World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
45
Citations
8691
World Ranking
6663
National Ranking
3616

Emily B. Falk publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emily B. Falk sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 162 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Emily B. Falk D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emily B. Falk sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Emily B. Falk is affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas primarily within psychology and neuroscience, with a distinct focus on cognitive and social psychological processes.

The main fields of study for Falk include:

  • Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Their work further delves into several subfields, notably:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Social Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Applied Psychology

Key research topics covered include:

  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Media Influence and Health
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts

Falk has contributed papers on the following subjects:

  • "Gendered citation practices in the field of communication," 2021, Annals of the International Communication Association
  • "Functional brain network architecture supporting the learning of social networks in humans," 2020, NeuroImage
  • "Purpose in Life, Loneliness, and Protective Health Behaviors During the COVID-19 Pandemic," 2021, The Gerontologist
  • "Social-Cognitive and Affective Antecedents of Code Switching and the Consequences of Linguistic Racism for Black People and People of Color," 2021, Affective Science
  • "Neural processes during adolescent risky decision making are associated with conformity to peer influence," 2020, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Falk include:

  • Yoona Kang
  • David M. Lydon-Staley
  • Danielle Cosme
  • Matthew Brook O'Donnell
  • Nicole Cooper

Falk's publications often appear in these venues:

  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Scientific Reports
  • Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
  • Cerebral Cortex
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Best Publications

  • Sharing the small moments: Ephemeral social interaction on Snapchat.

    Joseph B. Bayer;Nicole B. Ellison;Sarita Y. Schoenebeck;Emily B. Falk

  • Predicting Persuasion-Induced Behavior Change from the Brain

    Emily B. Falk;Elliot T. Berkman;Traci L Mann;Brittany Harrison

  • From Neural Responses to Population Behavior Neural Focus Group Predicts Population-Level Media Effects

    Emily B. Falk;Elliot T. Berkman;Matthew D. Lieberman

  • Impulsivity and inhibitory control deficits are associated with unhealthy eating in young adults

    Agnes J. Jasinska;Marie Yasuda;Charles F. Burant;Nicolette Gregor

  • Neural Activity During Health Messaging Predicts Reductions in Smoking Above and Beyond Self-Report

    Emily B. Falk;Elliot T. Berkman;Danielle Whalen;Matthew D. Lieberman

  • Beyond Brain Mapping Using Neural Measures to Predict Real-World Outcomes

    Elliot T. Berkman;Emily B. Falk

  • Social status modulates neural activity in the mentalizing network.

    Keely A. Muscatell;Sylvia A. Morelli;Emily B. Falk;Baldwin M. Way

  • What is a representative brain? Neuroscience meets population science.

    Emily B. Falk;Luke W. Hyde;Colter Mitchell;Jessica Faul

  • In the Trenches of Real-World Self-Control Neural Correlates of Breaking the Link Between Craving and Smoking

    Elliot T. Berkman;Emily B. Falk;Matthew D. Lieberman

  • Self-affirmation alters the brain's response to health messages and subsequent behavior change.

    Emily B. Falk;Matthew Brook O’Donnell;Christopher N. Cascio;Francis Tinney

  • Persuasion, Influence, and Value: Perspectives from Communication and Social Neuroscience

    Emily Falk;Christin Scholz

  • Functional brain imaging predicts public health campaign success

    Emily B. Falk;Emily B. Falk;Matthew Brook O'Donnell;Steven Tompson;Richard Gonzalez

  • Brain connectivity dynamics during social interaction reflect social network structure.

    Ralf Schmälzle;Ralf Schmälzle;Matthew Brook O'Donnell;Javier O Garcia;Christopher N Cascio

  • A neural model of valuation and information virality.

    Christin Scholz;Elisa C. Baek;Matthew Brook O’Donnell;Hyun Suk Kim

  • The Influence of Peer Behavior as a Function of Social and Cultural Closeness: A Meta-Analysis of Normative Influence on Adolescent Smoking Initiation and Continuation

    Jiaying Liu;Siman Zhao;Xi Chen;Emily B Falk

  • Dissociable Neural Systems Support Retrieval of How and Why Action Knowledge

    Robert P. Spunt;Emily B. Falk;Matthew D. Lieberman

  • Creating Buzz The Neural Correlates of Effective Message Propagation

    Emily B. Falk;Emily B. Falk;Sylvia A. Morelli;B. Locke Welborn;Karl Dambacher

  • Brain and Social Networks: Fundamental Building Blocks of Human Experience.

    Emily B. Falk;Danielle S. Bassett

  • Narcissists’ social pain seen only in the brain

    Christopher N. Cascio;Sara H. Konrath;Emily B. Falk

  • Neural Correlates of Susceptibility to Group Opinions in Online Word-of-Mouth Recommendations:

    Christopher N. Cascio;Matthew Brook O'Donnell;Joseph Bayer;Francis J. Tinney

  • Neural Responses to Exclusion Predict Susceptibility to Social Influence

    Emily B. Falk;Christopher N. Cascio;Matthew Brook O'Donnell;Joshua Carp

Frequent Co-Authors

Jean M. Vettel
Jean M. Vettel United States Army Research Laboratory
Matthew D. Lieberman
Matthew D. Lieberman University of California, Los Angeles
Danielle S. Bassett
Danielle S. Bassett University of Pennsylvania
Elliot T. Berkman
Elliot T. Berkman University of Oregon
C. Raymond Bingham
C. Raymond Bingham University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Jean T. Shope
Jean T. Shope University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Nicole B. Ellison
Nicole B. Ellison University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Shelley E. Taylor
Shelley E. Taylor University of California, Los Angeles
Richard Gonzalez
Richard Gonzalez University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology can open doors to a variety of online programs and career pathways, especially in the field of social work. Many professionals choose to advance their education online, which offers flexibility and accessibility while maintaining the academic standards needed for future licensing.

When exploring careers as a social worker, it's essential to understand the specific requirements for licensure in the state you wish to practice. For example, you can find detailed information about Vermont social work license requirements or review the Virginia social work license requirements.

If you're considering working in the Pacific Northwest, it's helpful to be familiar with Washington social work education requirements. Meanwhile, those interested in a career in Appalachia should look into how to become a social worker in West Virginia.

Researching state-by-state requirements ensures you select the most appropriate online program for your desired career path in psychology, counseling, or social work.

Best Scientists Citing Emily B. Falk

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles