World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
105
Citations
38498
World Ranking
6803
National Ranking
657

Helen J. Lachmann publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Helen J. Lachmann sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 630 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Helen J. Lachmann D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Helen J. Lachmann sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 105 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Helen J. Lachmann is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a significant focus on areas such as Molecular Biology, Nephrology, Immunology, Rheumatology, and Genetics.

Their work addresses multiple topics, including:

  • Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
  • Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments
  • Inflammasome and immune disorders
  • Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
  • Medical Imaging and Pathology Studies
  • Autoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders Research
  • Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis

Helen J. Lachmann has contributed to recent publications in high-impact journals. Notable papers include:

  • "Somatic Mutations in UBA1 and Severe Adult-Onset Autoinflammatory Disease," 2020, New England Journal of Medicine
  • "Familial Mediterranean fever, from pathogenesis to treatment: a contemporary review," 2020, TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES
  • "Impact of Earlier Diagnosis in Cardiac ATTR Amyloidosis Over the Course of 20 Years," 2022, Circulation
  • "Effect of Canakinumab vs Placebo on Survival Without Invasive Mechanical Ventilation in Patients Hospitalized With Severe COVID-19," 2021, JAMA
  • "Epidemiologic and Survival Trends in Amyloidosis, 1987-2019," 2020, New England Journal of Medicine

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Lachmann feature:

  • Philip N. Hawkins
  • Julian D. Gillmore
  • Ashutosh Wechalekar
  • Carol Whelan
  • Ana Martinez-Naharro

Their research outputs are often published in venues such as:

  • European Heart Journal
  • Circulation
  • European Journal of Heart Failure
  • British Journal of Haematology
  • Blood

Best Publications

  • Nonbiopsy Diagnosis of Cardiac Transthyretin Amyloidosis.

    Julian D. Gillmore;Mathew S. Maurer;Rodney H. Falk;Giampaolo Merlini

  • Somatic Mutations in UBA1 and Severe Adult-Onset Autoinflammatory Disease.

    David B. Beck;Marcela A. Ferrada;Keith A. Sikora;Amanda K. Ombrello

  • Natural history and outcome in systemic AA amyloidosis.

    Helen J Lachmann;Hugh J B Goodman;Janet A Gilbertson;J Ruth Gallimore

  • Use of canakinumab in the cryopyrin-associated periodic syndrome.

    Helen J Lachmann;Isabelle Kone-Paut;Jasmin B Kuemmerle-Deschner;Kieron S Leslie

  • Misdiagnosis of hereditary amyloidosis as AL (primary) amyloidosis.

    Helen J Lachmann;David R Booth;Susanne E Booth;Alison Bybee

  • Spectrum of clinical features in Muckle‐Wells syndrome and response to anakinra

    Philip N. Hawkins;Helen J. Lachmann;Ebun Aganna;Michael F. McDermott

  • Targeted pharmacological depletion of serum amyloid P component for treatment of human amyloidosis

    M. B. Pepys;J. Herbert;W. L. Hutchinson;G. A. Tennent

  • The European Society for Immunodeficiencies (ESID) Registry Working Definitions for the Clinical Diagnosis of Inborn Errors of Immunity

    Markus G. Seidel;Gerhard Kindle;Benjamin Gathmann;Isabella Quinti

  • Prognostic Value of Late Gadolinium Enhancement Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Cardiac Amyloidosis

    Marianna Fontana;Silvia Pica;Patricia Reant;Amna Abdel-Gadir

  • A new staging system for cardiac transthyretin amyloidosis

    Julian D Gillmore;Thibaud Damy;Marianna Fontana;Matthew Hutchinson

  • Interleukin-1-receptor antagonist in the Muckle-Wells syndrome.

    Philip N. Hawkins;Helen J. Lachmann;Michael F. McDermott

  • T helper 1 immunity requires complement-driven NLRP3 inflammasome activity in CD4+ T cells

    Giuseppina Arbore;Erin E. West;Rosanne Spolski;Avril A. B. Robertson

  • Outcome in systemic AL amyloidosis in relation to changes in concentration of circulating free immunoglobulin light chains following chemotherapy.

    Helen J. Lachmann;Ruth Gallimore;Julian D. Gillmore;Hugh D. Carr-Smith

  • Classification criteria for autoinflammatory recurrent fevers

    Marco Gattorno;Michael Hofer;Silvia Federici;Federica Vanoni

  • Association of mutations in the NALP3/CIAS1/PYPAF1 gene with a broad phenotype including recurrent fever, cold sensitivity, sensorineural deafness, and AA amyloidosis.

    Ebun Aganna;Fabio Martinon;Philip N. Hawkins;John B. Ross

  • Canakinumab for the Treatment of Autoinflammatory Recurrent Fever Syndromes

    Fabrizio De Benedetti;Marco Gattorno;Jordi Anton;Eldad Ben-Chetrit

  • Treatment of autoinflammatory diseases: results from the Eurofever Registry and a literature review

    Nienke Ter Haar;Helen Lachmann;Seza Özen;Pat Woo

  • The evaluation of monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance: a consensus report of the International Kidney and Monoclonal Gammopathy Research Group.

    Nelson Leung;Frank Bridoux;Vecihi Batuman;Aristeidis Chaidos

  • Clinical and subclinical inflammation in patients with familial Mediterranean fever and in heterozygous carriers of MEFV mutations

    H. J. Lachmann;B. Şengül;T. U. Yavuzşen;D. R. Booth

  • Native T1 mapping in transthyretin amyloidosis

    Marianna Fontana;Sanjay M. Banypersad;Thomas A. Treibel;Viviana Maestrini

Frequent Co-Authors

Julian D. Gillmore
Julian D. Gillmore University College London
Marco Gattorno
Marco Gattorno Istituto Giannina Gaslini
Philip N. Hawkins
Philip N. Hawkins University College London
Anna Simon
Anna Simon Christian Medical College & Hospital
Seza Ozen
Seza Ozen Hacettepe University
James C. Moon
James C. Moon University College London
Giampaolo Merlini
Giampaolo Merlini University of Pavia
Ahmet Gül
Ahmet Gül Istanbul University
Mark B. Pepys
Mark B. Pepys University College London
Claudia Kemper
Claudia Kemper National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Many students interested in Medicine explore various online degrees in healthcare to broaden their career opportunities. One popular route involves pursuing online nursing doctoral programs, which equip graduates for advanced practice, teaching, or leadership roles in healthcare.

For registered nurses seeking to advance their skills affordably, cheapest online bsn programs offer flexibility and cost savings without sacrificing educational quality. These programs often appeal to working professionals who want to further their credentials.

Individuals from non-nursing backgrounds also have options. msn direct entry programs online allow those holding a non-nursing bachelor’s degree to earn a master’s degree in nursing and enter the field more quickly.

If you’re considering a more straightforward path into nursing, direct entry nursing programs can provide accessible admissions for aspiring nurses. Each pathway helps students meet the increasing demand for healthcare professionals while offering the flexibility of online learning.

Best Scientists Citing Helen J. Lachmann

Trending Scientists