World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Microbiology 66 2432 2226 983 874 256 13319

Gary W. Procop publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Gary W. Procop between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Gary W. Procop published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 10.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2003. 18 of the 319 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2003. 1996: 2 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 16 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 19 publications 2004: 14 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 5 publications
1996 2025

319 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Gary W. Procop: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 2
1997 3
1998 3
1999 4
2000 10
2001 16
2002 8
2003 19
2004 14
2005 14
2006 14
2007 10
2008 10
2009 11
2010 10
2011 12
2012 6
2013 9
2014 13
2015 11
2016 14
2017 18
2018 11
2019 15
2020 15
2021 18
2022 3
2023 8
2024 13
2025 5
Total 319
Download as CSV

Gary W. Procop publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gary W. Procop sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 55–64 to 679+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 135–144 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 255–264 publications, is where this scientist sits. 55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 265 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 234 scientists 205–214 publications: 208 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55–64 publications 679+

This scientist: 256 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
55–64 8
65–74 29
75–84 55
85–94 112
95–104 137
105–114 190
115–124 235
125–134 234
135–144 288
145–154 265
155–164 264
165–174 253
175–184 276
185–194 190
195–204 234
205–214 208
215–224 198
225–234 155
235–244 161
245–254 160
255–264 146 256
265–274 139
275–284 148
285–294 115
295–304 96
305–314 88
315–324 106
325–334 65
335–344 76
345–354 64
355–364 62
365–374 65
375–384 61
385–394 34
395–404 44
405–414 36
415–424 35
425–434 29
435–444 33
445–454 34
455–464 25
465–474 26
475–484 20
485–494 19
495–504 16
505–514 17
515–524 23
525–534 14
535–544 14
545–554 18
555–564 12
565–574 7
575–584 9
585–594 9
595–604 9
605–614 7
615–624 9
625–634 7
635–644 4
645–654 5
655–664 6
665–674 7
675–678 3
679+ 99
Download as CSV

Gary W. Procop D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gary W. Procop sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40 to 127+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 162. Most scientists, 162, have 58 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 66 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 112 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 123 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40 30
41 86
42 90
43 117
44 122
45 123
46 108
47 110
48 106
49 109
50 129
51 111
52 116
53 127
54 134
55 134
56 112
57 136
58 162
59 151
60 139
61 123
62 126
63 144
64 109
65 103
66 124 66
67 112
68 103
69 131
70 94
71 93
72 96
73 92
74 80
75 66
76 87
77 60
78 73
79 59
80 57
81 55
82 47
83 77
84 50
85 45
86 42
87 41
88 32
89 38
90 35
91 34
92 27
93 26
94 33
95 22
96 37
97 22
98 21
99 22
100 30
101 16
102 20
103 17
104 19
105 16
106 19
107 18
108 14
109 10
110 9
111 7
112 11
113 6
114 15
115 10
116 12
117 7
118 10
119 10
120 11
121 2
122 7
123 12
124 5
125 9
126 6
127+ 95
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2007 - ASM Award for Research in Clinical Microbiology, American Society for Microbiology

Overview

Gary W. Procop is affiliated with the Cleveland Clinic in the United States, where the focus of their research lies primarily in the field of Medicine, with a significant emphasis on Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Oncology.

The scientist's published work encompasses a range of topics including:

  • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
  • Innovations in Medical Education
  • Radiology practices and education
  • COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
  • Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Gary W. Procop include:

  • "Association of Use of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers With Testing Positive for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)", 2020, JAMA Cardiology
  • "Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans: Update on the Diagnosis and Treatment", 2020, Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • "Alpha to Omicron: Disease Severity and Clinical Outcomes of Major SARS-CoV-2 Variants", 2022, The Journal of Infectious Diseases
  • "A Direct Comparison of Enhanced Saliva to Nasopharyngeal Swab for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Symptomatic Patients", 2020, Journal of Clinical Microbiology
  • "Dynamics and predisposition of respiratory viral co-infections in children and adults", 2020, Clinical Microbiology and Infection

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Gary W. Procop include:

  • Daniel D. Rhoads
  • Nabin K. Shrestha (7 joint publications)
  • Brian P. Rubin (5 joint publications)
  • Sixto M. Leal (4 joint publications)
  • Thomas McCarthy (4 joint publications)

Gary W. Procop's research has been published extensively in journals such as:

  • Journal of Clinical Microbiology (7 publications)
  • American Journal of Clinical Pathology (6 publications)
  • Academic Pathology (4 publications)
  • Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine (2 publications)
  • Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology (2 publications)

In 2007, Gary W. Procop received the ASM Award for Research in Clinical Microbiology from the American Society for Microbiology.

Best Publications

  • Validation of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing Tests for Universal Pathogen Detection.

    Robert Schlaberg;Charles Y. Chiu;Steve Miller;Gary W. Procop

  • Molecular diagnostics of infectious diseases

    Yi-Wei Tang;Gary W. Procop;David H. Persing

  • Multitarget fluorescence in situ hybridization assay detects transitional cell carcinoma in the majority of patients with bladder cancer and atypical or negative urine cytology.

    Marek Skacel;Mona Fahmy;Jennifer A. Brainard;James D. Pettay

  • Histologic features of zygomycosis: emphasis on perineural invasion and fungal morphology.

    John L. Frater;Gerri S. Hall;Gary W. Procop

  • Rapid Identification of Staphylococcus aureus Directly from Blood Cultures by Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization with Peptide Nucleic Acid Probes

    Kenneth Oliveira;Gary W. Procop;Deborah Wilson;James Coull

  • Antimicrobial resistance in Cairo, Egypt 1999-2000: a survey of five hospitals.

    Amani El Kholy;Hadia Baseem;Geraldine S. Hall;Gary W. Procop

  • Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization with Peptide Nucleic Acid Probes for Rapid Identification of Candida albicans Directly from Blood Culture Bottles

    Susan Rigby;Gary W. Procop;Gerhard Haase;Deborah Wilson

  • Rapid Identification of Staphylococcus aureus and the mecA Gene from BacT/ALERT Blood Culture Bottles by Using the LightCycler System

    Nabin K. Shrestha;Marion J. Tuohy;Gerri S. Hall;Carlos M. Isada

  • Detection of Pneumocystis jiroveci in Respiratory Specimens by Four Staining Methods

    Gary Procop;S. Haddad;J. Quinn;M. L. Wilson

  • Quantitative Real-Time PCR Is Not More Sensitive than “Conventional” PCR

    Patrick Bastien;Gary W. Procop;Udo Reischl

  • Alpha to Omicron: Disease Severity and Clinical Outcomes of Major SARS-CoV-2 Variants

    Unknown

  • Practical Guidance for Clinical Microbiology Laboratories: Laboratory Diagnosis of Parasites from the Gastrointestinal Tract

    Lynne S. Garcia;Michael Arrowood;Evelyne Kokoskin;Graeme P. Paltridge

  • Multicenter Evaluation of the Candida albicans/Candida glabrata Peptide Nucleic Acid Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization Method for Simultaneous Dual-Color Identification of C. albicans and C. glabrata Directly from Blood Culture Bottles

    Janeen R. Shepard;Rachel M. Addison;Barbara D. Alexander;Phyllis Della-Latta

  • The Role of Swab and Tissue Culture in the Diagnosis of Implantable Cardiac Device Infection

    Jimmy Dy Chua;Ahmad Abdul-Karim;Steven Mawhorter;Gary W. Procop

  • Gonorrhea in the HIV era: a reversal in trends among men who have sex with men.

    K. K. Fox;C. Del Rio;K. K. Holmes;E. W. Hook

  • Detection and Differentiation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Isolates by Real-Time PCR

    Nabin K. Shrestha;Marion J. Tuohy;Gerri S. Hall;Udo Reischl

  • Multicenter Comparison of the VITEK 2 Antifungal Susceptibility Test with the CLSI Broth Microdilution Reference Method for Testing Amphotericin B, Flucytosine, and Voriconazole against Candida spp.

    M. A. Pfaller;D. J. Diekema;G. W. Procop;M. G. Rinaldi

  • North American Paragonimiasis (Caused by Paragonimus kellicotti) in the Context of Global Paragonimiasis

    Gary W. Procop

  • Evaluation of the Verigene Gram-Positive Blood Culture Nucleic Acid Test for Rapid Detection of Bacteria and Resistance Determinants

    Christina M. Wojewoda;Linda Sercia;Maria Navas;Marion Tuohy

  • Multicenter Evaluation of a Candida albicans Peptide Nucleic Acid Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization Probe for Characterization of Yeast Isolates from Blood Cultures

    D. A. Wilson;M. J. Joyce;L. S. Hall;L. B. Reller

  • Simultaneous detection of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci in positive blood cultures by real-time PCR with two fluorescence resonance energy transfer probe sets.

    H. Sakai;G. W. Procop;N. Kobayashi;D. Togawa

  • HER2/neu amplification in breast cancer: stratification by tumor type and grade.

    Elise R. Hoff;Raymond R. Tubbs;Jonathan L. Myles;Gary W. Procop

Frequent Co-Authors

Sandra S. Richter
Sandra S. Richter Cleveland Clinic
Christine C. Ginocchio
Christine C. Ginocchio Qiagen (United States)
Thomas W. Bauer
Thomas W. Bauer Hospital for Special Surgery
Mary Jane Ferraro
Mary Jane Ferraro Harvard University
Raymond R. Tubbs
Raymond R. Tubbs Cleveland Clinic
Glenn D. Roberts
Glenn D. Roberts Mayo Clinic
Yi-Wei Tang
Yi-Wei Tang Chongqing Medical University
Udo Reischl
Udo Reischl University of Regensburg
Daniel J. Diekema
Daniel J. Diekema University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
L. B. Reller
L. B. Reller Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring microbiology opens up diverse career opportunities, often enhanced by complementary online degrees. For those seeking further education with flexible entry, mph online programs with easy admission requirements can be a strategic choice to broaden expertise in public health fields. These programs blend well with a microbiology background, increasing career versatility.

Graduates may also consider healthcare roles such as becoming a child life specialist salary with bachelor degree holder, which offers a rewarding path working with children in medical settings. This is an example of how a strong foundation in science supports specialized professions.

For those facing unique challenges, it’s encouraging to know that there are accessible educational paths as highlighted in the best associate degrees for felons. Microbiology and related fields can also provide second chances through structured online programs tailored to diverse learners.

Another evolving career path is becoming a functional medicine nurse practitioner salary professional, where expertise in biology and health sciences is crucial. Online degrees facilitate advancement in this specialized nursing field.

Best Scientists Citing Gary W. Procop

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles