World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Raoul C.M. Hennekam

Raoul C.M. Hennekam

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 122 3463 3232 129 125 681 57606
Genetics 118 412 396 13 13 575 51203

Raoul C.M. Hennekam publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Raoul C.M. Hennekam between 1966 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Raoul C.M. Hennekam published across 60 years, from 1966 to 2025, averaging 11.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 39 publications in 2005. 7 of the 704 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1966 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 39. Peak 39 publications in 2005. 1966: 1 publication 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 2 publications 1989: 7 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 8 publications 1993: 14 publications 1994: 12 publications 1995: 11 publications 1996: 17 publications 1997: 10 publications 1998: 18 publications 1999: 15 publications 2000: 14 publications 2001: 17 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 15 publications 2004: 24 publications 2005: 39 publications 2006: 19 publications 2007: 25 publications 2008: 28 publications 2009: 36 publications 2010: 39 publications 2011: 34 publications 2012: 39 publications 2013: 27 publications 2014: 34 publications 2015: 27 publications 2016: 27 publications 2017: 27 publications 2018: 28 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 1 publication
1966 2025

704 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Raoul C.M. Hennekam: publications per year, 1966 to 2025
Year Publications
1966 1
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 1
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 1
1985 0
1986 1
1987 1
1988 2
1989 7
1990 3
1991 5
1992 8
1993 14
1994 12
1995 11
1996 17
1997 10
1998 18
1999 15
2000 14
2001 17
2002 11
2003 15
2004 24
2005 39
2006 19
2007 25
2008 28
2009 36
2010 39
2011 34
2012 39
2013 27
2014 34
2015 27
2016 27
2017 27
2018 28
2019 13
2020 15
2021 13
2022 9
2023 10
2024 6
2025 1
Total 704
Download as CSV

Raoul C.M. Hennekam publications per year - data summary

  • Raoul C.M. Hennekam, a Genetics scholar from University of Amsterdam, has 704 publications recorded across 60 years, from 1966 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1966 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive years are 2005, 2010 and 2012, with 39 publications each.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1966, 1976, 1984, 1986 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 17 of the 60 years in the span carry no publications at all (1967, 1968, 1969, 1970 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 11.7 papers per year over the whole span, or 16.4 per year counting only the 43 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 39 publications, 6% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1966-1985: 3 publications (0.1 per year); 1986-2005: 244 publications (12.2 per year); 2006-2025: 457 publications (22.9 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Raoul C.M. Hennekam publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raoul C.M. Hennekam sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 575–584 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 575 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5 575
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

Raoul C.M. Hennekam publication distribution in Genetics in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 4,342 Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 67 ranges running from 45–54 to 703+ publications.
  • Raoul C.M. Hennekam, a Genetics scholar from University of Amsterdam, records 575 publications - the 95th percentile of the discipline.
  • 95% of ranked Genetics scientists score the same or lower than Raoul C.M. Hennekam, and about 5% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 195–204 publications range, and Raoul C.M. Hennekam ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 125–134 publications, holding 217 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 56% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 205–214 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 703 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (2% of the field).

Raoul C.M. Hennekam D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raoul C.M. Hennekam sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 118–119 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 118 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34 118
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Raoul C.M. Hennekam D-index placement in Genetics in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 4,342 Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 61 ranges running from 40–41 to 160+ D-Index.
  • Raoul C.M. Hennekam, a Genetics scholar from University of Amsterdam, records 118 D-Index - the 91st percentile of the discipline.
  • 91% of ranked Genetics scientists score the same or lower than Raoul C.M. Hennekam, and about 9% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 70–71 D-Index range, and Raoul C.M. Hennekam ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 62–63 D-Index, holding 191 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 51% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 70–71 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more, 96 scientists in all (2% of the field).

Overview

Raoul C.M. Hennekam is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research spans several fields, prominently including biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology with a total of 67 publications. Medicine is another significant area of focus with 41 publications. Within these broader fields, Hennekam's work touches on subfields such as molecular biology, genetics, surgery, physiology, and pediatrics, perinatology, and child health.

The scientist's research topics cover a range of subjects, including genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities, genomics and chromatin dynamics, RNA research and splicing, genetics and neurodevelopmental disorders, congenital limb and hand anomalies, chromatin remodeling and cancer, and prenatal screening and diagnostics.

Hennekam has authored papers in several key publication venues. These include:

  • European Journal of Medical Genetics
  • American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
  • American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C Seminars in Medical Genetics
  • Genetics in Medicine
  • Human Molecular Genetics

Notable recent publications by Hennekam encompass:

  • De novo SMARCA2 variants clustered outside the helicase domain cause a new recognizable syndrome with intellectual disability and blepharophimosis distinct from Nicolaides-Baraitser syndrome, 2020, Genetics in Medicine
  • Delineation of phenotypes and genotypes related to cohesin structural protein RAD21, 2020, Human Genetics
  • Large-scale open-source three-dimensional growth curves for clinical facial assessment and objective description of facial dysmorphism, 2021, Scientific Reports
  • Definition and clinical variability of SHANK3-related Phelan-McDermid syndrome, 2023, European Journal of Medical Genetics
  • European lipodystrophy registry: background and structure, 2020, Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases

Frequent coauthors working with Hennekam include:

  • Leonie A. Menke
  • Jill A. Fahrner
  • Ariana Kariminejad
  • Margaret P Adam
  • Kreepa Kooblall

Best Publications

  • Syndromes of the Head and Neck

    Raoul C. M. Hennekam;R. J. Gorlin;M. M. Cohen

  • LDL Receptor-Related Protein 5 (LRP5) Affects Bone Accrual and Eye Development

    Y. Q. Gong;R. B. Slee;N. Fukai;G. Rawadi

  • Revised diagnostic criteria for the Marfan syndrome.

    A. De Paepe;R. B. Devereux;H. C. Dietz;R. C. M. Hennekam

  • Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome caused by mutations in the transcriptional co-activator CBP

    Fred Petrif;Rachel H. Giles;Hans G. Dauwerse;Jasper J. Saris

  • Heterozygous germline mutations in the p53 homolog p63 are the cause of EEC syndrome.

    Jacopo Celli;Pascal Duijf;Ben C.J Hamel;Michael Bamshad

  • Recurrent Rearrangements of Chromosome 1q21.1 and Variable Pediatric Phenotypes

    Heather C Mefford;Andrew J Sharp;Carl Baker;Andy Itsara

  • Discovery of previously unidentified genomic disorders from the duplication architecture of the human genome

    Andrew J Sharp;Sierra Hansen;Rebecca R Selzer;Ze Cheng

  • Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome: review of the phenotype.

    Raoul C.M. Hennekam

  • Germline KRAS and BRAF mutations in cardio-facio-cutaneous syndrome

    Tetsuya Niihori;Yoko Aoki;Yoko Narumi;Giovanni Neri

  • Holoprosencephaly due to mutations in ZIC2, a homologue of Drosophila odd-paired.

    Stephen A. Brown;Dorothy Warburton;Lucia Y. Brown;Chih-yu Yu

  • The Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome

    Richard I Kelley;Raoul C M Hennekam

  • Genetic Heterogeneity in Rubinstein-Taybi Syndrome: Mutations in Both the CBP and EP300 Genes Cause Disease

    Jeroen H. Roelfsema;Stefan J. White;Yavuz Ariyürek;Deborah Bartholdi

  • Mapping the human DC lineage through the integration of high-dimensional techniques

    Peter See;Charles-Antoine Dutertre;Charles-Antoine Dutertre;Jinmiao Chen;Patrick Günther

  • Clinical and Molecular Phenotype of Aicardi-Goutières Syndrome

    Gillian Rice;Teresa Patrick;Rekha Parmar;Claire F Taylor

  • Mutations in STRA6 cause a broad spectrum of malformations including anophthalmia, congenital heart defects, diaphragmatic hernia, alveolar capillary dysplasia, lung hypoplasia, and mental retardation

    Francesca Pasutto;Heinrich Sticht;Gerhard Hammersen;Gabriele Gillessen-Kaesbach

  • Mutations in the Pericentrin (PCNT) Gene Cause Primordial Dwarfism

    Anita Rauch;Christian T. Thiel;Detlev Schindler;Ursula Wick

  • Expert consensus document: Clinical and molecular diagnosis, screening and management of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome: an international consensus statement.

    Frédéric Brioude;Jennifer M Kalish;Alessandro Mussa;Alison C Foster;Alison C Foster

  • Lamin A and ZMPSTE24 (FACE-1) defects cause nuclear disorganization and identify restrictive dermopathy as a lethal neonatal laminopathy

    Claire L. Navarro;Annachiara De Sandre-Giovannoli;Rafaëlle Bernard;Irène Boccaccio

  • Opitz G/BBB syndrome, a defect of midline development, is due to mutations in a new RING finger gene on Xp22

    Nandita A. Quaderi;Susann Schweiger;Karin Gaudenz;Brunella Franco

  • Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome.

    Raoul C M Hennekam;Raoul C M Hennekam

Frequent Co-Authors

Marcel M.A.M. Mannens
Marcel M.A.M. Mannens University of Amsterdam
Valérie Cormier-Daire
Valérie Cormier-Daire Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital
Alain Verloes
Alain Verloes Université Paris Cité
Gabriele Gillessen-Kaesbach
Gabriele Gillessen-Kaesbach University of Lübeck
Frits A. Beemer
Frits A. Beemer Utrecht University
Hülya Kayserili
Hülya Kayserili Koç University
Martijn H. Breuning
Martijn H. Breuning Leiden University Medical Center
Jill Clayton-Smith
Jill Clayton-Smith University of Manchester
Leslie G. Biesecker
Leslie G. Biesecker National Institutes of Health
Han G. Brunner
Han G. Brunner Radboud University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Genetics in the USA can open doors to diverse healthcare careers. For students looking for specialized roles, exploring medical billing and coding education is a great option. This field is crucial for managing patient records and ensuring accurate healthcare billing. You can start a flexible, remote-friendly career with affordable and accredited online programs.

Many genetics graduates are also drawn to nursing due to its blend of science and direct patient care. Finding what is the easiest nursing school to get into can speed up your entry into this vital profession, offering a smoother application process and accessible curriculums for motivated students.

Another in-demand field is healthcare administration. Gaining a degree in healthcare administration opens doors to leadership roles in hospitals, clinics, and research centers. Accelerated programs are available entirely online, helping you advance your career faster.

Cost is always top-of-mind when choosing a program. Compare your options to find the healthcare administration degree cost that fits your budget, ensuring you get quality education without excessive debt.

Best Scientists Citing Raoul C.M. Hennekam

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles