World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Microbiology

D-Index
66
Citations
13319
World Ranking
2431
National Ranking
983

Gary W. Procop publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gary W. Procop sits on this spectrum.

55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 264 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 233 scientists 205–214 publications: 207 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55 publications 679+

This scientist: 256 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

Gary W. Procop D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gary W. Procop sits on this spectrum.

40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 111 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 122 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 93 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2007 - ASM Award for Research in Clinical Microbiology, American Society for Microbiology

Overview

Gary W. Procop is affiliated with the Cleveland Clinic in the United States, where the focus of their research lies primarily in the field of Medicine, with a significant emphasis on Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Oncology.

The scientist's published work encompasses a range of topics including:

  • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
  • Innovations in Medical Education
  • Radiology practices and education
  • COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
  • Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Gary W. Procop include:

  • "Association of Use of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers With Testing Positive for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)", 2020, JAMA Cardiology
  • "Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans: Update on the Diagnosis and Treatment", 2020, Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • "Alpha to Omicron: Disease Severity and Clinical Outcomes of Major SARS-CoV-2 Variants", 2022, The Journal of Infectious Diseases
  • "A Direct Comparison of Enhanced Saliva to Nasopharyngeal Swab for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Symptomatic Patients", 2020, Journal of Clinical Microbiology
  • "Dynamics and predisposition of respiratory viral co-infections in children and adults", 2020, Clinical Microbiology and Infection

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Gary W. Procop include:

  • Daniel D. Rhoads
  • Nabin K. Shrestha (7 joint publications)
  • Brian P. Rubin (5 joint publications)
  • Sixto M. Leal (4 joint publications)
  • Thomas McCarthy (4 joint publications)

Gary W. Procop's research has been published extensively in journals such as:

  • Journal of Clinical Microbiology (7 publications)
  • American Journal of Clinical Pathology (6 publications)
  • Academic Pathology (4 publications)
  • Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine (2 publications)
  • Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology (2 publications)

In 2007, Gary W. Procop received the ASM Award for Research in Clinical Microbiology from the American Society for Microbiology.

Best Publications

  • Validation of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing Tests for Universal Pathogen Detection.

    Robert Schlaberg;Charles Y. Chiu;Steve Miller;Gary W. Procop

  • Molecular diagnostics of infectious diseases

    Yi-Wei Tang;Gary W. Procop;David H. Persing

  • Association of Use of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers With Testing Positive for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).

    Neil Mehta;Ankur Kalra;Amy S. Nowacki;Scott Anjewierden

  • Multitarget fluorescence in situ hybridization assay detects transitional cell carcinoma in the majority of patients with bladder cancer and atypical or negative urine cytology.

    Marek Skacel;Mona Fahmy;Jennifer A. Brainard;James D. Pettay

  • Histologic features of zygomycosis: emphasis on perineural invasion and fungal morphology.

    John L. Frater;Gerri S. Hall;Gary W. Procop

  • Rapid Identification of Staphylococcus aureus Directly from Blood Cultures by Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization with Peptide Nucleic Acid Probes

    Kenneth Oliveira;Gary W. Procop;Deborah Wilson;James Coull

  • Antimicrobial resistance in Cairo, Egypt 1999-2000: a survey of five hospitals.

    Amani El Kholy;Hadia Baseem;Geraldine S. Hall;Gary W. Procop

  • Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization with Peptide Nucleic Acid Probes for Rapid Identification of Candida albicans Directly from Blood Culture Bottles

    Susan Rigby;Gary W. Procop;Gerhard Haase;Deborah Wilson

  • Rapid Identification of Staphylococcus aureus and the mecA Gene from BacT/ALERT Blood Culture Bottles by Using the LightCycler System

    Nabin K. Shrestha;Marion J. Tuohy;Gerri S. Hall;Carlos M. Isada

  • Detection of Pneumocystis jiroveci in Respiratory Specimens by Four Staining Methods

    Gary Procop;S. Haddad;J. Quinn;M. L. Wilson

  • Quantitative Real-Time PCR Is Not More Sensitive than “Conventional” PCR

    Patrick Bastien;Gary W. Procop;Udo Reischl

  • Alpha to Omicron: Disease Severity and Clinical Outcomes of Major SARS-CoV-2 Variants

    Unknown

  • Practical Guidance for Clinical Microbiology Laboratories: Laboratory Diagnosis of Parasites from the Gastrointestinal Tract

    Lynne S. Garcia;Michael Arrowood;Evelyne Kokoskin;Graeme P. Paltridge

  • Multicenter Evaluation of the Candida albicans/Candida glabrata Peptide Nucleic Acid Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization Method for Simultaneous Dual-Color Identification of C. albicans and C. glabrata Directly from Blood Culture Bottles

    Janeen R. Shepard;Rachel M. Addison;Barbara D. Alexander;Phyllis Della-Latta

  • The Role of Swab and Tissue Culture in the Diagnosis of Implantable Cardiac Device Infection

    Jimmy Dy Chua;Ahmad Abdul-Karim;Steven Mawhorter;Gary W. Procop

  • Gonorrhea in the HIV era: a reversal in trends among men who have sex with men.

    K. K. Fox;C. Del Rio;K. K. Holmes;E. W. Hook

  • Detection and Differentiation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Isolates by Real-Time PCR

    Nabin K. Shrestha;Marion J. Tuohy;Gerri S. Hall;Udo Reischl

  • Multicenter Comparison of the VITEK 2 Antifungal Susceptibility Test with the CLSI Broth Microdilution Reference Method for Testing Amphotericin B, Flucytosine, and Voriconazole against Candida spp.

    M. A. Pfaller;D. J. Diekema;G. W. Procop;M. G. Rinaldi

  • North American Paragonimiasis (Caused by Paragonimus kellicotti) in the Context of Global Paragonimiasis

    Gary W. Procop

  • Evaluation of the Verigene Gram-Positive Blood Culture Nucleic Acid Test for Rapid Detection of Bacteria and Resistance Determinants

    Christina M. Wojewoda;Linda Sercia;Maria Navas;Marion Tuohy

  • Multicenter Evaluation of a Candida albicans Peptide Nucleic Acid Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization Probe for Characterization of Yeast Isolates from Blood Cultures

    D. A. Wilson;M. J. Joyce;L. S. Hall;L. B. Reller

  • Simultaneous detection of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci in positive blood cultures by real-time PCR with two fluorescence resonance energy transfer probe sets.

    H. Sakai;G. W. Procop;N. Kobayashi;D. Togawa

  • HER2/neu amplification in breast cancer: stratification by tumor type and grade.

    Elise R. Hoff;Raymond R. Tubbs;Jonathan L. Myles;Gary W. Procop

Frequent Co-Authors

Sandra S. Richter
Sandra S. Richter Cleveland Clinic
Christine C. Ginocchio
Christine C. Ginocchio Qiagen (United States)
Thomas W. Bauer
Thomas W. Bauer Hospital for Special Surgery
Mary Jane Ferraro
Mary Jane Ferraro Harvard University
Raymond R. Tubbs
Raymond R. Tubbs Cleveland Clinic
Glenn D. Roberts
Glenn D. Roberts Mayo Clinic
Yi-Wei Tang
Yi-Wei Tang Chongqing Medical University
Udo Reischl
Udo Reischl University of Regensburg
Daniel J. Diekema
Daniel J. Diekema University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
L. B. Reller
L. B. Reller Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring microbiology opens up diverse career opportunities, often enhanced by complementary online degrees. For those seeking further education with flexible entry, mph online programs with easy admission requirements can be a strategic choice to broaden expertise in public health fields. These programs blend well with a microbiology background, increasing career versatility.

Graduates may also consider healthcare roles such as becoming a child life specialist salary with bachelor degree holder, which offers a rewarding path working with children in medical settings. This is an example of how a strong foundation in science supports specialized professions.

For those facing unique challenges, it’s encouraging to know that there are accessible educational paths as highlighted in the best associate degrees for felons. Microbiology and related fields can also provide second chances through structured online programs tailored to diverse learners.

Another evolving career path is becoming a functional medicine nurse practitioner salary professional, where expertise in biology and health sciences is crucial. Online degrees facilitate advancement in this specialized nursing field.

Best Scientists Citing Gary W. Procop

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles