World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Animal Science and Veterinary

D-Index
43
Citations
6720
World Ranking
926
National Ranking
282

Markus F. Miller publication distribution in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Markus F. Miller sits on this spectrum.

29–33 publications: 1 scientists 34–38 publications: 6 scientists 39–43 publications: 17 scientists 44–48 publications: 23 scientists 49–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–58 publications: 44 scientists 59–63 publications: 66 scientists 64–68 publications: 75 scientists 69–73 publications: 71 scientists 74–78 publications: 85 scientists 79–83 publications: 108 scientists 84–88 publications: 105 scientists 89–93 publications: 84 scientists 94–98 publications: 103 scientists 99–103 publications: 97 scientists 104–108 publications: 95 scientists 109–113 publications: 89 scientists 114–118 publications: 88 scientists 119–123 publications: 109 scientists 124–128 publications: 93 scientists 129–133 publications: 89 scientists 134–138 publications: 95 scientists 139–143 publications: 92 scientists 144–148 publications: 80 scientists 149–153 publications: 75 scientists 154–158 publications: 74 scientists 159–163 publications: 67 scientists 164–168 publications: 53 scientists 169–173 publications: 62 scientists 174–178 publications: 63 scientists 179–183 publications: 50 scientists 184–188 publications: 55 scientists 189–193 publications: 50 scientists 194–198 publications: 27 scientists 199–203 publications: 44 scientists 204–208 publications: 31 scientists 209–213 publications: 28 scientists 214–218 publications: 38 scientists 219–223 publications: 33 scientists 224–228 publications: 36 scientists 229–233 publications: 29 scientists 234–238 publications: 35 scientists 239–243 publications: 23 scientists 244–248 publications: 24 scientists 249–253 publications: 29 scientists 254–258 publications: 28 scientists 259–263 publications: 21 scientists 264–268 publications: 25 scientists 269–273 publications: 11 scientists 274–278 publications: 18 scientists 279–283 publications: 13 scientists 284–288 publications: 18 scientists 289–293 publications: 10 scientists 294–298 publications: 12 scientists 299–303 publications: 11 scientists 304–308 publications: 15 scientists 309–313 publications: 14 scientists 314–318 publications: 14 scientists 319–323 publications: 8 scientists 324–328 publications: 8 scientists 329–333 publications: 13 scientists 334–338 publications: 14 scientists 339–343 publications: 13 scientists 344–348 publications: 10 scientists 349–353 publications: 11 scientists 354–358 publications: 5 scientists 359–363 publications: 8 scientists 364–368 publications: 8 scientists 369–373 publications: 6 scientists 374–378 publications: 7 scientists 379–383 publications: 8 scientists 384–388 publications: 3 scientists 389–393 publications: 4 scientists 394–398 publications: 5 scientists 399–403 publications: 8 scientists 404–408 publications: 5 scientists 409–413 publications: 4 scientists 414–418 publications: 3 scientists 419–423 publications: 8 scientists 424–428 publications: 5 scientists 429–433 publications: 3 scientists 434–438 publications: 5 scientists 439–441 publications: 5 scientists 442+ publications: 99 scientists
29 publications 442+

This scientist: 151 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more.

Markus F. Miller D-index placement in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Markus F. Miller sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 5 scientists 21 D-Index: 22 scientists 22 D-Index: 31 scientists 23 D-Index: 44 scientists 24 D-Index: 53 scientists 25 D-Index: 66 scientists 26 D-Index: 80 scientists 27 D-Index: 101 scientists 28 D-Index: 106 scientists 29 D-Index: 116 scientists 30 D-Index: 154 scientists 31 D-Index: 158 scientists 32 D-Index: 143 scientists 33 D-Index: 137 scientists 34 D-Index: 126 scientists 35 D-Index: 134 scientists 36 D-Index: 112 scientists 37 D-Index: 115 scientists 38 D-Index: 105 scientists 39 D-Index: 111 scientists 40 D-Index: 107 scientists 41 D-Index: 87 scientists 42 D-Index: 74 scientists 43 D-Index: 62 scientists 44 D-Index: 61 scientists 45 D-Index: 41 scientists 46 D-Index: 51 scientists 47 D-Index: 43 scientists 48 D-Index: 28 scientists 49 D-Index: 47 scientists 50 D-Index: 40 scientists 51 D-Index: 34 scientists 52 D-Index: 33 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 16 scientists 55 D-Index: 32 scientists 56 D-Index: 21 scientists 57 D-Index: 18 scientists 58 D-Index: 28 scientists 59 D-Index: 33 scientists 60 D-Index: 17 scientists 61 D-Index: 21 scientists 62 D-Index: 18 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 9 scientists 65 D-Index: 20 scientists 66 D-Index: 11 scientists 67 D-Index: 16 scientists 68 D-Index: 12 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 13 scientists 71 D-Index: 15 scientists 72 D-Index: 11 scientists 73 D-Index: 11 scientists 74 D-Index: 14 scientists 75 D-Index: 5 scientists 76 D-Index: 6 scientists 77+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 77+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2012 - Meats Research Award, American Society of Animal Science

Overview

Markus F. Miller is affiliated with Texas Tech University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, focusing notably on Food Science, Animal Science and Zoology, and Biotechnology, among other subfields.

Their work covers a range of important topics including Meat and Animal Product Quality, Food Safety and Hygiene, Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology, Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety, Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods, Animal Nutrition and Physiology, and Identification and Quantification in Food.

Markus F. Miller has published extensively in several respected venues. Frequent publication outlets include Foods, with eleven publications, as well as the Journal of Animal Science and Meat and Muscle Biology, each with two publications. Other venues include Animals and Meat Science.

Some recent papers illustrate the breadth of their research interests:

  • In-Plant Validation of Novel On-Site Ozone Generation Technology (Bio-Safe) Compared to Lactic Acid Beef Carcasses and Trim Using Natural Microbiota and Salmonella and E. coli O157:H7 Surrogate Enumeration (2021, Foods)
  • Minor differences in perceived sheepmeat eating quality scores of Australian, Chinese and American consumers (2020, Meat Science)
  • Quantitative Bio-Mapping of Salmonella and Indicator Organisms at Different Stages in a Commercial Pork Processing Facility (2022, Foods)
  • Influence of Demographic Factors on Sheepmeat Sensory Scores of American, Australian and Chinese Consumers (2020, Foods)
  • Effect of SeaFeed, a canola oil infused with Asparagopsis armata, on methane emissions, animal health, performance, and carcass characteristics of Angus feedlot cattle (2024, Translational Animal Science)

Miller frequently collaborates with other researchers, including M.M. Brashears, David A. Vargas, Marcos X. Sánchez-Plata, Diego E. Casas, and Alejandro Echeverry, with multiple joint publications alongside each.

They have been recognized by their peers, receiving the Meats Research Award from the American Society of Animal Science in 2012.

Best Publications

  • Consumer evaluation of beef of known categories of tenderness.

    S J Boleman;S L Boleman;R K Miller;J F Taylor

  • Shade and water misting effects on behavior, physiology, performance, and carcass traits of heat-stressed feedlot cattle.

    F M Mitlöhner;J L Morrow;J W Dailey;S C Wilson

  • Effects of conventional and grass feeding systems on the nutrient composition of beef

    J. M. Leheska;L. D. Thompson;J. C. Howe;E. Hentges

  • Environmental effects on pig performance, meat quality, and muscle characteristics

    J. G. Gentry;J. J. McGlone;M. F. Miller;J. R. Blanton

  • Alternative housing systems for pigs: Influences on growth, composition, and pork quality

    JG Gentry;JJ McGlone;Jr Jr Blanton;MF Miller

  • Effects of the transportation of beef cattle from the feedyard to the packing plant on prevalence levels of Escherichia coli O157 and Salmonella spp.

    A. R. Barham;B. L. Barham;A. K. Johnson;D. M. Allen

  • Tasco: Influence of a brown seaweed on antioxidants in forages and livestock—A review

    V. G. Allen;K. R. Pond;K. E. Saker;J. P. Fontenot

  • Evaluation of the contribution of tenderness, juiciness, and flavor to the overall consumer beef eating experience.

    Travis G O'Quinn;J F Legako;J C Brooks;Mark F Miller

  • Adipose tissue, longissimus muscle and anterior pituitary growth and function in clenbuterol-fed heifers.

    M. F. Miller;D. K. Garcia;M. E. Coleman;P. A. Ekeren

  • Predictors of Beef Tenderness: Development and Verification

    S.D. Shackelford;M. Koohmaraie;G. Whipple;T.L. Wheeler

  • Effects of duration of zilpaterol hydrochloride feeding and days on the finishing diet on feedlot cattle performance and carcass traits

    J. T. Vasconcelos;R. J. Rathmann;R. R. Reuter;J. Leibovich

  • Effects of postmortem injection time, injection level, and concentration of calcium chloride on beef quality traits.

    T L Wheeler;M Koohmaraie;J L Lansdell;G R Siragusa

  • Resting of pigs and hot-fat trimming and accelerated chilling of carcasses to improve pork quality

    S D Milligan;C B Ramsey;M F Miller;C S Kaster

  • Diverse birth and rearing environment effects on pig growth and meat quality.

    JG Gentry;JJ McGlone;MF Miller;Jr Jr Blanton

  • Improvement of beef tenderness and quality traits with calcium chloride injection in beef loins 48 hours postmortem.

    C R Kerth;M F Miller;C B Ramsey

  • Effect of vitamin D3 supplementation level on the postmortem tenderization of beef from steers.

    J. L. Montgomery;M. A. Carr;C. R. Kerth;G. G. Hilton

  • Tasco-Forage: III. Influence of a seaweed extract on performance, monocyte immune cell response, and carcass characteristics in feedlot-finished steers.

    V G Allen;K R Pond;K E Saker;J P Fontenot

  • Slaughter plant location, USDA quality grade, external fat thickness, and aging time effects on sensory characteristics of beef loin strip steak.

    M F Miller;C R Kerth;J W Wise;J L Lansdell

  • Effects of feeding zilpaterol hydrochloride with and without monensin and tylosin on carcass cutability and meat palatability of beef steers.

    G. G. Hilton;J. L. Montgomery;C. R. Krehbiel;D. A. Yates

  • Dietary zilpaterol hydrochloride. II. Carcass composition and meat palatability of beef cattle

    JM Leheska;JL Montgomery;CR Krehbiel;DA Yates

  • Ascophyllum nodosum supplementation: A preharvest intervention for reducing Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella spp. in feedlot steers

    KW Braden;Jr Jr Blanton;VG Allen;KR Pond

  • Substantial within-animal diversity of Salmonella isolates from lymph nodes, feces, and hides of cattle at slaughter.

    Sara E. Gragg;Guy H. Loneragan;Kendra K. Nightingale;Dayna M. Brichta-Harhay

  • Validation of Intervention Strategies To Control Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella Typhimurium DT 104 in Mechanically Tenderized and Brine-Enhanced Beef

    Alejandro Echeverry;J. Chance Brooks;Markus F. Miller;Jesse A. Collins

  • Validation of lactic acid bacteria, lactic acid, and acidified sodium chlorite as decontaminating interventions to control Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella Typhimurium DT 104 in mechanically tenderized and brine-enhanced (nonintact) beef at the purveyor.

    Alejandro Echeverry;J. Chance Brooks;Markus F. Miller;Jesse A. Collins

  • In-Plant Validation of Novel On-Site Ozone Generation Technology (Bio-Safe) Compared to Lactic Acid Beef Carcasses and Trim Using Natural Microbiota and Salmonella and E. coli O157:H7 Surrogate Enumeration.

    Diego E Casas;David A Vargas;Emile Randazzo;Dan Lynn

  • Influence of Demographic Factors on Sheepmeat Sensory Scores of American, Australian and Chinese Consumers.

    Rachel A. O’Reilly;Liselotte Pannier;Graham E. Gardner;Andrea J. Garmyn

  • Microbial Growth Study on Pork Loins as Influenced by the Application of Different Antimicrobials.

    David A. Vargas;Markus F. Miller;Dale R. Woerner;Alejandro Echeverry

  • Biomapping of Microbial Indicators on Beef Subprimals Subjected to Spray or Dry Chilling over Prolonged Refrigerated Storage.

    Diego E. Casas;Rosine Manishimwe;Savannah J. Forgey;Keelyn E. Hanlon

  • In-Plant Intervention Validation of a Novel Ozone Generation Technology (Bio-Safe) Compared to Lactic Acid in Variety Meats

    David A. Vargas;Diego E. Casas;Daniela R. Chávez-Velado;Reagan L. Jiménez

  • The Winning Weaning Food (WWF): The Development of a Complementary Food for Food- Insecure Infants and Young Children in Malawi

    Rufus J Theophilus;Markus Miller;Wilna H Oldewage-Theron;John Dawson

  • Seasonal prevalence of potentially positive non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) bovine hides and carcasses in Costa Rica.

    Byron D. Chaves;Alejandro Echeverry;Lyda G. García;M. Todd Brashears

  • ACCEPTABILITY OF VARIOUS GROUND BEEF AND PORK PRODUCTS EXTENDED WITH MECHANICALLY SEPARATED BEEF

    Markus F. Miller;Gordon W. Davis;C.Boyd Ramsey;Hugo Irizarry

  • Multiple Interventions for Improving Food Safety Practices in 2 Small Beef Abattoirs of Honduras and Associated Impacts on Risk-Mitigation Management:

    Diego Casas;Alexandra Calle;Mariely Bueso;Nelson Huerta-Leidenz

  • Effects of Sex Class, a Combined Androgen and Estrogen Implant, and Pasture Supplementation on Growth and Carcass Performance and Meat Quality of Zebu-Type Grass-Fed Cattle

    Nelson Huerta-Leidenz;Nancy Jerez-Timaure;Jhones Onorino Sarturi;Mindy M. Brashears

  • Effect of Enhancement on Three Beef Muscles with Phosphate or Alternative Functional Ingredients on the Eating Quality of Australian Beef

    NC Hardcastle;Andrea Garmyn;Markus Miller

  • Establishment of a preliminary baseline of Salmonella presence on pork and goat carcasses harvested in the Bahamas to address food and nutritional security interventions.

    Keelyn E Hanlon;Alejandro Echeverry;Markus F Miller;Mindy M Brashears

  • In-Plant Validation Study of Harvest Process Controls in Two Beef Processing Plants in Honduras

    Markus Miller;Deigo Casas;Mindy Brashears;Brenda Inestroza

Frequent Co-Authors

Mindy M. Brashears
Mindy M. Brashears Texas Tech University
H.R. Cross
H.R. Cross Texas A&M University
Guy H. Loneragan
Guy H. Loneragan Texas Tech University
Chris R. Kerth
Chris R. Kerth Texas A&M University
John J. McGlone
John J. McGlone Texas Tech University
W. T. Nichols
W. T. Nichols MSD (United States)
J.C. Brooks
J.C. Brooks Texas Tech University
Mohammad Koohmaraie
Mohammad Koohmaraie IEH Laboratories and Consulting Group
D. A. Yates
D. A. Yates University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Kevin R. Pond
Kevin R. Pond Texas Tech University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Animal Science and Veterinary fields opens doors to diverse career opportunities. For those interested in high-paying roles, exploring high paying jobs with animal science degree can provide valuable insight into professions such as veterinary medicine, animal nutrition, and wildlife conservation.

Beyond direct animal care, degrees in related areas like exercise science can broaden career options. Programs like exercise science degrees online offer flexible learning paths that prepare students for roles in physical health and rehabilitation, which often intersect with veterinary and animal wellness professions.

For individuals passionate about leadership and sports management, pathways such as becoming an athletic director jobs present exciting opportunities. These roles combine management skills with a focus on athletic programs, some of which involve working with animal-related sports like equestrian programs.

Another specialized career avenue is in behavior analysis, where obtaining a bcba degree can lead to certification as a Board Certified Behavior Analyst. This qualification is increasingly relevant in animal training and therapy sectors, emphasizing science-backed behavioral interventions.

Best Scientists Citing Markus F. Miller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles