World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer

Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 47 6568 6379 2904 2797 204 7764

Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer between 2004 and 2017, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer published across 14 years, from 2004 to 2017, averaging 14.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 38 publications in 2006. 1 of the 207 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2017. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 38. Peak 38 publications in 2006. 2004: 10 publications 2005: 24 publications 2006: 38 publications 2007: 36 publications 2008: 31 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 19 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 1 publication
2004 2017

207 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer: publications per year, 2004 to 2017
Year Publications
2004 10
2005 24
2006 38
2007 36
2008 31
2009 10
2010 18
2011 19
2012 12
2013 3
2014 2
2015 3
2016 0
2017 1
Total 207
Download as CSV

Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 202–211 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 204 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508 204
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689 47
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Programming language
  • Operating system
  • Database

His primary areas of investigation include Cloud computing, World Wide Web, Computer security, Programming language and Software. His research in Cloud computing intersects with topics in Content management, Search engine indexing and Component. The Component study which covers Interface that intersects with Service provider, Resource allocation, Computer network and Database.

His work on Electronic messaging as part of general World Wide Web research is frequently linked to Third party, bridging the gap between disciplines. The study incorporates disciplines such as File sharing and Networking hardware in addition to Computer security. His Programming language research includes themes of RDF query language and Sargable.

His most cited work include:

  • Personal data mining (297 citations)
  • Marketplace for cloud services resources (253 citations)
  • Hardware architecture for cloud services (242 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer spends much of his time researching Programming language, Theoretical computer science, Component, Information retrieval and World Wide Web. His work deals with themes such as Artificial intelligence and Code, which intersect with Programming language. Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer has researched Component in several fields, including Computer security, Interface, Database and Computer network.

His study in Information retrieval is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Metadata and Data mining. Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer combines subjects such as Cloud computing and Identity with his study of World Wide Web. His Cloud computing research incorporates elements of Software and Search engine indexing.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Programming language (28.64%)
  • Theoretical computer science (22.33%)
  • Component (15.05%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2010-2016)?

  • Theoretical computer science (22.33%)
  • Programming language (28.64%)
  • Component (15.05%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary scientific interests are in Theoretical computer science, Programming language, Component, Query optimization and Sargable. Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer has included themes like Language Integrated Query, Representation, Expression, Object and Algorithm in his Theoretical computer science study. His Programming language study typically links adjacent topics like Transformation.

The concepts of his Component study are interwoven with issues in Operating system, Information retrieval, Data mining and Database. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Spatial query and Interface. Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer interconnects Query language, Query by Example, Query expansion and RDF query language in the investigation of issues within Sargable.

Between 2010 and 2016, his most popular works were:

  • User perception of electronic messaging (79 citations)
  • Discovery and mining of performance information of a device for anticipatorily sending updates to the device (56 citations)
  • Data flow visualization and debugging (46 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Programming language
  • Operating system
  • Database

His scientific interests lie mostly in Component, Database, Big data, Programming language and Object model. His Component research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Data mining, Distributed computing and Operating system. Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer has included themes like Spatial query, Interface, Information filtering system and Cache in his Database study.

Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer has researched Programming language in several fields, including Transformation and Metadata. Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer focuses mostly in the field of Object model, narrowing it down to matters related to Logical data model and, in some cases, Theoretical computer science and Object Query Language. His Theoretical computer science study incorporates themes from Query language, Object Definition Language and Web query classification.

Best Publications

  • Personal data mining

    Raymond E. Ozzie;William H. Gates;Gary W. Flake;Thomas F. Bergstraesser

  • Hardware architecture for cloud services

    William H. Gates;Gary W. Flake;William J. Bolosky;Nishant V. Dani

  • Data security in an off-premise environment

    Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer;William H. Gates;Raymond E Ozzie;Thomas F. Bergstraesser

  • Marketplace for cloud services resources

    Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer;William H. Gates;Gary W. Flake;William J. Bolosky

  • Remote management of resource license

    Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer;William H. Gates;Thomas F. Bergstraesser;Lili Cheng

  • Access management in an off-premise environment

    Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer;William H. Gates;Lili Cheng;Daniel S. Glasser

  • Intent-aware search

    Dragos A. Manolescu;Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer;Laura J. Kern

  • Aggregated resource license

    Nishant V. Dani;William H. Gates;Thomas F. Bergstraesser;Lili Cheng

  • Off-premise encryption of data storage

    Raymond E Ozzie;William H. Gates;Thomas F. Bergstraesser;Lili Cheng

  • Electronic messaging tailored to user interest

    Dragos A. Manolescu;Matthew Jason Pope;Raymond E. Ozzie;Christopher H. Pratley

  • Resource standardization in an off-premise environment

    Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer;Thomas F. Bergstraesser;Christopher W. Brumme;Lili Cheng

  • Rights management in a cloud

    William H. Gates;Ira L. Snyder;Thomas F. Bergstraesser;Arnold N. Blinn

  • Visualization of participant relationships and sentiment for electronic messaging

    Dragos A. Manolescu;Matthew Jason Pope;Raymond E. Ozzie;Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer

  • User perception of electronic messaging

    Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer;Dragos A. Manolescu;Matthew Jason Pope;Matthew B. MacLaurin

  • Remote provisioning of information technology

    Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer;William H. Gates;Raymond E. Ozzie;Gary W. Flake

  • Cloud-based access control list

    Daniel S. Glasser;Melora Zaner-Godsey;William H. Gates;Lili Cheng

  • Compile time meta-object protocol systems and methods

    Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer;Avner Y. Aharoni;David Schach

  • Secure service computation

    Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer;Iii William H. Gates;Raymond E. Ozzie;Gary W. Flake

  • Distributed workflow execution

    Danny van Velzen;Jeffrey van Gogh;Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer

  • Task-related electronic coaching

    Dragos A. Manolescu;Matthew Jason Pope;Raymond E. Ozzie;Eric I-Chao Chang

Frequent Co-Authors

Alexander G. Gounares
Alexander G. Gounares Microsoft (United States)
Lili Cheng
Lili Cheng Microsoft (United States)
Raymond E. Ozzie
Raymond E. Ozzie Microsoft (United States)
Gary W. Flake
Gary W. Flake Independent Scientist / Consultant, US
James R. Larus
James R. Larus École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
William H. Gates
William H. Gates Microsoft (United States)
William J. Bolosky
William J. Bolosky Microsoft (United States)
Chandramohan A. Thekkath
Chandramohan A. Thekkath Microsoft (United States)
Ralf Lämmel
Ralf Lämmel Facebook (United States)
Michael Isard
Michael Isard Google (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to numerous related degrees and flexible career options. For example, students often consider an electrical engineering degree online admissions program, which blends hardware, software, and problem-solving skills vital for tech-driven industries.

Certifications can also fast-track your career. Many professionals are interested in easy certifications to get online that lead to well-paid tech jobs and help boost a resumé—even before completion of a full degree.

If you’re aiming for rapid upskilling, options like the fastest masters degree online programs allow you to earn a graduate degree in less time, providing a competitive edge in the dynamic STEM field.

For long-term career impact, some students choose to invest in the most valuable masters degrees, focusing on high-demand areas that promise both stability and strong earning potential.

Best Scientists Citing Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles