World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
93
Citations
26048
World Ranking
11019
National Ranking
5670

Michael Jerosch-Herold publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Jerosch-Herold sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 507 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Michael Jerosch-Herold D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Jerosch-Herold sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 93 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael Jerosch-Herold is affiliated with Brigham and Women's Hospital in the United States and conducts research primarily in the field of Medicine, with a focus on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Molecular Biology, Nephrology, and Epidemiology. Their work spans multiple topics related to cardiac health and imaging technologies.

The main subjects of their research include:

  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
  • Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments

Michael Jerosch-Herold frequently publishes in several key cardiovascular and radiology journals, including:

  • Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
  • JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Circulation
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Circulation Cardiovascular Imaging

Some recent papers illustrating their research scope are:

  • Reference ranges ("normal values") for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in adults and children: 2020 update, 2020, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
  • Mavacamten Favorably Impacts Cardiac Structure in Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy, 2020, Circulation
  • Myocardial T1 and T2 Mapping by Magnetic Resonance in Patients With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Associated Myocarditis, 2021, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Atorvastatin for Anthracycline-Associated Cardiac Dysfunction, 2023, JAMA
  • Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Stress Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Stable Chest Pain Syndromes, 2020, JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging

Frequent collaborative partners in their research include:

  • Raymond Y. Kwong
  • Otávio R. Coelho-Filho
  • Tomas G. Neilan
  • Thiago Quinaglia
  • Frederick L. Ruberg

Best Publications

  • ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 Expert Consensus Document on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents

    W. Gregory Hundley;David A. Bluemke;J. Paul Finn;Scott D. Flamm

  • Expert Consensus DocumentACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 Expert Consensus Document on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents

    W. Gregory Hundley;David A. Bluemke;J. Paul Finn;Scott D. Flamm

  • Utility of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

    Carsten Rickers;Norbert M. Wilke;Norbert M. Wilke;Michael Jerosch-Herold;Michael Jerosch-Herold;Susan A. Casey

  • T1 Mapping: Basic Techniques and Clinical Applications

    Andrew J. Taylor;Michael Salerno;Rohan Dharmakumar;Michael Jerosch-Herold

  • Magnetic resonance quantification of the myocardial perfusion reserve with a Fermi function model for constrained deconvolution.

    Michael Jerosch-Herold;Norbert Wilke;Arthur E. Stillman;Robert F. Wilson

  • Cardiovascular function in multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis: normal values by age, sex, and ethnicity.

    Shunsuke Natori;Shenghan Lai;J Paul Finn;Antoinette S Gomes

  • Myocardial perfusion reserve: assessment with multisection, quantitative, first-pass MR imaging.

    Norbert Wilke;Michael Jerosch-Herold;Ying Wang;Yimei Huang

  • Visceral adiposity and the risk of metabolic syndrome across body mass index: the MESA Study.

    Ravi V. Shah;Venkatesh L. Murthy;Siddique A. Abbasi;Ron Blankstein

  • Evidence for Microvascular Dysfunction in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: New Insights From Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    Steffen E. Petersen;Michael Jerosch-Herold;Lucy E. Hudsmith;Matthew D. Robson

  • Traditional Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Relation to Left Ventricular Mass, Volume, and Systolic Function by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging: The Multiethnic Study of Atherosclerosis

    Susan R. Heckbert;Wendy Post;Gregory D.N. Pearson;Donna K. Arnett

  • Prognostic Value of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Tissue Characterization in Risk Stratifying Patients With Suspected Myocarditis

    Christoph Gräni;Christian Eichhorn;Loïc Bière;Venkatesh L. Murthy

  • Reference ranges (“normal values”) for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in adults and children: 2020 update

    Nadine Kawel-Boehm;Scott J. Hetzel;Bharath Ambale-Venkatesh;Gabriella Captur

  • Myocardial blood flow quantification with MRI by model-independent deconvolution.

    Michael Jerosch-Herold;Cory Swingen;Ravi Teja Seethamraju

  • Quantification of Diffuse Myocardial Fibrosis and its Association with Myocardial Dysfunction in Congenital Heart Disease

    Craig S. Broberg;Sumeet S. Chugh;Catherine Conklin;David J. Sahn

  • Quantification of myocardial perfusion using dynamic 64-detector computed tomography.

    Richard T. George;Michael Jerosch-Herold;Caterina Silva;Kakuya Kitagawa

  • Anatomically Oriented Right Ventricular Volume Measurements With Dynamic Three-Dimensional Echocardiography Validated by 3-Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    Petra S. Niemann;Luiz Pinho;Thomas Balbach;Christian Galuschky

  • T1 Measurements Identify Extracellular Volume Expansion in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Sarcomere Mutation Carriers With and Without Left Ventricular Hypertrophy

    Carolyn Y. Ho;Siddique A. Abbasi;Tomas G. Neilan;Ravi V. Shah

  • Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Perfusion Imaging at 3-Tesla for the Detection of Coronary Artery Disease: A Comparison With 1.5-Tesla

    Adrian S.H. Cheng;Tammy J. Pegg;Theodoros D. Karamitsos;Nick Searle

  • Analysis of myocardial perfusion MRI

    Michael Jerosch-Herold;Ravi Teja Seethamraju;Cory M. Swingen;Norbert M. Wilke

  • Quantification of myocardial perfusion by cardiovascular magnetic resonance

    Michael Jerosch-Herold

Frequent Co-Authors

Raymond Y. Kwong
Raymond Y. Kwong Brigham and Women's Hospital
Ron Blankstein
Ron Blankstein Brigham and Women's Hospital
Stefan Neubauer
Stefan Neubauer University of Oxford
David A. Bluemke
David A. Bluemke University of Wisconsin–Madison
Joao A.C. Lima
Joao A.C. Lima Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Adrian P. Banning
Adrian P. Banning University of Oxford
Rob J. van der Geest
Rob J. van der Geest Leiden University Medical Center
Marcelo F. Di Carli
Marcelo F. Di Carli Brigham and Women's Hospital
Udo Hoffmann
Udo Hoffmann Harvard University
Hugh Watkins
Hugh Watkins University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in a medical career but seeking alternative routes or supportive roles, online degrees in healthcare offer flexibility and affordability. Programs like a bachelor of health information management online train students to manage and analyze healthcare data, a rapidly growing area in healthcare administration.

If you’re drawn to administrative and technical work, enrolling in a low cost medical coding and billing online program can prepare you for essential back-office roles in clinics and hospitals. These programs often require less time and investment than a full medical degree and have a strong job outlook.

Nursing offers dynamic patient-care opportunities. Options such as cheap np programs make it possible to advance your nursing credentials online and qualify for higher-responsibility positions. You may also wonder how much does online nursing school cost—typically, online options are more budget-friendly than in-person degrees, with similar career outcomes.

Exploring these pathways lets you join the healthcare field in ways that match your goals, schedule, and resources.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Jerosch-Herold

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles