World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 91 11824 11125 6060 5611 503 28363

Thomas W. Bauer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Thomas W. Bauer between 1980 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Thomas W. Bauer published across 46 years, from 1980 to 2025, averaging 13 papers a year. Output peaked at 35 publications in 2019. 20 of the 599 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 35. Peak 35 publications in 2019. 1980: 1 publication 1981: 1 publication 1982: 6 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 4 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 6 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 6 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 8 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 8 publications 1996: 13 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 11 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 13 publications 2002: 20 publications 2003: 16 publications 2004: 15 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 19 publications 2007: 18 publications 2008: 19 publications 2009: 30 publications 2010: 26 publications 2011: 21 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 24 publications 2015: 18 publications 2016: 25 publications 2017: 31 publications 2018: 30 publications 2019: 35 publications 2020: 21 publications 2021: 27 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 5 publications
1980 2025

599 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Thomas W. Bauer: publications per year, 1980 to 2025
Year Publications
1980 1
1981 1
1982 6
1983 2
1984 4
1985 3
1986 4
1987 6
1988 3
1989 6
1990 4
1991 6
1992 8
1993 5
1994 7
1995 8
1996 13
1997 3
1998 8
1999 11
2000 10
2001 13
2002 20
2003 16
2004 15
2005 14
2006 19
2007 18
2008 19
2009 30
2010 26
2011 21
2012 12
2013 11
2014 24
2015 18
2016 25
2017 31
2018 30
2019 35
2020 21
2021 27
2022 9
2023 6
2024 15
2025 5
Total 599
Download as CSV

Thomas W. Bauer publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas W. Bauer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 501–520 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 503 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617 503
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Thomas W. Bauer D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas W. Bauer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 90–91 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922 91
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Thomas W. Bauer is affiliated with the Hospital for Special Surgery in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a particular focus on Surgery, as well as significant work in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Epidemiology, Infectious Diseases, and Clinical Biochemistry.

The scientist's publications extensively cover several specialized topics, including:

  • Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
  • Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
  • Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
  • Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
  • Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
  • Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
  • Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques

Their frequent coauthors include Douglas E. Padgett, Timothy M. Wright, Martin Rottman, Dolores Wolfram, and Matthew F. Koff, each collaborating in multiple publications.

Bauer has published regularly in several academic venues, most notably:

  • JBJS Case Connector
  • HPB
  • Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
  • Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
  • Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance

Among their recent research articles are the following:

  • "Digital Whole Slide Imaging Compared With Light Microscopy for Primary Diagnosis in Surgical Pathology," 2020, Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
  • "Multicenter evaluation of the BIOFIRE Joint Infection Panel for the detection of bacteria, yeast, and AMR genes in synovial fluid samples," 2023, Journal of Clinical Microbiology
  • "Sequencing of Circulating Microbial Cell-Free DNA Can Identify Pathogens in Periprosthetic Joint Infections," 2021, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
  • "Fretting and corrosion of metal liners from modular dual mobility constructs," 2021, The Bone & Joint Journal
  • "Treatment of bone and joint infections by ceftazidime/avibactam and ceftolozane/tazobactam: a cohort study," 2021, Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance

Best Publications

  • New definition for periprosthetic joint infection: from the Workgroup of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society.

    Javad Parvizi;Benjamin Zmistowski;Elie F. Berbari;Thomas W. Bauer

  • Bone graft materials. An overview of the basic science

    Thomas W. Bauer;George F. Muschler

  • A multicenter retrieval study of the taper interfaces of modular hip prostheses.

    Jay R. Goldberg;Jeremy L. Gilbert;Joshua J. Jacobs;Thomas W. Bauer

  • The pathology of total joint arthroplasty.II. Mechanisms of implant failure.

    T. W. Bauer;Jean Schils

  • Biomechanical and Histological Evaluation of a Calcium Phosphate Cement

    E P Frankenburg;S A Goldstein;T W Bauer;S A Harris

  • Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Infection

    Thomas W. Bauer;Javad Parvizi;Naomi Kobayashi;Viktor Krebs

  • Hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stems. Histological analysis of components retrieved at autopsy.

    T. W. Bauer;R. C. T. Geesink;R. Zimmerman;J. T. Mcmahon

  • American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons clinical practice guideline on: the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections of the hip and knee.

    Craig Della Valle;Javad Parvizi;Thomas W. Bauer;Paul E. DiCesare

  • Use of injectable calcium phosphate cement for fracture fixation: A review

    Sune Larsson;Thomas W. Bauer

  • Osteonecrosis of the femoral head. A prospective randomized treatment protocol.

    Stulberg Bn;Davis Aw;Bauer Tw;Levine M

  • Periprosthetic Infection: What Are the Diagnostic Challenges?

    Javad Parvizi;Elie Ghanem;Sarah Menashe;Robert L. Barrack

  • Consensus in chronic ankle instability: aetiology, assessment, surgical indications and place for arthroscopy.

    S. Guillo;T. Bauer;J.W. Lee;M. Takao

  • Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection

    Benjamin Zmistowski;Craig Della Valle;Thomas W. Bauer;Konstantinos N. Malizos

  • Isolation and characterization of debris in membranes around total joint prostheses.

    Kristen Margevicius;Thomas Bauer;James McMahon;Stan Brown

  • Diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections of the hip and knee.

    Craig Delia Valle;Javad Parvizi;Thomas W. Bauer;Paul E. DiCesare

  • Graft tension in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction An in vivo study in dogs

    Shinichi Yoshiya;Jack T. Andrish;Michael T. Manley;Thomas W. Bauer

  • Biological response to chopped-carbon-fiber-reinforced peek.

    K. A. Jockisch;S. A. Brown;S. A. Brown;T. W. Bauer;K. Merritt;K. Merritt

  • Results of 2-stage reimplantation for infected total knee arthroplasty

    Kazuo Hirakawa;Bernard N. Stulberg;Alan H. Wilde;Thomas W. Bauer

  • Norian SRS cement augmentation in hip fracture treatment: Laboratory and initial clinical results

    Stuart B. Goodman;Thomas W. Bauer;Dennis Carter;Pierre Paul Casteleyn

  • Bone graft substitutes.

    T. W. Bauer

Frequent Co-Authors

Jean-Louis Gaillard
Jean-Louis Gaillard Hôpital Ambroise-Paré
Gary W. Procop
Gary W. Procop Cleveland Clinic
Javad Parvizi
Javad Parvizi Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University
Joseph P. Iannotti
Joseph P. Iannotti Cleveland Clinic
Jean-Louis Herrmann
Jean-Louis Herrmann Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines University
Craig J. Della Valle
Craig J. Della Valle Rush University Medical Center
Michael A. Mont
Michael A. Mont Cleveland Clinic
Stuart B. Goodman
Stuart B. Goodman Stanford University
Marc F. Swiontkowski
Marc F. Swiontkowski University of Minnesota
Steven A. Goldstein
Steven A. Goldstein University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a future in medicine opens doors to a wide array of online degree and career opportunities in healthcare. Many students start by earning an online healthcare administration degree, paving the way for leadership roles in clinics or hospitals. These flexible programs make healthcare management accessible even for working professionals.

For those focused on clinical practice and mental health, there’s increasing interest in accelerated nursing degrees, such as the shortest pmhnp program. These programs allow you to quickly become a psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner while balancing work and study.

Professionals looking to advance into upper management may consider the most cheap mha programs, which can provide a cost-effective way to gain advanced leadership skills. For nurses aiming for the highest clinical expertise, the best online dnp programs offer flexible doctoral-level education that prepares graduates for top-tier roles in healthcare delivery and policy.

Regardless of your chosen path, these online degrees can kickstart or advance your healthcare career with convenience, affordability, and recognized credentials.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas W. Bauer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles