World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Medicine
Italy
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
138
Citations
75715
World Ranking
1826
National Ranking
35

Stefano Pileri publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stefano Pileri sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 888 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Stefano Pileri D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stefano Pileri sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 138 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Medicine in Italy Leader Award

Overview

Stefano Pileri is affiliated with the European Institute of Oncology in Italy, where they focus primarily on medical research within the field of oncology, with particular emphasis on pathology and forensic medicine. Their published work reflects extensive engagement with lymphoma diagnosis and treatment and intersects with areas such as viral-associated cancers, T-cell and retrovirus studies, CAR-T cell therapy research, and chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Medicine

Within this broad area, their work concentrates on several subfields:

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Oncology
  • Immunology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetics

Major topics covered in Stefano Pileri's research encompass:

  • Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Viral-associated cancers and disorders
  • T-cell and Retrovirus Studies
  • CAR-T cell therapy research
  • Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
  • Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research
  • Immune Cell Function and Interaction

Among their frequent co-authors are:

  • Valentina Tabanelli
  • Giovanna Motta
  • Saveria Mazzara
  • Federica Melle
  • Enrico Derenzini

Stefano Pileri has contributed to publications predominantly appearing in the following venues:

  • Blood
  • Hematological Oncology
  • Blood Advances
  • Archiv für Pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und für Klinische Medicin
  • Cancers

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Stefano Pileri include:

  • The International Consensus Classification of Mature Lymphoid Neoplasms: a report from the Clinical Advisory Committee, 2022, Blood
  • Genomic profiling for clinical decision making in lymphoid neoplasms, 2022, Blood
  • Survival outcomes of patients with extranodal natural-killer T-cell lymphoma: a prospective cohort study from the international T-cell Project, 2020, The Lancet Haematology
  • Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma: A comprehensive review, 2020, Cancer Treatment Reviews
  • Outcomes and prognostic factors in angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma: final report from the international T-cell Project, 2021, Blood

Best Publications

  • The 2016 revision of the World Health Organization classification of lymphoid neoplasms

    Steven H. Swerdlow;Elias Campo;Stefano A. Pileri;Nancy Lee Harris

  • The 2008 WHO classification of lymphoid neoplasms and beyond: evolving concepts and practical applications.

    Elias Campo;Steven H. Swerdlow;Nancy L. Harris;Stefano Pileri

  • BRAF mutations in hairy-cell leukemia

    Enrico Tiacci;Vladimir Trifonov;Gianluca Schiavoni;Antony Holmes

  • CD30(+) anaplastic large cell lymphoma: a review of its histopathologic, genetic, and clinical features.

    Harald Stein;Hans-Dieter Foss;Horst Dürkop;Theresa Marafioti

  • ALK - anaplastic large-cell lymphoma is clinically and immunophenotypically different from both ALK + ALCL and peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified: Report from the International Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma Project

    Kerry J. Savage;Nancy Lee Harris;Julie Marie Vose;Fred Ullrich

  • Antigen unmasking on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections

    Giorgio Cattoretti;Stefano Pileri;Carlo Parravicini;Michael H. G. Becker

  • Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index 2: A New Prognostic Index for Follicular Lymphoma Developed by the International Follicular Lymphoma Prognostic Factor Project

    Massimo Federico;Monica Bellei;Luigi Marcheselli;Stefano Luminari

  • Tumours of histiocytes and accessory dendritic cells: an immunohistochemical approach to classification from the International Lymphoma Study Group based on 61 cases

    S. A. Pileri;T. M. Grogan;N. L. Harris;P Banks

  • ALK+ Lymphoma: Clinico-Pathological Findings and Outcome

    Brunangelo Falini;Stefano Pileri;Pier Luigi Zinzani;Antonino Carbone

  • Myeloid sarcoma: clinico-pathologic, phenotypic and cytogenetic analysis of 92 adult patients.

    S A Pileri;S Ascani;M C Cox;C Campidelli

  • WHO classification of tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues in 2008: an overview.

    Sabattini E;Bacci F;Sagramoso C;Pileri Sa

  • Intravascular lymphoma: clinical presentation, natural history, management and prognostic factors in a series of 38 cases, with special emphasis on the 'cutaneous variant'.

    Andrés J. M. Ferreri;Elías Campo;John F. Seymour;Rein Willemze

  • ALK-Positive Lymphoma: A Single Disease With a Broad Spectrum of Morphology

    Daniel Benharroch;Zarouhie Meguerian-Bedoyan;Laurence Lamant;Chauki Amin

  • Nongastric marginal zone B-cell lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue.

    Emanuele Zucca;Annarita Conconi;Ennio Pedrinis;Sergio Cortelazzo

  • CD30 (Ki-1) molecule: a new cytokine receptor of the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily as a tool for diagnosis and immunotherapy.

    B Falini;S Pileri;G Pizzolo;H Durkop

  • A monoclonal antibody (MUM1p) detects expression of the MUM1/IRF4 protein in a subset of germinal center B cells, plasma cells, and activated T cells

    Brunangelo Falini;Marco Fizzotti;Alessandra Pucciarini;Barbara Bigerna

  • The EnVision++ system: a new immunohistochemical method for diagnostics and research. Critical comparison with the APAAP, ChemMate, CSA, LABC, and SABC techniques.

    E Sabattini;K Bisgaard;S Ascani;S Poggi

  • Correlation of high numbers of intratumoral FOXP3+ regulatory T cells with improved survival in germinal center-like diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma and classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma

    Alexandar Tzankov;Cecile Meier;Petra Hirschmann;Philip Went

  • Gene expression signatures delineate biological and prognostic subgroups in peripheral T-cell lymphoma.

    Javeed Iqbal;George Wright;Chao Wang;Andreas Rosenwald

  • The World Health Organization Classification of Lymphoid Neoplasms

    Alejandra Carvajal-Cuenca;Stefano A. Pileri;Elias Campo

Frequent Co-Authors

Pier Luigi Zinzani
Pier Luigi Zinzani University of Bologna
Brunangelo Falini
Brunangelo Falini University of Perugia
Michele Baccarani
Michele Baccarani University of Bologna
Giorgio Inghirami
Giorgio Inghirami Cornell University
Fabio Facchetti
Fabio Facchetti University of Brescia
Elias Campo
Elias Campo University of Barcelona
Sante Tura
Sante Tura University of Bologna
Giovanni Martinelli
Giovanni Martinelli University of Bologna
Umberto Vitolo
Umberto Vitolo University of Turin
Gianluca Gaidano
Gianluca Gaidano University of Eastern Piedmont Amadeo Avogadro

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

While studying Medicine in the USA typically involves earning an MD or DO degree in person, there are several related healthcare fields offering flexible online pathways. For those interested in the business side of healthcare, cheapest mha programs online can be a cost-effective route to a leadership role in hospitals or clinics. Students looking for more options can also explore online mha programs affordable, balancing quality education with budget.

Nurses seeking advanced clinical or executive roles should consider pursuing a Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP). There are cheap dnp online programs that make this possible without the high cost or need to relocate. For those drawn to pharmaceutical sciences, pursuing a pharmacy degree online enables students to advance their career while meeting licensure requirements.

Each of these online degree options can open doors to rewarding careers in healthcare, providing flexible alternatives to traditional, in-person medical education.

Best Scientists Citing Stefano Pileri

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles