World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
113
Citations
54932
World Ranking
4890
National Ranking
481

James C. Moon publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James C. Moon sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 807 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

James C. Moon D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James C. Moon sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 113 D-Index — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

James C. Moon is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a focus on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Molecular Biology, Oncology, and Infectious Diseases.

The scientific topics covered in James C. Moon's work include:

  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies

Frequent co-authors collaborating with James C. Moon include Charlotte Manisty, Thomas A. Treibel, Peter Kellman, Gabriella Captur, and Rhodri Davies.

James C. Moon has published extensively in several key cardiovascular and imaging journals. The most common venues for their publications are:

  • European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
  • European Heart Journal
  • JACC. Cardiovascular imaging
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Their recent notable research papers include:

  • "2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies" (2023, European Heart Journal)
  • "Neoadjuvant-Adjuvant or Adjuvant-Only Pembrolizumab in Advanced Melanoma" (2023, New England Journal of Medicine)
  • "Antibody response to first BNT162b2 dose in previously SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals" (2021, The Lancet)
  • "Pre-existing polymerase-specific T cells expand in abortive seronegative SARS-CoV-2" (2021, Nature)
  • "Patterns of myocardial injury in recovered troponin-positive COVID-19 patients assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance" (2021, European Heart Journal)

Best Publications

  • Comparison of interstudy reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance with two-dimensional echocardiography in normal subjects and in patients with heart failure or left ventricular hypertrophy.

    Frank Grothues;Frank Grothues;Gillian C Smith;James C.C Moon;Nicholas G Bellenger

  • Nonbiopsy Diagnosis of Cardiac Transthyretin Amyloidosis.

    Julian D. Gillmore;Mathew S. Maurer;Rodney H. Falk;Giampaolo Merlini

  • Clinical recommendations for cardiovascular magnetic resonance mapping of T1, T2, T2 and extracellular volume: A consensus statement by the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) endorsed by the European Association for Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI)

    Daniel R. Messroghli;James C. Moon;Vanessa M. Ferreira;Lars Grosse-Wortmann

  • Differentiation of Heart Failure Related to Dilated Cardiomyopathy and Coronary Artery Disease Using Gadolinium-Enhanced Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

    J.A. McCrohon;J.C.C. Moon;S.K. Prasad;W.J. McKenna

  • Myocardial T1 mapping and extracellular volume quantification: a Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) and CMR Working Group of the European Society of Cardiology consensus statement

    James C Moon;Daniel R Messroghli;Peter Kellman;Stefan K Piechnik

  • Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Cardiac Amyloidosis

    Alicia Maria Maceira;Jayshree Joshi;Sanjay Kumar Prasad;James Charles Moon

  • Proposal for a revised definition of dilated cardiomyopathy, hypokinetic non-dilated cardiomyopathy, and its implications for clinical practice : a position statement of the ESC working group on myocardial and pericardial diseases

    Yigal M Pinto;Perry M Elliott;Eloisa Arbustini;Yehuda Adler

  • Equilibrium Contrast Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance for the Measurement of Diffuse Myocardial Fibrosis Preliminary Validation in Humans

    Andrew S. Flett;Martin P. Hayward;Michael T. Ashworth;Michael S. Hansen

  • Toward clinical risk assessment inhypertrophic cardiomyopathy withgadolinium cardiovascular magnetic resonance

    James C.C Moon;William J McKenna;Jane A McCrohon;Perry M Elliott

  • Prognostic significance of myocardial fibrosis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

    Rory O'Hanlon;Agata Grasso;Michael Roughton;James C. Moon

  • Interstudy reproducibility of right ventricular volumes, function, and mass with cardiovascular magnetic resonance

    Frank Grothues;James C Moon;Nicholas G Bellenger;Gillian S Smith

  • The histologic basis of late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

    James C. C. Moon;Emma Reed;Mary N. Sheppard;Andrew G. Elkington

  • Right ventricular function in adults with repaired tetralogy of Fallot assessed with cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: detrimental role of right ventricular outflow aneurysms or akinesia and adverse right-to-left ventricular interaction.

    Periklis A. Davlouros;Philip J. Kilner;Tim S. Hornung;Wei Li

  • Noncontrast T1 mapping for the diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis.

    Theodoros D. Karamitsos;Stefan K. Piechnik;Sanjay M. Banypersad;Marianna Fontana

  • Evaluation of techniques for the quantification of myocardial scar of differing etiology using cardiac magnetic resonance

    Andrew S. Flett;Jonathan Hasleton;Christopher Cook;Derek Hausenloy

  • ASNC/AHA/ASE/EANM/HFSA/ISA/SCMR/SNMMI Expert Consensus Recommendations for Multimodality Imaging in Cardiac Amyloidosis: Part 1 of 2—Evidence Base and Standardized Methods of Imaging

    Sharmila Dorbala;Yukio Ando;Sabahat Bokhari;Angela Dispenzieri

  • Ventricular Fibrosis Suggested by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Adults With Repaired Tetralogy of Fallot and Its Relationship to Adverse Markers of Clinical Outcome

    Sonya V. Babu-Narayan;Philip J. Kilner;Wei Li;James C. Moon

  • Gadolinium enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance in Anderson-Fabry disease. Evidence for a disease specific abnormality of the myocardial interstitium.

    James C C Moon;Bhavesh Sachdev;Andrew G Elkington;William J McKenna

  • Prognostic Value of Late Gadolinium Enhancement Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Cardiac Amyloidosis

    Marianna Fontana;Silvia Pica;Patricia Reant;Amna Abdel-Gadir

  • Comparison of interstudy reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance with two-dimensional echocardiography in normal subjects and in patients with heart failure or left ventricular hypertrophy☆

    F. Grothues;G.C. Smith;J.C.C. Moon

Frequent Co-Authors

Perry M. Elliott
Perry M. Elliott University College London
Dudley J. Pennell
Dudley J. Pennell National Institutes of Health
Julian D. Gillmore
Julian D. Gillmore University College London
Steffen E. Petersen
Steffen E. Petersen Queen Mary University of London
Derek J. Hausenloy
Derek J. Hausenloy National University of Singapore
William J. McKenna
William J. McKenna University College London
Alun D. Hughes
Alun D. Hughes University College London
Stefan K Piechnik
Stefan K Piechnik University of Oxford
Derralynn Hughes
Derralynn Hughes Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust
Sanjay Sharma
Sanjay Sharma St George's, University of London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re exploring paths beyond traditional medical school, the U.S. offers a variety of accessible healthcare degrees and careers. For nursing hopefuls, attending easy nursing schools to get into can provide a direct route into the field. Some schools even offer lpn to rn programs without teas test requirements, making the transition less stressful for applicants.

Online education is also expanding opportunities in allied health professions. If you’re interested in the administrative side of healthcare, consider a healthcare administration degree offered in an accelerated online format. For those seeking flexible entry into the industry, online medical coding classes with financial aid are available, reducing financial barriers for students.

These alternative routes can help you quickly launch a healthcare career, gain practical experience, or lay the groundwork for future medical studies. Explore multiple pathways to find a health profession that matches your interests, schedule, and goals.

Best Scientists Citing James C. Moon

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles