World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Animal Science and Veterinary
USA
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Animal Science and Veterinary

D-Index
103
Citations
34743
World Ranking
13
National Ranking
6

Mohammad Koohmaraie publication distribution in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mohammad Koohmaraie sits on this spectrum.

29–33 publications: 1 scientists 34–38 publications: 6 scientists 39–43 publications: 17 scientists 44–48 publications: 23 scientists 49–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–58 publications: 44 scientists 59–63 publications: 66 scientists 64–68 publications: 75 scientists 69–73 publications: 71 scientists 74–78 publications: 85 scientists 79–83 publications: 108 scientists 84–88 publications: 105 scientists 89–93 publications: 84 scientists 94–98 publications: 103 scientists 99–103 publications: 97 scientists 104–108 publications: 95 scientists 109–113 publications: 89 scientists 114–118 publications: 88 scientists 119–123 publications: 109 scientists 124–128 publications: 93 scientists 129–133 publications: 89 scientists 134–138 publications: 95 scientists 139–143 publications: 92 scientists 144–148 publications: 80 scientists 149–153 publications: 75 scientists 154–158 publications: 74 scientists 159–163 publications: 67 scientists 164–168 publications: 53 scientists 169–173 publications: 62 scientists 174–178 publications: 63 scientists 179–183 publications: 50 scientists 184–188 publications: 55 scientists 189–193 publications: 50 scientists 194–198 publications: 27 scientists 199–203 publications: 44 scientists 204–208 publications: 31 scientists 209–213 publications: 28 scientists 214–218 publications: 38 scientists 219–223 publications: 33 scientists 224–228 publications: 36 scientists 229–233 publications: 29 scientists 234–238 publications: 35 scientists 239–243 publications: 23 scientists 244–248 publications: 24 scientists 249–253 publications: 29 scientists 254–258 publications: 28 scientists 259–263 publications: 21 scientists 264–268 publications: 25 scientists 269–273 publications: 11 scientists 274–278 publications: 18 scientists 279–283 publications: 13 scientists 284–288 publications: 18 scientists 289–293 publications: 10 scientists 294–298 publications: 12 scientists 299–303 publications: 11 scientists 304–308 publications: 15 scientists 309–313 publications: 14 scientists 314–318 publications: 14 scientists 319–323 publications: 8 scientists 324–328 publications: 8 scientists 329–333 publications: 13 scientists 334–338 publications: 14 scientists 339–343 publications: 13 scientists 344–348 publications: 10 scientists 349–353 publications: 11 scientists 354–358 publications: 5 scientists 359–363 publications: 8 scientists 364–368 publications: 8 scientists 369–373 publications: 6 scientists 374–378 publications: 7 scientists 379–383 publications: 8 scientists 384–388 publications: 3 scientists 389–393 publications: 4 scientists 394–398 publications: 5 scientists 399–403 publications: 8 scientists 404–408 publications: 5 scientists 409–413 publications: 4 scientists 414–418 publications: 3 scientists 419–423 publications: 8 scientists 424–428 publications: 5 scientists 429–433 publications: 3 scientists 434–438 publications: 5 scientists 439–441 publications: 5 scientists 442+ publications: 99 scientists
29 publications 442+

This scientist: 287 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more.

Mohammad Koohmaraie D-index placement in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mohammad Koohmaraie sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 5 scientists 21 D-Index: 22 scientists 22 D-Index: 31 scientists 23 D-Index: 44 scientists 24 D-Index: 53 scientists 25 D-Index: 66 scientists 26 D-Index: 80 scientists 27 D-Index: 101 scientists 28 D-Index: 106 scientists 29 D-Index: 116 scientists 30 D-Index: 154 scientists 31 D-Index: 158 scientists 32 D-Index: 143 scientists 33 D-Index: 137 scientists 34 D-Index: 126 scientists 35 D-Index: 134 scientists 36 D-Index: 112 scientists 37 D-Index: 115 scientists 38 D-Index: 105 scientists 39 D-Index: 111 scientists 40 D-Index: 107 scientists 41 D-Index: 87 scientists 42 D-Index: 74 scientists 43 D-Index: 62 scientists 44 D-Index: 61 scientists 45 D-Index: 41 scientists 46 D-Index: 51 scientists 47 D-Index: 43 scientists 48 D-Index: 28 scientists 49 D-Index: 47 scientists 50 D-Index: 40 scientists 51 D-Index: 34 scientists 52 D-Index: 33 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 16 scientists 55 D-Index: 32 scientists 56 D-Index: 21 scientists 57 D-Index: 18 scientists 58 D-Index: 28 scientists 59 D-Index: 33 scientists 60 D-Index: 17 scientists 61 D-Index: 21 scientists 62 D-Index: 18 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 9 scientists 65 D-Index: 20 scientists 66 D-Index: 11 scientists 67 D-Index: 16 scientists 68 D-Index: 12 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 13 scientists 71 D-Index: 15 scientists 72 D-Index: 11 scientists 73 D-Index: 11 scientists 74 D-Index: 14 scientists 75 D-Index: 5 scientists 76 D-Index: 6 scientists 77+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 77+

This scientist: 103 D-Index — 100th percentile

100% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Animal Science and Veterinary in United States Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Animal Science and Veterinary in United States Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Animal Science and Veterinary in United States Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Animal Science and Veterinary in United States Leader Award
  • 1994 - Meats Research Award, American Society of Animal Science

Overview

Mohammad Koohmaraie is affiliated with IEH Laboratories and Consulting Group in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on various aspects of meat science, food safety, and microbiology, reflecting an interdisciplinary approach across agricultural and biological sciences as well as biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology.

Their published work covers a range of topics related to meat and animal product quality, epidemiology of pathogens such as Salmonella, Campylobacter, and Escherichia coli, with additional interests in viral gastroenteritis research, agriculture sustainability, environmental impact, and food safety and hygiene.

  • Meat and Animal Product Quality
  • Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
  • Escherichia coli research studies
  • Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
  • Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
  • Food Safety and Hygiene

Koohmaraie's research outputs have appeared in multiple publication venues. The most frequent venues include:

  • Animal Frontiers
  • Journal of Food Protection
  • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Meat Science

Some notable recent papers by Mohammad Koohmaraie cover a variety of current issues in food microbiology and meat safety:

  • Seasonal Prevalence of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli on Pork Carcasses for Three Steps of the Harvest Process at Two Commercial Processing Plants in the United States, 2020, Applied and Environmental Microbiology
  • Challenges and opportunities for defining the role and value of meat for our global society and economy, 2023, Animal Frontiers
  • The Denver Call for Action, 2025, Animal Frontiers
  • Fate of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli (STEC) and Salmonella during Kosher Processing of Fresh Beef, 2023, Journal of Food Protection
  • Seasonal prevalence and characterization of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli on pork carcasses at three steps of the harvest process at two commercial processing plants in the US, 2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Frequent co-authors contributing to the body of work with Koohmaraie include:

  • Norasak Kalchayanand
  • T. L. Wheeler
  • Ivan Nastasijević
  • J. W. Schmidt
  • Marija Bošković

The subfields of study represented in their research encompass food science, animal science and zoology, endocrinology, infectious diseases, and biotechnology.

  • Food Science
  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Endocrinology
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Biotechnology

Mohammad Koohmaraie received the Meats Research Award from the American Society of Animal Science in 1994, recognizing their contributions within the field of meat science research.

Best Publications

  • Correlation of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157 prevalence in feces, hides, and carcasses of beef cattle during processing.

    Robert O. Elder;James E. Keen;Gregory R. Siragusa;Genevieve A. Barkocy-Gallagher

  • Biochemical factors regulating the toughening and tenderization processes of meat

    Mohammad Koohmaraie

  • Is Z-disk degradation responsible for postmortem tenderization?

    Richard G. Taylor;Geert H. Geesink;Valery F. Thompson;Mohammad Koohmaraie

  • Contribution of postmortem muscle biochemistry to the delivery of consistent meat quality with particular focus on the calpain system

    M. Koohmaraie;G.H. Geesink

  • Muscle proteinases and meat aging.

    Mohammad Koohmaraie

  • Consumer evaluation of beef of known categories of tenderness.

    S J Boleman;S L Boleman;R K Miller;J F Taylor

  • The role of Ca2+ - dependent proteases (calpains) in post mortem proteolysis and meat tenderness

    M. Koohmaraie

  • Meat tenderness and muscle growth: is there any relationship?

    Mohammad Koohmaraie;Matthew P Kent;Steven D Shackelford;Eva Veiseth

  • Cell surface charge characteristics and their relationship to bacterial attachment to meat surfaces

    J. S. Dickson;Mohammad Koohmaraie

  • Seasonal prevalence of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli, including O157:H7 and non-O157 serotypes, and Salmonella in commercial beef processing plants.

    Genevieve A. Barkocy-Gallagher;Terrance M. Arthur;Mildred Rivera-Betancourt;Xiangwu Nou

  • Comparisons of Bos Indicus and Bos Taurus Inheritance for Carcass Beef Characteristics and Meat Palatability

    John D. Crouse;Larry V. Cundiff;Robert M. Koch;Mohammad Koohmaraie

  • Evaluation of attributes that affect longissimus muscle tenderness in bos taurus and bos indicus cattle

    G. Whipple;M. Koohmaraie;M. Koohmaraie;M. E. Dikeman;M. E. Dikeman;J. D. Crouse;J. D. Crouse

  • Relationship between shear force and trained sensory panel tenderness ratings of 10 major muscles from Bos indicus and Bos taurus cattle.

    S D Shackelford;T L Wheeler;M Koohmaraie

  • A muscle hypertrophy condition in lamb (callipyge): characterization of effects on muscle growth and meat quality traits.

    M. Koohmaraie;S. D. Shackelford;S. D. Shackelford;T. L. Wheeler;T. L. Wheeler;Steven M. Lonergan;Steven M. Lonergan

  • Variation in palatability and biochemical traits within and among eleven beef muscles.

    M. S. Rhee;T. L. Wheeler;S. D. Shackelford;M. Koohmaraie

  • Effects of calpastatin and micro-calpain markers in beef cattle on tenderness traits.

    E. Casas;S. N. White;T. L. Wheeler;S. D. Shackelford

  • Evaluation of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in CAPN1 for association with meat tenderness in cattle.

    B. T. Page;E. Casas;M. P. Heaton;N. G. Cullen

  • In-Store Valuation of Steak Tenderness

    Jayson L. Lusk;John Andrew Fox;Ted C. Schroeder;James Mintert

  • Postmortem proteolysis in longissimus muscle from beef, lamb and pork carcasses

    M Koohmaraie;G Whipple;D H Kretchmar;J D Crouse

  • Quantitative trait loci affecting growth and carcass composition of cattle segregating alternate forms of myostatin.

    E Casas;S D Shackelford;J W Keele;R T Stone

  • μ-Calpain is essential for postmortem proteolysis of muscle proteins,

    G. H. Geesink;S. Kuchay;A. H. Chishti;M. Koohmaraie

  • Variation in proteolysis, sarcomere length, collagen content, and tenderness among major pork muscles.

    T L Wheeler;S D Shackelford;M Koohmaraie

  • Escherichia coli O157 prevalence and enumeration of aerobic bacteria, Enterobacteriaceae, and Escherichia coli O157 at various steps in commercial beef processing plants.

    Terrance M. Arthur;Joseph M. Bosilevac;Xiangwu Nou;Steven D. Shackelford

  • Effect of post-mortem storage on Ca(++)-dependent proteases, their inhibitor and myofibril fragmentation.

    M. Koohmaraie;S.C. Seidemann;J.E. Schollmeyer;T.R. Dutson

  • Consumer impressions of Tender Select beef.

    S D Shackelford;T L Wheeler;M K Meade;J O Reagan

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven D. Shackelford
Steven D. Shackelford Agricultural Research Service
Tommy L. Wheeler
Tommy L. Wheeler United States Department of Agriculture
Terrance M. Arthur
Terrance M. Arthur United States Department of Agriculture
Larry V. Cundiff
Larry V. Cundiff Agricultural Research Service
Eduardo Casas
Eduardo Casas Agricultural Research Service
John W. Keele
John W. Keele Agricultural Research Service
Michael E. Dikeman
Michael E. Dikeman Kansas State University
Gregory R. Siragusa
Gregory R. Siragusa Scout Microbiology
J. W. Savell
J. W. Savell Texas A&M University
Gary L. Bennett
Gary L. Bennett Agricultural Research Service

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Animal Science and Veterinary studies opens doors to a variety of related fields, many of which offer flexible online learning options. For those interested in behavioral sciences, exploring bcba accredited programs can provide specialized training in behavior analysis that complements animal care and rehabilitation.

Career pathways often extend beyond veterinary practice. Consider the intersection of animal welfare and mental health by looking into nasp accredited online school psychology programs, which prepare professionals to support wellbeing in educational environments, including those focusing on animal-assisted interventions.

For those aiming for advanced clinical roles, online apa accredited psyd programs offer doctoral-level training in psychology without GRE requirements, facilitating a smoother transition into specialized areas that may overlap with veterinary behavioral health.

Finally, addressing substance abuse issues is increasingly important within both human and animal care services. Exploring the best online substance abuse counseling degree programs equips students with the skills needed to support recovery, a vital aspect of holistic health approaches in community and clinical settings.

Best Scientists Citing Mohammad Koohmaraie

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles