World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Animal Science and Veterinary
USA
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Animal Science and Veterinary

D-Index
76
Citations
20261
World Ranking
103
National Ranking
34

Steven D. Shackelford publication distribution in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven D. Shackelford sits on this spectrum.

29–33 publications: 1 scientists 34–38 publications: 6 scientists 39–43 publications: 17 scientists 44–48 publications: 23 scientists 49–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–58 publications: 44 scientists 59–63 publications: 66 scientists 64–68 publications: 75 scientists 69–73 publications: 71 scientists 74–78 publications: 85 scientists 79–83 publications: 108 scientists 84–88 publications: 105 scientists 89–93 publications: 84 scientists 94–98 publications: 103 scientists 99–103 publications: 97 scientists 104–108 publications: 95 scientists 109–113 publications: 89 scientists 114–118 publications: 88 scientists 119–123 publications: 109 scientists 124–128 publications: 93 scientists 129–133 publications: 89 scientists 134–138 publications: 95 scientists 139–143 publications: 92 scientists 144–148 publications: 80 scientists 149–153 publications: 75 scientists 154–158 publications: 74 scientists 159–163 publications: 67 scientists 164–168 publications: 53 scientists 169–173 publications: 62 scientists 174–178 publications: 63 scientists 179–183 publications: 50 scientists 184–188 publications: 55 scientists 189–193 publications: 50 scientists 194–198 publications: 27 scientists 199–203 publications: 44 scientists 204–208 publications: 31 scientists 209–213 publications: 28 scientists 214–218 publications: 38 scientists 219–223 publications: 33 scientists 224–228 publications: 36 scientists 229–233 publications: 29 scientists 234–238 publications: 35 scientists 239–243 publications: 23 scientists 244–248 publications: 24 scientists 249–253 publications: 29 scientists 254–258 publications: 28 scientists 259–263 publications: 21 scientists 264–268 publications: 25 scientists 269–273 publications: 11 scientists 274–278 publications: 18 scientists 279–283 publications: 13 scientists 284–288 publications: 18 scientists 289–293 publications: 10 scientists 294–298 publications: 12 scientists 299–303 publications: 11 scientists 304–308 publications: 15 scientists 309–313 publications: 14 scientists 314–318 publications: 14 scientists 319–323 publications: 8 scientists 324–328 publications: 8 scientists 329–333 publications: 13 scientists 334–338 publications: 14 scientists 339–343 publications: 13 scientists 344–348 publications: 10 scientists 349–353 publications: 11 scientists 354–358 publications: 5 scientists 359–363 publications: 8 scientists 364–368 publications: 8 scientists 369–373 publications: 6 scientists 374–378 publications: 7 scientists 379–383 publications: 8 scientists 384–388 publications: 3 scientists 389–393 publications: 4 scientists 394–398 publications: 5 scientists 399–403 publications: 8 scientists 404–408 publications: 5 scientists 409–413 publications: 4 scientists 414–418 publications: 3 scientists 419–423 publications: 8 scientists 424–428 publications: 5 scientists 429–433 publications: 3 scientists 434–438 publications: 5 scientists 439–441 publications: 5 scientists 442+ publications: 99 scientists
29 publications 442+

This scientist: 264 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more.

Steven D. Shackelford D-index placement in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven D. Shackelford sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 5 scientists 21 D-Index: 22 scientists 22 D-Index: 31 scientists 23 D-Index: 44 scientists 24 D-Index: 53 scientists 25 D-Index: 66 scientists 26 D-Index: 80 scientists 27 D-Index: 101 scientists 28 D-Index: 106 scientists 29 D-Index: 116 scientists 30 D-Index: 154 scientists 31 D-Index: 158 scientists 32 D-Index: 143 scientists 33 D-Index: 137 scientists 34 D-Index: 126 scientists 35 D-Index: 134 scientists 36 D-Index: 112 scientists 37 D-Index: 115 scientists 38 D-Index: 105 scientists 39 D-Index: 111 scientists 40 D-Index: 107 scientists 41 D-Index: 87 scientists 42 D-Index: 74 scientists 43 D-Index: 62 scientists 44 D-Index: 61 scientists 45 D-Index: 41 scientists 46 D-Index: 51 scientists 47 D-Index: 43 scientists 48 D-Index: 28 scientists 49 D-Index: 47 scientists 50 D-Index: 40 scientists 51 D-Index: 34 scientists 52 D-Index: 33 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 16 scientists 55 D-Index: 32 scientists 56 D-Index: 21 scientists 57 D-Index: 18 scientists 58 D-Index: 28 scientists 59 D-Index: 33 scientists 60 D-Index: 17 scientists 61 D-Index: 21 scientists 62 D-Index: 18 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 9 scientists 65 D-Index: 20 scientists 66 D-Index: 11 scientists 67 D-Index: 16 scientists 68 D-Index: 12 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 13 scientists 71 D-Index: 15 scientists 72 D-Index: 11 scientists 73 D-Index: 11 scientists 74 D-Index: 14 scientists 75 D-Index: 5 scientists 76 D-Index: 6 scientists 77+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 77+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Animal Science and Veterinary in United States Leader Award
  • 2019 - Meats Research Award, American Society of Animal Science

Overview

Steven D. Shackelford is affiliated with the Agricultural Research Service in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with an emphasis on subfields such as Agronomy and Crop Science and Genetics.

The scientist's work focuses on topics related to genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock, ruminant nutrition and digestive physiology, and reproductive physiology in livestock. These areas represent the core themes in their research outputs.

Among their publications, one notable paper is titled Non-Invasive Metabolomics Biomarkers of Production Efficiency and Beef Carcass Quality Traits, published in 2021 in Research Square. This study has contributed to the understanding of metabolomics biomarkers as they relate to livestock production efficiency and meat quality.

Frequent collaborators in their research include Virginia M. Artegoitia, John W. Newman, Andrew P. Foote, D.A. King, and T. L. Wheeler. These co-authors have collaborated on at least one publication each, reflecting a consistent network of scientific cooperation.

The scientist's work has appeared in venues such as Research Square, evidencing their engagement with current research dissemination platforms.

In recognition of their contributions, Steven D. Shackelford was awarded the Meats Research Award by the American Society of Animal Science in 2019.

Best Publications

  • Research Guidelines for Cookery, Sensory Evaluation, and Instrumental Tenderness Measurements of Meat

    Tommy L. Wheeler;Linda S. Papadopoulos;K. Miller

  • Meat tenderness and muscle growth: is there any relationship?

    Mohammad Koohmaraie;Matthew P Kent;Steven D Shackelford;Eva Veiseth

  • National beef tenderness survey.

    J B Morgan;J W Savell;D S Hale;R K Miller

  • Seasonal prevalence of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli, including O157:H7 and non-O157 serotypes, and Salmonella in commercial beef processing plants.

    Genevieve A. Barkocy-Gallagher;Terrance M. Arthur;Mildred Rivera-Betancourt;Xiangwu Nou

  • Relationship between shear force and trained sensory panel tenderness ratings of 10 major muscles from Bos indicus and Bos taurus cattle.

    S D Shackelford;T L Wheeler;M Koohmaraie

  • A muscle hypertrophy condition in lamb (callipyge): characterization of effects on muscle growth and meat quality traits.

    M. Koohmaraie;S. D. Shackelford;S. D. Shackelford;T. L. Wheeler;T. L. Wheeler;Steven M. Lonergan;Steven M. Lonergan

  • Variation in palatability and biochemical traits within and among eleven beef muscles.

    M. S. Rhee;T. L. Wheeler;S. D. Shackelford;M. Koohmaraie

  • Effects of calpastatin and micro-calpain markers in beef cattle on tenderness traits.

    E. Casas;S. N. White;T. L. Wheeler;S. D. Shackelford

  • IDENTIFICATION OF THRESHOLD LEVELS FOR WARNER-BRATZLER SHEAR FORCE IN BEEF TOP LOIN STEAKS

    S.D. Shackelford;J.B. Morgan;H.R. Cross;J.W. Savell

  • Quantitative trait loci affecting growth and carcass composition of cattle segregating alternate forms of myostatin.

    E Casas;S D Shackelford;J W Keele;R T Stone

  • Heritabilities and phenotypic and genetic correlations for bovine postrigor calpastatin activity, intramuscular fat content, Warner-Bratzler shear force, retail product yield, and growth rate

    S. D. Shackelford;M. Koohmaraie;L. V. Cundiff;K. E. Gregory

  • Detection of quantitative trait loci for growth and carcass composition in cattle.

    E. Casas;S. D. Shackelford;J. W. Keele;M. Koohmaraie

  • Variation in proteolysis, sarcomere length, collagen content, and tenderness among major pork muscles.

    T L Wheeler;S D Shackelford;M Koohmaraie

  • Escherichia coli O157 prevalence and enumeration of aerobic bacteria, Enterobacteriaceae, and Escherichia coli O157 at various steps in commercial beef processing plants.

    Terrance M. Arthur;Joseph M. Bosilevac;Xiangwu Nou;Steven D. Shackelford

  • Post-harvest interventions to reduce/eliminate pathogens in beef.

    M. Koohmaraie;T.M. Arthur;J.M. Bosilevac;M. Guerini

  • Consumer impressions of Tender Select beef.

    S D Shackelford;T L Wheeler;M K Meade;J O Reagan

  • Association of markers in the bovine CAPN1 gene with meat tenderness in large crossbred populations that sample influential industry sires.

    B. T. Page;E. Casas;R. L. Quaas;R. M. Thallman

  • An evaluation of tenderness of the longissimus muscle of Angus by Hereford versus Brahman crossbred heifers.

    S D Shackelford;M Koohmaraie;M Koohmaraie;M F Miller;M F Miller;J D Crouse;J D Crouse

  • Characterization of biological types of cattle (Cycle VI): carcass, yield, and longissimus palatability traits.

    T. L. Wheeler;L. V. Cundiff;S. D. Shackelford;M. Koohmaraie

  • Evaluation of slice shear force as an objective method of assessing beef longissimus tenderness.

    S D Shackelford;T L Wheeler;M Koohmaraie

  • A new single nucleotide polymorphism in CAPN1 extends the current tenderness marker test to include cattle of Bos indicus, Bos taurus, and crossbred descent.

    S. N. White;E. Casas;T. L. Wheeler;S. D. Shackelford

  • Near-infrared reflectance analysis for predicting beef longissimus tenderness

    B Park;Y R Chen;W R Hruschka;S D Shackelford

  • Salmonella and Escherichia coli O157:H7 Contamination on Hides and Carcasses of Cull Cattle Presented for Slaughter in the United States: an Evaluation of Prevalence and Bacterial Loads by Immunomagnetic Separation and Direct Plating Methods

    Dayna M. Brichta-Harhay;Michael N. Guerini;Terrance M. Arthur;Joseph M. Bosilevac

  • Prevalence of Escherichia coli O157:H7, Listeria monocytogenes, and Salmonella in two geographically distant commercial beef processing plants in the United States.

    Mildred Rivera-Betancourt;Steven D. Shackelford;Terrance M. Arthur;Kurt E. Westmoreland

  • Sampling, cooking, and coring effects on Warner-Bratzler shear force values in beef

    T L Wheeler;S D Shackelford;M Koohmaraie

  • Association of the muscle hypertrophy locus with carcass traits in beef cattle.

    E. Casas;J. W. Keele;S. D. Shackelford;M. Koohmaraie

  • Effect of chemical dehairing on the prevalence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and the levels of aerobic bacteria and enterobacteriaceae on carcasses in a commercial beef processing plant.

    Xiangwu Nou;Mildred Rivera-Betancourt;Joseph M. Bosilevac;Tommy L. Wheeler

  • Effect of postmortem storage on mu-calpain and m-calpain in ovine skeletal muscle.

    E Veiseth;S D Shackelford;T L Wheeler;M Koohmaraie

  • Super shedding of Escherichia coli O157:H7 by cattle and the impact on beef carcass contamination.

    Terrance M. Arthur;Dayna M. Brichta-Harhay;Joseph M. Bosilevac;Norasak Kalchayanand

Frequent Co-Authors

Mohammad Koohmaraie
Mohammad Koohmaraie IEH Laboratories and Consulting Group
Tommy L. Wheeler
Tommy L. Wheeler United States Department of Agriculture
David A. King
David A. King Agricultural Research Service
Terrance M. Arthur
Terrance M. Arthur United States Department of Agriculture
Eduardo Casas
Eduardo Casas Agricultural Research Service
Harvey C. Freetly
Harvey C. Freetly Agricultural Research Service
Timothy P. L. Smith
Timothy P. L. Smith Agricultural Research Service
John W. Keele
John W. Keele Agricultural Research Service
Larry A. Kuehn
Larry A. Kuehn Agricultural Research Service
Gary L. Bennett
Gary L. Bennett Agricultural Research Service

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students pursuing Animal Science and Veterinary studies, diversifying skills with related online degrees can open numerous career pathways. For example, degrees in exercise science can complement animal rehabilitation and health, making programs like exercise science online degree highly relevant for professionals interested in animal fitness and therapy.

Beyond animal care, leadership roles in sports or organizational management may appeal to graduates seeking career growth. Understanding how do I become an athletic director pathways can broaden options for those interested in managing animal-related sports or competitive events.

Advanced degrees also play a crucial role, such as behavioral analysis certifications. For those interested in animal behavior or therapy, exploring bcba masters programs offers specialized training that enhances career prospects in clinical and research settings.

Similarly, careers intersecting psychology and education benefit from programs accredited for quality and rigor. Investigating nasp approved online school psychology programs can be advantageous for those focused on behavioral studies, including animal-assisted interventions and welfare education.

Best Scientists Citing Steven D. Shackelford

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles