World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 93 11018 10348 5669 5238 507 26048

Michael Jerosch-Herold publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michael Jerosch-Herold between 1985 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michael Jerosch-Herold published across 41 years, from 1985 to 2025, averaging 14 papers a year. Output peaked at 44 publications in 2013. 51 of the 573 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 44. Peak 44 publications in 2013. 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 2 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 2 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 15 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 17 publications 2007: 19 publications 2008: 22 publications 2009: 19 publications 2010: 34 publications 2011: 37 publications 2012: 38 publications 2013: 44 publications 2014: 20 publications 2015: 29 publications 2016: 22 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 20 publications 2019: 28 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 18 publications 2024: 22 publications 2025: 29 publications
1985 2025

573 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michael Jerosch-Herold: publications per year, 1985 to 2025
Year Publications
1985 1
1986 1
1987 2
1988 0
1989 2
1990 0
1991 1
1992 1
1993 2
1994 3
1995 4
1996 3
1997 5
1998 2
1999 5
2000 4
2001 6
2002 3
2003 11
2004 15
2005 8
2006 17
2007 19
2008 22
2009 19
2010 34
2011 37
2012 38
2013 44
2014 20
2015 29
2016 22
2017 19
2018 20
2019 28
2020 15
2021 23
2022 19
2023 18
2024 22
2025 29
Total 573
Download as CSV

Michael Jerosch-Herold publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Jerosch-Herold sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 501–520 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 507 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617 507
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Michael Jerosch-Herold D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Jerosch-Herold sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 92–93 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 93 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839 93
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Michael Jerosch-Herold is affiliated with Brigham and Women's Hospital in the United States and conducts research primarily in the field of Medicine, with a focus on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Molecular Biology, Nephrology, and Epidemiology. Their work spans multiple topics related to cardiac health and imaging technologies.

The main subjects of their research include:

  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
  • Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments

Michael Jerosch-Herold frequently publishes in several key cardiovascular and radiology journals, including:

  • Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
  • JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Circulation
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Circulation Cardiovascular Imaging

Some recent papers illustrating their research scope are:

  • Reference ranges ("normal values") for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in adults and children: 2020 update, 2020, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
  • Mavacamten Favorably Impacts Cardiac Structure in Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy, 2020, Circulation
  • Myocardial T1 and T2 Mapping by Magnetic Resonance in Patients With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Associated Myocarditis, 2021, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Atorvastatin for Anthracycline-Associated Cardiac Dysfunction, 2023, JAMA
  • Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Stress Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Stable Chest Pain Syndromes, 2020, JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging

Frequent collaborative partners in their research include:

  • Raymond Y. Kwong
  • Otávio R. Coelho-Filho
  • Tomas G. Neilan
  • Thiago Quinaglia
  • Frederick L. Ruberg

Best Publications

  • ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 Expert Consensus Document on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents

    W. Gregory Hundley;David A. Bluemke;J. Paul Finn;Scott D. Flamm

  • Expert Consensus DocumentACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 Expert Consensus Document on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents

    W. Gregory Hundley;David A. Bluemke;J. Paul Finn;Scott D. Flamm

  • Utility of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

    Carsten Rickers;Norbert M. Wilke;Norbert M. Wilke;Michael Jerosch-Herold;Michael Jerosch-Herold;Susan A. Casey

  • T1 Mapping: Basic Techniques and Clinical Applications

    Andrew J. Taylor;Michael Salerno;Rohan Dharmakumar;Michael Jerosch-Herold

  • Magnetic resonance quantification of the myocardial perfusion reserve with a Fermi function model for constrained deconvolution.

    Michael Jerosch-Herold;Norbert Wilke;Arthur E. Stillman;Robert F. Wilson

  • Cardiovascular function in multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis: normal values by age, sex, and ethnicity.

    Shunsuke Natori;Shenghan Lai;J Paul Finn;Antoinette S Gomes

  • Myocardial perfusion reserve: assessment with multisection, quantitative, first-pass MR imaging.

    Norbert Wilke;Michael Jerosch-Herold;Ying Wang;Yimei Huang

  • Visceral adiposity and the risk of metabolic syndrome across body mass index: the MESA Study.

    Ravi V. Shah;Venkatesh L. Murthy;Siddique A. Abbasi;Ron Blankstein

  • Evidence for Microvascular Dysfunction in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: New Insights From Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    Steffen E. Petersen;Michael Jerosch-Herold;Lucy E. Hudsmith;Matthew D. Robson

  • Traditional Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Relation to Left Ventricular Mass, Volume, and Systolic Function by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging: The Multiethnic Study of Atherosclerosis

    Susan R. Heckbert;Wendy Post;Gregory D.N. Pearson;Donna K. Arnett

  • Prognostic Value of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Tissue Characterization in Risk Stratifying Patients With Suspected Myocarditis

    Christoph Gräni;Christian Eichhorn;Loïc Bière;Venkatesh L. Murthy

  • Myocardial blood flow quantification with MRI by model-independent deconvolution.

    Michael Jerosch-Herold;Cory Swingen;Ravi Teja Seethamraju

  • Quantification of Diffuse Myocardial Fibrosis and its Association with Myocardial Dysfunction in Congenital Heart Disease

    Craig S. Broberg;Sumeet S. Chugh;Catherine Conklin;David J. Sahn

  • Quantification of myocardial perfusion using dynamic 64-detector computed tomography.

    Richard T. George;Michael Jerosch-Herold;Caterina Silva;Kakuya Kitagawa

  • Anatomically Oriented Right Ventricular Volume Measurements With Dynamic Three-Dimensional Echocardiography Validated by 3-Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    Petra S. Niemann;Luiz Pinho;Thomas Balbach;Christian Galuschky

  • T1 Measurements Identify Extracellular Volume Expansion in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Sarcomere Mutation Carriers With and Without Left Ventricular Hypertrophy

    Carolyn Y. Ho;Siddique A. Abbasi;Tomas G. Neilan;Ravi V. Shah

  • Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Perfusion Imaging at 3-Tesla for the Detection of Coronary Artery Disease: A Comparison With 1.5-Tesla

    Adrian S.H. Cheng;Tammy J. Pegg;Theodoros D. Karamitsos;Nick Searle

  • Analysis of myocardial perfusion MRI

    Michael Jerosch-Herold;Ravi Teja Seethamraju;Cory M. Swingen;Norbert M. Wilke

  • Quantification of myocardial perfusion by cardiovascular magnetic resonance

    Michael Jerosch-Herold

Frequent Co-Authors

Raymond Y. Kwong
Raymond Y. Kwong Brigham and Women's Hospital
Ron Blankstein
Ron Blankstein Brigham and Women's Hospital
Stefan Neubauer
Stefan Neubauer University of Oxford
David A. Bluemke
David A. Bluemke University of Wisconsin–Madison
Joao A.C. Lima
Joao A.C. Lima Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Adrian P. Banning
Adrian P. Banning University of Oxford
Rob J. van der Geest
Rob J. van der Geest Leiden University Medical Center
Marcelo F. Di Carli
Marcelo F. Di Carli Brigham and Women's Hospital
Udo Hoffmann
Udo Hoffmann Harvard University
Hugh Watkins
Hugh Watkins University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in a medical career but seeking alternative routes or supportive roles, online degrees in healthcare offer flexibility and affordability. Programs like a bachelor of health information management online train students to manage and analyze healthcare data, a rapidly growing area in healthcare administration.

If you’re drawn to administrative and technical work, enrolling in a low cost medical coding and billing online program can prepare you for essential back-office roles in clinics and hospitals. These programs often require less time and investment than a full medical degree and have a strong job outlook.

Nursing offers dynamic patient-care opportunities. Options such as cheap np programs make it possible to advance your nursing credentials online and qualify for higher-responsibility positions. You may also wonder how much does online nursing school cost—typically, online options are more budget-friendly than in-person degrees, with similar career outcomes.

Exploring these pathways lets you join the healthcare field in ways that match your goals, schedule, and resources.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Jerosch-Herold

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles