World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Anton M. Scheuhammer

Anton M. Scheuhammer

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
50
Citations
10441
World Ranking
4936
National Ranking
206

Anton M. Scheuhammer publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anton M. Scheuhammer sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 94 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Anton M. Scheuhammer D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anton M. Scheuhammer sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Anton M. Scheuhammer is affiliated with Carleton University in Canada. Their academic profile centers on research activities conducted within this institution.

No recent papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, book publications, main fields or subfields of study, main topics of work, or awards won are listed in the available data. Consequently, the profile remains focused on the basic affiliation information provided.

Best Publications

  • Effects of Environmental Methylmercury on the Health of Wild Birds, Mammals, and Fish

    Anton M Scheuhammer;Michael W Meyer;Mark B Sandheinrich;Michael W Murray

  • The chronic toxicity of aluminium, cadmium, mercury, and lead in birds: a review.

    A.M. Scheuhammer

  • Ecotoxicology of Mercury

    James G. Wiener;David P. Krabbenhoft;Gary H. Heinz;Anton M. Scheuhammer

  • Effects of acidification on the availability of toxic metals and calcium to wild birds and mammals.

    A.M. Scheuhammer

  • Geographic trend in mercury measured in common loon feathers and blood

    David C Evers;Joseph D. Kaplan;Michael W Meyer;Peter S. Reaman

  • Selenium in Birds

    Harry M. Ohlendorf;Gary H. Heinz

  • Mink as a sentinel species in environmental health

    Niladri Basu;Anton M. Scheuhammer;Steven J. Bursian;John Elliott

  • Recent progress on our understanding of the biological effects of mercury in fish and wildlife in the Canadian Arctic.

    Anton Scheuhammer;Birgit Braune;Hing Man Chan;Héloïse Frouin

  • Mercury in Freshwater Fish of Northeast North America – A Geographic Perspective Based on Fish Tissue Monitoring Databases

    Neil C Kamman;Neil M Burgess;Charles T Driscoll;Howard A Simonin

  • The ecotoxicology of lead shot and lead fishing weights.

    A. M. Scheuhammer;S. L. Norris

  • Is dietary mercury of neurotoxicological concern to wild polar bears (Ursus maritimus)

    Niladri Basu;Anton M. Scheuhammer;Christian Sonne;Robert J. Letcher

  • Heavy metal and metallothionein concentrations in Atlantic Canadian seabirds.

    J. E. Elliott;A. M. Scheuhammer;F. A. Leighton;P. A. Pearce

  • Common loon eggs as indicators of methylmercury availability in North America.

    D. C. Evers;K. M. Taylor;R. J. Taylor

  • Impacts of Mercury on Freshwater Fish-Eating Wildlife and Humans

    H.M. Chan;A.M. Scheuhammer;A. Ferran;C. Loupelle

  • Relationships among mercury, selenium, and neurochemical parameters in common loons ( Gavia immer ) and bald eagles ( Haliaeetus leucocephalus )

    A. M. Scheuhammer;N. Basu;N. M. Burgess;J. E. Elliott

  • Cadmium in Birds

    Mark Wayland;Anton M. Scheuhammer

  • Lead Poisoning in Upland-foraging Birds of Prey in Canada

    A J Clark;A M Scheuhammer

  • Mercury and selenium accumulation in common loons (Gavia immer) and common mergansers (Mergus merganser) from Eastern Canada

    Anton M. Scheuhammer;Allan H. K. Wong;Della Bond

  • Effects of mercury on neurochemical receptors in wild river otters (Lontra canadensis).

    Niladri Basu;Anton Scheuhammer;Nicole Grochowina;Kate Klenavic

  • Influence of reduced dietary calcium on the accumulation and effects of lead, cadmium, and aluminum in birds.

    A.M. Scheuhammer

  • Mercury exposure in breeding common loons (Gavia immer) in Central Ontario, Canada

    Anton M. Scheuhammer;Carolyn M. Atchison;Allan H. K. Wong;David C. Evers

Frequent Co-Authors

Niladri Basu
Niladri Basu McGill University
Hing Man Chan
Hing Man Chan University of Ottawa
John E. Elliott
John E. Elliott Environment and Climate Change Canada
Birgit M. Braune
Birgit M. Braune Carleton University
R. Douglas Evans
R. Douglas Evans Trent University
David C. Evers
David C. Evers University of Minnesota
Neil M. Burgess
Neil M. Burgess Environment and Climate Change Canada
David R. S. Lean
David R. S. Lean University of Ottawa
Robert J. Letcher
Robert J. Letcher Carleton University
Gary H. Heinz
Gary H. Heinz United States Fish and Wildlife Service

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those passionate about Environmental Sciences, pursuing advanced education online offers flexible pathways to enhance knowledge and career prospects. One promising option is exploring online edd no dissertation programs, which allow professionals to focus on practical leadership skills without the traditional dissertation requirement.

Additionally, educators and researchers looking to advance their credentials can consider transitioning from an eds to edd program. This pathway is ideal for environmental educators aiming to impact policy and curriculum development at higher levels.

For those interested in social work aspects related to environmental justice and community health, fully funded dsw programs online offer affordable doctoral opportunities that blend social work expertise with environmental concerns.

Lastly, students seeking broad interdisciplinary knowledge to complement environmental studies might explore a cheap online general studies degree. This option provides a cost-effective foundation to enter varied roles within environmental fields.

Best Scientists Citing Anton M. Scheuhammer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles