World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
John Mitchell Thompson

John Mitchell Thompson

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Animal Science and Veterinary 45 818 753 51 47 152 7490

John Mitchell Thompson publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by John Mitchell Thompson between 1986 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. John Mitchell Thompson published across 39 years, from 1986 to 2024, averaging 4.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2001. 4 of the 162 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2001. 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 4 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 15 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 3 publications 2024: 1 publication
1986 2024

162 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
John Mitchell Thompson: publications per year, 1986 to 2024
Year Publications
1986 1
1987 1
1988 1
1989 0
1990 1
1991 0
1992 2
1993 1
1994 0
1995 1
1996 4
1997 5
1998 2
1999 0
2000 3
2001 15
2002 6
2003 5
2004 6
2005 14
2006 6
2007 10
2008 13
2009 11
2010 15
2011 4
2012 7
2013 5
2014 4
2015 4
2016 0
2017 0
2018 4
2019 3
2020 0
2021 3
2022 1
2023 3
2024 1
Total 162
Download as CSV

John Mitchell Thompson publication distribution in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Mitchell Thompson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 84 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 29–33 to 442+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 109. Most scientists, 109, have 119–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 149–153 publications, is where this scientist sits. 29–33 publications: 1 scientist 34–38 publications: 6 scientists 39–43 publications: 17 scientists 44–48 publications: 23 scientists 49–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–58 publications: 44 scientists 59–63 publications: 66 scientists 64–68 publications: 75 scientists 69–73 publications: 71 scientists 74–78 publications: 85 scientists 79–83 publications: 108 scientists 84–88 publications: 105 scientists 89–93 publications: 84 scientists 94–98 publications: 103 scientists 99–103 publications: 97 scientists 104–108 publications: 95 scientists 109–113 publications: 89 scientists 114–118 publications: 88 scientists 119–123 publications: 109 scientists 124–128 publications: 93 scientists 129–133 publications: 89 scientists 134–138 publications: 95 scientists 139–143 publications: 92 scientists 144–148 publications: 80 scientists 149–153 publications: 75 scientists 154–158 publications: 74 scientists 159–163 publications: 67 scientists 164–168 publications: 53 scientists 169–173 publications: 62 scientists 174–178 publications: 63 scientists 179–183 publications: 50 scientists 184–188 publications: 55 scientists 189–193 publications: 50 scientists 194–198 publications: 27 scientists 199–203 publications: 44 scientists 204–208 publications: 31 scientists 209–213 publications: 28 scientists 214–218 publications: 38 scientists 219–223 publications: 33 scientists 224–228 publications: 36 scientists 229–233 publications: 29 scientists 234–238 publications: 35 scientists 239–243 publications: 23 scientists 244–248 publications: 24 scientists 249–253 publications: 29 scientists 254–258 publications: 28 scientists 259–263 publications: 21 scientists 264–268 publications: 25 scientists 269–273 publications: 11 scientists 274–278 publications: 18 scientists 279–283 publications: 13 scientists 284–288 publications: 18 scientists 289–293 publications: 10 scientists 294–298 publications: 12 scientists 299–303 publications: 11 scientists 304–308 publications: 15 scientists 309–313 publications: 14 scientists 314–318 publications: 14 scientists 319–323 publications: 8 scientists 324–328 publications: 8 scientists 329–333 publications: 13 scientists 334–338 publications: 14 scientists 339–343 publications: 13 scientists 344–348 publications: 10 scientists 349–353 publications: 11 scientists 354–358 publications: 5 scientists 359–363 publications: 8 scientists 364–368 publications: 8 scientists 369–373 publications: 6 scientists 374–378 publications: 7 scientists 379–383 publications: 8 scientists 384–388 publications: 3 scientists 389–393 publications: 4 scientists 394–398 publications: 5 scientists 399–403 publications: 8 scientists 404–408 publications: 5 scientists 409–413 publications: 4 scientists 414–418 publications: 3 scientists 419–423 publications: 8 scientists 424–428 publications: 5 scientists 429–433 publications: 3 scientists 434–438 publications: 5 scientists 439–441 publications: 5 scientists 442+ publications: 99 scientists
29–33 publications 442+

This scientist: 152 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,155 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
29–33 1
34–38 6
39–43 17
44–48 23
49–53 28
54–58 44
59–63 66
64–68 75
69–73 71
74–78 85
79–83 108
84–88 105
89–93 84
94–98 103
99–103 97
104–108 95
109–113 89
114–118 88
119–123 109
124–128 93
129–133 89
134–138 95
139–143 92
144–148 80
149–153 75 152
154–158 74
159–163 67
164–168 53
169–173 62
174–178 63
179–183 50
184–188 55
189–193 50
194–198 27
199–203 44
204–208 31
209–213 28
214–218 38
219–223 33
224–228 36
229–233 29
234–238 35
239–243 23
244–248 24
249–253 29
254–258 28
259–263 21
264–268 25
269–273 11
274–278 18
279–283 13
284–288 18
289–293 10
294–298 12
299–303 11
304–308 15
309–313 14
314–318 14
319–323 8
324–328 8
329–333 13
334–338 14
339–343 13
344–348 10
349–353 11
354–358 5
359–363 8
364–368 8
369–373 6
374–378 7
379–383 8
384–388 3
389–393 4
394–398 5
399–403 8
404–408 5
409–413 4
414–418 3
419–423 8
424–428 5
429–433 3
434–438 5
439–441 5
442+ 99
Download as CSV

John Mitchell Thompson D-index placement in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Mitchell Thompson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 77+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 158. Most scientists, 158, have 31 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 5 scientists 21 D-Index: 22 scientists 22 D-Index: 31 scientists 23 D-Index: 44 scientists 24 D-Index: 53 scientists 25 D-Index: 66 scientists 26 D-Index: 80 scientists 27 D-Index: 101 scientists 28 D-Index: 106 scientists 29 D-Index: 116 scientists 30 D-Index: 154 scientists 31 D-Index: 158 scientists 32 D-Index: 143 scientists 33 D-Index: 137 scientists 34 D-Index: 126 scientists 35 D-Index: 134 scientists 36 D-Index: 112 scientists 37 D-Index: 115 scientists 38 D-Index: 105 scientists 39 D-Index: 111 scientists 40 D-Index: 107 scientists 41 D-Index: 87 scientists 42 D-Index: 74 scientists 43 D-Index: 62 scientists 44 D-Index: 61 scientists 45 D-Index: 41 scientists 46 D-Index: 51 scientists 47 D-Index: 43 scientists 48 D-Index: 28 scientists 49 D-Index: 47 scientists 50 D-Index: 40 scientists 51 D-Index: 34 scientists 52 D-Index: 33 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 16 scientists 55 D-Index: 32 scientists 56 D-Index: 21 scientists 57 D-Index: 18 scientists 58 D-Index: 28 scientists 59 D-Index: 33 scientists 60 D-Index: 17 scientists 61 D-Index: 21 scientists 62 D-Index: 18 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 9 scientists 65 D-Index: 20 scientists 66 D-Index: 11 scientists 67 D-Index: 16 scientists 68 D-Index: 12 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 13 scientists 71 D-Index: 15 scientists 72 D-Index: 11 scientists 73 D-Index: 11 scientists 74 D-Index: 14 scientists 75 D-Index: 5 scientists 76 D-Index: 6 scientists 77+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 77+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,155 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 5
21 22
22 31
23 44
24 53
25 66
26 80
27 101
28 106
29 116
30 154
31 158
32 143
33 137
34 126
35 134
36 112
37 115
38 105
39 111
40 107
41 87
42 74
43 62
44 61
45 41 45
46 51
47 43
48 28
49 47
50 40
51 34
52 33
53 43
54 16
55 32
56 21
57 18
58 28
59 33
60 17
61 21
62 18
63 21
64 9
65 20
66 11
67 16
68 12
69 17
70 13
71 15
72 11
73 11
74 14
75 5
76 6
77+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

John Mitchell Thompson is affiliated with the University of New England in Australia and conducts research primarily in the fields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences as well as Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology. Their work covers various subfields such as Animal Science and Zoology, Genetics, Small Animals, and Cell Biology.

Their research mainly addresses topics related to Meat and Animal Product Quality, Animal Nutrition and Physiology, Genetic and Phenotypic Traits in Livestock, Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies, Pharmacological Effects and Assays, and Muscle Metabolism and Nutrition.

Recent publications by John Mitchell Thompson include:

  • Prediction of consumer palatability in beef using visual marbling scores and chemical intramuscular fat percentage, 2020, Meat Science
  • The relative importance of eating quality and carcass yield in determining beef carcass value, 2022, Meat Science
  • Does a single adjustment in the meat standards Australia beef grading model cater for different hormonal growth promotant formulations?, 2021, animal
  • The impact of different Hormonal Growth Promotants (HGP) on desmin degradation and collagen content of various muscles from pasture and feedlot finished steer carcasses, 2021, Meat Science

Frequent co-authors in their research collaborations include:

  • P. McGilchrist
  • Rod Polkinghorne
  • D.T. Packer
  • Sarah Stewart
  • G.E. Gardner

John Mitchell Thompson has published predominantly in the journal Meat Science, with additional publications in the journal animal.

Best Publications

  • Managing meat tenderness.

    John Thompson

  • Meat standards and grading: a world view.

    R.J. Polkinghorne;J.M. Thompson

  • The effects of marbling on flavour and juiciness scores of cooked beef, after adjusting to a constant tenderness

    John Mitchell Thompson

  • Body composition and implications for heat production of Angus steer progeny of parents selected for and against residual feed intake

    E. C. Richardson;R. M. Herd;V. H. Oddy;J. M. Thompson

  • Evolution of the Meat Standards Australia (MSA) beef grading system

    R Polkinghorne;John Mitchell Thompson;R Watson;A Gee

  • Development of the Meat Standards Australia (MSA) prediction model for beef palatability

    R Watson;R Polkinghorne;John Mitchell Thompson

  • The interaction between pH and temperature decline early postmortem on the calpain system and objective tenderness in electrically stimulated beef longissimus dorsi muscle.

    I.H Hwang;J.M Thompson

  • Factors affecting beef palatability — farmgate to chilled carcass

    D. M. Ferguson;H. L. Bruce;J. M. Thompson;A. F. Egan

  • Methods used in the CRC program for the determination of carcass yield and beef quality

    D. Perry;W. R. Shorthose;D. M. Ferguson;J. M. Thompson

  • Factors contributing to proteolysis and disruption of myofibrillar proteins and the impact on tenderisation in beef and sheep meat

    David L Hopkins;John Mitchell Thompson

  • The impact of processing on sensory and objective measurements of sheep meat eating quality

    John Mitchell Thompson;D L Hopkins;D N D'Souza;P J Walker

  • The relationship between tenderness, proteolysis, muscle contraction and dissociation of actomyosin

    D.L Hopkins;J.M Thompson

  • Genetic and phenotypic characterisation of animal, carcass, and meat quality traits from temperate and tropically adapted beef breeds. 4. Correlations among animal, carcass, and meat quality traits *

    A. Reverter;D. J. Johnston;D. M. Ferguson;D. Perry

  • A research note on factors affecting the determination of myofibrillar fragmentation.

    D.L Hopkins;P.J Littlefield;J.M Thompson

  • Epistasis Between Calpain 1 and Its Inhibitor Calpastatin Within Breeds of Cattle

    W. Barendse;B. E. Harrison;R. J. Hawken;D. M. Ferguson

  • The effect of time and type of electrical stimulation on the calpain system and meat tenderness in beef longissimus dorsi muscle

    I.H Hwang;J.M Thompson

  • A meta-analysis of zilpaterol and ractopamine effects on feedlot performance, carcass traits and shear strength of meat in cattle.

    Ian J. Lean;John M. Thompson;Frank R. Dunshea

  • Video image analysis in the Australian meat industry--precision and accuracy of predicting lean meat yield in lamb carcasses.

    DL Hopkins;E Safari;John Mitchell Thompson;CR Smith

  • Development of a sensory protocol for testing palatability of sheep meats

    John Mitchell Thompson;A Gee;D L Hopkins;D W Pethick

  • New Concepts of Sheep Growth

    John Thompson

  • Long-term consequences of birth weight and growth to weaning on carcass, yield and beef quality characteristics of Piedmontese- and Wagyu-sired cattle

    Paul Greenwood;Linda Cafe;H Hearnshaw;DW Hennessy

  • THE DEGRADATION OF MYOFIBRILLAR PROTEINS IN BEEF AND LAMB USING DENATURING ELECTROPHORESIS - AN OVERVIEW

    D L Hopkins;John Mitchell Thompson

  • Use of a bovine genome array to identify new biological pathways for beef marbling in Hanwoo (Korean Cattle)

    Seung-Hwan Lee;Cedric Gondro;Julius van der Werf;Nam-Kuk Kim

  • Beef quality grades as determined by Korean and Australian consumers

    J. M. Thompson;R. Polkinghorne;I. H. Hwang;A. M. Gee

  • The effect of dietary treatment on meat quality and on consumer perception of sheep meat eating quality

    D W Pethick;R Davidson;D L Hopkins;R H Jacob

  • Effect of sheep type on meat and eating quality of sheep meat

    D L Hopkins;P J Walker;John Mitchell Thompson;D W Pethick

  • The effect of degree of doneness of beef steaks on consumer acceptability of meals in restaurants

    R.J. Cox;J.M. Thompson;C.M. Cunial;S. Winter

  • Effects of hormonal growth promotants (HGP) on growth, carcass characteristics, the palatability of different muscles in the beef carcass and their interaction with aging

    John Mitchell Thompson;B M McIntyre;G D Tudor;David W Pethick

  • Genetics of meat quality and carcass traits and the impact of tenderstretching in two tropical beef genotypes

    Matthew Lee Wolcott;David Johnston;Stephen Barwick;CL Iker

  • Current usage and future development of the Meat Standards Australia (MSA) grading system

    R Polkinghorne;R Watson;John Mitchell Thompson;David W Pethick

  • Demographic and design effects on beef sensory scores given by Korean and Australian consumers

    I. H. Hwang;R. Polkinghorne;J. M. Lee;J. M. Thompson

  • The effect of time off feed prior to slaughter on muscle glycogen metabolism and rate of pH decline in three different muscles of stimulated and non-stimulated sheep carcasses

    B L Daly;B L Daly;Graham Edwin Gardner;D M Ferguson;John Mitchell Thompson

  • New electrical stimulation technologies for sheep carcasses

    F D Shaw;S R Baud;I Richards;D W Pethick

  • Genetic variation in fatty acid composition of subcutaneous fat in cattle

    M. J. Kelly;R. K. Tume;S. Newman;J. M. Thompson

  • Length of exposure to high post-rigor temperatures affects the tenderisation of the beef M. longissmus dorsi

    K L Thomson;Graham E Gardner;Graham E Gardner;N Simmons;John Mitchell Thompson

  • Effect of carcass suspension and cooking method on the palatability of three beef muscles as assessed by Korean and Australian consumers

    B. Y. Park;I. H. Hwang;S. H. Cho;Y. M. Yoo

  • The effect of design and demographic factors on consumer sensory scores

    John Mitchell Thompson;A B Pleasants;D W Pethick

Frequent Co-Authors

David W. Pethick
David W. Pethick Murdoch University
David L. Hopkins
David L. Hopkins Charles Sturt University
Graham E. Gardner
Graham E. Gardner Murdoch University
G. H. Geesink
G. H. Geesink University of New England
Heather M Burrow
Heather M Burrow University of New England
David Johnston
David Johnston University of New England
Drewe Ferguson
Drewe Ferguson Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Paul L. Greenwood
Paul L. Greenwood University of New England
D. L. Robinson
D. L. Robinson University of New England
Alex J. Ball
Alex J. Ball University of New England

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees related to Animal Science and Veterinary fields can open diverse career opportunities beyond traditional roles. For those interested in behavioral aspects, programs like school psychology programs online accredited by nasp offer specialized training to support animal-assisted therapy in educational settings.

Graduates aiming for advanced practice can consider psyd programs online apa accredited, which provide clinical psychology expertise, enhancing one's ability to address mental health issues in both humans and animal-related contexts.

For professionals focused on rehabilitation and recovery sectors, an online substance abuse counselor degree online offers flexible training to support individuals and communities, complementing work in veterinary social services or animal welfare organizations.

Lastly, those seeking to strengthen interpersonal and family dynamics related to animal guardianship will find value in online marriage and family therapy graduate programs. These programs prepare students to address the complex relationships between families and their animal companions effectively.

Best Scientists Citing John Mitchell Thompson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles