World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
114
Citations
47168
World Ranking
4745
National Ranking
2570

Genetics

D-Index
114
Citations
46387
World Ranking
470
National Ranking
241

Leslie G. Biesecker publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leslie G. Biesecker sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 432 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Leslie G. Biesecker D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leslie G. Biesecker sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 114 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2016 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Overview

Leslie G. Biesecker is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on fields including Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Medicine, with a specific emphasis on Genetics and Molecular Biology as key subfields. Their work encompasses topics such as Genomics and Rare Diseases, Vascular Malformations and Hemangiomas, Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities, BRCA gene mutations in cancer, Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics, Genetic factors in colorectal cancer, and Genetic Associations and Epidemiology.

They have contributed extensively to academic literature, publishing in several well-known venues. Frequent publication sources include Genetics in Medicine, The American Journal of Human Genetics, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), UNC Libraries, and American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A.

Some of the recent papers featuring Leslie G. Biesecker are:

  • Calibration of computational tools for missense variant pathogenicity classification and ClinGen recommendations for PP3/BP4 criteria (2022, The American Journal of Human Genetics)
  • Strategic vision for improving human health at The Forefront of Genomics (2020, Nature)
  • Fitting a naturally scaled point system to the ACMG/AMP variant classification guidelines (2020, Human Mutation)
  • Using the ACMG/AMP framework to capture evidence related to predicted and observed impact on splicing: Recommendations from the ClinGen SVI Splicing Subgroup (2023, The American Journal of Human Genetics)
  • Genetic regulation of OAS1 nonsense-mediated decay underlies association with COVID-19 hospitalization in patients of European and African ancestries (2022, Nature Genetics)

Throughout their career, Leslie G. Biesecker has collaborated frequently with notable coauthors including Jennifer J. Johnston, Katie L. Lewis, Heidi L. Rehm, Julie C. Sapp, and Jonathan S. Berg.

The scientist has been recognized with membership awards such as being a Member of the National Academy of Medicine in 2016 and a Member of the Association of American Physicians.

Best Publications

  • Consensus Statement : Chromosomal Microarray Is a First-Tier Clinical Diagnostic Test for Individuals with Developmental Disabilities or Congenital Anomalies

    David T. Miller;Margaret P. Adam;Margaret P. Adam;Swaroop Aradhya;Leslie G. Biesecker

  • ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing

    Robert C. Green;Robert C. Green;Jonathan S. Berg;Wayne W. Grody;Sarah S. Kalia

  • Guidelines for investigating causality of sequence variants in human disease

    D G MacArthur;T A Manolio;D P Dimmock;H L Rehm

  • A Mosaic Activating Mutation in AKT1 Associated with the Proteus Syndrome

    Marjorie J Lindhurst;Julie C Sapp;Jamie K. Teer;Jennifer J Johnston

  • Diagnostic Clinical Genome and Exome Sequencing

    Leslie G. Biesecker;Robert C. Green

  • GLI3 frameshift mutations cause autosomal dominant Pallister-Hall syndrome.

    Seongman Kang;John M. Graham;Ann Haskins Olney;Leslie G. Biesecker

  • A genomic view of mosaicism and human disease

    Leslie G. Biesecker;Nancy B. Spinner

  • Recommendations for interpreting the loss of function PVS1 ACMG/AMP variant criterion

    Ahmad N. Abou Tayoun;Ahmad N. Abou Tayoun;Tina Pesaran;Marina T. DiStefano;Andrea Oza

  • Performance of ACMG-AMP Variant-Interpretation Guidelines among Nine Laboratories in the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium

    Laura M. Amendola;Gail P. Jarvik;Michael C. Leo;Heather M. McLaughlin

  • Proteus syndrome: diagnostic criteria, differential diagnosis, and patient evaluation.

    Leslie G. Biesecker;Rudolf Happle;John B. Mulliken;Rosanna Weksberg

  • PIK3CA‐related overgrowth spectrum (PROS): Diagnostic and testing eligibility criteria, differential diagnosis, and evaluation

    Kim M. Keppler-Noreuil;Jonathan J. Rios;Victoria E.R. Parker;Robert K. Semple

  • Modeling the ACMG/AMP variant classification guidelines as a Bayesian classification framework.

    Sean V. Tavtigian;Marc S. Greenblatt;Steven M. Harrison;Robert L. Nussbaum

  • Recommendations for application of the functional evidence PS3/BS3 criterion using the ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation framework.

    Sarah E. Brnich;Ahmad N. Abou Tayoun;Fergus J. Couch;Garry R. Cutting

  • Actionable exomic incidental findings in 6503 participants: challenges of variant classification

    Laura M. Amendola;Michael O. Dorschner;Peggy D. Robertson;Joseph S. Salama

  • Ethical and practical guidelines for reporting genetic research results to study participants: Updated guidelines from a national heart, lung, and blood institute working group

    Richard R. Fabsitz;Amy McGuire;Richard R. Sharp;Mona Puggal

  • Elevated basal serum tryptase identifies a multisystem disorder associated with increased TPSAB1 copy number.

    Jonathan J Lyons;Xiaomin Yu;Jason D Hughes;Quang T Le

  • A GNAS1 imprinting defect in pseudohypoparathyroidism type IB

    Jie Liu;Deborah Litman;Marjorie J. Rosenberg;Shuhua Yu

  • A Novel Nemaline Myopathy in the Amish Caused by a Mutation in Troponin T1

    Jennifer J. Johnston;Richard Ian Kelley;Richard Ian Kelley;Thomas O. Crawford;D. Holmes Morton

  • Oculofaciocardiodental and Lenz microphthalmia syndromes result from distinct classes of mutations in BCOR

    David Ng;Nalin Thakker;Connie M Corcoran;Dian Donnai

  • Refinement and Discovery of New Hotspots of Copy-Number Variation Associated with Autism Spectrum Disorder

    Santhosh Girirajan;Megan Y. Dennis;Carl Baker;Maika Malig

Frequent Co-Authors

Barbara B. Biesecker
Barbara B. Biesecker RTI International
Heidi L. Rehm
Heidi L. Rehm Brigham and Women's Hospital
Robert C. Green
Robert C. Green Brigham and Women's Hospital
James C. Mullikin
James C. Mullikin National Institutes of Health
Raoul C.M. Hennekam
Raoul C.M. Hennekam University of Amsterdam
John M. Graham
John M. Graham Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
William M. P. Klein
William M. P. Klein National Institutes of Health
Jonathan S. Berg
Jonathan S. Berg University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Alejandro A. Schäffer
Alejandro A. Schäffer National Institutes of Health
Graeme C.M. Black
Graeme C.M. Black University of Manchester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in genetics opens the door to various related online degrees and flexible learning opportunities. For those interested in roles that support healthcare services, online medical coding programs offer practical, in-demand skills that can complement a foundation in genetics.

Many students are looking for ways to enter the workforce faster. Enrolling in a fast track degree allows motivated learners to complete their studies at a quicker pace, making it possible to launch careers in science, research, or healthcare sooner.

Flexibility is important for adult learners and professionals. Self paced online degrees provide the option to study genetics or allied fields according to your own schedule, making it easier to balance education with work or family responsibilities.

Cost and accessibility can also impact your decision. You may consider enrolling in online colleges no application fee to reduce upfront expenses and streamline the admissions process.

Best Scientists Citing Leslie G. Biesecker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles