World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Raymond R. Tubbs

Raymond R. Tubbs

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
98
Citations
47467
World Ranking
8777
National Ranking
4526

Raymond R. Tubbs publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raymond R. Tubbs sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 516 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Raymond R. Tubbs D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raymond R. Tubbs sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 98 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Raymond R. Tubbs was affiliated with the Cleveland Clinic in the United States. Their research primarily focused on the field of Medicine, with specific attention to subfields such as Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Genetics, and Hematology.

The scientist contributed to topics including:

  • Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
  • Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments

Raymond R. Tubbs coauthored research with a number of frequent collaborators, including:

  • Patrick J. Stiff
  • Joseph M. Unger
  • James R. Cook
  • Louis S. Constine
  • Stephen Couban

Their recent publications include:

  • "Autologous Transplantation as Consolidation for Aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma," 2020, venue: UNC Libraries

Raymond R. Tubbs published exclusively in UNC Libraries and there are no book publications recorded.

Best Publications

  • American society of clinical oncology/college of american pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer

    Antonio C. Wolff;M. Elizabeth H. Hammond;Jared N. Schwartz;Karen L. Hagerty

  • American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer.

    Antonio C. Wolff;M. Elizabeth H. Hammond;Jared N. Schwartz;Karen L. Hagerty

  • Stromal gene signatures in large-B-cell lymphomas

    G Lenz;G Wright;S S Dave;W Xiao

  • Chronic active B-cell-receptor signalling in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

    R. Eric Davis;Vu N. Ngo;Georg Lenz;Pavel Tolar

  • Oncogenically active MYD88 mutations in human lymphoma

    Vu N. Ngo;Vu N. Ngo;Ryan M. Young;Roland Schmitz;Sameer Jhavar

  • Tumor-Associated Macrophages and Survival in Classic Hodgkin's Lymphoma

    Christian Steidl;Tang Lee;Sohrab P. Shah;Pedro Farinha

  • Concurrent Expression of MYC and BCL2 in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Treated With Rituximab Plus Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, and Prednisone

    Nathalie A. Johnson;Graham W. Slack;Kerry J. Savage;Joseph M. Connors

  • Burkitt lymphoma pathogenesis and therapeutic targets from structural and functional genomics

    Roland Schmitz;Ryan M. Young;Michele Ceribelli;Sameer Jhavar

  • T-cell lymphomas containing Epstein-Barr viral DNA in patients with chronic Epstein-Barr virus infections.

    James F. Jones;Susan Shurin;Carlos Abramowsky;Raymond R. Tubbs

  • Identification of a Novel Gammaretrovirus in Prostate Tumors of Patients Homozygous for R462Q RNASEL Variant

    Anatoly Urisman;Ross J Molinaro;Ross J Molinaro;Nicole Fischer;Sarah J Plummer

  • Determining cell-of-origin subtypes of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma using gene expression in formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tissue

    David W. Scott;George W. Wright;P. Mickey Williams;Chih Jian Lih

  • Gene expression signatures delineate biological and prognostic subgroups in peripheral T-cell lymphoma.

    Javeed Iqbal;George Wright;Chao Wang;Andreas Rosenwald

  • Loss of T-Cell Receptor ζ Chain and p56lck in T-Cells Infiltrating Human Renal Cell Carcinoma

    James H. Finke;Arnold H. Zea;Jill Stanley;Dan L. Longo

  • Autologous Transplantation as Consolidation for Aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

    Patrick J. Stiff;Joseph M. Unger;James R. Cook;Louis S. Constine

  • Multitarget fluorescence in situ hybridization assay detects transitional cell carcinoma in the majority of patients with bladder cancer and atypical or negative urine cytology.

    Marek Skacel;Mona Fahmy;Jennifer A. Brainard;James D. Pettay

  • The CXC Chemokines IP-10 and Mig Are Necessary for IL-12-Mediated Regression of the Mouse RENCA Tumor

    Charles S. Tannenbaum;Raymond Tubbs;David Armstrong;James H. Finke

  • Long-Term Follow-up after Partial Removal of a Solitary Kidney

    Andrew C. Novick;Gordon Gephardt;Brian Guz;Donald Steinmuller

  • Breast cancers with brain metastases are more likely to be estrogen receptor negative, express the basal cytokeratin CK5/6, and overexpress HER2 or EGFR.

    David G. Hicks;Sarah M. Short;Nichole L. Prescott;Shannon M. Tarr

  • Uniform Detection of Immunoglobulin-Gene Rearrangement in Benign Lymphoepithelial Lesions

    Andrew Fishleder;Raymond Tubbs;Bonnie Hesse;Howard Levine

  • Loss of signalling via Gα13 in germinal centre B-cell-derived lymphoma

    Jagan R. Muppidi;Roland Schmitz;Jesse A. Green;Jesse A. Green;Wenming Xiao

Frequent Co-Authors

Ronald M. Bukowski
Ronald M. Bukowski Cleveland Clinic
James H. Finke
James H. Finke Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine
Lisa M. Rimsza
Lisa M. Rimsza Mayo Clinic
Eric D. Hsi
Eric D. Hsi Cleveland Clinic
Randy D. Gascoyne
Randy D. Gascoyne BC Cancer Agency
Elias Campo
Elias Campo University of Barcelona
Jan Delabie
Jan Delabie University Health Network
Andreas Rosenwald
Andreas Rosenwald University of Würzburg
Elaine S. Jaffe
Elaine S. Jaffe National Institutes of Health
Louis M. Staudt
Louis M. Staudt National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Medicine in the USA isn't limited to traditional paths. Aspiring healthcare professionals often explore flexible online programs to fit their needs and schedules. Many start their journey with a nursing degree online, gaining foundational clinical and theoretical skills right from home.

Registered nurses wishing to advance their credentials can look for the cheapest rn to bsn programs, which offer a cost-effective way to qualify for higher-level positions and increased pay.

For those interested in leadership, research, or teaching, a phd nursing education online opens doors to influential careers and academia.

Even if you don't have a nursing background, specialized online msn programs for non nurses allow career changers to enter the field quickly and efficiently.

Each of these online pathways supports different career goals within healthcare—making it easier than ever to find your unique place in medicine.

Best Scientists Citing Raymond R. Tubbs

Recently Published Articles