World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Animal Science and Veterinary

D-Index
30
Citations
2530
World Ranking
2526
National Ranking
137

Robin H. Jacob publication distribution in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robin H. Jacob sits on this spectrum.

29–33 publications: 1 scientists 34–38 publications: 6 scientists 39–43 publications: 17 scientists 44–48 publications: 23 scientists 49–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–58 publications: 44 scientists 59–63 publications: 66 scientists 64–68 publications: 75 scientists 69–73 publications: 71 scientists 74–78 publications: 85 scientists 79–83 publications: 108 scientists 84–88 publications: 105 scientists 89–93 publications: 84 scientists 94–98 publications: 103 scientists 99–103 publications: 97 scientists 104–108 publications: 95 scientists 109–113 publications: 89 scientists 114–118 publications: 88 scientists 119–123 publications: 109 scientists 124–128 publications: 93 scientists 129–133 publications: 89 scientists 134–138 publications: 95 scientists 139–143 publications: 92 scientists 144–148 publications: 80 scientists 149–153 publications: 75 scientists 154–158 publications: 74 scientists 159–163 publications: 67 scientists 164–168 publications: 53 scientists 169–173 publications: 62 scientists 174–178 publications: 63 scientists 179–183 publications: 50 scientists 184–188 publications: 55 scientists 189–193 publications: 50 scientists 194–198 publications: 27 scientists 199–203 publications: 44 scientists 204–208 publications: 31 scientists 209–213 publications: 28 scientists 214–218 publications: 38 scientists 219–223 publications: 33 scientists 224–228 publications: 36 scientists 229–233 publications: 29 scientists 234–238 publications: 35 scientists 239–243 publications: 23 scientists 244–248 publications: 24 scientists 249–253 publications: 29 scientists 254–258 publications: 28 scientists 259–263 publications: 21 scientists 264–268 publications: 25 scientists 269–273 publications: 11 scientists 274–278 publications: 18 scientists 279–283 publications: 13 scientists 284–288 publications: 18 scientists 289–293 publications: 10 scientists 294–298 publications: 12 scientists 299–303 publications: 11 scientists 304–308 publications: 15 scientists 309–313 publications: 14 scientists 314–318 publications: 14 scientists 319–323 publications: 8 scientists 324–328 publications: 8 scientists 329–333 publications: 13 scientists 334–338 publications: 14 scientists 339–343 publications: 13 scientists 344–348 publications: 10 scientists 349–353 publications: 11 scientists 354–358 publications: 5 scientists 359–363 publications: 8 scientists 364–368 publications: 8 scientists 369–373 publications: 6 scientists 374–378 publications: 7 scientists 379–383 publications: 8 scientists 384–388 publications: 3 scientists 389–393 publications: 4 scientists 394–398 publications: 5 scientists 399–403 publications: 8 scientists 404–408 publications: 5 scientists 409–413 publications: 4 scientists 414–418 publications: 3 scientists 419–423 publications: 8 scientists 424–428 publications: 5 scientists 429–433 publications: 3 scientists 434–438 publications: 5 scientists 439–441 publications: 5 scientists 442+ publications: 99 scientists
29 publications 442+

This scientist: 98 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more.

Robin H. Jacob D-index placement in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robin H. Jacob sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 5 scientists 21 D-Index: 22 scientists 22 D-Index: 31 scientists 23 D-Index: 44 scientists 24 D-Index: 53 scientists 25 D-Index: 66 scientists 26 D-Index: 80 scientists 27 D-Index: 101 scientists 28 D-Index: 106 scientists 29 D-Index: 116 scientists 30 D-Index: 154 scientists 31 D-Index: 158 scientists 32 D-Index: 143 scientists 33 D-Index: 137 scientists 34 D-Index: 126 scientists 35 D-Index: 134 scientists 36 D-Index: 112 scientists 37 D-Index: 115 scientists 38 D-Index: 105 scientists 39 D-Index: 111 scientists 40 D-Index: 107 scientists 41 D-Index: 87 scientists 42 D-Index: 74 scientists 43 D-Index: 62 scientists 44 D-Index: 61 scientists 45 D-Index: 41 scientists 46 D-Index: 51 scientists 47 D-Index: 43 scientists 48 D-Index: 28 scientists 49 D-Index: 47 scientists 50 D-Index: 40 scientists 51 D-Index: 34 scientists 52 D-Index: 33 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 16 scientists 55 D-Index: 32 scientists 56 D-Index: 21 scientists 57 D-Index: 18 scientists 58 D-Index: 28 scientists 59 D-Index: 33 scientists 60 D-Index: 17 scientists 61 D-Index: 21 scientists 62 D-Index: 18 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 9 scientists 65 D-Index: 20 scientists 66 D-Index: 11 scientists 67 D-Index: 16 scientists 68 D-Index: 12 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 13 scientists 71 D-Index: 15 scientists 72 D-Index: 11 scientists 73 D-Index: 11 scientists 74 D-Index: 14 scientists 75 D-Index: 5 scientists 76 D-Index: 6 scientists 77+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 77+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Internal medicine
  • Animal science
  • Biochemistry

His primary scientific interests are in Animal science, Environmental management system, Tenderness, Intramuscular fat and Biotechnology. Robin H. Jacob is interested in Animal feed, which is a field of Animal science. His Longissimus Lumborum study in the realm of Tenderness interacts with subjects such as Genetic correlation.

His study in Biotechnology is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Eicosapentaenoic acid, Soil indicators and Docosahexaenoic acid. His Heritability research includes elements of Marbled meat, Agronomy, Animal breeding and Meat tenderness. Robin H. Jacob has included themes like Quality and Breed in his Food science study.

His most cited work include:

  • Genetic parameters for meat quality traits of Australian lamb meat (84 citations)
  • Associations of sire estimated breeding values and objective meat quality measurements with sensory scores in Australian lamb. (73 citations)
  • Health beneficial long chain omega-3 fatty acid levels in Australian lamb managed under extensive finishing systems. (67 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Robin H. Jacob mainly investigates Animal science, Intramuscular fat, Biotechnology, Loin and Sire. His study in the fields of Tenderness under the domain of Animal science overlaps with other disciplines such as Carcass weight. His studies deal with areas such as Animal breeding and Heritability as well as Tenderness.

His Intramuscular fat research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Meat tenderness, Browning, Marbled meat and Flock. In his study, which falls under the umbrella issue of Biotechnology, Glycogen is strongly linked to Crossbreed. His Sire study combines topics in areas such as Breed, Longissimus muscle and Eye muscle.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Animal science (75.27%)
  • Intramuscular fat (27.96%)
  • Biotechnology (22.58%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2015-2021)?

  • Animal science (75.27%)
  • Loin (21.51%)
  • Intramuscular fat (27.96%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Robin H. Jacob mostly deals with Animal science, Loin, Intramuscular fat, Red meat and Carcass weight. Robin H. Jacob mostly deals with Tenderness in his studies of Animal science. His studies in Loin integrate themes in fields like Breed, Yield and Sire.

As a part of the same scientific family, Robin H. Jacob mostly works in the field of Breed, focusing on Food science and, on occasion, Muscle type. His Sire research incorporates themes from Longissimus Lumborum and Eye muscle. The Red meat study combines topics in areas such as Longissimus, Modified atmosphere and Heritability.

Between 2015 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Production factors influence fresh lamb longissimus colour more than muscle traits such as myoglobin concentration and pH. (26 citations)
  • Short term supplementation rates to optimise vitamin E concentration for retail colour stability of Australian lamb meat (20 citations)
  • Retail colour stability of lamb meat is influenced by breed type, muscle, packaging and iron concentration. (16 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Internal medicine
  • Animal science
  • Biochemistry

His primary areas of study are Animal science, Longissimus, Breed, Red meat and Loin. Robin H. Jacob is involved in the study of Animal science that focuses on Crossbreed in particular. His Longissimus research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Increased intramuscular fat, Food science, Yield and Sire.

His Breed study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Lipid oxidation, Surgery, Shelf life, Food packaging and Meat packing industry. Robin H. Jacob regularly ties together related areas like Modified atmosphere in his Red meat studies. Robin H. Jacob interconnects Water holding capacity, Intramuscular fat, Tenderness and Food handling in the investigation of issues within Loin.

Best Publications

  • Genetic parameters for meat quality traits of Australian lamb meat

    S.I. Mortimer;J.H.J. van der Werf;R.H. Jacob;D.L. Hopkins

  • Associations of sire estimated breeding values and objective meat quality measurements with sensory scores in Australian lamb.

    L. Pannier;G.E. Gardner;G.E. Gardner;K.L. Pearce;K.L. Pearce;M. McDonagh;M. McDonagh

  • Intramuscular fat in the longissimus muscle is reduced in lambs from sires selected for leanness

    L. Pannier;L. Pannier;D.W. Pethick;D.W. Pethick;G.H. Geesink;G.H. Geesink;A.J. Ball;A.J. Ball

  • Case studies demonstrating the benefits on pH and temperature decline of optimising medium-voltage electrical stimulation of lamb carcasses

    K.L. Pearce;R. van de Ven;C. Mudford;R.D. Warner

  • Health beneficial long chain omega-3 fatty acid levels in Australian lamb managed under extensive finishing systems

    Eric N. Ponnampalam;Kym L. Butler;Robin H. Jacob;David W. Pethick

  • Factors affecting the colour of lamb meat from the longissimus muscle during display: The influence of muscle weight and muscle oxidative capacity

    H.B. Calnan;H.B. Calnan;R.H. Jacob;D.W. Pethick;D.W. Pethick;G.E. Gardner;G.E. Gardner

  • Preliminary estimates of genetic parameters for carcass and meat quality traits in Australian sheep

    S. I. Mortimer;J. H. J. van der Werf;J. H. J. van der Werf;R. H. Jacob;R. H. Jacob;D. W. Pethick;D. W. Pethick

  • Quality of lamb meat from the Information Nucleus Flock.

    R. D. Warner;R. D. Warner;R. H. Jacob;J. E. Hocking Edwards;M. McDonagh

  • Muscle glycogen concentrations in commercial consignments of Australian lamb measured on farm and post-slaughter after three different lairage periods

    R. H. Jacob;D. W. Pethick;H. M. Chapman

  • Production factors influence fresh lamb longissimus colour more than muscle traits such as myoglobin concentration and pH.

    H. Calnan;H. Calnan;R.H. Jacob;D.W. Pethick;D.W. Pethick;G.E. Gardner;G.E. Gardner

  • The effect of dietary treatment on meat quality and on consumer perception of sheep meat eating quality

    D W Pethick;R Davidson;D L Hopkins;R H Jacob

  • Using Australian Sheep Breeding Values to increase lean meat yield percentage

    G. E. Gardner;G. E. Gardner;A. Williams;A. Williams;J. Siddell;A. J. Ball

  • Plasma and tissue α-tocopherol concentrations and meat colour stability in sheep grazing saltbush (Atriplex spp.)

    K. L. Pearce;K. L. Pearce;D. G. Masters;G. M. Smith;R. H. Jacob

  • Associations of genetic and non-genetic factors with concentrations of iron and zinc in the longissimus muscle of lamb.

    L. Pannier;D.W. Pethick;D.W. Pethick;M.D. Boyce;M.D. Boyce;A.J. Ball;A.J. Ball

  • Quantifying the hydration status of lambs in relation to carcass characteristics

    R.H. Jacob;D.W. Pethick;P. Clark;D.N. D'Souza

  • Prime Australian lamb supplies key nutrients for human health

    L. Pannier;L. Pannier;E. N. Ponnampalam;G. E. Gardner;G. E. Gardner;D. L. Hopkins

  • Techniques to reduce the temperature of beef muscle early in the post mortem period – a review

    Robin H. Jacob;David L. Hopkins

  • Consumer Perceptions of Meat Redness Were Strongly Influenced by Storage and Display Times.

    Maddison T. Corlett;David W. Pethick;Khama R. Kelman;Robin H. Jacob

  • Animal factors affecting the meat quality of Australian lamb meat.

    R.H. Jacob;D.W. Pethick;D.W. Pethick

  • Balancing consumer and societal requirements for sheep meat production: an Australasian perspective.

    D.M. Ferguson;N.M. Schreurs;P.R. Kenyon;R.H. Jacob

  • Short term supplementation rates to optimise vitamin E concentration for retail colour stability of Australian lamb meat

    C.G. Jose;R.H. Jacob;D.W. Pethick;G.E. Gardner

  • The effect of magnesium oxide supplementation on muscle glycogen metabolism before and after exercise and at slaughter in sheep

    G. E. Gardner;R. H. Jacob;D. W. Pethick

Frequent Co-Authors

David W. Pethick
David W. Pethick Murdoch University
Graham E. Gardner
Graham E. Gardner Murdoch University
David L. Hopkins
David L. Hopkins Charles Sturt University
Robyn D. Warner
Robyn D. Warner University of Melbourne
Alex J. Ball
Alex J. Ball University of New England
G. H. Geesink
G. H. Geesink University of New England
Eric N. Ponnampalam
Eric N. Ponnampalam University of Melbourne
J. H. J. van der Werf
J. H. J. van der Werf University of New England
Andrew Swan
Andrew Swan University of New England
Norah M. E. Fogarty
Norah M. E. Fogarty King's College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Animal Science and Veterinary fields often opens doors to related disciplines in health and counseling. For those interested in expanding their expertise to mental health and behavioral support, exploring accredited programs is essential. For example, students may consider apa accredited psyd programs that provide rigorous training in psychology without the need for GRE scores.

Those looking to specialize in addiction treatment might find the best online substance abuse counseling degree options valuable. These programs prepare graduates to support individuals facing addiction, complementing the empathetic and holistic approach often emphasized in veterinary care.

Another relevant pathway is marriage and family therapy, where professionals can work closely with clients to improve relational dynamics. Exploring marriage and family masters programs offers essential skills for fostering healthy family environments, an area that frequently intersects with animal-assisted therapy approaches.

For advanced career goals, pursuing an online phd counseling can provide the highest level of expertise and open opportunities in research, teaching, or clinical leadership. These diverse career pathways highlight the interdisciplinary potential for those studying Animal Science and Veterinary fields.

Best Scientists Citing Robin H. Jacob

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles