World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Physics 108 1254 1187 657 610 756 42393

Enrico Ramirez-Ruiz publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Enrico Ramirez-Ruiz between 1998 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Enrico Ramirez-Ruiz published across 29 years, from 1998 to 2026, averaging 28.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 81 publications in 2013. 30 of the 833 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 81. Peak 81 publications in 2013. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 14 publications 2002: 17 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 15 publications 2005: 24 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 20 publications 2009: 30 publications 2010: 30 publications 2011: 17 publications 2012: 19 publications 2013: 81 publications 2014: 73 publications 2015: 54 publications 2016: 55 publications 2017: 67 publications 2018: 50 publications 2019: 44 publications 2020: 35 publications 2021: 46 publications 2022: 22 publications 2023: 28 publications 2024: 23 publications 2025: 29 publications 2026: 1 publication
1998 2026

833 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Enrico Ramirez-Ruiz: publications per year, 1998 to 2026
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 2
2000 2
2001 14
2002 17
2003 9
2004 15
2005 24
2006 14
2007 11
2008 20
2009 30
2010 30
2011 17
2012 19
2013 81
2014 73
2015 54
2016 55
2017 67
2018 50
2019 44
2020 35
2021 46
2022 22
2023 28
2024 23
2025 29
2026 1
Total 833
Download as CSV

Enrico Ramirez-Ruiz publication distribution in Physics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Physics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Enrico Ramirez-Ruiz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 70 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 103–122 to 1,469+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 162. Most scientists, 162, have 323–342 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,469 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 743–762 publications, is where this scientist sits. 103–122 publications: 7 scientists 123–142 publications: 10 scientists 143–162 publications: 31 scientists 163–182 publications: 35 scientists 183–202 publications: 53 scientists 203–222 publications: 81 scientists 223–242 publications: 85 scientists 243–262 publications: 112 scientists 263–282 publications: 114 scientists 283–302 publications: 126 scientists 303–322 publications: 136 scientists 323–342 publications: 162 scientists 343–362 publications: 155 scientists 363–382 publications: 156 scientists 383–402 publications: 134 scientists 403–422 publications: 145 scientists 423–442 publications: 147 scientists 443–462 publications: 131 scientists 463–482 publications: 131 scientists 483–502 publications: 116 scientists 503–522 publications: 106 scientists 523–542 publications: 103 scientists 543–562 publications: 87 scientists 563–582 publications: 84 scientists 583–602 publications: 94 scientists 603–622 publications: 70 scientists 623–642 publications: 76 scientists 643–662 publications: 60 scientists 663–682 publications: 54 scientists 683–702 publications: 60 scientists 703–722 publications: 48 scientists 723–742 publications: 64 scientists 743–762 publications: 48 scientists 763–782 publications: 37 scientists 783–802 publications: 43 scientists 803–822 publications: 34 scientists 823–842 publications: 36 scientists 843–862 publications: 32 scientists 863–882 publications: 32 scientists 883–902 publications: 31 scientists 903–922 publications: 25 scientists 923–942 publications: 15 scientists 943–962 publications: 24 scientists 963–982 publications: 13 scientists 983–1,002 publications: 21 scientists 1,003–1,022 publications: 21 scientists 1,023–1,042 publications: 16 scientists 1,043–1,062 publications: 9 scientists 1,063–1,082 publications: 19 scientists 1,083–1,102 publications: 11 scientists 1,103–1,122 publications: 17 scientists 1,123–1,142 publications: 11 scientists 1,143–1,162 publications: 7 scientists 1,163–1,182 publications: 4 scientists 1,183–1,202 publications: 10 scientists 1,203–1,222 publications: 8 scientists 1,223–1,242 publications: 16 scientists 1,243–1,262 publications: 4 scientists 1,263–1,282 publications: 10 scientists 1,283–1,302 publications: 5 scientists 1,303–1,322 publications: 7 scientists 1,323–1,342 publications: 4 scientists 1,343–1,362 publications: 8 scientists 1,363–1,382 publications: 6 scientists 1,383–1,402 publications: 7 scientists 1,403–1,422 publications: 3 scientists 1,423–1,442 publications: 4 scientists 1,443–1,462 publications: 4 scientists 1,463–1,468 publications: 3 scientists 1,469+ publications: 100 scientists
103–122 publications 1,469+

This scientist: 756 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,469 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Physics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,678 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
103–122 7
123–142 10
143–162 31
163–182 35
183–202 53
203–222 81
223–242 85
243–262 112
263–282 114
283–302 126
303–322 136
323–342 162
343–362 155
363–382 156
383–402 134
403–422 145
423–442 147
443–462 131
463–482 131
483–502 116
503–522 106
523–542 103
543–562 87
563–582 84
583–602 94
603–622 70
623–642 76
643–662 60
663–682 54
683–702 60
703–722 48
723–742 64
743–762 48 756
763–782 37
783–802 43
803–822 34
823–842 36
843–862 32
863–882 32
883–902 31
903–922 25
923–942 15
943–962 24
963–982 13
983–1,002 21
1,003–1,022 21
1,023–1,042 16
1,043–1,062 9
1,063–1,082 19
1,083–1,102 11
1,103–1,122 17
1,123–1,142 11
1,143–1,162 7
1,163–1,182 4
1,183–1,202 10
1,203–1,222 8
1,223–1,242 16
1,243–1,262 4
1,263–1,282 10
1,283–1,302 5
1,303–1,322 7
1,323–1,342 4
1,343–1,362 8
1,363–1,382 6
1,383–1,402 7
1,403–1,422 3
1,423–1,442 4
1,443–1,462 4
1,463–1,468 3
1,469+ 100
Download as CSV

Enrico Ramirez-Ruiz D-index placement in Physics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Physics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Enrico Ramirez-Ruiz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 59 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 185+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 167. Most scientists, 167, have 80–81 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 185 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 108–109 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 76 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 110 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 143 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 153 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 144 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 167 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 167 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 166 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 132 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 155 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 134 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 137 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 102 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 112 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 110 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 116 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 97 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 103 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 87 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 90 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 78 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 75 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 67 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 69 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 59 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 53 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 42 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 41 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 33 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 32 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 45 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 19 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 24 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 28 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 31 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 20 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 12 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 24 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 23 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 15 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 15 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 11 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 17 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 12 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 11 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 9 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 9 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 11 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 4 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 8 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 5 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 3 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 4 scientists 184 D-Index: 4 scientists 185+ D-Index: 99 scientists
70–71 D-Index 185+

This scientist: 108 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 185 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Physics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,678 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 76
72–73 110
74–75 143
76–77 153
78–79 144
80–81 167
82–83 167
84–85 166
86–87 132
88–89 155
90–91 134
92–93 137
94–95 102
96–97 112
98–99 110
100–101 116
102–103 97
104–105 103
106–107 87
108–109 90 108
110–111 67
112–113 78
114–115 75
116–117 67
118–119 69
120–121 60
122–123 59
124–125 53
126–127 42
128–129 41
130–131 33
132–133 32
134–135 45
136–137 19
138–139 24
140–141 28
142–143 31
144–145 22
146–147 20
148–149 12
150–151 16
152–153 24
154–155 23
156–157 15
158–159 15
160–161 11
162–163 17
164–165 12
166–167 11
168–169 9
170–171 9
172–173 11
174–175 4
176–177 8
178–179 5
180–181 3
182–183 4
184 4
185+ 99
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2020 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 2018 - Fellow of American Physical Society (APS) Citation For contributions to the understanding of transient phenomena such as collisions, mergers, and disruptions of stars with novel computer simulations, and his work supporting promotion and retention of women and underrepresented minorities in science

Overview

Enrico Ramirez-Ruiz is affiliated with the University of California, Santa Cruz in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Physics and Astronomy, with a significant concentration in Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, and Instrumentation. They have contributed extensively to subfields including Biomedical Engineering and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics, notably Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae, Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations, Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research, Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies, Astronomy and Astrophysical Research, Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena, and Astro and Planetary Science.

Frequent publication venues for Enrico Ramirez-Ruiz include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • The Astrophysical Journal
  • The Astrophysical Journal Letters
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics

Some recent papers featuring their involvement are:

  • SN 2023ixf in Messier 101: A Variable Red Supergiant as the Progenitor Candidate to a Type II Supernova, 2023, The Astrophysical Journal Letters
  • A cool and inflated progenitor candidate for the Type Ib supernova 2019yvr at 2.6 yr before explosion, 2021, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
  • Massive Stellar Triples Leading to Sequential Binary Black-Hole Mergers in the Field, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Stellar Tidal Disruption Events with Abundances and Realistic Structures (STARS): Library of Fallback Rates, 2020, The Astrophysical Journal
  • Dynamical Unification of Tidal Disruption Events, 2023, OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)

Collaborations play a significant role in their research activity. Frequent co-authors include:

  • R. J. Foley
  • Katie Auchettl
  • D. A. Coulter
  • D. O. Jones
  • Brenna Mockler

Enrico Ramirez-Ruiz has been recognized by several professional organizations. They were named Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 2020.

Additionally, they were made a Fellow of the American Physical Society (APS) in 2018, with a citation noting contributions to the understanding of transient phenomena such as collisions, mergers, and disruptions of stars through novel computer simulations, as well as supporting the promotion and retention of women and underrepresented minorities in science.

Best Publications

  • A gravitational-wave standard siren measurement of the Hubble constant

    B. P. Abbott;R. Abbott;T. D. Abbott;F. Acernese;F. Acernese

  • Evidence for a canonical gamma-ray burst afterglow light curve in the Swift XRT data

    J. A. Nousek;C. Kouveliotou;D. Grupe;K. L. Page

  • First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: a tale of two elements - chemical evolution of magnesium and europium

    Jill P. Naiman;Annalisa Pillepich;Volker Springel;Enrico Ramirez-Ruiz

  • Origin of the heavy elements in binary neutron-star mergers from a gravitational-wave event

    Daniel Kasen;Brian Metzger;Jennifer Barnes;Eliot Quataert

  • Gamma-Ray Bursts in the Swift Era

    N. Gehrels;E. Ramirez-Ruiz;Derek B. Fox

  • Swope Supernova Survey 2017a (SSS17a), the optical counterpart to a gravitational wave source

    D. A. Coulter;R. J. Foley;C. D. Kilpatrick;M. R. Drout

  • A limit on the variation of the speed of light arising from quantum gravity effects

    A. A. Abdo;M. Ackermann;M. Ajello;K. Asano

  • Light curves of the neutron star merger GW170817/SSS17a: Implications for r-process nucleosynthesis

    M. R. Drout;A. L. Piro;B. J. Shappee;C. D. Kilpatrick

  • Broadband observations of the naked-eye gamma-ray burst GRB 080319B

    J. L. Racusin;S. V. Karpov;M. Sokolowski;J. Granot

  • Fermi Observations of High-Energy Gamma-Ray Emission from GRB 080916C

    M. Ackermann;M. Ajello;L. Baldini;J. Ballet

  • An optical supernova associated with the X-ray flash XRF 060218.

    E. Pian;E. Pian;P. A. Mazzali;N. Masetti;P. Ferrero

  • A giant γ-ray flare from the magnetar SGR 1806–20

    D.M. Palmer;S. Barthelmy;N. Gehrels;R.M. Kippen

  • A possible relativistic jetted outburst from a massive black hole fed by a tidally disrupted star.

    Joshua S. Bloom;Dimitrios Giannios;Brian D. Metzger;S. Bradley Cenko

  • No supernovae associated with two long-duration gamma ray bursts

    Johan P. U. Fynbo;Darach Watson;Christina C. Thöne;Jesper Sollerman

  • No supernovae from two nearby long gamma ray bursts

    Johan P. U. Fynbo;Darach Watson;Christina C. Thoene;Jesper Sollerman

  • HYDRODYNAMICAL SIMULATIONS TO DETERMINE THE FEEDING RATE OF BLACK HOLES BY THE TIDAL DISRUPTION OF STARS: THE IMPORTANCE OF THE IMPACT PARAMETER AND STELLAR STRUCTURE

    James Guillochon;Enrico Ramirez-Ruiz

  • The progenitors of short gamma-ray bursts

    William H Lee;Enrico Ramirez-Ruiz

  • Closing in on a Short-Hard Burst Progenitor: Constraints from Early-Time Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy of a Possible Host Galaxy of GRB 050509b

    J. S. Bloom;J. X. Prochaska;D. Pooley;C. H. Blake

  • A Possible Cepheid-like Luminosity Estimator for the Long Gamma-Ray Bursts

    Daniel E. Reichart;Daniel E. Reichart;Donald Q. Lamb;Edward E. Fenimore;Enrico Ramirez-Ruiz

  • High-resolution calculations of merging neutron stars - III. Gamma-ray bursts

    Stephan Rosswog;Enrico Ramirez-Ruiz;Melvyn B. Davies

Frequent Co-Authors

Jonathan Granot
Jonathan Granot Open University of Israel
Daniel Kasen
Daniel Kasen University of California, Berkeley
Ryan J. Foley
Ryan J. Foley University of California, Santa Cruz
Eleonora Troja
Eleonora Troja National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Joshua S. Bloom
Joshua S. Bloom University of California, Berkeley
Chryssa Kouveliotou
Chryssa Kouveliotou George Washington University
Daniel A. Perley
Daniel A. Perley Liverpool John Moores University
Chris L. Fryer
Chris L. Fryer Los Alamos National Laboratory
Ralph A. M. J. Wijers
Ralph A. M. J. Wijers University of Amsterdam
Hongzheng Chen
Hongzheng Chen Zhejiang University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Enrico Ramirez-Ruiz

Trending Scientists