World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
40
Citations
5913
World Ranking
9382
National Ranking
3979

Lev Novik publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lev Novik sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 129 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Lev Novik D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lev Novik sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lev Novik is affiliated with Microsoft in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Computer Science, with specific focus on subfields including Information Systems, Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems and Management, and Signal Processing.

Their main topics of research involve Cloud Computing and Resource Management, Advanced Database Systems and Queries, Scientific Computing and Data Management, and Data Management and Algorithms.

Lev Novik has contributed to publications in the Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, a venue where they have presented two papers. These recent papers include:

  • Helios, published in 2020, Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment
  • Hyperspace, published in 2021, Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment

Frequent collaborators in their research include Rahul Potharaju, Terry Kim, Wentao Wu, Vidip Acharya, and Andrew Fogarty. Each of these coauthors has worked with them on at least two occasions.

Best Publications

  • Delaying interaction with points of interest discovered based on directional device information

    Moe Khosravy;Lev Novik

  • Overlay of information associated with points of interest of direction based data services

    Moe Khosravy;Lev Novik

  • Mobile computing services based on devices with dynamic direction information

    Moe Khosravy;Lev Novik;Irena Hudis

  • Systems and methods for the utilization of metadata for synchronization optimization

    Lev Novik;Tomas Talius;Yunxin Wu;Shaoyu Zhou

  • Systems and methods for synchronizing computer systems throuth an intermediary file system share or device

    Darshatkumar Shah;Lev Novik;Michael W. Thomas;Nils H. Pohlmann

  • Systems and methods for providing synchronization services for units of information manageable by a hardware/software interface system

    Ashish Shah;Darshatkumar A. Shah;Irena Hudis;Lev Novik

  • Security in peer to peer synchronization applications

    Vivek Jawahir Jhaveri;Lev Novik

  • Systems and methods for providing conflict handling for peer-to-peer synchronization of units of information manageable by a hardware/software interface system

    Vivek Jawahir Jhaveri;Ashish Shah;Irena Hudis;Lev Novik

  • Using query language for event filtering and aggregation

    Lev Novik;Raymond McCollum;Irena Hudis

  • Adapting microsoft SQL server for cloud computing

    Philip A. Bernstein;Istvan Cseri;Nishant Dani;Nigel Ellis

  • Minimal extensions required for multi-master offline and collaboration for devices and web services

    Moe Khosravy;Lev Novik;Michael Ray Clark

  • System and method for forward custom marshaling event filters

    Lev Novik;Raymond McCollum;Irena Hudis

  • Portal services based on interactions with points of interest discovered via directional device information

    Moe Khosravy;Lev Novik

  • Synchronizing logical views independent of physical storage representations

    Yunxin Wu;Shaoyu Zhou;Lev Novik;Irena Hudis

  • Discovering queries based on example tuples

    Yanyan Shen;Kaushik Chakrabarti;Surajit Chaudhuri;Bolin Ding

  • Mobile computing devices, architecture and user interfaces based on dynamic direction information

    Moe Khosravy;Lev Novik;Darryl E. Rubin

  • Optimized query tree

    Irena Hudis;Raymond McCollum;Lev Novik

  • Method and apparatus for applying policies

    Ashvinkumar J. Sanghvi;Howard M. Hance;Lev Novik;Raxit A. Kagalwala

  • Systems and methods for synchronizing with multiple data stores

    Ashish B. Shah;Lev Novik;Irena Hudis;Darshatkumar A. Shah

  • Digital rights management for distributed devices

    Moe Khosravy;Lev Novik

Frequent Co-Authors

Douglas B. Terry
Douglas B. Terry Amazon Web Services
Surajit Chaudhuri
Surajit Chaudhuri Microsoft (United States)
John Platt
John Platt Google (United States)
Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer
Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer Microsoft (United States)
Philip A. Bernstein
Philip A. Bernstein Microsoft (United States)
David B. Lomet
David B. Lomet Microsoft (United States)
Dahlia Malkhi
Dahlia Malkhi Diem Association
Raghu Ramakrishnan
Raghu Ramakrishnan Microsoft (United States)
Kaushik Chakrabarti
Kaushik Chakrabarti Microsoft (United States)
Bolin Ding
Bolin Ding Alibaba Group (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens the door to a wide range of online degrees and career options. For those seeking efficient ways to enter the workforce, there are quick degrees online that pay well, enabling students to launch tech-focused careers faster than ever.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is another booming area. Enrolling in an online ai degree can equip you with specialized skills that are in high demand, while allowing you to learn remotely and often at a more affordable cost.

Choosing the right academic path is crucial. Exploring the college majors that align with your interests and the current job market can maximize your career potential in tech and beyond.

If you’re considering advancing your education, the easiest masters programs to get into offer a flexible and accessible route for skill enhancement, career change, or career progression—perfect for busy professionals looking to balance work and study.

Best Scientists Citing Lev Novik

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles