated periodic syndrome.

    Helen J Lachmann;Isabelle Kone-Paut;Jasmin B Kuemmerle-Deschner;Kieron S Leslie

  • Misdiagnosis of hereditary amyloidosis as AL (primary) amyloidosis.

    Helen J Lachmann;David R Booth;Susanne E Booth;Alison Bybee

  • Spectrum of clinical features in Muckle‐Wells syndrome and response to anakinra

    Philip N. Hawkins;Helen J. Lachmann;Ebun Aganna;Michael F. McDermott

  • Targeted pharmacological depletion of serum amyloid P component for treatment of human amyloidosis

    M. B. Pepys;J. Herbert;W. L. Hutchinson;G. A. Tennent

  • The European Society for Immunodeficiencies (ESID) Registry Working Definitions for the Clinical Diagnosis of Inborn Errors of Immunity

    Markus G. Seidel;Gerhard Kindle;Benjamin Gathmann;Isabella Quinti

  • Prognostic Value of Late Gadolinium Enhancement Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Cardiac Amyloidosis

    Marianna Fontana;Silvia Pica;Patricia Reant;Amna Abdel-Gadir

  • A new staging system for cardiac transthyretin amyloidosis

    Julian D Gillmore;Thibaud Damy;Marianna Fontana;Matthew Hutchinson

  • Interleukin-1-receptor antagonist in the Muckle-Wells syndrome.

    Philip N. Hawkins;Helen J. Lachmann;Michael F. McDermott

  • T helper 1 immunity requires complement-driven NLRP3 inflammasome activity in CD4+ T cells

    Giuseppina Arbore;Erin E. West;Rosanne Spolski;Avril A. B. Robertson

  • Outcome in systemic AL amyloidosis in relation to changes in concentration of circulating free immunoglobulin light chains following chemotherapy.

    Helen J. Lachmann;Ruth Gallimore;Julian D. Gillmore;Hugh D. Carr-Smith

  • Classification criteria for autoinflammatory recurrent fevers

    Marco Gattorno;Michael Hofer;Silvia Federici;Federica Vanoni

  • Association of mutations in the NALP3/CIAS1/PYPAF1 gene with a broad phenotype including recurrent fever, cold sensitivity, sensorineural deafness, and AA amyloidosis.

    Ebun Aganna;Fabio Martinon;Philip N. Hawkins;John B. Ross

  • Canakinumab for the Treatment of Autoinflammatory Recurrent Fever Syndromes

    Fabrizio De Benedetti;Marco Gattorno;Jordi Anton;Eldad Ben-Chetrit

  • Treatment of autoinflammatory diseases: results from the Eurofever Registry and a literature review

    Nienke Ter Haar;Helen Lachmann;Seza Özen;Pat Woo

  • The evaluation of monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance: a consensus report of the International Kidney and Monoclonal Gammopathy Research Group.

    Nelson Leung;Frank Bridoux;Vecihi Batuman;Aristeidis Chaidos

  • Clinical and subclinical inflammation in patients with familial Mediterranean fever and in heterozygous carriers of MEFV mutations

    H. J. Lachmann;B. Şengül;T. U. Yavuzşen;D. R. Booth

  • Native T1 mapping in transthyretin amyloidosis

    Marianna Fontana;Sanjay M. Banypersad;Thomas A. Treibel;Viviana Maestrini

Frequent Co-Authors

Julian D. Gillmore
Julian D. Gillmore University College London
Marco Gattorno
Marco Gattorno Istituto Giannina Gaslini
Philip N. Hawkins
Philip N. Hawkins University College London
Anna Simon
Anna Simon Christian Medical College & Hospital
Seza Ozen
Seza Ozen Hacettepe University
James C. Moon
James C. Moon University College London
Giampaolo Merlini
Giampaolo Merlini University of Pavia
Ahmet Gül
Ahmet Gül Istanbul University
Mark B. Pepys
Mark B. Pepys University College London
Claudia Kemper
Claudia Kemper National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Many students interested in Medicine explore various online degrees in healthcare to broaden their career opportunities. One popular route involves pursuing online nursing doctoral programs, which equip graduates for advanced practice, teaching, or leadership roles in healthcare.

For registered nurses seeking to advance their skills affordably, cheapest online bsn programs offer flexibility and cost savings without sacrificing educational quality. These programs often appeal to working professionals who want to further their credentials.

Individuals from non-nursing backgrounds also have options. msn direct entry programs online allow those holding a non-nursing bachelor’s degree to earn a master’s degree in nursing and enter the field more quickly.

If you’re considering a more straightforward path into nursing, direct entry nursing programs can provide accessible admissions for aspiring nurses. Each pathway helps students meet the increasing demand for healthcare professionals while offering the flexibility of online learning.

Best Scientists Citing Helen J. Lachmann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles