World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
David W. Pethick

David W. Pethick

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Animal Science and Veterinary 67 214 199 15 14 435 14239

David W. Pethick publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David W. Pethick between 1978 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David W. Pethick published across 44 years, from 1978 to 2021, averaging 9.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 32 publications in 2005. 16 of the 436 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 32. Peak 32 publications in 2005. 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 3 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 16 publications 1998: 13 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 11 publications 2001: 19 publications 2002: 12 publications 2003: 13 publications 2004: 13 publications 2005: 32 publications 2006: 22 publications 2007: 18 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 30 publications 2011: 21 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 27 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 11 publications
1978 2021

436 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David W. Pethick: publications per year, 1978 to 2021
Year Publications
1978 1
1979 0
1980 0
1981 2
1982 3
1983 2
1984 2
1985 1
1986 3
1987 2
1988 0
1989 0
1990 4
1991 4
1992 0
1993 3
1994 5
1995 4
1996 6
1997 16
1998 13
1999 8
2000 11
2001 19
2002 12
2003 13
2004 13
2005 32
2006 22
2007 18
2008 11
2009 15
2010 30
2011 21
2012 17
2013 15
2014 27
2015 14
2016 11
2017 19
2018 11
2019 10
2020 5
2021 11
Total 436
Download as CSV

David W. Pethick publication distribution in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David W. Pethick sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 84 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 29–33 to 442+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 109. Most scientists, 109, have 119–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 434–438 publications, is where this scientist sits. 29–33 publications: 1 scientist 34–38 publications: 6 scientists 39–43 publications: 17 scientists 44–48 publications: 23 scientists 49–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–58 publications: 44 scientists 59–63 publications: 66 scientists 64–68 publications: 75 scientists 69–73 publications: 71 scientists 74–78 publications: 85 scientists 79–83 publications: 108 scientists 84–88 publications: 105 scientists 89–93 publications: 84 scientists 94–98 publications: 103 scientists 99–103 publications: 97 scientists 104–108 publications: 95 scientists 109–113 publications: 89 scientists 114–118 publications: 88 scientists 119–123 publications: 109 scientists 124–128 publications: 93 scientists 129–133 publications: 89 scientists 134–138 publications: 95 scientists 139–143 publications: 92 scientists 144–148 publications: 80 scientists 149–153 publications: 75 scientists 154–158 publications: 74 scientists 159–163 publications: 67 scientists 164–168 publications: 53 scientists 169–173 publications: 62 scientists 174–178 publications: 63 scientists 179–183 publications: 50 scientists 184–188 publications: 55 scientists 189–193 publications: 50 scientists 194–198 publications: 27 scientists 199–203 publications: 44 scientists 204–208 publications: 31 scientists 209–213 publications: 28 scientists 214–218 publications: 38 scientists 219–223 publications: 33 scientists 224–228 publications: 36 scientists 229–233 publications: 29 scientists 234–238 publications: 35 scientists 239–243 publications: 23 scientists 244–248 publications: 24 scientists 249–253 publications: 29 scientists 254–258 publications: 28 scientists 259–263 publications: 21 scientists 264–268 publications: 25 scientists 269–273 publications: 11 scientists 274–278 publications: 18 scientists 279–283 publications: 13 scientists 284–288 publications: 18 scientists 289–293 publications: 10 scientists 294–298 publications: 12 scientists 299–303 publications: 11 scientists 304–308 publications: 15 scientists 309–313 publications: 14 scientists 314–318 publications: 14 scientists 319–323 publications: 8 scientists 324–328 publications: 8 scientists 329–333 publications: 13 scientists 334–338 publications: 14 scientists 339–343 publications: 13 scientists 344–348 publications: 10 scientists 349–353 publications: 11 scientists 354–358 publications: 5 scientists 359–363 publications: 8 scientists 364–368 publications: 8 scientists 369–373 publications: 6 scientists 374–378 publications: 7 scientists 379–383 publications: 8 scientists 384–388 publications: 3 scientists 389–393 publications: 4 scientists 394–398 publications: 5 scientists 399–403 publications: 8 scientists 404–408 publications: 5 scientists 409–413 publications: 4 scientists 414–418 publications: 3 scientists 419–423 publications: 8 scientists 424–428 publications: 5 scientists 429–433 publications: 3 scientists 434–438 publications: 5 scientists 439–441 publications: 5 scientists 442+ publications: 99 scientists
29–33 publications 442+

This scientist: 435 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,155 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
29–33 1
34–38 6
39–43 17
44–48 23
49–53 28
54–58 44
59–63 66
64–68 75
69–73 71
74–78 85
79–83 108
84–88 105
89–93 84
94–98 103
99–103 97
104–108 95
109–113 89
114–118 88
119–123 109
124–128 93
129–133 89
134–138 95
139–143 92
144–148 80
149–153 75
154–158 74
159–163 67
164–168 53
169–173 62
174–178 63
179–183 50
184–188 55
189–193 50
194–198 27
199–203 44
204–208 31
209–213 28
214–218 38
219–223 33
224–228 36
229–233 29
234–238 35
239–243 23
244–248 24
249–253 29
254–258 28
259–263 21
264–268 25
269–273 11
274–278 18
279–283 13
284–288 18
289–293 10
294–298 12
299–303 11
304–308 15
309–313 14
314–318 14
319–323 8
324–328 8
329–333 13
334–338 14
339–343 13
344–348 10
349–353 11
354–358 5
359–363 8
364–368 8
369–373 6
374–378 7
379–383 8
384–388 3
389–393 4
394–398 5
399–403 8
404–408 5
409–413 4
414–418 3
419–423 8
424–428 5
429–433 3
434–438 5 435
439–441 5
442+ 99
Download as CSV

David W. Pethick D-index placement in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David W. Pethick sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 77+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 158. Most scientists, 158, have 31 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 67 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 5 scientists 21 D-Index: 22 scientists 22 D-Index: 31 scientists 23 D-Index: 44 scientists 24 D-Index: 53 scientists 25 D-Index: 66 scientists 26 D-Index: 80 scientists 27 D-Index: 101 scientists 28 D-Index: 106 scientists 29 D-Index: 116 scientists 30 D-Index: 154 scientists 31 D-Index: 158 scientists 32 D-Index: 143 scientists 33 D-Index: 137 scientists 34 D-Index: 126 scientists 35 D-Index: 134 scientists 36 D-Index: 112 scientists 37 D-Index: 115 scientists 38 D-Index: 105 scientists 39 D-Index: 111 scientists 40 D-Index: 107 scientists 41 D-Index: 87 scientists 42 D-Index: 74 scientists 43 D-Index: 62 scientists 44 D-Index: 61 scientists 45 D-Index: 41 scientists 46 D-Index: 51 scientists 47 D-Index: 43 scientists 48 D-Index: 28 scientists 49 D-Index: 47 scientists 50 D-Index: 40 scientists 51 D-Index: 34 scientists 52 D-Index: 33 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 16 scientists 55 D-Index: 32 scientists 56 D-Index: 21 scientists 57 D-Index: 18 scientists 58 D-Index: 28 scientists 59 D-Index: 33 scientists 60 D-Index: 17 scientists 61 D-Index: 21 scientists 62 D-Index: 18 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 9 scientists 65 D-Index: 20 scientists 66 D-Index: 11 scientists 67 D-Index: 16 scientists 68 D-Index: 12 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 13 scientists 71 D-Index: 15 scientists 72 D-Index: 11 scientists 73 D-Index: 11 scientists 74 D-Index: 14 scientists 75 D-Index: 5 scientists 76 D-Index: 6 scientists 77+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 77+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,155 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 5
21 22
22 31
23 44
24 53
25 66
26 80
27 101
28 106
29 116
30 154
31 158
32 143
33 137
34 126
35 134
36 112
37 115
38 105
39 111
40 107
41 87
42 74
43 62
44 61
45 41
46 51
47 43
48 28
49 47
50 40
51 34
52 33
53 43
54 16
55 32
56 21
57 18
58 28
59 33
60 17
61 21
62 18
63 21
64 9
65 20
66 11
67 16 67
68 12
69 17
70 13
71 15
72 11
73 11
74 14
75 5
76 6
77+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Internal medicine
  • Enzyme
  • Food science

Animal science, Food science, Tenderness, Biotechnology and Microbiology are his primary areas of study. His Animal science research includes elements of Glycogen, Environmental management system and Animal nutrition. His work deals with themes such as Quality, Weaning and Polysaccharide, which intersect with Food science.

His Tenderness research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Loin, Intramuscular fat, Palatability and Heritability. His Biotechnology study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Soil indicators, Stimulation and Carcass composition. His studies deal with areas such as Fermentation, Serpulina hyodysenteriae and Large intestine as well as Microbiology.

His most cited work include:

  • Intramuscular fat content in meat-producing animals: development, genetic and nutritional control, and identification of putative markers. (407 citations)
  • Nutritional and hormonal regulation of energy metabolism in skeletal muscles of meat-producing animals (184 citations)
  • Effects of dietary factors and other metabolic modifiers on quality and nutritional value of meat (183 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary areas of study are Animal science, Intramuscular fat, Food science, Tenderness and Internal medicine. His Animal science research focuses on Biotechnology and how it connects with Crossbreed. His study in Intramuscular fat is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Meat tenderness and Marbled meat.

His Food science research incorporates elements of Feces, Weaning and Polysaccharide. His Tenderness research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Quality, Brahman, Flavour and Rump. His studies in Sire integrate themes in fields like Breed and Eye muscle.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Animal science (54.82%)
  • Intramuscular fat (23.25%)
  • Food science (19.08%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2014-2021)?

  • Animal science (54.82%)
  • Intramuscular fat (23.25%)
  • Loin (15.79%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

David W. Pethick spends much of his time researching Animal science, Intramuscular fat, Loin, Tenderness and Carcass weight. His Animal science research incorporates themes from Red meat and Eye muscle. His research on Intramuscular fat concerns the broader Food science.

His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Lightness, Longissimus and Yield. His Tenderness research includes themes of Quality, Flavour and Rump. His Carcass weight research integrates issues from Lean meat and Flock.

Between 2014 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • What is artificial meat and what does it mean for the future of the meat industry (49 citations)
  • European conformation and fat scores have no relationship with eating quality (38 citations)
  • Production factors influence fresh lamb longissimus colour more than muscle traits such as myoglobin concentration and pH. (26 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Internal medicine
  • Enzyme
  • Biochemistry

David W. Pethick mainly focuses on Animal science, Intramuscular fat, Red meat, Grading and Quality. His research integrates issues of Biochemistry and Pasture in his study of Animal science. His work carried out in the field of Intramuscular fat brings together such families of science as Loin and Anatomy.

His work in Red meat covers topics such as Carcass weight which are related to areas like Myoglobin, Breed type, Longissimus and Lightness. His Quality study combines topics in areas such as Ossification, Surgery and Negative relationship. He undertakes multidisciplinary studies into Tenderness and Sensory system in his work.

Best Publications

  • Intramuscular fat content in meat-producing animals: development, genetic and nutritional control, and identification of putative markers.

    J. F. Hocquette;F. Gondret;E. Baéza;F. Médale

  • Physiological responses of Bos taurus and Bos indicus cattle to prolonged, continuous heat and humidity

    D.T. Beatty;A. Barnes;E.E. Taylor;D. Pethick

  • Genetic and environmental effects on meat quality

    R.D. Warner;P.L. Greenwood;D.W. Pethick;D.M. Ferguson

  • Effects of dietary factors and other metabolic modifiers on quality and nutritional value of meat

    F.R. Dunshea;D.N. D’Souza;D.W. Pethick;G.S. Harper

  • Growth, development and nutritional manipulation of marbling in cattle: a review

    D. W. Pethick;G. S. Harper;V. H. Oddy

  • Relationship between animal age, intramuscular fat, cooking loss, pH, shear force and eating quality of aged meat from sheep

    DL Hopkins;Roger Hegarty;PJ Walker;David W Pethick

  • Nutritional influences on some major enteric bacterial diseases of pig.

    John R Pluske;David W Pethick;Deborah E Hopwood;David J Hampson

  • Nutritional and hormonal regulation of energy metabolism in skeletal muscles of meat-producing animals

    J.F Hocquette;I Ortigues-Marty;D Pethick;P Herpin

  • Increasing viscosity of the intestinal contents alters small intestinal structure and intestinal growth, and stimulates proliferation of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli in newly-weaned pigs

    D. E. McDonald;D. W. Pethick;B. P. Mullan;D. J. Hampson

  • What is artificial meat and what does it mean for the future of the meat industry

    Sarah P.F. Bonny;Sarah P.F. Bonny;Graham E. Gardner;David W. Pethick;Jean François Hocquette

  • The incidence of swine dysentery in pigs can be reduced by feeding diets that limit the amount of fermentable substrate entering the large intestine

    John R. Pluske;Peter M. Siba;David W. Pethick;Zorica Durmic

  • Opportunities for predicting and manipulating beef quality.

    Jean-François Hocquette;Raphaëlle Botreau;Brigitte Picard;Alain Jacquet

  • Adipocyte fatty acid-binding protein and mitochondrial enzyme activities in muscles as relevant indicators of marbling in cattle.

    C. Jurie;I. Cassar-Malek;M. Bonnet;C. Leroux

  • Genetic parameters for meat quality traits of Australian lamb meat

    S.I. Mortimer;J.H.J. van der Werf;R.H. Jacob;D.L. Hopkins

  • The impact of processing on sensory and objective measurements of sheep meat eating quality

    John Mitchell Thompson;D L Hopkins;D N D'Souza;P J Walker

  • Associations of sire estimated breeding values and objective meat quality measurements with sensory scores in Australian lamb.

    L. Pannier;G.E. Gardner;G.E. Gardner;K.L. Pearce;K.L. Pearce;M. McDonagh;M. McDonagh

  • How might marbling begin

    G. S. Harper;D. W. Pethick

  • Prevention of acidosis and laminitis associated with grain feeding in horses

    James B. Rowe;Michael J. Lees;David W. Pethick

  • Processing cereal grains for animal feeding

    J.B. Rowe;M. Choct;D.W. Pethick

  • Acetate supply and utilization by the tissues of sheep in vivo.

    D. W. Pethick;D. B. Lindsay;P. J. Barker;A. J. Northrop

  • Confirmation of the Role of Rapidly Fermentable Carbohydrates in the Expression of Swine Dysentery in Pigs after Experimental Infection

    John R. Pluske;Zorica Durmic;David W. Pethick;Bruce P. Mullan

Frequent Co-Authors

Graham E. Gardner
Graham E. Gardner Murdoch University
Robin H. Jacob
Robin H. Jacob Government of Western Australia
John R. Pluske
John R. Pluske Australasian Pork Research Institute
David L. Hopkins
David L. Hopkins Charles Sturt University
David J. Hampson
David J. Hampson Murdoch University
B.P. Mullan
B.P. Mullan Government of Western Australia
Frank R. Dunshea
Frank R. Dunshea University of Melbourne
Jean-François Hocquette
Jean-François Hocquette INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Alex J. Ball
Alex J. Ball University of New England
Robyn D. Warner
Robyn D. Warner University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring careers in Animal Science and Veterinary fields often leads students to complementary disciplines that enhance their expertise and job prospects. For those interested in the physical health and rehabilitation of animals, an online exercise science degree offers valuable knowledge in biomechanics and wellness. This degree equips learners with skills applicable in animal therapy and conditioning roles.

Behavioral studies are another crucial aspect, especially for understanding animal behavior or working in applied behavioral analysis. Accredited credentials like those found in bcba accredited programs prepare students for careers focusing on behavior intervention and therapy, which can directly impact animal welfare.

Psychological principles also intersect with veterinary studies, particularly in managing the human-animal bond or animal-assisted therapy. Pursuing nasp approved online programs or psyd programs online apa accredited can provide essential skills in counseling and psychological assessment, expanding career opportunities in both animal and human psychological health sectors.

By integrating these related degrees and certifications, graduates can create diverse career pathways that address both the physical and behavioral health of animals, enhancing their professional versatility and impact.

Best Scientists Citing David W. Pethick

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles