World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
33
Citations
4149
World Ranking
7888
National Ranking
482

Neil M. Burgess publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neil M. Burgess sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 60 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Neil M. Burgess D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neil M. Burgess sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Neil M. Burgess is affiliated with Environment and Climate Change Canada in Canada. Their research centers on Environmental Science, with a significant focus on subfields including Ecology, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, and Sociology and Political Science.

The primary topics of their work cover Marine Animal Studies Overview, Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, Mercury Impact and Mitigation Studies, Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity, Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies, Species Distribution and Climate Change, and Environmental Conservation and Management.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Neil M. Burgess include:

  • Prevalence of sustainable and unsustainable use of wild species inferred from the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, 2021, Conservation Biology
  • Mitigating the Impacts of Development Corridors on Biodiversity: A Global Review, 2021, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
  • Factors influencing mercury levels in Leach's storm-petrels at northwest Atlantic colonies, 2022, The Science of The Total Environment
  • Mercury levels in North Atlantic seabirds: A synthesis, 2022, Marine Pollution Bulletin
  • Inter-colony variation in predation, mercury burden and adult survival in a declining seabird, 2023, The Science of The Total Environment

Neil M. Burgess frequently publishes in the following venues:

  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Conservation Biology
  • Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
  • Environmental Research Infrastructure and Sustainability
  • Marine Pollution Bulletin

Frequent coauthors in their research efforts include Ingrid L. Pollet, Diego Juffe-Bignoli, Christine Tam, Jessica Thorn, and Joseph W. Bull, demonstrating collaborative work with multiple experts in related fields.

Best Publications

  • Patterns and interpretation of mercury exposure in freshwater avian communities in northeastern north America.

    David C. Evers;Neil M. Burgess;Louise Champoux;Bart Hoskins

  • Geographic trend in mercury measured in common loon feathers and blood

    David C Evers;Joseph D. Kaplan;Michael W Meyer;Peter S. Reaman

  • Methylmercury exposure associated with reduced productivity in common loons

    Neil M. Burgess;Michael W. Meyer

  • An assessment of the toxicological significance of anthropogenic contaminants in Canadian arctic wildlife.

    Aaron T. Fisk;Cynthia A. de Wit;Mark Wayland;Zou Zou Kuzyk

  • Mercury in Freshwater Fish of Northeast North America – A Geographic Perspective Based on Fish Tissue Monitoring Databases

    Neil C Kamman;Neil M Burgess;Charles T Driscoll;Howard A Simonin

  • Toxicity of dietary methylmercury to fish: derivation of ecologically meaningful threshold concentrations.

    David C. Depew;Niladri Basu;Neil M. Burgess;Linda M. Campbell

  • Relationships among mercury, selenium, and neurochemical parameters in common loons ( Gavia immer ) and bald eagles ( Haliaeetus leucocephalus )

    A. M. Scheuhammer;N. Basu;N. M. Burgess;J. E. Elliott

  • Flame retardants in eggs of four gull species (Laridae) from breeding sites spanning Atlantic to Pacific Canada

    Da Chen;Robert J. Letcher;Neil M. Burgess;Louise Champoux

  • Marine Foraging Birds As Bioindicators of Mercury in the Gulf of Maine

    M. Wing Goodale;David C. Evers;Steven E. Mierzykowski;Alexander L. Bond;Alexander L. Bond

  • Mercury and other Contaminants in Common Loons Breeding in Atlantic Canada

    Neil M. Burgess;David C. Evers;Joseph D. Kaplan

  • Mercury biomagnification in the food webs of acidic lakes in Kejimkujik National Park and National Historic Site, Nova Scotia

    Brianna WynB. Wyn;Brianna WynB. Wyn;Karen A. KiddK.A. Kidd;Karen A. KiddK.A. Kidd;Neil M. BurgessN.M. Burgess;Neil M. BurgessN.M. Burgess;R. Allen CurryR.A. Curry;R. Allen CurryR.A. Curry

  • Mercury trends in herring gull (Larus argentatus) eggs from Atlantic Canada, 1972-2008: Temporal change or dietary shift?

    Neil M. Burgess;Alexander L. Bond;Craig E. Hebert;Ewa Neugebauer

  • Perfluoroalkyl carboxylates and sulfonates and precursors in relation to dietary source tracers in the eggs of four species of gulls (Larids) from breeding sites spanning Atlantic to Pacific Canada.

    Wouter A. Gebbink;Robert J. Letcher;Neil M. Burgess;Louise Champoux

  • Reproduction of cavity-nesting birds in pesticide-sprayed apple orchards in southern Ontario, Canada, 1988–1994

    Christine A. Bishop;Brian Collins;Pierre Mineau;Neil M. Burgess

  • European starlings ( Sturnus vulgaris ) suggest that landfills are an important source of bioaccumulative flame retardants to Canadian terrestrial ecosystems

    Da Chen;Pamela Martin;Neil M. Burgess;Louise Champoux

  • INTERACTIVE MORTALITY FACTORS IN COMMON LOONS FROM MARITIME CANADA

    Pierre-Yves Daoust;Gary Conboy;Scott McBurney;Neil Burgess

  • PCBs in sediments and the coastal food web near a local contaminant source in Saglek Bay, Labrador.

    Z.A. Kuzyk;J.P. Stow;N.M. Burgess;S.M. Solomon

  • Lead and stable lead isotope ratios in soil, earthworms, and bones of American woodcock (Scolopax minor) from eastern Canada.

    Anton M. Scheuhammer;Della E. Bond;Neil M. Burgess;Jean Rodrigue

  • Derivation of screening benchmarks for dietary methylmercury exposure for the common loon (Gavia immer): Rationale for use in ecological risk assessment

    David C. Depew;Niladri Basu;Neil M. Burgess;Linda M. Campbell

  • Biological effects of marine PCB contamination on black guillemot nestlings at Saglek, Labrador: liver biomarkers.

    Zou Zou A. Kuzyk;Neil M. Burgess;Jason P. Stow;Glen A. Fox

Frequent Co-Authors

John E. Elliott
John E. Elliott Environment and Climate Change Canada
Robert J. Letcher
Robert J. Letcher Carleton University
Linda M. Campbell
Linda M. Campbell Saint Mary's University
David C. Evers
David C. Evers University of Minnesota
Karen A. Kidd
Karen A. Kidd McMaster University
Craig E. Hebert
Craig E. Hebert Carleton University
Anton M. Scheuhammer
Anton M. Scheuhammer Carleton University
Kelly R. Munkittrick
Kelly R. Munkittrick University of New Brunswick
Chad R. Hammerschmidt
Chad R. Hammerschmidt Wright State University
Celia Y. Chen
Celia Y. Chen Dartmouth College

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Ecology and Evolution, exploring related career pathways often means considering complementary degrees in science, education, healthcare, or research. Many choose online programs in fields like nursing or environmental science for their flexibility and broad professional applications. Comparing programs is essential—resources like capella university vs wgu rn to bsn highlight the benefits and differences between major online universities, helping prospective students make informed decisions.

Affordability is another key concern. Those interested in healthcare or life science careers can find guidance on the cheapest bsn to msn online programs, ensuring quality education without excessive student debt. It’s also important to choose reputable institutions—lists of non profit colleges can point students toward accredited online programs globally recognized for their value.

For active duty military members and veterans, educational flexibility is vital. Luckily, there are resources specifically dedicated to finding military friendly colleges online, which offer unique benefits and support services. No matter your background or goals, a wide variety of online degree pathways can support your journey in ecology-focused fields or closely allied disciplines.

Best Scientists Citing Neil M. Burgess

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles