World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer

Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
47
Citations
7764
World Ranking
6567
National Ranking
2903

Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 250 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 560 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 424 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 378 scientists 262–271 publications: 300 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 204 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 984 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 969 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 765 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 517 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Programming language
  • Operating system
  • Database

His primary areas of investigation include Cloud computing, World Wide Web, Computer security, Programming language and Software. His research in Cloud computing intersects with topics in Content management, Search engine indexing and Component. The Component study which covers Interface that intersects with Service provider, Resource allocation, Computer network and Database.

His work on Electronic messaging as part of general World Wide Web research is frequently linked to Third party, bridging the gap between disciplines. The study incorporates disciplines such as File sharing and Networking hardware in addition to Computer security. His Programming language research includes themes of RDF query language and Sargable.

His most cited work include:

  • Personal data mining (297 citations)
  • Marketplace for cloud services resources (253 citations)
  • Hardware architecture for cloud services (242 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer spends much of his time researching Programming language, Theoretical computer science, Component, Information retrieval and World Wide Web. His work deals with themes such as Artificial intelligence and Code, which intersect with Programming language. Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer has researched Component in several fields, including Computer security, Interface, Database and Computer network.

His study in Information retrieval is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Metadata and Data mining. Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer combines subjects such as Cloud computing and Identity with his study of World Wide Web. His Cloud computing research incorporates elements of Software and Search engine indexing.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Programming language (28.64%)
  • Theoretical computer science (22.33%)
  • Component (15.05%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2010-2016)?

  • Theoretical computer science (22.33%)
  • Programming language (28.64%)
  • Component (15.05%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary scientific interests are in Theoretical computer science, Programming language, Component, Query optimization and Sargable. Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer has included themes like Language Integrated Query, Representation, Expression, Object and Algorithm in his Theoretical computer science study. His Programming language study typically links adjacent topics like Transformation.

The concepts of his Component study are interwoven with issues in Operating system, Information retrieval, Data mining and Database. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Spatial query and Interface. Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer interconnects Query language, Query by Example, Query expansion and RDF query language in the investigation of issues within Sargable.

Between 2010 and 2016, his most popular works were:

  • User perception of electronic messaging (79 citations)
  • Discovery and mining of performance information of a device for anticipatorily sending updates to the device (56 citations)
  • Data flow visualization and debugging (46 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Programming language
  • Operating system
  • Database

His scientific interests lie mostly in Component, Database, Big data, Programming language and Object model. His Component research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Data mining, Distributed computing and Operating system. Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer has included themes like Spatial query, Interface, Information filtering system and Cache in his Database study.

Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer has researched Programming language in several fields, including Transformation and Metadata. Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer focuses mostly in the field of Object model, narrowing it down to matters related to Logical data model and, in some cases, Theoretical computer science and Object Query Language. His Theoretical computer science study incorporates themes from Query language, Object Definition Language and Web query classification.

Best Publications

  • Personal data mining

    Raymond E. Ozzie;William H. Gates;Gary W. Flake;Thomas F. Bergstraesser

  • Hardware architecture for cloud services

    William H. Gates;Gary W. Flake;William J. Bolosky;Nishant V. Dani

  • Data security in an off-premise environment

    Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer;William H. Gates;Raymond E Ozzie;Thomas F. Bergstraesser

  • Marketplace for cloud services resources

    Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer;William H. Gates;Gary W. Flake;William J. Bolosky

  • Remote management of resource license

    Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer;William H. Gates;Thomas F. Bergstraesser;Lili Cheng

  • Access management in an off-premise environment

    Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer;William H. Gates;Lili Cheng;Daniel S. Glasser

  • Intent-aware search

    Dragos A. Manolescu;Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer;Laura J. Kern

  • Aggregated resource license

    Nishant V. Dani;William H. Gates;Thomas F. Bergstraesser;Lili Cheng

  • Off-premise encryption of data storage

    Raymond E Ozzie;William H. Gates;Thomas F. Bergstraesser;Lili Cheng

  • Electronic messaging tailored to user interest

    Dragos A. Manolescu;Matthew Jason Pope;Raymond E. Ozzie;Christopher H. Pratley

  • Resource standardization in an off-premise environment

    Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer;Thomas F. Bergstraesser;Christopher W. Brumme;Lili Cheng

  • Rights management in a cloud

    William H. Gates;Ira L. Snyder;Thomas F. Bergstraesser;Arnold N. Blinn

  • Visualization of participant relationships and sentiment for electronic messaging

    Dragos A. Manolescu;Matthew Jason Pope;Raymond E. Ozzie;Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer

  • User perception of electronic messaging

    Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer;Dragos A. Manolescu;Matthew Jason Pope;Matthew B. MacLaurin

  • Remote provisioning of information technology

    Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer;William H. Gates;Raymond E. Ozzie;Gary W. Flake

  • Cloud-based access control list

    Daniel S. Glasser;Melora Zaner-Godsey;William H. Gates;Lili Cheng

  • Compile time meta-object protocol systems and methods

    Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer;Avner Y. Aharoni;David Schach

  • Secure service computation

    Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer;Iii William H. Gates;Raymond E. Ozzie;Gary W. Flake

  • Distributed workflow execution

    Danny van Velzen;Jeffrey van Gogh;Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer

  • Task-related electronic coaching

    Dragos A. Manolescu;Matthew Jason Pope;Raymond E. Ozzie;Eric I-Chao Chang

Frequent Co-Authors

Alexander G. Gounares
Alexander G. Gounares Microsoft (United States)
Lili Cheng
Lili Cheng Microsoft (United States)
Raymond E. Ozzie
Raymond E. Ozzie Microsoft (United States)
Gary W. Flake
Gary W. Flake Independent Scientist / Consultant, US
James R. Larus
James R. Larus École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
William H. Gates
William H. Gates Microsoft (United States)
William J. Bolosky
William J. Bolosky Microsoft (United States)
Chandramohan A. Thekkath
Chandramohan A. Thekkath Microsoft (United States)
Ralf Lämmel
Ralf Lämmel Facebook (United States)
Michael Isard
Michael Isard Google (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to numerous related degrees and flexible career options. For example, students often consider an electrical engineering degree online admissions program, which blends hardware, software, and problem-solving skills vital for tech-driven industries.

Certifications can also fast-track your career. Many professionals are interested in easy certifications to get online that lead to well-paid tech jobs and help boost a resumé—even before completion of a full degree.

If you’re aiming for rapid upskilling, options like the fastest masters degree online programs allow you to earn a graduate degree in less time, providing a competitive edge in the dynamic STEM field.

For long-term career impact, some students choose to invest in the most valuable masters degrees, focusing on high-demand areas that promise both stability and strong earning potential.

Best Scientists Citing Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles