World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 52 2414 2174 1189 1059 119 14032

Amjad Javed publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Amjad Javed between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Amjad Javed published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 5.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2004. 3 of the 151 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2004. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 6 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 18 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 3 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 18 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 2 publications
1998 2025

151 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Amjad Javed: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 6
2000 5
2001 6
2002 4
2003 9
2004 18
2005 11
2006 5
2007 5
2008 8
2009 6
2010 5
2011 6
2012 5
2013 3
2014 6
2015 4
2016 3
2017 3
2018 3
2019 1
2020 3
2021 3
2022 1
2023 18
2024 1
2025 2
Total 151
Download as CSV

Amjad Javed publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amjad Javed sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 117–126 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 119 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177 119
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Amjad Javed D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amjad Javed sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106 52
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Amjad Javed is affiliated with the University of Alabama at Birmingham in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with specific expertise in several subfields including molecular biology, oncology, hematology, rheumatology, and cancer research.

The scientist's work covers multiple key topics within biomedical research. These include:

  • Bone Metabolism and Diseases
  • Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
  • Protease and Inhibitor Mechanisms
  • Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
  • TGF-β signaling in diseases
  • Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Bone health and treatments

Significant recent papers published by Amjad Javed include:

  • "Runx2 is required for hypertrophic chondrocyte mediated degradation of cartilage matrix during endochondral ossification," 2021, published in Matrix Biology Plus
  • "Runx2 Deficiency in Osteoblasts Promotes Myeloma Progression by Altering the Bone Microenvironment at New Bone Sites," 2020, published in Cancer Research
  • "Runx2 Deficiency in Osteoblasts Promotes Myeloma Resistance to Bortezomib by Increasing TSP-1-Dependent TGFβ1 Activation and Suppressing Immunity in Bone Marrow," 2021, published in Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
  • "Runx2 deletion in hypertrophic chondrocytes impairs osteoclast mediated bone resorption," 2024, published in Bone
  • "Loss of early B cell protein λ5 decreases bone mass and accelerates skeletal aging," 2022, published in Frontiers in Immunology

Their frequent publication venues highlight a range of journals focused on immunology, cancer, and bone research including:

  • Frontiers in Immunology
  • Matrix Biology Plus
  • Cancer Research
  • Bone
  • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

Amjad Javed collaborates consistently with other researchers in their field. Frequent co-authors include Harunur Rashid, Xiaoxuan Xu, Timothy N. Trotter, Mohamed Khass, and Peter D. Burrows. Each of these collaborations has contributed notably to their body of work, with four papers each involving these colleagues.

Best Publications

  • Canonical WNT Signaling Promotes Osteogenesis by Directly Stimulating Runx2 Gene Expression

    Tripti Gaur;Christopher J. Lengner;Hayk Hovhannisyan;Ramesh A. Bhat

  • Oxidative Stress Induces Vascular Calcification Through Modulation of the Osteogenic Transcription Factor Runx2 by AKT Signaling

    Chang Hyun Byon;Amjad Javed;Qun Dai;John C. Kappes

  • Runx2 control of organization, assembly and activity of the regulatory machinery for skeletal gene expression.

    Gary S. Stein;Jane B. Lian;Andre J. Van Wijnen;Janet L. Stein

  • Regulatory controls for osteoblast growth and differentiation: role of Runx/Cbfa/AML factors

    Jane B. Lian;Amjad Javed;S. Kaleem Zaidi;Christopher Lengner

  • Networks and hubs for the transcriptional control of osteoblastogenesis

    Jane B. Lian;Gary S. Stein;Amjad Javed;Andre J. Van Wijnen

  • The Runx2 Osteogenic Transcription Factor Regulates Matrix Metalloproteinase 9 in Bone Metastatic Cancer Cells and Controls Cell Invasion

    Jitesh Pratap;Amjad Javed;Lucia R. Languino;Andre J. van Wijnen

  • Transient upregulation of CBFA1 in response to bone morphogenetic protein-2 and transforming growth factor beta1 in C2C12 myogenic cells coincides with suppression of the myogenic phenotype but is not sufficient for osteoblast differentiation.

    Mi Hye Lee;Amjad Javed;Hyun Jung Kim;Hong In Shin

  • CCAAT/Enhancer-binding Proteins (C/EBP) β and δ Activate Osteocalcin Gene Transcription and Synergize with Runx2 at the C/EBP Element to Regulate Bone-specific Expression

    Soraya E. Gutierrez;Amjad Javed;Daniel K. Tennant;Monique van Rees

  • Regulatory roles of Runx2 in metastatic tumor and cancer cell interactions with bone.

    J. Pratap;J. B. Lian;A. Javed;G. L. Barnes

  • Smooth Muscle Cell-Specific Runx2 Deficiency Inhibits Vascular Calcification

    Yong Sun;Chang Hyun Byon;Kaiyu Yuan;Jianfeng Chen

  • Dlx3 Transcriptional Regulation of Osteoblast Differentiation: Temporal Recruitment of Msx2, Dlx3, and Dlx5 Homeodomain Proteins to Chromatin of the Osteocalcin Gene

    Mohammad Q. Hassan;Amjad Javed;Maria I. Morasso;Jeremy Karlin

  • Subnuclear targeting of Runx/Cbfa/AML factors is essential for tissue-specific differentiation during embryonic development.

    Je Yong Choi;Je Yong Choi;Jitesh Pratap;Amjad Javed;S. Kaleem Zaidi

  • Groucho/TLE/R-esp proteins associate with the nuclear matrix and repress RUNX (CBF(alpha)/AML/PEBP2(alpha)) dependent activation of tissue-specific gene transcription

    A. Javed;B. Guo;S. Hiebert;J.Y. Choi

  • Differential Regulation of the Two Principal Runx2/Cbfa1 N-Terminal Isoforms in Response to Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 during Development of the Osteoblast Phenotype

    Chaitali Banerjee;Amjad Javed;Je Yong Choi;Jack Green

  • Mitotic occupancy and lineage-specific transcriptional control of rRNA genes by Runx2

    Daniel W. Young;Mohammad Q. Hassan;Jitesh Pratap;Mario Galindo;Mario Galindo

  • Cbfbeta interacts with Runx2 and has a critical role in bone development.

    Mondira Kundu;Amjad Javed;Jae-Pil Jeon;Alan Horner

  • Impaired intranuclear trafficking of Runx2 (AML3/CBFA1) transcription factors in breast cancer cells inhibits osteolysis in vivo.

    Amjad Javed;George L. Barnes;Jitesh Pratap;Tomasz Antkowiak

  • Expression and regulation of Runx2/Cbfa1 and osteoblast phenotypic markers during the growth and differentiation of human osteoblasts.

    Michelle Prince;Chaitali Banerjee;Amjad Javed;Jack Green

  • BMP2 commitment to the osteogenic lineage involves activation of Runx2 by DLX3 and a homeodomain transcriptional network.

    Mohammad Q. Hassan;Rahul S. Tare;Suk Hee Lee;Matthew Mandeville

  • runt Homology Domain Transcription Factors (Runx, Cbfa, and AML) Mediate Repression of the Bone Sialoprotein Promoter: Evidence for Promoter Context-Dependent Activity of Cbfa Proteins

    Amjad Javed;George L. Barnes;B. O. Jasanya;Janet L. Stein

Frequent Co-Authors

Gary S. Stein
Gary S. Stein University of Vermont
Jane B. Lian
Jane B. Lian University of Vermont
Janet L. Stein
Janet L. Stein University of Vermont
Andre J. Van Wijnen
Andre J. Van Wijnen University of Connecticut Health Center
Martin Montecino
Martin Montecino Andrés Bello University
Sayyed K. Zaidi
Sayyed K. Zaidi University of Vermont
Je-Yong Choi
Je-Yong Choi Kyungpook National University
Christopher J. Lengner
Christopher J. Lengner University of Pennsylvania
Louis C. Gerstenfeld
Louis C. Gerstenfeld Boston University
Jeffrey A. Nickerson
Jeffrey A. Nickerson University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Molecular Biology opens up a variety of career opportunities and related academic paths—many of which can be pursued online or through hybrid options. If you’re considering cross-disciplinary advancement or a career shift, programs in fields like health sciences, education, and library science may be of interest.

For those fascinated by information and data management, pursuing a library science degree can be a complement or an alternative. It’s worth reviewing the average cost of mlis degree us to better understand affordability and long-term ROI.

Healthcare remains a popular pathway for science graduates. If you’re drawn to patient-centered roles, you may want to explore asha accredited slpa programs in speech-language pathology, even if your undergraduate studies weren’t in this area. Those needing to bridge from another science or communication major can also investigate speech pathology bridge programs online.

Alternatively, if you wish to transition into nursing, there are flexible paths available. Look at options such as completing a non nursing degree to bsn online for accelerated entry into this in-demand field.

Best Scientists Citing Amjad Javed

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles